Pierpao

grafici militari

Photoshop CS3 :-) --Noclador (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested moves on COM:DL

Hi, Just to tell that the requested moves cannot be executed by the delinker bot. Enjoy the work. --Foroa (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Women_by_name

Category discussion notification

Category:Women_by_name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

People vs peoples

Peoples is correct as the plural of people, ethnic group. The plural of people, a bunch of persons, remains people, a bunch of persons. --Foroa (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Catégories vides

Pourrais-tu s'il te plaît, à ce propos, jeter un coup d'oeil dans

• Category:Streets in Hanover,
• Category:Eclectic architecture in Hanover,
• Category:Listed buildings in Hanover,
• Category:Former listed buildings in Hanover
  

et - si tu comprends l'allemand - dans cette discussion sur le forum? Merci. Bohème (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour ton message et - bingo ! :-) Bohème (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Renaming request for Pont su la Meuse, Domremy-la-Pucelle 01 09.jpg

Thank you for renaming. Please check in future details, when you think you need rename in another name than proposed by the uploader/requester. 01 09 means picture #1 in 2009 of this object and is not part of a date definition. Picture is taken 6 September 2009 not 1st. -- Хрюша ^?? 12:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Question about pd-text

Hi Pierpao,
I saw you 'keep'-decision on this file: File:India_House_Amsterdam_Logo.jpg. I don't want to argue about the decision but I was wondering why this logo is considered to be text only/text with simple geometric shapes. Is the flower considered to be a simple geometric shape? I thought this phrase was relating to squares, circles, semicircles etc and that an arrangement of simple geometric shapes were already considered to be non-simple. Do you have a link where I can read a bit more about this so I don't nominate files anymore that fit this threshold.
Best regards, JZ85 (talk) 08:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Cat removing

What is this supposewd to mean? I hope it was by accident, otherwise I'd consider this vandalism [1] - and many others. Please undo all of these edits. --FA2010 (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Drassodes Lapidosus.jpg

Obviously you did not understand why I requested renaming the above image. The species depicted there is not Drassodes lapidosus, but a Clubiona sp. Therefore the image is named and described incorrectly. This incorrect name leads to the situation that the image is used on a lot of pages related to Drassodes lapidosus, while, in fact, it is not that species. Readers of Wikipedia are presented with incorrect information all the time because the file is incorrectly named and described.

I am not the only one complaining about this. Also see [2]. The original author seems to be no longer active and does not react.

Please reconsider renaming the file again, otherwise this problem will never be solved. --57.79.167.152 12:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Aiuto: modifica nomi files

Grazie, ho messo la parola "File" davanti al nome di questo file e anche di questo, potresti correggerli? .--Franco aq (talk) 19:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Grazie, ma File:Tsarevich (Fabergé egg) surprise - 2.jpg dovrebbe diventare File:Tsarevich (Fabergé egg) and surprise.jpg. --Franco aq (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Paintings frames

Category:Paintings frames has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Saibo (Δ) 00:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:19th century oil paintings

Category:19th century oil paintings has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 19:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 45943f6f425989435cecfbdcd6cd383d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Leo Gestel, Self Portrait.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Screenshots

What movie screenshots am I supposed to have uploaded? Did you even read the descriptions of the images? I have done careful research to check that they are all in the public domain. --Lobo512 (talk) 19:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Renaming

There was no reason whatsoever to rename the file http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Leo_Gestel,_Self_portrait,_1941,_pastel.jpg&diff=65822395&oldid=65822314 Please refrain from such senseless renamings. In fact, commas and similar characters are even rather bad in filenames. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 22:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for you suggestion. In commons:rename there is no mention about commas, moreover if they were bad, why are allowed by Mediawiki? Anyway usually i do not use commas in renaming but according to point 6 of commons:rename i did it to armonize Leo gestel self portraits that you can find in category:Leo Gestel. Thanks again--Pierpao.lo (listening) 06:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Contre-jour

Contre-jour is against daylight. It is an extreme form of en:Backlighting_(lighting_design) but not the same. --Foroa (talk) 14:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 009042425b8bcc3aeed057214953ceff

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Categorie "by style" e "by period"

Ciao Pierpao. Volevo avvisarti che ti ho cancellato le due categorie Category:Art in Italy by style e la successiva "by city" che hai creato recentemente. A parte che erano assolutamente ridondanti perché esistono le stesse "by period", ma poi tieni presente che nelle nostre categorie che riguardano l'Italia NON vi sono categorie "by style". Le abbiamo tutte eliminate e sostituite con le corrispondenti "by period"; un lavoro di uniformizzazione che abbiamo fatto un paio di anni fa in quanto queste categorie artistiche erano categorizzate alcune "by style" e altre "by period", risultando così ora l'una, ora l'altra "mancanti o inesistenti" mentre invece erano semplicemente rese nell'altra forma. Giusto per informarti affinché tu possa... uniformarti! "Ciao e buon lavoro. --DenghiùComm (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

File da cancellazione immediata?

Ciao Pierpao. Il file E3 2010 Castlevania Lords of Shadow.jpg che ho caricato poco fa, perché dovrebbe essere da cancellazione immediata? --Fabyrav (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Il fatto è che l'avevo trovato così su Flickr (con questa licenza) e sarebbe stata utile per una pagina, non so poi se la licenza su Flickr è giusta o sbagliata. Comunque la foto si voleva concentrare sull'ambiente e sull'evento, non sul logo o sugli screenshot, però se viola il copyright, pazienza. --Fabyrav (talk) 19:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Category rename

In regards to:Commons:Categories for discussion#Category:Photos of topless females featuring armpits OK You were not too bold. You found something to change/improve, and took action. We depend on everyone's contributions. _{Senator2029║talk} 18:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Women touching their-selves in art

Category:Women touching their-selves in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Cynwolfe (talk) 00:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Katie Waltern

You categorized Category:Katie Waltern in Category:Unidentified people of the United States. That doesn't make much sense to me: if we have her name, in what sense is she "unidentified"? - Jmabel ! talk 05:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Because there was no category before [3] and I didn't know if she was a dancer or a singer or what else, usually people is categorized by job, and... I forgot to add people by name. But if you want you can remove Category:Unidentified people of the United States. Thanks--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

categorizzazione :)

Ciao Pierpao, ho visto il tuo intervento su Category:Photographs (with graphics effects) of cats grazie :) però guardando un po' ho trovato questa Category:Photographic effects non pensi sia + indicata? al posto di Category:Optical effects ??? grazie ciao (PS: per favore risp nella mia talk come su wikipedia, che sennò mi dimentico, ciao grazie ancora) --Pava (talk) 17:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Mappe di Shepherd

La cartina deriva da File:Shepherd-c-030-031.jpg. Grazie. --Cristiano64 (talk) 08:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Ho fatto qualche aggiunta/precisazione. Spero vada bene :) Correggi pure. Grazie ancora. --Cristiano64 (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: foto di quadri e incisioni

Grazie per la tua cortese risposta. --Massimo Telò (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

COM:File renaming and recent file moves

Hi Pierpao, thanks for volunteering in file renaming. Today I am writing you because I observed some files possibly renamed not in accordance with the policy: [4] [5]. I am also not happy with the situation that we can't change a file's title without the file's name. But we have this technical limitation and changing the file's name often causes trouble (especially if the uploader does not like it or if it is highly in use). So one could interpret the reason "sorting" as Harmonize file names of a set of images or misleading names into accurate ones but this needs a lot of fantasy. As long as no one else complains it's not a big deal but if someone does you are in danger loosing your file mover flag.

Again, thanks for helping at Commons. Kind regards -- Rillke^(q?) 07:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

categorizzazione sedan Lancia nere

Ciao Pierpao, ho visto che hai cambiato la categorizzazione di alcune fotografie della Lancia Thema 2011, spostandole dalla caterogia "black sedans" alla sottocategoria "black Lancia sedans" senza però averla creata, questo ha portato alle due immagini una lacuna nella loro categorizzazione. Io ora ho creato la categoria che tu molto probabilmente volevi creare però volevo chiederti se avevi fatto queste operazioni anche con altre immagini. Ciao grazie --Pava (talk) 22:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

la mia non era una critica, volevo solo capire, cmq le avevi categorizzate come 2010 black sedan ed era vuota anche quella, le ho spostate io, ho solo chiesto perchè quei link rossi. Non ho capito come posso aiutarti, lo faccio volentieri :) --Pava (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Wrong edit

Please note that "by 1938" means "before 1938 or in 1938", not "in 1938". http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Christian_Rohlfs_Buchenwald.jpg&diff=84392847&oldid=84329817 --FA2010 (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Re:Bar italiano

Riguardo a cosa scusa? :) --Viscontino (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Mestieri

Grazie mille. Riguardo ai commenti ti giuro che ho cercato su it.wikipedia basandomi sull'interwiki di en.wikipedia. Per esempio "balloonist" non aveva "mongolfierista" che poi è una parola che conosco. Il punto è.. che ti ringrazio anche per il resto. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Monument of Nizami Ganjavi

Buongiorno, Pierpao. I'm user from Azerbaijan. The last year in your city, in your beautiful city was erected a monument of a very famous Azerbaijani poet Nizami Ganjavi. This monument was erected in Villa Borghese park (in Viale Madama Letizia). Could you make a photo of this monument and upload it to the Commons? Grazie per il vostro tempo)) --Interfase (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Nuvola icon categorization

Hello! Was this second edit accidental? An SVG version is linked from the description. —David Levy 15:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes I really wonder what you are doing? Apart from a number of PNG who already have a SVG.[6] Why the category "modified" is obsolet? Should it be deleted? Why you create Category:Nuvola PNG icons? What meaning has this category? another small mistake Is there a evidence to this: “All SVG versions of Nuvola icons are modified, so they should be categorized under Category:Nuvola SVG icons, not here, as their status as "modified" is implied by not being a PNG.”? All identical GNOME icons are modified? Sorry about that, but this is questionable and should be mentioned on the Commons:Project Nuvola 2.0+!? -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ ℗ 13:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Pierpao, sorry for my late answer. That sentence is written at top of Category: Modified Nuvola icons, so they is now empty!? This simply means that all these SVG are not originals!? -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ ℗ 14:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Per favore prendi ASSOLUTAMENTE visione di questa discussione

Ciao perdonami se mi permetto (e se lo metto così in evidenza) ma per favore devi assolutamente prendere visione di questa discussione, bisogna fare qualcosa altrimenti si cancelleranno moltissime immagini Commons:Bar_italiano#Campagna_di_cancellazione_per_il_NO-FOP_Italy_.28_.C3.A8_fatta_molto_male.29. Ho spiegato per bene perché le immagini non devono venir cancellate, ma l'utente né mi ascolta né partecipa alla discussione --Pava (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:People with black skin

Do you want to state you agree with deleting this category? if you do, please type in Support or Delete as your comment. grazi.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

undeletion request

Ciao :) vista la tua esperienza con la licenza delle immagini e la loro correttezza, puoi dire il tuo parere tecnico su questa discussione? Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:.22_13_-_ITALY_-_monuments_of_Milan_in_art_-_marking_pen_drawings_colored_by_children_-_Teatro_alla_Scala.jpg_.E2.80.8E. Grazie mille ciao --Pava (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

[[Media:]]

Please index subcategories correctly

Hello. Please use capital letters for the sorting variables that appear after the "|": xxx|Flowers and not xxx|flowers. Men and Women (or Males and Females) are top-indexed together in gender-specific subcategories: xxx| Female and not xxx|Female. Thank you. Orrlingtalk 13:28, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel (renaming)

What you mean when renaming is Electress Wilhelmine Caroline von Hessen-Kassel (Princess of Denmark). The Files mean Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel, a Prussian princess. The original file name was short, but not wrong. „Hofdame“ means „court lady“ (gentildonna?). However, the attribution to Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel not seem to be clear. See also my references in this file. Wilhelmine was the women of Heinrich von Preussen, the young brother of Friedrich II. (Federico II). Therefore, she was named „Prinzessin Heinrich von Preussen“. --Botaurus (talk) 09:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

My mistake. Your references are good. Anyway I renamed this picture because its title was not correct and this File:Kreis_des_Antoine_Pesne_-_Bildnis_einer_unbekannten_Frau.jpg that is another version of the same picture with a similar title. Moreover in the description was specified "unknown lady". Thanks for your correction--Pierpao.lo (listening) 23:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I've replied to you

on User talk:Orrling#Category:Black and white photographs of women. Orrlingtalk 11:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop creating "Females" categories

Please don't create any more "Females" categories when there's a "Women" category of the same topic with marginal differences (as in the arts). I've commented for you on this matter elaborately on my tlakpage here, so, as long as we're still discussing this issue please avoid creating more duplicate categories by splitting "Women" and "Females". Thanks, Orrlingtalk 15:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I hope you understand the message from the recent threads by multiple editors on Commons. Please avoid creating any new category for females or women when either one of them already exists. Thanks, Orrlingtalk 19:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Asia ok.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Asia ok.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Video di Ecoltex

Ciao, mi sono permesso di copiaincollare in toto la categorizzazione che hai fatto del video di cui abbiamo parlato al bar e, dato che occupano la stessa cat, ti dispiacerebbe passarle in rassegna velocemente per controllare che ve ne siano di non consone? Intanto grazie per la dritta (mi ero completamente dimenticato di aver fatto un paio di video anche io che sono finiti nella categoria madre).--Threecharlie (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

re: ciao

Ciao :) mi fa piacere sentirti dire queste parole, a cosa ti riferisci in particolare? Alla "campagna" ?? --Pava (talk) 20:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Beh dai non è successo niente, non si smette mai d'imparare :D grazie mille --Pava (talk) 15:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Sottoesposizioni

Il tag "underexposed" non è stato creato per giudicare l'immagine o la capacità artistica dell'autore ma semplicemente per segnalare all'atelier che si occupa di ritocchi che è mecessario che prendano visione dell'immagine (non necessariamente perché la foto è scura, ma anche perché il colore è totalmente sbilanciato per via di una illuminazione fioca, tipicamente una lampadina). Io personalmente non faccio ritocchi se non in casi davvero estremi (qui trovi un esempio di cosa intenda io per "underexposed": per favore, guarda come era l'immagine prima del mio ritocco, e come è adesso), e se marco una immagine (ho già abbastanza da fare con le mie, per mettermi a pattugliare quelle altrui) è perché davvero siamo a un caso limite.
Per esempio, nell'immagine in cui mi chiedi se io sia sicuro, la risposta è sì (anche perché il tag si riferisce a questa versione, non a quella attuale, che è già ribilanciata proprio a seguito dell'inserimento di quel tag!). Il caso e la coincidenza vuole che bolo77 sia mio amico, che abbiamo visitato assieme il museo quando lui fece le foto, e che io abbia visto il mosaico originale. Ti assicuro che le tessere del mosaico sono bianche e non gialle, a parte una fascia ottagonale arancione. Questo, credo, taglia la testa al toro. Quanto ad Arno Roca, non ho presente di quali immagini tu stia parlando: dovresti usarmi la cortesia di farmi un esempio, in modo che possa comprendere di cosa esattamente tu stia parlando. A giudicare dalle miniature, infatti, dovrebbero essere tutte ok, salvo un paio che sono dei macchioni indistinti, nelle quali però non vedo nessun tag di underexposed. Se mi fai un esempio capisco meglio.
Quanto al fatto che a tuo parere sarebbe meglio cancellare le immagini piuttosto che ritoccarle, come sai su Commons ogni punto di vista vale quanto ogni altro punto di vista. Se tu ritieni di dover mettere in cancellazione le immagini, questo è un tuo diritto; semplicemente, io sono veramente molto restio a farlo, salvo quando siamo di fronte a un copyvio. Ecco perché preferisco il tag, che dopo tutto dù origine a una azione reversibile (la versione originale resta online) ad una cancellazione.
Ciao, e grazie per la stima. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 18:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Perché dici di "disturbarmi"? Le pagine di discussione sono fatte per discutere, altrimenti cosa le usiamo a fare? :-D

Il fatto è che io sono viziato perché ho fatto il direttore di giornale, e quindi so che quelle foto così scure sono inutilizzabili. E no, l'autore, essendo uno sconosciuto, difficilmente meriterà di venire citato e usato "as is". Se ci fai caso, perfino il fatto che meriti una categoria a sé è stato messo in discussione... Quindi, cosa le teniamo a fare, quelle macchione nere? Quale pagina di Wikipedia potrebbero mai illustrare, un domani?

Ad ogni modo, quelli che citi sono casi limite. Togli pure il tag da quelle foto ed amen. Anzi, ho visto che lo hai già fatto. Vorrà dire che in futuro le metterò direttamente in cancellazione, dopodiché qualcun altro mi scriverà dicendo: ma perché cancellarle? basterebbe ritoccarle... WikiCommons funziona così! :-) Ciao, buon lavoro. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed wikis

	Thanks
	Buongiorno! Thank you for your strong support for NonFreeWiki; it is much appreciated. Arrivederci! Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 13:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Caricare immagini derivate da Commons

Grazie per la risposta al quesito posto nel Bar. Chiedo cortesemente delucidazioni sul metodo da te seguito: parti dal caricamento guidato?. Grazie. --Massimo Telò _(scrivimi) 12:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Men_wearing_hats

Men wearing hats has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Australian_pearls

Category:Australian_pearls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Alan Liefting (talk) 21:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

grazie

Grazie a te per il messaggio. Spero un giorno di riuscire a tornare attivo, ma credo sia solo una questione di tempo ;) A presto--Trixt (talk) 21:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Spostamento

Ciao! Eh, era poco ortodossa, ma confidavo che leggendo la spiegazione si sarebbe capito... ora vedo di rimediare, grazie della segnalazione :) -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Ah, non sapevo potessi farlo tu! Stavo andando a rompere le balle a Jaqen :D allora:

• File:Piazzo di Segonzano - chiesa dell'Immacolata - acquasantiera.JPG va spostata a File:Piazzo di Segonzano - chiesa dell'Immacolata - fonte battesimale.jpg
• e File:Switch places with File-Piazzo di Segonzano - chiesa dell'Immacolata - acquasantiera.jpg va spostata a File:Piazzo di Segonzano - chiesa dell'Immacolata - acquasantiera.JPG

Sostanzialmente andavano solo scambiate di posto...

Grazie mille! -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Lo so, è che il nome di destinazione era già occupato dall'altra foto, allora ho fatto così (a margine, posso dire che, anche senza leggere la spiegazione che avevo messo, al vedere una richiesta di spostamento al titolo ":File:Switch places with File-XXX.jpg" qualche domanda dovrebbe sorgere spontanea?). Più che altro, adesso il nome di questa foto non è uniforme con le altre della categoria, che seguono tutte il pattern "Piazzo di Segonzano - chiesa dell'Immacolata - X". -- Syrio posso aiutare? 11:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Mail

La mia è attivata. Ciao! --Xinstalker (talk) 17:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Please, don't do it again

If you don't wish to move a file, it's OK, don't do it. But, please, don't remove the move request. Uploader request is a perfectly valid reason to ask for a file rename, especially considering that, if you read Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion I could simply ask for deletion (#7 criterium) and upload it again. That's the reason for having the possibility of simply renaming articles. Again, if you don't want to move it, you'd better not edit the file page. Thanks -- Discasto 07:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Never mind, a file mover with the right understanding of the policies has taken care of the task. -- Discasto 17:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. Anyway, you, as file mover, must apply current file move policies, not future ones. Does it make sense? -- Discasto 20:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Re

Ciao! Ti ho risposto. Grazie comunque! Ciao! --Xinstalker (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

RfC on the scope of file renaming criterion 2

Pursuant to the closing of the RFC "Proposed overhaul of the "Which files should be renamed?" section", a second RfC has been opened at Commons:Requests for comment/File renaming criterion 2 specifically to address the scope of criterion 2, which currently reads "To change from a completely meaningless name to a name that describes what the image displays." Since you participated in the initial discussion, I am notifying you of the follow-up RfC.

Please note that I fully anticipate that the first few days will see a number of additional options proposed, so it may be a good idea to check back periodically on the RfC.

Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Categories

Hello Pierpao. Just in case you were not aware, anyone can move categories using the same tab as for articles. If you request deletion for the Bearded Men category, you can move the original category and take the category history with it. Also I should have said that the files in the category don't get moved so they will have to be moved separately. Green Giant (talk) 12:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Uccello

tutto a posto , si è trattato di un errore di sbaglio. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 17:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Pierpao/common.js

Hi Pierpao, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Pierpao/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 4 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 35 character 43: ['categorymembers'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: data['query-continue']['categorymembers']['cmcontinue'],
2. ISSUE: line 35 character 62: ['cmcontinue'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: data['query-continue']['categorymembers']['cmcontinue'],
3. ISSUE: line 70 character 29: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if ( old_length == 0 ) {
4. ISSUE: line 91 character 14: Don't make functions within a loop. - Evidence: });

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 07:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC).

Category:Santo Stefano di Magra–Sarzana railway

Nella lingua inglese è corretto l'uso del trattino lungo.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi,

Please inform the uploader. Thanks for your help. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg

File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Loghi

La questione dei loghi va vista di volta in volta, non c'è un caso generale. Ecco perché il template non è validato in automatico. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 17:14, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg

File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:Fëdor Ivanovič Šaljapin

Can you please explain what language is it? according to the rules which transcription you did it? And what for? --Shakko (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Renames

Hi Pierpao, please see User talk:Vzeebjtf. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 12:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Images_using_filenames_with_Facebook_photo_identities_nominated_for_deletion

Category:Images_using_filenames_with_Facebook_photo_identities_nominated_for_deletion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Muzammil (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Fotobank.az watermark removing

Hi, Pierpao. Could you teach me how did you remove the fotobank watermark from this image? I mean which program did you use, which watermark template or smt.? Maybe I will remove another watermark myself. --Interfase (talk) 07:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carrière de marbre, près de Jaipur, Rajasthan, Inde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

BUON ANNO!!

Ciao Pierpaolo tanti auguri di Buon Anno, un felice 2015 ricco di buone cose ;) --Pava (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Moving

ehm - so moving and with that violating the Commons language policy and the rename guidelines is okay, moving back is not possible because it does not fit the rename guidelines? That's what you saying? Or did I get it wrong? ...Sicherlich ^talk 23:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

ah I see, you reverted yourself. thanks. Did not see it was removed by Medium69 again ...Sicherlich ^talk 23:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

no problem. Anyways, it seems the guideline (and the language policy) is just waste of webspace as nobody cares about it ...Sicherlich ^talk 10:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Men_by_name_(flat_list)

Category:Men_by_name_(flat_list) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rudolph Buch (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Images_of_airplanes_with_bad_file_names

Please do not keep placing your new Category:Images_of_airplanes_with_bad_file_names under Category:Aircraft.

• The new category is badly named. The word "airplanes" should not be used in Wikimedia projects - "aircraft" is the correct word for both singular and plural aircraft.
• The new category is purely your invention, and therefore contains your personally selected image files, and does not fit correctly into the hierarchical schemas of categories Aviation and Aircraft. It properly belongs under Category:Selected photos of aircraft.PeterWD (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Copies of paintings

Copies of paintings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Waltham, The Duke of 07:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

undo triathlon bikes

I, It is not a triathlon bikes its a triathlètes on the bike, they have a lot of picture with this bike, and they are not in this category. if you dont understand why is not is, ask a question please. the catégory equipment its for à picture whith only the aero bike, not for triathlètes, please remote your undo. Best regard. --Kagaoua (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Grazie

per gli spostamenti :) volevo giusto richiederli. Ciao, -- Syrio posso aiutare? 15:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Roma

Sì, gira questa voce di corridoio che io sia di Roma :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Una sola cosa: tecnicamente, per le foto di s. Pietro e collegate, dovevi indicare "Files of the Vatican City", visto che non è Roma... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Stop overcategorization

Hello Pierpao, Files should appear only once in a branch (from the root to the last sub-category). If the file eg is in the Category:Black and white photographs of sitting women, it should not be above (Category:Black and white photographs of women) and not below this category. --Jean11 (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

(transfer)

Hello. As you can read in the description "This category is applied to all black and white photographs (as a tag...". This is the reason why it's a hidden category.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

(/transfer)

reply where the conversation is started,

What I have written above is a fact, it is part commons policies Commons:Categories. --Jean11 (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Pierpao, I have something read, in case of Black and white of photograhs you are right, sorry. Regards --Jean11 (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Jean11 Never mind. But please tell me. What have you read? Thanks--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

" After the discussion in July 2009, this category had a fairly clear guideline IMO." by docu here. And "This category is applied to all black and white photographs (as a tag, i.e. has no subcategories). This allows to identify easily B&W photos (as a media type). The use of this category in addition to topical sub-categories of Category: Black and white photography remains a subject of contention." --Jean11 (talk) 14:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Ligier Dué First

Many thanks for corecting the name on the image I uploaded. Regards Charles01 (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

category:Djamila Bouazza

Are you sure this girls is not Djamila Bouazza? --Pierpao.lo (listening) 05:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Pierpao

Oui je suis sûr et certain qu'il ne s'agit pas de Djamila Bouazza. Vous pouvez vérifiez vous même sur cette source, un site algérien très sérieux, sur l'histoire : Memoria dz, je me base pas uniquement sur ce site, j'ai en plus des :documents en ma possessions qui prouve ça. Si vous avez besoin d'autres informations, je me tiens à votre disposition.

Excuse moi de vous écrire en français, je suis nul en anglais.

Cordialement

Saber68 19:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Pas de problème. Merci beaucoup. Qui est cette fille? File:Djamila Bouazza (1938-2015) 2.jpg--Cordialement Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Le nom de cette jeune fille pour ce fichier File:Djamila_Bouazza_(1938-2015)_2.jpg, est Djamila Bouazza, donc il y a pas d'erreur pour ce fichier. Et c'est juste aussi pour ce fichier : Fille:Djamila Bouazza (1938-2015) 1.jpg

Cordialement

Saber68 13:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Correzione immagini

Ciao Pierpao. Grazie per avermi risposto. Allora le immagini da correggere sono queste:

• File:Aeolian Islands german map.png il nome di Milazzo (con una L).
• quattro files di planimetrie di templi greci File:Peripteros.png, File:Peripteros.svg, File:Pseudodipteros 1.png, File:Pseudodipteros 1.svg che presentano tutti lo stesso grave errore, l'opistodomo aperto e comunicante con la cella: non esistono templi greci dove la cella è in comunicazione con l'opistodomo. L'opistodomo, qualora tu non lo sapessi, è la stanzetta situata a sinistra, dietro la cella del tempio, sul lato opposto all'ingresso della cella (il pronaos), che era destinato ad accogliere le offerte dei fedeli. Quello che tu dovresti fare qui è chiudere quel passaggio. Se non ti è chiaro come dovrebbe essere, hai qui un esempio corretto che ti farà capire esattamente come dovrebbero essere corretti questi quattro files. Che mi dici? E' fattibile la cosa? Altrimenti ci rivolgiamo ad altri. So che la WP tedesca ha un "laboratorio" in questo senso, ma non so più né come si chiama né dove cercarlo. Fammi sapere. E grazie fin d'ora! --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Grande Pierpao ! Hai fatto un lavoro perfetto ! In attesa di vedere corretto anche l'ultimo rimasto (il Pseudodipteros-svg), ti ringrazio fin d'ora sentitamente ! Ciao da --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

DenghiùComm Per così poco figurati e poi non potevo certo tirarmi indietro, avrei tradito me stesso :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 06:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Generic flag of Nord-Pas-de-Calais.svg

Could you reverse your latest move of this file? It was moved in the first place because it is most certainly not the flag of Nord-Pas de Calais (Cfr. here). Tom-L (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Which should be the correct filename--Pierpao.lo (listening) 09:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Jean-Etienne Liotard 15 (negative).jpg

File:Jean-Etienne Liotard 15 (negative).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 10:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Richiesta di aiuto per traduzione

Salve Pierpao, avrei bisogno di un aiuto per una pagina di wikiquote e mi hanno indicato te, la pagina è questa, ci sono tutti i contenuti con mote fonti affidabili (potresti farti aiutare dalla versione italiana e inglese se vuoi), se tu volessi accettare dovresti solo aggiustare le impostazioni richieste da wikiquote e la grammatica. Pensi di poterci riuscire? Spero di ricevere una tua risposta. Ciao Smitersleon (talk) 16:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Intanto grazie mille! Pierpao per la risposta, finalmente! perché non riuscivo a trovare qualcuno... Si giustamente è in cancellazione perché deve essere corretta, deve essere corretta per essere accettata, ma tranquillo c'è tutto quello che serve, allora ti spiego meglio meglio:

• Intanto ti dico che la versione italiana è fatta benissimo e la versione inglese, anche se forse manca qualcosina, va più che bene
• La prima citazione di Hai Tien è in inglese presa dalla versione inglese e sotto c'è la traduzione in tedesco fatta male, anche se la cosa più logica credo che sarebbe stata prendere la citazione direttamente da questo documentario con il doppiaggio in tedesco
• la seconda citazione è presa da un'altro documentario di origine giapponese (Bruce Lee in G.O.D 死亡的遊戯: 1 2 3 4) che in Italia non è ancora uscito, e forse neanche in Germania, ed è presa da questa intervista
• le successive ultime 2 citazioni in inglese sono tradotte pure male in tedesco ma sono entrambi presenti nelle versioni en e it

Forse avrò dato per scontato altre cose ma sono qui anche per questo...oltre che ringraziarti nuovamente... A presto amico mio Smitersleon (talk) 12:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Ciao Pierpao, ti informò che hanno eliminato la pagina, comunque se vuoi rispondermi puoi sempre farlo ciao Smitersleon (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

OK Pierpao non c'è problema. Comunque io ho rifatto la pagina, se guardi adesso è fatta molto meglio oltre ad essere di una semplicità mostruosa, adesso c'è tutto, contenuti in tedesco, fonti ecc... e per qualche motivo molto sconosciuto e incomprensibile è stata proposta per la cancellazione immediata, adesso se tu volessi aiutarmi, quanto meno a farmi dare una spiegazione logica, te ne sarei molto grato, se non puoi occupartene non fa niente però ti pregerei di non lasciarmi senza risposta, inoltre ti confesso di essere in grosse difficoltà a trovare qualcuno disponibile. Però credimi quando ti dico che è molto semplice per chi conosce il tedesco, se vedi la pagina non ha nulla di strano. Quindi dato che prima ti sei dimostrato disponibile (e per questo te ne sarò molto grato) ad aiutarmi, ti chiedo se puoi occupartene adesso, se non puoi ti invito a farmelo sapere e ti prometto di non disturbati più. Grazie Smitersleon (talk) 14:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Grazie tante Pierpao e scusa le insistenze, ciao Smitersleon (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Aridaje! Hanno messo un'altra volta la pagina in cancellazione, aspetto la decisione, ciao Smitersleon (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

si ho già chiesto a tanti e infatti aspetto anche altre risposte, spero solo che non ci stiano molto per decidere, volendo ci sono appena scritte 2 parole, c'è poco da confondersi, è semplice oltre a questo la versione inglese e quella italiana potrebbe chiarirgli eventuali dubbi, per le impostazioni non sono diverse dalle altre di dewikiquote, l'unica cosa strana (molto strana!) e che osservando tutti i wikidata di Bruce Lee gli Admin di dewikiquote provvedono ad eliminare qualsiasi cosa lo rriguardi, l'unico progetto in assoluta mondiale di tutti i progetti wikimedia, io non sono un amministratore ma non credo proprio che questo si può fare... Comunque grazie lo stesso per tutto, ciao Smitersleon (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Ma sai, se mi approvano la pagina per me va bene, se invece dovessero eliminarmela (che tra l'altro è stata corretta da un tedesco), lo farò presente (sperando che servirà a qualcosa perché potrebbero evitare chiudendo i confronti o ancora peggio interpretare a favore prpio con retorica politichese, ma nonostante ciò lo farò presente e)...sopratutto la dichiarazione di Vsop.de, che ironicamente ha usato dei toni poco adeguati del tipo: ...non ti basta la versione italiana?...(io non parlo tedesco ma ho potuto leggerlo tramite google translate), ma dico io questo è modo di rivolgersi? fa parte dell'educazione!... Comunque grazie dell'informazione Smitersleon (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:PowerPointIcon.PNG

File:PowerPointIcon.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Codename Lisa (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Muscat banner2.jpg

Ciao. Ho provveduto a caricare una nuova versione del file in oggetto (tagliando l'edificio sulla dx come da tua correzione operata qui File:Old Muscat (3).jpg per com:No Fop in Oman. Perchè vedo la modifica solo aprendo la foto a tutto schermo e non all'apertura "normale" dell'immagine? Eventualmente potresti tu sistemre la cosa o cancellarla del tutto? Grazie per la risposta. --Massimo Telò _(scrivimi) 16:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Ho chiesto la canellazione del file File:Muscat banner2.jpg. --Massimo Telò _(scrivimi) 18:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Painted portraits in military uniforms of Russia

And now I should spend a lot of time to put all the Russian portraits in one place back. Why didn't create the "right named" category? Why simply delete existed?! Thanks a lot. --Shakko (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I do no understand what you have written. I simply moved painted poirtraits... to portrait paintings. This was my scope al least. Maybe I made a mistake but I do not unnderstand which is. Category:Painted portraits in military uniforms of Russia is a broken redirect.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 16:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I made same changes. Hope you like them. If not please tell me exactly what to want to do and I'll be happy to fix. With cat a lot you can move sub all categories and all files in one click. Shakko--Pierpao.lo (listening) 16:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of an entry in “Template:Occupation/list”

Regarding your deletion (cf. Special:Diff/183804930) in Template:Occupation/list: You’ve spotted an entry that is not in Template:Occupation/en, this was good. The right approach, though, would not have been the deletion, but a correction into the actually used term in the template. The reason is, that this list is important as overview for missing translations, in your case probably into Italian. So, every entry from the English template has to be there, too. With your change nothing was improved. This time you do not have do anything here, because I did the change just now: Special:Diff/183878432. --Speravir (Talk) 01:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Regular deletion

At File:Vlore.jpg you reverted my edit, saying it was a candidate for regular deletion.

Surely if there are copies available online, which are higher resolution and higher quality (the image uploaded was blurred), it doesn't matter where it came from but it is a copyright violation. For example: http://szallashelyek-utazas.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Vlore-Albania.jpg

Also you said a regular deletion request will be started, but nothing has happened since.

Domdomegg (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry I made a mistake. Thank you for advising me Domdomegg. --Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

No problem, I completely understand! :) Domdomegg (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

criterio 5 o criterio 2?

Secondo te per l'innata rigidità di commons per rinominare File:Buy now for 2014.jpg devo mettere criterio 5 o criterio 2? Per me è 2, non c'è blatant advertising ma ironia, ma non si sa mai... così ho lasciato perdere e te l'ho segnalato direttamente.--Alexmar983 (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

"comprale adesso per il 2014" che nome sarebbe per un file ospitato su un archivio che si presuppone possibilmente "serio"? Chiaramente o è criterio 5 (commerciale) o è ironico e quindi è critrio 2 (ambiguo, che cosa comprerei del resto mica si capisce dal titolo). Insomma non è un buon titolo perché leggendolo non ho idea di cosa parli la foto, no? Pensavo a una cosa tipo "Pumpkins Surrey 2013" o qualcosa di simile. --Alexmar983 (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

mi ero preoccupato all'inizio. Sono filemover da oggi comunque. E non ho mai cambiato lingue ai file, anzi cambiando titoli assurdi mi sono pure sforzato di chiedere lingue aderentissime a quelle delle località mostrato, finché ho potuto. Grazie comunque!--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Complimenti per la promozione Alexmar983 comunque era criterio 2; il 5 è per gli insulti, le bestemmie, le parolacce. I titoli di fantasia non sono vietati anche se relegati praticamente ai titoli delle opere d'arte stabiliti dall'autore. Il tuo file era un titolo ambiguo non vietato--Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Caricamento immagini derivate da Commons

Fino ad alcuni giorni fa la procedura di caricamento immagini derivate da Commons è stata attiva. Purtroppo, a distanza di due mesi, è di nuovo non raggiungibile. Sai spiegare il motivo? Grazie. --Massimo Telò _(scrivimi) 16:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Circolo Filologico Milanese

Faccio riferimento ad una tua osservazione relativa alla pagina che intendo creare a proposito dell'oggetto. Mi hai chiesto se mi sono informato se la voce sia enciclopedica prima di fare un lavoro inutile. Sinceramente no, l'ho valutato autonomamente e non sapevo né ho letto da qualche parte che fosse da richiedere. Ho considerato l'importanza dei soci, dei collaboratori e dei personaggi famosi premiati, facenti parte del Circolo e ho ritenuto che fosse sicuramente enciclopedica. Ti chiedo quindi a chi devo fare la richiesta per il futuro, proprio per evitare di fare cose inutili o che mi vengano contestate. Grazie.--Brunokito (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Rileggendo meglio la mia richiesta di autorizzazione al Bar mi accorgo di non avere chiarito bene cosa volevo fosse autorizzato. Io non ho alcun interesse ad uno screenshot dalla home del circolo, la pagina Wiki che avrei intenzione di creare lo descriverà al di là del sito, che mi è servito solo per sapere dell'esistenza del Circolo, io mi riferivo solo ad una foto che rappresenta l'interno del circolo, per la foto chiedevo il permesso, se ad esempio fosse una foto fatta prima del 1995 credo non avrebbe problemi, ma il punto è che non so chi ne sia l'autore e forse scrivendo al circolo saprebbero dirmelo. --Brunokito (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Ti ringrazio sei stato gentilissimo, purtroppo farei volentieri una foto della facciata, ma io sono di Forlì e sarebbe eccessivo farsi 250 km. per questo! Tuttavia non demordo, ci sono migliaia di voci, scusami, abbastnza futili, che però sopravvivono allegramente, un circolo culturale di questa importanza mi sembrava ovvio potesse essere enciclopedico, vedrò, devo soprattutto evitare errori stupidi. Grazie per la dritta sulla foto comunque. Io so che le foto scattate in Italia da oltre vent'annni {{PD-Italia}} hanno ormai perso il copywright, però tu ora mi dici che se una foto viene pubblicata su un sito lo riacquista.... mi hai fatto venire un dubbio. Cmq è materia abbastanza difficile! Grazie ancora per l'aiuto e i consigli --84.220.169.6 18:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

No problem

Guarda l'ho scritto su meta, se avessi voluto evitare il blocco avrei ingoiato l'accusa di essere "sbagliato" con i neoutenti (peraltro basata su un solo episodio, quindi non determinante pure se fosse vera). Si andava verso un topic ban e basta. Cosa che per m andava bene tanto io comunque mi stavo allontanand dalle discussioni.

Ma la mia arrabiattura era per ribadire la mia opposizione a ogni "doppio standard", e la rifarei comunque. Ne ho anche parlato in ML di WMI e non è stato certo un mio assolo.

Fra l'altro l'impulsività di M7 ha determinato un pastrocchio non da poco: non è stato confermato alcun ban, e non si può additarmi entrambe le misure al rientro se non continuando con le forzature. Quindi fra un anno se ripasso che devo fare :D? Lo scopriremo vivendo.

Peraltro io sono molto attivo comunque: oggi avevo un corso di presentazione wikimedia, ieri ho scritto una mail a un importante professore francese per la sua voce su enWiki. E adesso sono qua a mettere titoli in altre lingue a voci dei musei del cibo. Praticamente è cambiato nulla.

Fra l'altro lo vuoi sapere un aneddoto buffisimo? Sebbene non abbia fatto nulla da IP, né mi interessa farlo su itWiki, M7 ha bloccato purel'IP del centro culturale dove faccio il corso. Secondo me è un danneggiamento di wikipedia inutile. Comunque guarda è stato ancora più interessante e produttivo: lo studente a cui facevo lezione, un bravissimo magistrato in pensione, ne ha voluto sapere di più e di più, e sui vari aspetti legali delle cose. Gli ho fatto vedere i blocchi per copyright, mi ha dato ragione su tante intepretazioni che non mi si filava nssuno. E poi abbiamo chiuso il computer, siamo andati al bar, mi ha offerto un caffé (cioccolata per me). Un pomeriggio veramente piacevole, si è anche impegnato per trovare un'altra soluzione con i contatti che ha nelle amministrazioni pubbliche.--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Musei del cibo

Senti una domanda Template:Musei del cibo messo nelle immagini va bene oppure per scrupolo è meglio metterci anche "description" standard secondo te? Hai qualche parere in merito?--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Non ho capito Alexmar983 esiste già un parametro descrizione. Che intendi per description" standard e come metterlo? grazie. Ah sicuramente aggiungere il parametro per l'autore della foto--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Description non è quello standard nelle foto? Mi interessava un parere terzo in merito: non dovrebbe esserci quel template e poi eventualmente un template aggiuntivo legato all'iniziativa?--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Io non lo metterei anche perchè è già nei vari {{It}} {{En}} ecc. Alexmar983--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Voce Manuel Infante

Pierpaolo, avevo fatto questa richiesta al Bar italiano, ma forse non so per quale motivo non c'è starà risposta. La ripropongo direttamente a te.

---

Per una pagina tradotta, ma priva della foto, avrei trovato un libro francese con in copertina la foto del compositore Manuel Infante. Ho fatto un screen-shot della copertina. Il compositore è morto nel 1958, non si conosce l'autore della foto, ma il libro, essendo di Manuel Infante è ovviamnete precedente al 1958, di conseguenza anche la foto. Dettagli del libro: Manuel Infante Danses Andalouses N°1 "Ritmo". 2 Pianos SALABERT Référence: SLB5517 Posso caricarla? In questo caso sarebbe corretto

This work is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.

? --Brunokito (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Saladinus - Serie Gioviana.jpg

Ciao, qui è stato apposto un template di cancellazione che a me sembra non c'entri nulla ma non ho ben capito quale sia il problema. Tu sapresti risolverlo, per favore? --Micione (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Ottimo e abbondante, grazie mille! :) --Micione (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Cancellazione

E qual è il problema, scusami tanto? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

L'ho protetta per evitare un florilegio di avvisi inutili. A me dispiace per Tullio, ma come amministratore devo tutelare il lavoro del progetto, non dell'utente. Comunque per venire incontro ho archiviato e decronizzato la pagina e l'ho protetta definitivamente, mentre la nuova talk è semiprotetta così gli avvisi possono eventualmente essere messi. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Re:File:MariaAdelaidevonSavoyen01.jpg

This make sense. I already checked that the redirection is not used. Unless the redirection was created too recently, it may not be deleted. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

OK, thakns to tell me. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Controllo copyright

Ciao.. Sono stanco sto andando a letto, ma ho un problema perché qua in Cina non posso usare google e la ricerca immagini. Questa foto, l'ho sistemata mentre ma sarebbe da controllare che non sia una violazione. non riesco al momento a accedere al sito riportato nella pagina dell'utente che la usa. Puoi controllare quando hai tempo tu? Grazie infinite.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Fatto, Grazie. Buona continuazione Alexmar983--Pierpao.lo (listening) 06:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

barnstar

Haha oddio grazie mille! Farò in modo di meritarmela anche qui su Commons, allora :D Appendo volentieri in pagina utente! -- Syrio posso aiutare? 09:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Donne

Sicuro di aver annullato la modifica giusta? [7] Avevo semplicemente cliccato HotCat per sbaglio. Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno. Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione. Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link. La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST. Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-) per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Oscurare la crono

Ci rinuncio, è due minuti che lo cerco e su wiki per me sono troppi... Sai mica qual è il template che si usa per chiedere l'oscuramento di una cronologia (informazioni personali)?--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

su itwikipdia lo conosco (mai conosciuto quel redirct però, la prima volta che lo vedo), quindi mi stai confermando che su commons non c'è un vero template? Grazie, scrivo agli amministratori.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

infatti da wikidata c'ero passato a un certo punto. Lo farò presente.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Massimo Marzi

Ascolta quando hai tempo puoi dare un'occhiata agli upload dell'utente Massimo Marzi? Gli ho scritto ma non mi ha risposto, secondo me alcuni tag sono sbagliati. Possono essere recuperate alcune immagini (il fotoritratto di inizio secolo ad esempio, il fotografo è plausibilmente defunto da oltre settant'anni) ma non può scrivere su tutte "opera propria".--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Incontro a Cascina (PI)

Ciao, ti scrivo perché vedo che sei iscritto in it: Categoria:Utenti grossetani (fra l'altro pensavo tu vivessi in tutt'altra provincia). Sperando che tu legga in tempo volevo informarti che con Kaspo (coordinatore regionale WMI per la Toscana) abbiamo finito di impostare it:Wikipedia:Raduni/WikiGita all'abbazia di San Savino. Si tratta di un edificio normalmente chiuso al pubblico. Ne saranno fatte altre in zona toscana di gite soprattutto nel mese di Wiki Loves Monument quindi se si è interessati all'idea si accetta con piacere ogni feedback. Stiamo preparando una mailing list per future escursioni.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Se Susanna ha la mail dico di passarla a Luca-Kaspo. prossimo incontro sicuro: Empoli, 25 settembre per WikiLovesMonuments. Io non ci sarò.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:DKW_F93_(1956_restyling)

DKW F93 (1956 restyling) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Pibwl (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:San Juan - Apache Mescalero chief.jpg

File:San Juan - Apache Mescalero chief.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Tutto ok

Grazie della gentilezza. Tu come va? Vuoi iscriverti alla mailing list toscana di WMI? Non te l'ho ancora chiesto mi sa. Parlando di immagini, sono nella giuria del concorso regionale quest'anno. Magari il prossimo anno se ti va ti contatto/segnalo. Ti ho visto poco in giro, pensavo che avessi da fare e non ti ho importunato.--Alexmar983 (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Spero che tutto fili meglio adesso, anche io in passato ho dovuto assentarmi per del tempo da ruoli più attivi. Nel mio caso fu più per cose in RL che per wiki, ma poteva essere il contrario. Felice comunque di rivederti in giro. Se hai dubbi su qualcosa ti aggiorno limitatamente a cosa so. Altrimenti dimmi cosa ti piace fare per tirare su l'umore e ti aiuto.--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Microsoft Word 2010 Icon-1-.svg

And also:

• File:Outlook 2010.png

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:51, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Angelo Bronzino 056.jpg

Hi Pierpao, your rename of File:Angelo Bronzino 056.jpg and other files doesn't seem to be in line with Commons:File renaming. Please have a look at that page. You should move files just to give them a better file name, this is highlighted in the policy page by " In general, Commons aims to provide stable file names as there might be external file clients and file moving involves significant human and computing resources. Thus renaming should be used with caution". Thank you, Multichill (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

File:White eagle order - Ordine aquila bianca odierno.png

File:White eagle order - Ordine aquila bianca odierno.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jakub Kaja (✉) 15:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Microsoft Word 2010 Icon-1-.svg

And also:

• File:Outlook 2010.png

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 22:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Visto che sei tornato bello ringalluzzito da qualche tempo... se hai voglia di imparare qualcosa in più su wikidata e i rapporti con commons e la gestione immagine, fammi un fischio....

Alexmar983 (talk) 12:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Io sono tornato a agosto ma mi pare a Cascina di averti invitato no? Poi io non ho fatto più nulla. A dicembre sono stato 9 gg a casa, ho visto Lorenzo di sfuggita un pomeriggio. Al momento sto organizzando qualcosa per maggio ma quando abbiamo iniziato non eri ancora tornato quindi non ho pensato a te fra le mail preliminari (con tutti i coordinatori nel giro... la fatica). So che Luca Kaspo e il tizio di Empoli di OSM (Marco, mi pare si chiami) stanno organizzando qualcosa. E poi c'è una premiazione di WLM Toscana, per la quale ho fatto un poster. Per la ML c'è un link ma non riesco a ritrovarlo nella posta dove ne avevo preso nota. Ti pingo User:Kaspo così oltre a aggiornarti degli eventi ti ci mette lui in ML.

Come da predetto Ruthven è diventato sysop su commons. Lui poi lo fanno steward prima o poi quindi mancate solo tu e Threecharlie.

Per wikidata di scrivo con più calma quando è finita la stagione dei grant WMF e della commissione microgrant di WMI.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Di archiviazione? No. Ma provvedo per anno.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Esana...metti! Se mi dai tempo ci arrivo. Arrivo anche a te come promesso giorni fa. In genere le faccio in modo abbastanza random, ma se vuoi intensifico sulle Marche un po' (ma per me tutte le regioni sono uguali, vado genuinamente a caso da chi mi gira sotto mano). Certo fa sempre strano vedere la gente di itwikipedia (penso a chi aggiunge appelli di scattare foto ai corsi WMI) muoversi sempre un po' dopo e un po' in ordine sparso e inefficiente rispetto a quando sarebbe possibile su molti aspetti. Per dire se avessi potuto mandare un messaggio preimpostato su questa campagna di sensibilizzazione a trovare le immagini mancanti lo avevo già fatto da mesi, ma nemmeno ci provo a spiegarmi... finirebbe tutto in discorsoni sulla "burocrazia", il "gioco di ruolo", i "massimi sistemi". Le dinamiche di itwikipedia sono troppo indietro, altrimenti ci si sarebbe già accorti che il problema della mancanza delle immagini locali è "in potenza" già risolto: la sofisticazione dei software e i dati wikimetrici dicono che si può trovare a livello subprovinciale un utente che in pochi mesi scatti tutte le foto richieste nel raggio di 10-15 km.

Ma itwikipedia non vuole davvero soluzioni "definitive".... ciò richiederebbe una visione utilitaristica che è impedita dal fatto che le utenze "bravissime e competentissime" di itwikipedia hanno bisogno di un sistema inefficiente dove sono "indispensabili", e comunque a una visione utilitaristica va qui associato anche un approccio partecipativo e dinamico a wikidata, che al momento si può avere solo in modo faticoso e passo passo perché a sentire certuni wikidata deve essere solo presentata in un certo modo e insegnare alla utenze queste cose così è improprio (qui la giustificazione è purtroppo descrivere l'utente medio come un povero scemotto che senza l' "utente indispensabile" non ce la farebbe da solo). Insomma utenti "bravissimi e competentissimi" dicono che questi strumenti che collegano wikidata al lavoro contenutistico effettivo (nel caso: razionalizzare la ricerca di immagini) io a te e a altri non li dovrei nemmeno insegnare... Lo so è un commento molto "politico", perché come disse una volta un furbacchione che voleva cambiare argomento, io come noto "sono un politico" (o giù di lì).--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Tramonti

Tramonti is a commune in Italy, this redirection is wrong... Wieralee (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Correzione files

Ciao Pierpao. Circa due anni fa sei stato tanto carino da correggermi alcuni files. Avrei di nuovo alcuni da correggere e da aggiustare. Saresti ancora disponibile? Naturalmente solo se hai tempo e voglia. In piena libertà. Fammi sapere. Ciao e grazie in anticipo. --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Allora. Alcuni files hanno errori nella scrittura:

• File:ItalianWineRegions.jpg (Abruzzi ---> Abruzzo)  Done
• File:Pozzuoli NASA ISS004-E-5376 modified names.jpg (Possillipo ---> Posillipo)  Done
• File:Stereobat und Krepis (de).PNG (Euthynetrie ---> Euthynterie) Done
• File:Citta elime.jpg (Iaitias ---> Iaitas o Iaitai) vedi qui  Done

  Altri vanno ritagliati nella sola immagine:

• File:Napoli, Stazione Centrale distrutta.jpg (da ritagliare e raddrizzare)
• File:Napoli, Piazza Plebiscito 2.jpg (da ritagliare e raddrizzare)  Done
• File:San Leucio, panorama.jpg (da ritagliare)  Done
• File:Napoli, Grand Hotel 3 (bis).jpg (da ritagliare)  Done
• File:Napoli, Fontana di Mezzocannone 2.jpg (togliere tutto il testo a sinistra)  Done
  

Vedi un po' quello che puoi fare. Naturalmente con tutto comodo. Ciao e grazie infinite. --DenghiùComm (talk) 11:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Grazie comunque per tutto quello che hai fatto o riuscirai a fare. Io purtroppo non ho nessuna conoscenza grafica in questo campo, altrimenti l'avrei provveduto io stesso. Sì, lo so, molte foto hanno una bassa risoluzione, ma le ho caricate lo stesso perché le reputavo un documento storicamente importante. In genere quando qualcun altro carica la foto "pulita" o a risoluzione maggiore, sono io stesso che le sostituisco. Questi qui invece mi sono sembrati "casi disperati". Ancora grazie di tutto Pierpao ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 12:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

P.S.: per la foto File:Napoli, Piazza Plebiscito 2.jpg in basso c'è un pezzo di un'altra foto... E' possibile eliminarlo? Anche solo tagliarlo, senza raddrizzare la foto... tanto l'inclinazione è minima... It's possible? Denghiù ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Ah ok. Ora sì! Era rimasto visibile cosa in effetti non c'era più. Grazie infinite ! Hai fatto un lavoro perfetto ! Per Piazza Garibaldi vedremo chi lo potrà fare. Ciao. --DenghiùComm (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Villa Pelosio.jpg

File:Villa Pelosio.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Delfort (talk) 08:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Non ti sei evidentemente accorto di aver trasferito da it.wiki un file in evidente violazione di copyright (screen da google maps, ci sono numerosi watermarks sull'immagine). Ciao, --Delfort (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Guarda a metà sopra il numero 121 sulla destra, oppure a mezza altezza lato sinistro. Indirizzo esatto su google maps: Via Luigi Iorio, 121 Boscotrecase. Ciao, --Delfort (talk) 09:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Ormai ho l'occhio ;) Si vede che sono sgranate, si vede che l'angolazione "puzza", poi si vedono i watermark...insomma una serie di indizi. Poi basta cercare l'indirizzo su maps e confrontare! Ciao, --Delfort (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Moving of photos

It's not nice to move a photo to an other place without contacting the author, because I cannot find out my photo later, if the redirect will be deleted. So I moved it also from File:Airport crash tenders in Exeter International Airport.jpg to File:Airport crash tenders in Exeter International Airport 0732.jpg :-( --K@rl (talk) 17:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Incontro tosco-ligure

Segnalo it:Wikipedia:Raduni/Incontro tosco-ligure.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Ani Laugh 2.gif

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:PD San Marino

Hi :-) You have moved thiscategory, but you didn't empty it. It can't be done automatically. Can you fix it, please? Wieralee (talk) 01:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bianconera con tre stelle.png

Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Stub puzzle image

I would do it, if you promise to change it in all the articles it appears. If you only exchange it in 2 or 3 cases, it will not be worth the work (SVG shading is not easy).--Lommes (talk) 23:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Limousines

If you have a look at limousines now you will see that there are a large number of Daimler images (136) added by me but no one else has done anything! Actually I did add GAZ-12 ZIM‎. You've gone all quiet. Can you come and have a chat on my talk page please, I know how much you prefer that. Eddaido (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Pierpao, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done Ora attiva il gadget dalle tue preferenze "Visual File Change", funzionerà. Per quanto riguarda le chiese, è colpa di Threecharlie: se fosse per lui, starei ora in Chapels. A volte ci vuole taanta pazienza ;-) --Ruthven (msg) 21:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

IT-wiki transfer

Aloha! The transfer of File:As I Lay Dying.png got screwed up. No data transferred. Could you have a peek? Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Done by user:Lepido User:Hedwig in Washington--Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Microsoft whisler logo.png

And also:

• File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Sysop

Lo vuoi fare su itwiki? Bene, adesso non hai scuse pratiche per farlo anche su commons, giusto?

Quando ti candidiamo qui?--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Fare il sysop su itwiki non è agevole visto il clima che oscilla fra apatico e teso, penso che sia implicito che lo si faccia ricavandosi delle nicchie, soprattutto. Sperando di non trovarsi nell'occhio del ciclone quando capita. Ha tuttavia un aspetto utile : lo si può usare come biglietto da visita su altre piattaforme. Per diventare sysop, indubbiamente dimostra una certa maturità esserlo da un'altra parte. E quindi se lo diventi di là, fra qualche mese lo puoi diventare anche di qua dove paradossalmente sei anche più qualificato secondo me, visto che la variabilità di scenari è minore. A dirla tutta, stupisce che tu non lo sia diventato prima qui :D--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

I voti sono stati relativamente pochi e la chiusura non è stata rapida come in altri casi. Sarà l'estate ma secondo me itwikipedia non ti merita :D vieni qua a tempo piedo a fare il sysop!--Alexmar983 (talk) 03:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

La mia assenza è ideologica, nulla di personale eh. Solo che dopo che mi sono trovato trattato male per aver ricordato che non è il caso di eleggere sysop uno che aveva giocato con sockpuppet o giù di lì ho anche detto basta. Se qualcuno ha tanta voglia di spendersi per gente così e magari non per venire a votare un wikipediano stimato, perché mi devo sforzare io di valutare e riconoscere i meriti effettivi dei candidati? Anche se lo ammetto uno dei voti forse lo hai avuto grazie a me. Ma non lo dire in giro :D--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Rinuncio a trovare linearità in itwikipedia. Che poi le linee guida su copyviol e copyright immagini sbaglio o le hai, soprattutto negli anni passati, curate tu? Mi chiedo quanti ne abbiano cognizione, eppure chi mette la faccia sulla linea guida è molto più prezioso di chi la commenta. Non mancherò di citarlo alla tua candidatura qua.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Immagine

Ma perché non le fate in PNG? Gif è morto e puzza. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Marco Pannella - Manifesti per la morte.jpg

File:Marco Pannella - Manifesti per la morte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Also affected is File:Marco Pannella - Manifesti per la morte - 2.jpg. Storkk (talk) 08:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Ukraine

Вітаємо!

Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.

Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlmwikimediaukraine.org.ua

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Blue Barnstar Lane.jpg

Dear Pierpao. In June I asked you to stop the edit war. Now you reverted again. Is that your way to edit here? --Gereon K. (talk) 17:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Gereon K. Hello. Honestly and sincerely I did not remember you wrote me. Sorry. Anyway, it is a [Star anchor] which primary use is to anchor two walls togheter. See category:Star anchors. It is not a barnstar. A barnstar is a star on a barn. It is a Wikimedia Award too and therefore it is in category:Wikimedia barnstars. Why do you want to add also to category:Barnstars? --Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I was not taking into considertation that it is already in the category for Wikimedia barnstars. --Gereon K. (talk) 06:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Unknown French Master - Allegory of the Vanity of Earthly Things - 2.jpg

Do you have good sources for the move? The postcard I scanned says Bigot, not even supposedly Bigot. It was published by Palazzo Barberini.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

by name / by title

Ciao Pierpao. Ma sei proprio sicuro di tutti questi cambiamenti che hai fatto? Se per i films posso essere d'accordo con te che è meglio parlare di titoli che non di nomi, ma per le statue antiche non ne sono tanto convinto. "Farnese Bull" e "Venere Callipige" (o qualsiasi altro nome che esse possono avere) pensi davvero che sono titoli e non invece nomi attribuiti a queste statue? Saluti. --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Grazie per il lavoro che stai facendo. Penso che sia meglio essere il più semplici possibile. Poi lo sappiamo tutti che il sistema non può essere perfetto e che qui e là vi possono sempre essere delle sfasature. Ma se il 90% delle sculture sono nomi, lasciamoli fra i nomi. Il "Toro Farnese" è anche detto "Supplizio di Dirce" che è un titolo con un nome di persona. Credo che sia un unicum... Altri gruppi sono tutti nomi: "Eros e Psiche", "Zeus e Ganimede", "Satiro e Bacco", "Ermafrodito e Satiro", ecc. Se puoi riportare indietro le statue ai by name credo che sarebbe un bene. Grazie mille. Buon lavoro. --DenghiùComm (talk) 07:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

P.S.: purtroppo attualmente sono in giro all'estero quindi non mi è possibile lavorare seriamente e con impegno su commons. Mi è possibile solo qualche sguardo fugace e reazioni mordi-e-fuggi.

File:Elementary-sum.png

File:Elementary-sum.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jahobr (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not change file names

Majority of file names in the Category:Porczyński Gallery are starting with the last name of the author, thanks to this the files are automatically sorted. What's more there was no reason for this change. Artinpl (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Could you also provide rationale for renaming all files in this category, there's no apparent reason for change. Artinpl (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

I will not ask for your permission or consult you how I should name my own work or the PD file that I am uploading. There's MNW naming convention in Commons, work out by me and some other users for few years, if you like it or not, and there was no problem with this. Please familiarize yourself with Commons:File renaming guidelines, especially Criteria to decline section. Artinpl (talk) 19:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

I just saw Yours discussion. I'm a former Wikipedian-in-Residence in National Museum of Warsaw and I would like to bring your attention, that the 'MNW naming convention in Commons' is rather 'artist's name and surname - title', as you can see there. Regards. Gytha (talk) 11:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

License rules

Hello! I've seen your upload File:Frankfurt am Main, Gedenkstätte Neuer Börneplatz -- 2015 -- 6715 (cropped).jpg. Please follow the rules of the license. You modified my image, it's a derivate. So you should add your name as modifier. I do not support derivates, you should do this. I'll update your modifications and add your name as attribution. And for the next image: please follow the license rules and add your name yourself. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 15:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Repubblica di Siena e Principato di Piombino tra XV e XVI secolo.png

File:Repubblica di Siena e Principato di Piombino tra XV e XVI secolo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rapsar (talk) 08:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Repubblica di Siena e Principato di Piombino tra XV e XVI secolo.png

Pierpa, ho visto che sei intervenuto nella discussione sulla proposta di cancellazione del File:Repubblica di Siena e Principato di Piombino tra XV e XVI secolo.png mi sono scordato di aggiungere la fonte quando lo caricai, ora ho corretto l'errore. Potresti chiudere la richiesta di cancellazione ? Non so poi bene sinceramente come funzioni Brucointestino (talk) 11:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Foto Bonifica Ordigni anni '70.

Ciao Pierpao, grazie per le tue precisazioni ma nuovamente mi ripeto, omettendo la seconda parte della mia precedente spiegazione, la quale evidentemente ha generato confusione: la foto non ha alcun tipo di copyright perchè è scaduto.Ti auguro buona giornata--Cinghiale7512 (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Foto Bonifica

Ciao Pierpao, provo a riassumere un'ultima volta, per definitiva chiarezza:

1) la foto è datata 1979, quindi è correttamente caricata su it.wikipedia nel pubblico dominio perché il copyright scaduto. La licenza è cioè libera;

2) anche se non necessario, ho in ogni caso informato l'autore prima della pubblicazione, non per motivi legislativi ma etici e di gentilezza. Lo stesso autore si è mostrato ben felice e disponibile alla pubblicazione. Non ho pubblicato lo scambio di messaggi perché superfluo e per rispetto della privacy. In ogni caso le condizioni di cui al punto 1) implicano la possibilità di ricopiare la foto su wikicommons senza l'autorizzazione dell'autore;

3) la foto che hai segnalato tu era una prima versione. Un vecchio doppione con descrizione non dettagliata. Ne ho richiesto la cancellazione perché è un refuso.

