Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, •Davele!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Steiermark - Gemeindezusammenlegungen ab 2015.png edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Steiermark - Gemeindezusammenlegungen ab 2015.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Jarekt, wo ist das Problem? Es war ohnehin GDFL 3.0 angegeben. Falls ich das falsch eingegeben hatte, dann hätten Sie die Vorlage auch selbst korrigieren können. Gruß --Davele2014 (talk) 12:15, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ich habe es jetzt von diesem Bild kopiert und hoffe, dass es so okay ist. Gruß --Davele2014 (talk) 12:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Tolle Karten (Gemeinderatswahlen Kärnten) Agricola Planitius (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Agricola Planitius: Vielen Dank! War zwar sehr viel Arbeit, habe ich aber gerne gemacht. Und bei den Gemeinderatswahlen in der Steiermark wartet schon die nächste Arbeit. Freundliche Grüße Davele2014 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Steir. Gemeindewahlen edit

Danke auch hier für diese Grafik! Warum allerdings ist die entgegen der üblichen Leserichtung dargestellt? --Josef Moser (talk) 09:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Josef Moser: Vielen Dank für Ihr Lob, Josef. Nun, die „übliche“ Leserichtung war mir nicht so wichtig, wie das Ansinnen, dass die aktuellsten Ergebnisse an verderster Stelle stehen. Ich kann es aber gerne auch umformatieren. Netten Gruß --Davele2014 (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Gern geschehen, war mir ein Bedürfnis! Wenn's leicht geht, bitte ich aber doch um eine Änderung, weil: die Beschriftungen (im Bild und in der Unterschrift) schreiben 1970-2015, während die Grafik von 2015-1970 zeigt, das hat irgendwie ein "Eck", weil normalerweise (denke zumindest ich) ist die aktuellste Aussage einer Zeitreihe eher rechts statt links zu finden.--Josef Moser (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hallo Josef! War zwar einige Arbeit, ist aber bereits wunschgemäß geschehen. Zudem habe ich das File:Steiermark – Wahlbeteiligung bei Gemeinderatswahlen 1975–2015.png neu erstellt. Frohe Ostern wünscht --Davele2014 (talk) 07:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Super! Danke schön! Frohe Ostern bei gutem Wetter wünsche auch ich! - momentan leben wir ja mit Sturm, Kälte, Wintergewitter, Hagel, Graupelschauer und anderen wenig frühlingshaften Erscheinungen.--Josef Moser (talk) 08:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Naj, ganz so schlecht ist es in der Südoststeiermark auch wieder nicht und schlechtes Wetter gibt es ja nicht, sondern nur die falsche Bekleidung. Außerdem hat das derzeitige Aprilwetter auch seinen Reiz. Grüße Davele2014 (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Peggau, Gemeindevorstand 2015.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Peggau, Gemeindevorstand 2015.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dear Jarekt, I noticed on the file „schriftliche Freigabe an Wikipedia Permissions folgt nach“ – in english: „written release on Wikipedia Permissions follows“. Is this so hard to understand? Perhaps it would be better to leave such edits a German-speaking administrator.
I'm not the municipality Peggau and I have no impingement how quickly the municipality sends the designated release statement to Wikipedia Permissions. In any case, the release can only be done below, because I had to tell the community what name I have uploaded their photo. If this causes such problems, then I'll do without it in the future, I make this work for Wikipedia. Best Regards --Davele (talk) 13:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Dear Davele all I am saying is that at the moment your file does not have any valid license templates. You have {{GFDL-3.0}} but there is no such license template. That is all --Jarekt (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Dear Jarekt, I have corrected the license and hope it fits now. I am not familiar with all the license. It's all too confusing. Best Regards --•Davele (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:AUT Kirchbach-Zerlach COA.png edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AUT Kirchbach-Zerlach COA.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply