Hi Dims, you want to delete two of your pictures. Please give a reasen for deletion. Image:Ruskealskie vodopady 2.JPG and Image:Ruskealskie vodopady 1.JPG. Thank you -- Breezie 18:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Because I've add them accidentally while trying to make my links work. Identical ones exist under names Image:Ruskealskie_vodopady_1.jpeg and Image:Ruskealskie_vodopady_2.jpeg. Dims 22:24, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Page/Categories edit

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please don't forget to add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example Moscow, Category:Moscow.

EugeneZelenko 18:12, 1 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Привет! Я просто не совсем понимаю, как нужно категоризировать. Категории должны быть на английском языке? Если "да", то как же многоязычность? Как подписывать картинки? На русском или на английском? Спасибо. Dims 04:28, 5 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Категории только по-английски. Перед тем, как изобретать новые, желательно внимательно рассмотреть уже существующие, может они уже давно существуют :-). Описание изображений лучше на всех известных Вам языках. Существуют специальные шаблоны для обозначения языка. Например: Template:English, Template:Русский. --EugeneZelenko 04:36, 5 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Тогда предлагаю усовершенствование. Почему не сделать так, чтобы, зайдя в некоторую категорию, можно было бы грузить картинку прямо в неё? А то приходится открывать несолько окон и не очень удобно, плюс ещё сервер медленно работает. Кроме того, нет кнопки "категория" на основной странице закачки, приходится два раза заходить. Dims 16:16, 8 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Некоторые возражения :-) Во-первых до сих пор нет единства в мнении, куда заносить изображения: в страницы или категории. Во-вторых изображение может добавляться в несколько страниц/категорий одновременно.
Моя рекомендация - потратить некоторое время на изучение существующей структуры страниц/категорий и действовать потом по обстоятельствам. --EugeneZelenko 17:57, 8 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image:SolarClockSolovki.jpg edit

Correct tag is PD-user, not PD-User. Please use templates {{English}}, {{Русский}} instead of plain en:, ru:. --EugeneZelenko 13:53, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

NASA Images edit

Please use {{PD-USGov-NASA}} tag for NASA images. --EugeneZelenko 02:20, 5 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Many-worlds-bloch.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Many-worlds-bloch.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Koernerbroetchen 20:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Dims!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--gildemax 13:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Viainemiainen.jpeg edit

 
File:Viainemiainen.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--A333 (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Ministry_of_foreign_affairs_building_Moscow.jpg edit

 
File:Ministry_of_foreign_affairs_building_Moscow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 10:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:MemorialToJuriDolgoruky.jpeg edit

 
File:MemorialToJuriDolgoruky.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Millennium simulation - galaxies.jpg edit

 
File:Millennium simulation - galaxies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huntster (t @ c) 18:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:ChemicalAbundance.png edit

 
File:ChemicalAbundance.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Perpetuum1.png edit

There seems to be no reason for the arm at "2 o'clock" to be in the position as in your illustration, the wheel would have to rotate more before the arm and wright's center of gravity would be to the right of the hinge.


My edit of your image can be seen at:


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Perpetuum1Edit.png

GregorDS (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

20:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)