Buone feste anche a te :)--Cinghiale7512 (talk) 18:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Ciao Pierpao, non era mia intenzione "insistere", se hai percepito questo me ne scuso. Al contrario proprio perché condivido, ed avevo già letto in precedenza, le regole a cui fai riferimento non comprendevo la richiesta di cancellazione (posto che la foto andava in ogni caso cancellata in quanto refuso).

Faccio in ogni caso un passo indietro perché vorrei capire meglio per il futuro, probabilmente quello che ho letto l'ho interpretato male. Dammi una mano se puoi per favore considerato che evidentemente hai meglio approfondito l'argomento. Dunque:

a) in questa pagina https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bonifica_ordigni_mazzaferro_fine_anni_70.jpg è specificata la "classica" regola che tu indichi: cioè su wikicommons vanno in PD automatico tutte le foto prima del 1976. La mia è del 1979 quindi alla lettera non può andare in automatico secondo la normativa.

b) Mi ero soffermato in precedenza sull'URAA alla pagina che tu indichi https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:URAA-restored_copyrights. Alla voce preliminary tests si riporta questa affermazione: Works not copyrightable in the United States are not affected by URAA restoration. For example, architectural works (i.e. buildings) constructed before December 1, 1990, are not copyrightable in the US.

c) Avevo poi anche letto la pagina del fair use: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use dove la legislazione statunitense riportava i 4 punti cardine per garantirne l'uso nonostante un eventuale copyright: L'oggetto e la natura dell'uso, in particolare se ha natura commerciale oppure didattica e senza scopo lucrativo; La natura dell'opera protetta; La quantità e l'importanza della parte utilizzata, in rapporto all'insieme dell'opera protetta; Le conseguenze di questo uso sul mercato potenziale o sul valore dell'opera protetta.

Avevo quindi concluso quanto segue.

1) Relativamente al punto b) la mia foto, al pari di un edificio, non mi sembra copyrightable negli U.S.A. 2) Relativamente al punto c) la mia foto è senza scopo di lucro, la natura dell'opera non è creativa, la quantità è minima considerato che è 1 sola foto, non ha conseguenze sul mercato potenziale perché è la foto di un camion.

A tuo parere sono corrette le 2 conclusioni precedenti? Grazie ancora per le tue valutazioni, mi torneranno buone in futuro.--Cinghiale7512 (talk) 00:11, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Ottimo, ti ringrazio per i chiarimenti.--Cinghiale7512 (talk) 01:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CERNIERA 2.jpg

Copyright status: File:CERNIERA 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CERNIERA 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Cancellazione foto Mazzaferro (Urbino)

Ciao Pierpao, ho visto la cancellazione di questa foto: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Scultura_aquiloni_Mazzaferro_Urbino.JPG. Posto che non era mia, era comunque di rilievo per la pagina. Volevo sapere a tal proposito se fosse ripristinabile con la conoscenza di queste informazioni: 1) lo sculture che l'ha realizzata risiede in loco 2) l'ha fatta gratuitamente per poi donarla al quartiere e alla città. Esiste anche un video dell'inaugurazione che ti linko: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2oiXuQOVBk. Dal minuto 1:37 si parla nello specifico della scultura che è posta su una rotatoria. E' lo stesso sindaco che conferma che è un regalo di concittadini. Tra l'altro al minuto 2:04 compare in primo piano lo scultore: occhiali e barbetta bianca. In questi casi si può considerare la legge sul copyright by-passata? Senza che richieda all'autore stesso la licenza cc-by-sa per pubblicare una foto dell'opera che lui stesso ci ha regalato? Come puoi immaginare la situazione è un po' surreale, avere un regalo a 50m da casa mia e non poterlo fotografare senza autorizzazione.--Cinghiale7512 (talk) 14:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Chiederò all'autore di poter fotografare la scultura che ci ha regalato e pubblicare la foto con cc-by-sa.--Cinghiale7512 (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Killed_soldiers

Killed soldiers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 09:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Images_of_trains_(check_needed)

Category:Images_of_trains_(check_needed) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sathish kalathil (talk) 08:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Portrait_paintings_of_females_from_Lithuania

Portrait paintings of females from Lithuania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Moves should be aligned to the guidance at Commons:File renaming

Please do not undertake unproductive and practically pointless moves like you have done for File:Buddhism Symbol.png. Such moves just create too many edits across too many wikis for no, or little, value. The criteria for moving is specified at Commons:File renaming. Thanks for your understanding on this.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Ihmo buddismsynbol is meaningless and hardly to understand for arabic, est europe and all people with a native language using a not latin alphabet. Try to translate this for instance Яидудомой (Я иду домой=I go home). This is a multilingal project. Do you remeber? Not only for native english speaking people.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

On a wiki such as this we have consensus for such moves of some magnitude, at least look to have a conversation, not solely based on your opinion. There is clear guidance in the "reasons not to move" section, and the renames that you undertook are IMHO not required, especially due to the number of links that existed. Please don't make trivial changes as the instructional page states. Also, while you think that it is a bit better, the fact that you are triggering all those edits cross wiki is relevant for the decision-making.

And I am hardly unaware of this wiki, and its purpose, nor that we are multi-language. So please don't use that one as a defence.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

I note from reading your talk page that this has been a repeated discussion, and from some of my fellow admins. So I again reinforce the guidance, and ask for use of the rename function to only be where it is clearly an advantage. If you are unsure, then start a conversation and gain a consensus.  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:ScarpaRome2000.jpg

File:ScarpaRome2000.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Same as a non-free image on en-wiki en:File:ScarpaRome2000.jpg, shows the author is a Paolo Castagno, no license show on archive of source http://web.archive.org/web/20041023094221/http://www.papersera.net/papersera/scarpa/index.htm Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyvio

Your editions seem totally absurd to me. In addition, another user made the necessary corrections so that the images can remain in Commons.--Philip J Fry (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:AS Béziers.svg

File:AS Béziers.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bloody-libu (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Antonio-Serena.jpg

File:Antonio-Serena.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.repubblica.it/2003/k/sezioni/politica/finisr/anto/anto.html Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

File:LNC Logo.jpg

File:LNC Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quotes (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - preparazione

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana Stiamo organizzando Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019. Il concorso si tiene a settembre ma ci muoviamo con largo anticipo. Puoi consultare in questa pagina il lavoro in corso. Ci sono monumenti (o intere amministrazioni) che mancano vicino alla tua zona di interesse? Fallo presente e vedremo di fare il possibile! per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Per informazioni: toscanawikimedia.it #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki toscanawiki

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Lansdowne Herakles Getty Museum (retouched) 2.jpg

Hi, Could you do a proper upload please, including the change you made to the picture? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Strange result. I used derivative fx. Check now please Yann--Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Why you list in featured pictures and made it a redirect to another file? Yann--Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand. The FP here is File:Lansdowne Herakles Getty Museum (retouched).jpg, the file was renamed. What do you mean? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

[8]--Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

See the history [9] What happended? Did you move the file, before I upload it? Yann--Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes, the file was moved before you uploaded it, so there was no description, source, license, etc. Now ok. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

But it is ok that now this image listed here Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects? Yann --Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes, the problem arised because you uploaded the file under the old filename. Now fixed. There may be a cache issue. Yann (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Owen_Meredith

Owen Meredith has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 10:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Works_by_subject

Works by subject has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 07:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Commons_users_by_name

Category:Commons_users_by_name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 17:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your imports

Hi, please only import files to Commons if you are prepared to do proper after care. Don't leave us with additional files in already heavily backlogged maintenance categories. Jcb (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Have you delete it? Jcb. Why?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Jcb--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

No, I did not (yet) delete them, but they will be deleted if you don't fix them within 7 days. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

It's the first time I import. In the original versions there were all needed informations. So must be due import issues. Where Can I find them because I dont' see them in my uploads--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Jcb--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Pierpao - Jcb (talk) 17:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Omaggio a Rimbaud.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Omaggio a Rimbaud.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Omaggio a Rimbaud.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Non ho capito proprio il senso dell'avviso. Che cosa manca User:Ruthven? l'autore ha scritto un lenzuolo per dire che è lui e che lo ha rilasciato nel pubblico dominio. Mi sa che non trasferirò più file visti questi e [altri problemi]--Pierpao.lo (listening) 09:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Eh, ma così non vale! :) Anch'io posso scrivere che sono Pablo Picasso e che rilascio le mie opere con licenza Creative Commons. Così con buoni tutti!

Le autorizzazioni scritte nella pagina le accettavamo prima che esistesse OTRS, verso il 2005 e prima. Da quella data in poi, bisogna che l'utente che carica il file dimostri che ha il diritto di usare la foto/quadro/musica già pubblicata altrove.

