Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DigitalIceAge!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Eagleiidocs.jpg edit

 
File:Eagleiidocs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Epson ActionNote 650C.JPG edit

Copyright status: File:Epson ActionNote 650C.JPG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Epson ActionNote 650C.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Mccawcellular.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Mccawcellular.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mccawcellular.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Elec-Trol logo.svg edit

Copyright status: File:Elec-Trol logo.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Elec-Trol logo.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Ring_theory.svg edit

Nice work, thanks so much! Valereee (talk) 18:50, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure :-). DigitalIceAge (talk) 18:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Windows NT 31 print.svg edit

 
File:Windows NT 31 print.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mfcallahan (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Windows NT 4.0 Workstation logo.svg edit

 
File:Windows NT 4.0 Workstation logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mfcallahan (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

PDP-6 Logotype edit

What was the source material you used for the PDP-6 logotype? Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 11:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Larsbrinkhoff: The typeface DEC used is called Hellenic Wide JF. I used a PDP-4 brochure for positioning. DigitalIceAge (talk) 14:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! As you may have seen, there's a different logotype on later PDP-6 computer. But I haven't found any photo with a good view. If you do, I'd be interested to hear about it! Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, I can just barely make out the typeface in this picture and it looks like Hellenic Wide. I'll have to do some more spelunking in Google Images to find the later revision's badge... DigitalIceAge (talk) 21:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The first page of this brochure from mid-'65 does indeed show a different font. Looks like the same one used on early PDP-8s, which makes sense because they're both from the same year. Will have to use fontsinuse.com to crossrefernce what it might be. DigitalIceAge (talk) 22:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for looking into this!
I have a collection of old logotypes for your consideration: https://github.com/larsbrinkhoff/t-shirts/tree/master/pictures I see you have LMI and PDP-11 done already. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 06:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: Awesome! I will strongly consider it. If you'd like I can create those exact lockups for Lisp Machines and the PDP-11 too. DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I could hardly decline such a kind offer. As you can surmise from the URL, I have collected those for making t-shirts for myself, and friends and family. Would you allow me to use your designs? Someone already made a nicer PDP-10 logotype: https://github.com/PDP-10/documents/blob/master/shirts/sharpjs-pdp-10/digital-pdp-10.svg The vertically stacked format look better on a shirt. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 06:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: By all means, use them however you wish – wouldn't feel right holding them hostage since they're not exactly my logos, heh. I agree vertical stacks are the way to go on a T-shirt (the opposite of infoboxes as it turns out...) I will upload the lion's share to Commons, barring maybe that Interlisp print with the graphics and the DEC LARS report, which I might upload to MEGA. DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: Data Disc done. :) DigitalIceAge (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, it looks great! FYI. My interest in Data Disc is two-fold: 1. a drive was used at the Stanford AI lab to store bitmaps for 32 video feeds, distributed to 58 raster displays. And 2. an early version of MIT's ITS system used two Data Disc drives to store files. The other logos I collected have similar connections. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: That reminds me that I own one of these beasts. Geez, I can only imagine the racket they made while spinning... BTW, I finished Foonly, III, and Systems Concepts before conking out last night. DigitalIceAge (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Awesome! I'm snarfing these to my GitHub repository. Do you want to be credited as DigialIceAge or something else? Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: Glad you like them! "DigitalIceAge" works for me. DigitalIceAge (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: Knocked a whole bunch out:
The remaining two (Interlisp and DEC LARS) will take longer because they're more complex. DigitalIceAge (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! They are very nice! Hey, never mind the LARS report. I only stashed that photo away because I thought it was funny, and it's somewhat vaguely related. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 05:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: ...And here's a link to the Interlisp book cover. I had to resort to autotracing it because the doodles were too complex, but I used a high quality scan from Bitsavers. With some Waifu2x trickery I think it turned out better than I expected. Plus at T-shirt scale it shouldn't be too obvious, the low-ish fidelity: https://mega.nz/file/q753VCIb#BrJNJT9xrb4p4TK7j0mZhWPNuFw_RL1QsWCqTebogSk You're welcome about the logos BTW. This link was extremely helpful in finding the colors for the PDP mastheads. It might come in handy for you in your T-shirt making pursuits. :) DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The book cover came out very nice. If you'd like a bit of a challenge, I have "Computer Corporation of America", or CCA. They are on my radar because they used to have an office in the same building as Project MAC, and they sold their own Emacs version. I haven't found any high resolution images. Google gives us two bad ones: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22computer+corporation+of+america%22&tbm=isch Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 10:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Larsbrinkhoff: Done! Wasn't too bad. I tried scraping the PDFs uploaded to the company's old website via archive.org, but stupidly they only embedded bitmaps of their logos in those PDFs. DigitalIceAge (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much! That's all I have. :-) Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

For your information, a photo of a PDP-6 log book. https://github.com/larsbrinkhoff/t-shirts/blob/master/pictures/PDP-6-LOG.jpg Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Very handsome. :) I'll see if I can make a vector—is there a more head-on picture? DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Keycap legends for historical keyboards edit

Hello again! I'm trying to make replicas of some historical keyboards, especially the "Knight keyboard" in use at the MIT AI lab. Would you like to help me making vector images for each keycap? Here are some photos, but I may be able to get better ones: http://xahlee.info/kbd/knight_keyboard.html I'm happy to pay you for your work. Larsbrinkhoff (talk) 06:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Windows 3.0 logo (print).svg edit

 
File:Windows 3.0 logo (print).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Артём 13327 (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Windows 3.0 logo (print) with wordmark.svg edit

 
File:Windows 3.0 logo (print) with wordmark.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Артём 13327 (talk) 18:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:MarkLogic logo.svg edit

Copyright status: File:MarkLogic logo.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MarkLogic logo.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Newton, Inc. logo.svg edit

Copyright status: File:Newton, Inc. logo.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Newton, Inc. logo.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Pontiac 'Pointer'.svg edit

Harmonizing categories is forbidden; Criterion #4 is dedicated only for sets (one subject, one day, one author), one photo divided into many parts (Thames 1/100; Thames 2/100, etc.), Wikisource's books or for templates (BSicon and others). In such a case you can use Criterion #2 (meaningless name) or #3 (error, mistake). Wieralee (talk) 07:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Gw2k 2004 logo.svg edit

 
File:Gw2k 2004 logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:PC Partner logo.svg edit

 
File:PC Partner logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

plicit 00:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:NEC PC-8801 - 28416963104.jpg edit

 
File:NEC PC-8801 - 28416963104.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 08:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, why have you changed the logo colors? The logo was on commons, why changing it? Datsofelija (talk) 06:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Datsofelija: All primary sources that I could find (archives of the Fyre Festival website, flyers, social media accounts etc.) show the logo in black and white only. I'm pretty sure the orange zigzag of that upload was made up by a third party. DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi! I am the former "Comrade-yutyo" guy. Do you know the name of the font used in OS/2 logo? VectorVoyager (talk) 08:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@VectorVoyager: Obstensibly it's Helvetica (Neue) Condensed Bold, but no foundry's version of that font matched the countours of the actual letterforms used on the OS/2 box, so I traced the letterforms from scratch. I've searched high and low through PDFs and PostScript files on Google, Archive.org, and Discmaster.textfiles.com (RIP) for an official vector copy of the logo to no avail. If you could find it, you have my sincerest gratitude. DigitalIceAge (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Acer 6311-KW box top.jpeg edit

 
File:Acer 6311-KW box top.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:PACKAGE
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 08:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

IBM Quantum System Two.svg edit

Hi. I want to get advice from you regarding metallic background for vector recreations. I used gradient in File:IBM Quantum System Two.svg, attempting to replicate the metallic texture in the original product. I ask you because your File:IBM Personal Computer badge recreation.svg is used in restorations. VectorVoyager (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

"I ask you because your File:IBM Personal Computer badge recreation.svg is used in restorations". Wow, is it really?! I'd like to see those restorations.
Here is the YouTube tutorial I used to create the brushed metal effect in Inkscape. It's essentially a modified "Film Grain" complex filter (Filter > Image Effects > Film Grain) with the x parameter of the Turbuluence filter set to around 0.025 or so and the K1 and K3 parameters of the Composition filter set to around 0.1 or so. This creates a relatively realistic brushed metal effect over a subltle gradient like yours. Hope this helps! DigitalIceAge (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, my memory failed me. I disremembered restoration video of IBM PCjr made by 8-Bit Guy. But I have seen your vectorization works being used in many YT videos. Thanks for the tips! I also use Inkscape so its very useful.--VectorVoyager (talk) 10:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Microsoft Windows 98 logo with wordmark.svg edit

 
File:Microsoft Windows 98 logo with wordmark.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teksjag (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply