Thanks edit

Thank you very much for the many pictures of Braunschweig! Greetings, --Jonny84 (talk) 14:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

And thank you for understanding Braunschweig so well and making sure that the photos are filed properly. If you live there, you are a very lucky person. What a remarkable city! with all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kissel 1928 White Eagle (Wisconsin Historical Museum) edit

I recently toured the Wisconsin Automobile Museum in Hartford Wisconsin [1] and I'm wondering if this is the same building that you toured. I added a location map to the flickr image. I saw no indication of the Wisconsin Historical Society involvement. I have a series of Kissel, etc. photographs to upload soon and I was considering if it is time for a museum-level category. Please respond here on your talk page to keep the discuss centralized. Thank you. RoyalbroilAlt (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Well that's very interesting! I have not been to the Wisconsin Automobile Museum, and took my picture in Madison at the Wisconsin Historical Museum. But it sure looks to me like the Automobile Museum is worthy of a museum-level category, and we're very lucky that you have a number of photos to upload. Thank you! and best wishes, Daderot (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Got it, thanks! I have been considering driving to Madison to tour the Wisconsin Historical Society sometime. I'm much more excited to see it now. Their website makes it look to be strictly a research storage facility. Royalbroil 13:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Arista tiles edit

Hello, I'm very interested in the arista tiles from Alcazar of the following link:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arista_tiles,_16th_century_-_Alc%C3%A1zar_of_Seville,_Spain_-_DSC07336.JPG#filehistory. 

There aren't any details about them in the description other than they're from Seville. Do you have any information of where it was taken? Was it a specific museum? I'm writing a paper on a similar tile and it would be useful to have it as a reference.

Thank you. R.L. Montes

Hello, R. L. Montes! I took that photo inside the Alcázar of Seville, which now serves as a museum. However, as you point out, the description given for the tiles was quite vague. So I don't know if the tiles come from the Alcázar or somewhere else. I'm sorry I don't have more detailed information than that, but would be very glad to help in any way that I can. Best wishes to you, Daderot (talk) 22:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Chop_suey edit

 

Chop suey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Achim (talk) 12:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Trinity_College,_Hartford edit

 

Trinity College, Hartford has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kenneth C. Zirkel (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image: Heartnut?, Mount Auburn Cemetery edit

Hello "Daderot", i commented upon File_talk:Juglans_ailantifolia,_Mount_Auburn_Cemetery.JPG Maybe someone got a chance to take further photos of the same tree to prove my suspicion. There could be a sign telling it was "var. cordiformis", heartnut, still mixing up happens easily, in especial in case of hybrids. Kind regards, Erwin Stamnaria0568 (talk) 08:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'm wondering about ... edit

the tennis shoe on the statue of File:Oberlin College - La Penserosa, by Richard Henry Park.jpg. I can guess about three explanations, but non of them are likely to be correct. Just interested. Smallbones (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I'd be most interested in your guesses. I have none! (BTW you have some GREAT photos!) Daderot (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Northwest_Africa_5549_meteorite edit

 

Category:Northwest_Africa_5549_meteorite has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Basilicofresco (msg) 22:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Han Dynasty period Chinese art from the Sichuan provincial museum edit

These are fantastic images! Thanks for sharing them. Do you have any more of them? If so, feel free to share them too! I've been adding your images to articles already. Cheers. PericlesofAthens (talk) 14:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi PericlesofAthens - Thank you so much. It's a great museum. Those are all the photos I have, and I believe those are all the exhibits on display when I was there. There were a few more pieces in the Sichuan University Museum (it looks like the provincial museum sometimes lends pieces to the university museum). with all best wishes to you, Daderot (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mistaken file uploads edit

Hi Daderot. How's it going? I saw your deletion request for the photo of the dining room. I just wanted to let you know of an easy way to mark files for renaming, after they have been uploaded. I'm not sure if you know this already so apologies if I am repeating it. You can use {{rename|New name.jpg|1}} on the file page. As the uploader, it is acceptable for you to request a rename for any reason (other motives are detailed at Commons:File renaming). In the past with renamings I have marked, administrators have responded quite quickly. It also saves having to reupload the file. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Seb26 - thanks for the tip! all best wishes to you, Daderot (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Gondola_side_chair,_maker_unknown,_New_York_City,_c._1820,_mahogany,_cherry,_mahogany_veneer,_silk_upholstery_-_De_Young_Museum_-_DSC00812 edit

Dear Daderot, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gondola_chair#/media/File:Gondola_side_chair,_maker_unknown,_New_York_City,_c._1820,_mahogany,_cherry,_mahogany_veneer,_silk_upholstery_-_De_Young_Museum_-_DSC00812.JPG. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 12:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Dear Professor Demirkan, I am very happy that the picture is useful to you, and am delighted that it will appear in your book. Please do feel free to use it any way that you wish, with or without credit. If you do wish to give credit, 'Daderot' is good. With many thanks, and all best wishes to you - Daderot (talk) 20:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Photo of National Security Operations Center edit

Hi... Not sure if you've seen the discussion page for your National Security Operations Center photograph but the date for the photograph appears to be wrong -- I noticed that the IBM PC and the Epson printer would seem to be much later than 1975 (apparently Jdmurray15 thinks so, too). I didn't want to issue a "move" request without checking with you, though --Jhfrontz (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! No, I hadn't seen the discussion, so thank you for the pointer. I agree that the IBM PC came after 1975 - I remember those days. The caption does appear to be wrong, and I don't have any issue with you moving the file. Thank you for the heads up, and thank you twice for fixing things! Daderot (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yasu (talk) 14:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bicycles edit

I see you edited Category:Historical bicycles and/or Category:Vintage bicycles, so you may be interested in Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/08/Category:Historical bicycles and Category:Vintage bicycles. - Jmabel ! talk 16:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Adenia subsessilifolia - Palmengarten Frankfurt - DSC01662.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

69.181.158.36 02:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hammam-Lif (Tunisia) ancient synagogue edit

Hi Daderot, while writing a short article ‎for the Hebrew Wikipedia about the Hammam-Lif (Tunisia) ancient synagogue, I found your picture of the date palm tree taken in the Brooklyn ‎Museum. ‎https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Date_Palm_Tree,_Hammam_Lif,_Tunisia,_6th_‎century_AD,_mosaic_of_stone,_mortar_-_Brooklyn_Museum_-_Brooklyn,_NY_-‎‎_DSC08250.JPG‎ Have you taken pictures of other mosaic panels of the Roman period Hammam Lif ‎synagogue in this museum? If so – would you kindly allow us to use it (in Wikipedia) ? Zilla, Tel-Aviv, Drz (talk) 08:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zilla, I'm sorry to say that was the only such mosaic on display when I was there. So that's all I have.... Of course you can use the Date Palm image in any way that you wish, and I'm particularly happy that it is useful for your new article. Good luck with it! Daderot (talk) 09:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Hoya caudata - United States Botanic Garden - DSC09587.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

72.168.177.30 02:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Picture used edit

Dear Daderot

I should like to inform you that I have used your images

  • Baiyi Guanyin, China, Qing dynasty, late 18th century AD, Dehua-ware porcelain - Linden-Museum - Stuttgart, Germany - DSC03618.jpg
  • Seated Yakushi Nyorai (Bhaisajyaguru), Nara period, 8th century, wood-core lacquer with gold leaf - Tokyo National Museum - DSC05091.JPG

in my recently published book:

Buddhistische Tempel in China, 中原佛寺圖考 [Zhōngyuán fósì túkǎo]
I: ISBN 978-3-7448-7270-6 (Hardcover) (URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2017080780)
II: ISBN 978-3-7448-7273-7 (Hardcover) (URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-20170807245)