Per il tuo commento al Bar, la risposta è semplice: se importi file su Commons, devi usare i template di Commons. Ora, l'errore e la poca flessibilità dell'admin è qui evidente, ma sottolinea anche che le importazioni sono mal fatte. Devi sostituire "opera propria" col template {{own}}, scrivere la data dello scatto (visibile negli EXIF) se assente, inserire le categorie corrette e il corretto template di licenza. Importare vuol dire questo. I file dubbi, come questo che ti ho segnalato, vanno direttamente cancellati nel progetto d'origine, senza importarli su Commons (dove contattare l'autore diventa difficile, perché è l'"importatore" ad essere avvisato). Spero di essere stato esaustivo :D Ciao! --Ruthven (msg) 13:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Aspetta che mi sta sfuggendo qualche cosa User:Ruthven, ok per commons. Tornando a Wikipedia, non sto capendo, questo riguarda solo i quadri o tutte le opere particolarmente professionali, anche foto, o che cosa? perchè al di là del fatto che è un quadro pregiato io non ci vedo differenza con chi carica una foto e dice che è sua, e noi gli crediamo per buona fede--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Solamente le foto scattate dall'utente stesso possono essere caricate senza autorizzazione scritta (ed i file nel pubblico dominio). Tutto il resto deve essere cancellato se non vi è autorizzazione (su questioni di copyright si assume la buona fede: ma si cancella prima e si verifica se c'è buona fede poi). Il quadro, a differenza della foto, è stato già "pubblicato" il giorno della sua prima esposizione al pubblico, che non può essere quella del caricamento su Commons. Ovviamente anche le foto già pubblicate altrove necessitano di autorizzazione scritta. --Ruthven (msg) 15:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

PS: Questo vale per tutti i progetti Wikimedia (non c'è differenza fra Wikipedia e Commons). I file in EDP sono un'eccezione, ma questa deve essere giustificabile. --Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

File:- panoramio (2311).jpg

File:- panoramio (2311).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana sta per iniziare

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana L'organizzazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019 ha proseguito e qua potete consultare il lavoro dei volontari. Qui potete valutare quanto è stato liberato finora. Nuove liberatorie arriveranno nei prossimi giorni. Il primo settembre inizia il concorso, ti preghiamo di informare le persone interessate vicino a te e, se puoi, anche di condividere i post sui vari canali sociali. Qui e qui e qui è possibile scaricare il volantino di promozione regionale in alcune delle lingue più comuni per i turisti. messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Per informazioni: toscanawikimedia.it @WikiToscana Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki toscanawiki #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments2019

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--23:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Ciao ho visto che hai adottato un sacco di comuni a cavallo fra Grosseto e Siena che sono aderenti. Per favore se hai delle foto in zona caricale perché il caricamente è molto indietro rispetto a altre province. A me nell'attività di coordinamento non servono migliaia di foto in più ma coperture omogenee per rappresentare tutta la regione.--Alexmar983 (talk) 23:15, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Guada le liste, comunque mentre c'è Abbadia San Salvatore che non è aggiornata da anni, mentre Castell'Azzara e Santa Fiore si meriterebbero una copertura migliore. Non escludo ne arrivino altri il prossimo anno.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

c:Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Spray_Can

hi, please use {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} for triggering automatic archiving if all tasks are done - thx --Mrmw (talk) 17:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

you dont know what to do? please edit your request in commons-graphic-lab und finish with the section-resolved-template - thx --Mrmw (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Giurato locale WLM2019

Ciao, ti andrebbe di fare il giurato wikimediano in questa mini-selezione delle foto WLM dell'edizione 2019 per il sud-ovest della Toscana? Vorrei dei nomi diversi dall'altra giuria se possibile e alla fine non è tanto lavoro, c'è solo da scegliere 10 foto preferite fra quelle elencate e poi fra le foto scelte da almeno un giurato, i vincitori. Ci sarà una piccola premiazione il 14 marzo a Follonica.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Si fa da remoto, sì.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Sezione Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2019_in_Italy/Tuscany/Round_2/Pisa&Livorno&Grosseto#Fotografie_di_partenza. Quali sono le 10 che ti convincono di più?--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Vai tranquillo.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Quando hai scelto puoi metterle qui direttamente, e se alcune sono uguali alle mie che ho già scelto e che ci trovi già, metti solo quelle diverse. Alla fine avremo una galleria di circa 25-35 foto scelte da almeno un giurato e su quelle rifeltteremo qualche giorno e prenderemo le più votate, al netto di qualche scelta adottata per evitare p.e. troppi vincitori uguali, o soggetti simili.--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Visto che i giurati stanno votando e abbiamo finalisti in termini pratici il minimo lavoro possibile da fare è segnalare altre due o tre foto che non ci sono ancora e che ti piacerebbe che passino il turno. Invece quelle che ti piacciono e ci sono già le puoi per informazione spostare in alto in elenco.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Perdonami ma non ho capito il senso della tua pagina forse. Se quei numeri sotto sono le tue posizioni relative allora andando fino alla 10 son ben più di tre quelle che non ci sono ancora nelle prefinaliste, sono almeno tipo sei. Inserendone in elenco e spostando in alto quelle a cui hai dato un voto viene così. Ciao.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Allora qua ci sono i tre. Dove sono quelli da spostare se mi piacciono?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified_locations_in_Eurasia

Category:Unidentified_locations_in_Eurasia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Template:Category renamed

Template:Category renamed has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 03:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Cambridge United FC.png

File:Cambridge United FC.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Glorious 93 (talk) 18:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Media_requiring_renaming_without_the_related_template

Media requiring renaming without the related template has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 18:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Public_domain_by_country

Public domain by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

RZuo (talk) 22:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Torre Galfa Rifacimento.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Italian template manual edit link.png

Copyright status: File:Italian template manual edit link.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Italian template manual edit link.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

R:File:Maria Cristina Messa 2021.jpg

Non ho capito però perché l'immagine File:Maria Cristina Messa 2021.jpg sarebbe out of scope, è un ritaglio di un immagine che già abbiamo qui ed è allo stato l'unica disponibile. --ZioNicco (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30

Автор фото Aeou, інфографіка AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA), CC BY-SA 4.0

Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика

Регіон	К-ть пам'яток	К-ть фото
Севастополь	1	1
АР Крим	12	51
Закарпаття	26	96
Миколаївщина	29	81
Рівненщина	36	186
Херсонщина	36	83
Житомирщина	55	324
Донеччина	57	153
Тернопільщина	62	234
Буковина	75	220
Луганщина	82	90
Львівщина	82	351
Кіровоградщина	88	181
Волинь	98	270
Одещина	115	383
Сумщина	129	414
Дніпропетровщина	139	278
Київ	159	248
Хмельниччина	166	538
Полтавщина	171	594
Харківщина	175	625
Київщина	181	651
Черкащина	186	455
Прикарпаття	240	305
Вінничина	242	775
Запоріжжя	253	317
Чернігівщина	305	519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

• «Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
• «Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
• «Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 18:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana sta per finire

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana Fra poco si chiuderà l'edizione 2021 di Wiki Loves Monuments. Ci teniamo a segnalare a chi avesse scorso le liste in precedenza, che negli ultimi giorni sono stati concessi a tempo indefinito nuovi beni da fotografare a Pontremoli, Volterra e San Giovanni Valdarno. Se hai delle foto di archivio da condividere, il bottone blu di caricamento su ogni riga in tabella sarà attivo fino alla mezzanotte di oggi. per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Per informazioni: toscanawikimedia.it WikiToscana Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki toscanawiki Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Logo sophia.jpg

File:Logo sophia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blomet36 (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Rilievo-con-il-foro-stenop.jpg

File:Rilievo-con-il-foro-stenop.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: nofile) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Chaoborus.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Viktor & Rolf.jpg

File:Viktor & Rolf.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: bad quality image of ) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Daniel.9.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 01:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments e Wiki Loves Puglia 2022

Ciao, ti scrivo perché negli anni scorsi hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments e in particolare alla sua edizione regionale per la Puglia, Wiki Loves Puglia. Ti ricordo che il concorso torna dal 1º al 30 settembre, come ogni anno, e che puoi caricare sin da ora le tue fotografie! Novità di quest'anno, oltre all'aggiunta di alcuni comuni tra cui Taranto, è l'arrivo di tutti i castelli e di tutte le fortificazioni d'Italia, nonché di Puglia. Puoi caricare le foto dei monumenti partecipanti sempre tramite le liste su Wikipedia in italiano, mentre l'elenco delle wikigite, cioè le passeggiate fotografiche, previste e altre informazioni su premi e giuria si trovano qui. Grazie e... aspetto le tue foto! --Ferdi2005_(talk) 11:26, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Laurels_in_art

Laurels in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 11:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Re:File:Carolyn Wirth - I Read Emily Dickinson All Last Winter.jpg

Ciao, ho chiuso la DR cancellandola, grazie! Jaqen (talk) 13:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Premiazione e mostra fotografica di Wiki Loves Puglia 2022

Grazie di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Puglia 2022. Vorrei informarti che la premiazione del concorso regionale si terrà il 10 dicembre alle 18:00 presso la Sala del Colonnato del Palazzo della Città metropolitana di Bari (Lungomare Nazario Sauro 27). Contestualmente verrà inaugurata la mostra fotografica delle edizioni 2020, 2021 e 2022 che rimarrà esposta fino all’8 gennaio 2023 e poi girerà per le città della Puglia, tra cui Brindisi (a seguire, dal 14 febbraio al 14 marzo 2023 presso il Palazzo Granafei-Nervegna). Ulteriori informazioni nella pagina di raduno. Ti aspetto per scoprire insieme le foto che hanno vinto questa edizione del concorso! --Ferdi2005_(msg) 17:29, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Pierpao,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File: Atlético Central Córdoba

Ti ringrazio per la correzione del file.

Ieri ho seguito la procedura per chiedere il cambio del nome nel file.

Sono andato al file che volevo cambiare il nome: Cena de Campeones. Central Córdoba 1982. Ho cliccato Rinomina.

Inserito la motivazione: Errore di sintassi nell'inserimento dell'anno: da Central Córdoba 1982 a Cena de Campeones 1982, come evidenziato nella didascalia.

Fornito il nuovo nome: C. A. Central Córdoba - Cena de Campeones 1982 - Tomás Felipe Carlovich con Alejandro Caserio.

A questo punto premevo invio e appariva il segnale di errore: Impossibile contattare il Filemover.

Ti diro che mi piace di più il nome scelto da te: Atlético Central Córdoba.

È possibile caricare un'intera galleria?

Ciao. Alejandro Caserio (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Photographs_of_actors

Photographs of actors has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

186.173.79.57 01:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Aspirina nitrossibutilestere.jpg

File:Aspirina nitrossibutilestere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 19:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Buongiorno Pierpao,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a contatti@wikilovesmonuments.it.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Ritorna Wiki Loves Puglia anche nel 2023!

Ciao, ti scrivo perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments con fotografie della Puglia. Ritorna anche quest'anno, per la quinta edizione, il concorso regionale di Wiki Loves Monuments dedicato alla Puglia: Wiki Loves Puglia. A partire da quest'anno partecipano anche tutte le chiese e gli edifici religiosi; c'è anche un'altra novità: le fotografie verranno caricate su Wikimedia Commons attraverso la nuova app del concorso. Vorrei invitarti a partecipare anche quest'anno con le tue fotografie della regione entro il 30 settembre! Inoltre, abbiamo in programma ben 13 wikigite in diversi comuni pugliesi, compresa un'editathon a Brindisi il 9 settembre. Ti aspetto! Grazie, --Ferdi2005_(talk) 10:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

..จั+66938011000w

จะทิ้งไร มี.."XXX: 49.237.38.52 16:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

มอย่าเหนื่อยกูก็เช/น กัน

.tdjusji and the other hand I promise you and your team to help me to do the same way for me and my husband 49.237.38.52 16:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

sfhfshf 49.237.38.52 16:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kanizsa Battle by Hans Rudolph Miller.jpg

Copyright status: File:Kanizsa Battle by Hans Rudolph Miller.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kanizsa Battle by Hans Rudolph Miller.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)