--Zenwort (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dear Zenwort, Thank you! I am delighted that the images were useful to you, and very much appreciate your kind note. Congratulations and good luck with your book! with all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Waddesdon Manor edit

Hi Daderot

Love your photographs of the collection at Waddesdon! Would you be happy for me to edit your photograph summaries to include the object information and link to the relevant entry on the Waddesdon collection database please? Your summaries would then look like this (but with yourself listed as the source/photographer): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Giovanni_Paolo_Panini,_A_Concert_Given_by_the_duc_de_Nivernais_to_mark_the_Birth_of_the_Dauphin,_1751_at_Waddesdon_Manor.jpg

Many thanks.

Greetings! thank you for your very kind words. I'd be delighted if you could add more information about the objects - I think that would be extremely valuable. with best wishes, and many thanks, Daderot (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. edit

Thank you for uploading the images of the Lý Dynasty coins, I will use that picture 📷 on Dutch Wikipedia soon. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm delighted that they are helpful, and doubly delighted to learn about your fantastic work with coins and banknotes. We're all really lucky to have you writing articles. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 11:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Using your pics on my web page edit

Hi Daderot,

Thanks a lot for sharing your images, great stuff! I just used a bunch of details from your Klee and Kandinsky photos for my web page

https://tu-dresden.de/mn/math/geometrie/kraehmer?set_language=en

as I am fed up with these generic photos of coffee mugs, black boards and happy students that fill university web pages these days. I attribute the copyright in each picture to you and added a thanks to at the page

https://tu-dresden.de/mn/math/geometrie/kraehmer/die-professur/index

I hope that is fine with you, if not just let me know, please!

Uli Krähmer (ulrich.kraehmer@tu-dresden.de)

Hi Uli, I am very, very happy that you can use these photos. The art is wonderful, and it is now in the public domain. Aren't we lucky? I do not have any copyright in these images - they are fully in the public domain. But I do appreciate your note and thanks. As a former mathematics student (logic and set theory), I really appreciate your page. with all best wishes to you, Daderot (talk) 22:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Thuja sutchuenensis" at Hilliers edit

Hi Daderot - I showed File:Thuja sutchuenensis - Hillier Gardens - Romsey, Hampshire, England - DSC04427.jpg (and - DSC04429.jpg) to an expert on Cupressaceae, and he concluded the photos show Cupressus funebris, not even a Thuja at all. Could you remove the above pic from en:Thuja sutchuenensis please, then I will rename the two files to their correct identity without leaving redirects, so that searching for Thuja sutchuenensis will not find them. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there MPF, yes, I will do that right now. Thank you for finding and fixing my mistakes - I very much appreciate it. with regards, Daderot (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
I've removed the photo from wikipedia. Daderot (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Done; now there's nothing to give these pics a misleading search result :-) MPF (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Renamed to File:Cupressus funebris - Hillier Gardens - Romsey, Hampshire, England - DSC04427.jpg and File:Cupressus funebris - Hillier Gardens - Romsey, Hampshire, England - DSC04429.jpg - MPF (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
With continued thanks! Daderot (talk) 23:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Another ID query edit

Hi Daderot - File:Lythrum maritimum - Botanischer Garten, Frankfurt am Main - DSC02714.JPG you have named Lythrum maritimum, but the garden label in the photo says Lythrum hyssopifolia. I'm not familiar with either species, but the Plant List accepts them as separate species (from South America and Europe, respectively); are you sure the garden label is incorrect? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi MPF - Happy holidays to you! I believe this is my mistake. I do use the Plant List to check for synonyms, and cannot see any reason why I would confuse the two names. Thank you for correcting things, and all best wishes to you. Daderot (talk) 11:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Does this look familiar? edit

This photograph here looks similar to yours File:Glasshouses of Kaisaniemi Botanical Garden - DSC03590.JPG.--Htm (talk) 22:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Htm! Happy New Year to you! I very much appreciate your note - thank you. As it happens, I now put all my pictures into the public domain, and am happy if anyone uses them in any way. So I am glad that this picture is being used, and certainly do not wish for any credit. But I do - really - appreciate your note, and thank you for it. with all best wishes for the New Year, Daderot (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thanks for your kind answer. -I was informing you beacause got a a message on wednesday from Commons mailing list:

"TLDR: someone is stealing WLM photo on https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/paul-fearn.html?tab=artwork&page=11 :/ Longer story: WMFR just received an OTRS message from a WLM competitor who discovered that someone is wrongly taking credits for its WLM photos (and other WLM files and other files from Commons apparently) on the fineartamerica website. This competitor send a mail to this website and asked if WMFR can help in any way. So now, I'm sending you this mail to know whether you had to deal with things like this or if you have any ideas of what should be done." I noticed your photo because i live in Helsinki and the classhouse was familiar me. Those WLM-photos in question are not in PD. I'm not disturbing you any longer and best wishes for the New Year to you too! --Htm (talk) 03:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Very interesting... Such a life it is, with all kinds of minor criminals... but for me, I really want to put my things in the public domain, and have no attribution concerns for my own photos. With all best wishes to you, Daderot (talk) 11:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Coffee and tea set items, 1 of 3, designer Paul Burck, Gebr. Bauscher, 1900-1901, porcelain with overglaze decor - Museum Künstlerkolonie Darmstadt - Mathildenhöhe - Darmstadt, Germany - DSC06373 07.jpg edit

Please consider using {{Speedy deletion}} template if you uploaded the photos you want to have deleted within the next 7 days of the upload date (7. Author or uploader request deletion criteria). Triplecaña (talk) 14:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Aha! thank you, I will do that. Thank you for the suggestion. Daderot (talk) 15:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Check the edit summary please edit

Hi there. Maybe you can answer my question at this edit. Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greetings to you! I believe that this is your question: "Category:Turbans of India and this cat (Category:Dastar)., can they be the same thing? Who knows?". Am I right? Unfortunately I do not have a very good understanding of the situation. However, my belief is that 'Dastar' are turbans specific to Sikh people. If so, this is different from the more-general 'Turbans of India'. But we should find an expert to tell us. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Soami Painting for making t-shirts? edit

Hello Daderot,

I am in the process of making t-shirts that have an art component to them and I wanted to use your photohgraph of Soami's "Li Bai viewing the waterfall" on one of the shirts. Is this something you would be against? On my behalf, for what its worth, I can only say that I believe that images impact people and the more people feast their eyes on Japanese painting of that period, the better. If you want to get back on me on this that would be great, I could also send you specimens of how the t-shirts look. On any case, as someone who has as I can see from above learn't from experience a lot about photography copyright and old paintings, I would also like your perspective on what the grey areas are in this issue. Best, Agy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sōami#/media/File:Li_Bai_viewing_the_waterfall_at_Mr._Lu,_by_Soami_(d._1525),_Japan,_Muromachi_period,_approx._1500-1525,_hanging_scroll,_ink_on_paper_-_Asian_Art_Museum_of_San_Francisco_-_DSC01478.JPG

Greetings Agy - I am 100% in favor of your project. It sounds great. The art itself is old enough so that it is in the public domain, and I have put my photo in the public domain. Therefore, you are free and clear to do absolutely anything you want with this image. And as a fan of Li Bai, I'm delighted he will appear in your t-shirts. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 12:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Appreciation edit

But I want to stress again, my appreciation for your work and documentation, regardless of what you might tell me about your views/permission on the commercial usage of these images.

Carved handprints in Japan edit

Hello. You uploaded photos of carved handprints in Japan:

I wonder whether you are aware that freedom of panorama does not apply to artistic works in Japan, especially per Template:NoFoP-Japan. Moreover, those handprints look creative enough for copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kitanoumi handprint.JPG, which I was involved in.

There are more at Category:Handprints in Hibiya, but we'll get to those later as I'm unsure whether de minimis applies. --George Ho (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! I have no idea whether handprints can be protected by copyright. That's a really interesting question.... First, let me say that I do not have a problem with removing them if that makes sense. That said, I'm not an attorney, but have had fun reading various US copyright regulations and interpretations, which of course might be quite different from the regulations in Japan. In the US, it seems that "Natural forms and images are part of the public domain, which means that no person can own a copyright or a patent on them." Possibly handprints fall into this category as a natural form. And the US is clear that the following cannot be protected by copyright: "Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans". Also: "US law does not grant copyright for typical personal signatures, so the only issue will usually be whether the signature is protected under local law. In many—but not all—countries, a typical signature is not considered sufficiently original to be granted copyright protection." So these prints are - possibly - natural forms with names, signatures, and short phrases. In short, it's certainly a puzzler to me. But as I say, I do not have any strong objections to removing them if that makes sense. with best wishes to you, Daderot (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Um... you may want to use {{Speedydelete}} on the files and save them into your hard drive, print them out, or something. Or you can copy them into Google Photos. It's much quicker and more efficient than DR, IMHO. Moreover, the bot can remove any deleted images from articles that use them. George Ho (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. I added the "no permission since" tag on File:Toho movie handprint - Hibiya, Chiyoda, Tokyo - DSC09707.JPG; please feel free to add {{Speedydelete}}, which would lead to a quicker deletion. I haven't added the tag on others yet as I have been hoping that you can add the "speedydelete" tag. George Ho (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I resized the following images to help meet COM:de minimis:

I wonder whether you agree with the resizing. --George Ho (talk) 05:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Niels W. Gade statue edit

You have (a long time ago) uploaded some images of the Niels W. Gade statue in Copenhagen yhat can be found in this category. The name of the category and the title of the individual files state that it was created by Peder Severin Krøyer but all the sources that I can find credit Vilhelm Bissen. Do you know your source?Ramblersen (talk) 12:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Alpinia formosana edit

 
Category:Alpinia formosana has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 02:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Brau_people edit

 

Brau people has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


— Le Loy (talk) 10:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thank you for uploading File:Armor with coins, Tlingit, detail, collected in Alaska in mid 1800s, hide, Chinese coins from 1644-1796 - Native American collection - Peabody Museum, Harvard University - DSC06039.jpg, seeing this image inspired me to write a piece over at w:en:Culture of the Tlingit where I used the image. Keep up the good work.   --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you - that's a very interesting new section that you have written. I'm a fan of your numismatics efforts, and hope you keep up the excellent work. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 09:17, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Permission, photographer credit in _Thoreau Society Bulletin_ edit

Dear Daderot,

Lovely photo of the Thoreau-Alcott house. Would love to publish it in the _Thoreau Society Bulletin_. Please email to discuss.

Mark Gallagher mark.gallagher@thoreausociety.org

Hi Mark, I've sent a note to your email account. Hope it provides all the releases that you require. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 21:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

You should check out Reddit today. edit

Your boar vessel picture has become a meme lol. Nixinova (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Go figure.... thanks for the tip! Daderot (talk) 09:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Here's the KYM article and some examples: [2] [3] [4] [5]. Nixinova (talk) 04:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your photo for sale edit

I noticed that this "File:Church ship votive, the frigate Wictoria by Lars Werving, 1733, Lappajärvi Church - National Museum of Finland - DSC04252.JPG" your taken photo is for sale in Alamy. --Zunter (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I appreciate your note. However, it is OK with me if they try to sell it. I put my photographs in the public domain, so people can do anything they want with them. Again, many thanks, and all best wishes. Daderot (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image of Samuel Hahnemann monument, Washington edit

Hi Daderot,

I'm writing to request for permission to use your images --> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Samuel_Hahnemann_Memorial_-_Washington%2C_DC_-_DSC05613.JPG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Samuel_Hahnemann_Memorial_-_Washington,_DC_-_DSC05590.JPG to publish in a non-profitable classical homeopathy book. I would really appreciate if you could contact us via email: classicalhomeopathy.my@gmail.com

Best Regards, spcol

Hi there, I've responded (positively) to your email account. Good luck with the book! Daderot (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Harvard,_Massachusetts edit

 

Harvard, Massachusetts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Boy with pigeon at Tokyo National Museum edit

Hi, could you please have a look at the description I added to your your file? I guess the given information is enough to add PD template with source. Would you consider adding such PD template to this file? (Artwork is called in Japanese

牙彫小児愛鳩像

)

Thank you indeed to contribute and introduce important works of human kind to Commons, and happy dropping by via working on wikidata! Cheers, --Omotecho (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greetings Omotecho - Thank you! I think your changes are very good. They add considerable value to the image. I am not sure what "PD template with source" means, but will gladly do it when I understand. And finally, I must say that wikidata is a wonderful project, and want to thank you for working on it. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 09:58, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

barnstar.Daderot."Category:Houses in Salem, Massachusetts" edit

thanks

  The Photographer's Barnstar
I am very impressed by your great contribution....to get to see the photos..someone must get the categories in line....this is great work...

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
I am very impressed by your great contribution....to get to see the photos..someone must get the categories in line....this is great work...
 
Patek Philippe série Calatrava
 
File:Toho movie handprints - Hibiya, Chiyoda, Tokyo - DSC09706.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Please evaulate. This is a copyrighted artwork with "per de minimis" permission. The first version is a high resolution pic and has to be deleted. About the second choose yourself. There is another file File:Toho_movie_handprints_-_Hibiya,_Chiyoda,_Tokyo_-_DSC09701.JPG with the same issue.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cunigunde of Luxemburg (Shinjuku) edit

Hello Daderot,

I certainly see benefit in linking/associating the two statues Category:Cunigunde of Luxemburg (Shinjuku) with Category:Cunigunde of Luxemburg (Maximiliansbrunnen, Bamberg) (and my edit did indeed lose that).

But placing Category:Cunigunde of Luxemburg (Shinjuku) cat as a sub cat of Category:Cunigunde of Luxemburg (Maximiliansbrunnen, Bamberg) means that a statue in Japan appears within the statues in Germany category.

What do you think to a new cat that covered both? For example Category:Trader Legend pole is used tolink the same sculpture in different locations, and many of Henry Moore's sculptures (under Category:Sculptures by Henry Moore) have a category for the work, and then a sub cat for the different castings.

Icarusgeek (talk) 09:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there Icarusgeek - thank you for your note. Yes, your idea seems like a good one. It would definitely solve the problem.... with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 10:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

usage of the photo of Mosaics, Worcester Art Museum - IMG 7449.JPG edit

Dear Daderot,

I write on behalf of Dr. Aliza Steinberg, an Israeli Art Historian whom I am assisting. Dr. Steinberg is researching the subject of Garments and Accessories in the late Antiquities in Israel.

We are currently working on publishing a scholastic book on this subject, and we would like to make use of a photo that you published online in the following link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mosaics,_Worcester_Art_Museum_-_IMG_7449.JPG

We ask you therefore permission to use your photo in Dr. Steinberg’s book which is meant to benefit other scholars interested in this subject.

We kindly await your reply.

With best regards, Tom Golovner Assistant to Dr. Steinberg

Dear Mr. Golovner, I am very happy to agree to Dr. Steinberg's request. This image is in the public domain, and may be used for any purpose, whether commercial or nonprofit. You have full rights to publish it in any form, without restriction, and without fee. For myself, I am delighted that it can be used as part of Dr. Steinberg's book. with all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 21:37, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Return to the user page of "Daderot/Archive 3".