User talk:Dmitry Ivanov/Archives/VI

This user has uploaded 8 valued images to Wikimedia Commons.

2015

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rostokino Aqueduct.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, it's a beautiful structure and this could be useful. DeFacto (talk) 13:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Façade hoists.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Picture is good, but there are pages on Wikipedia which photos could be used. Othervise lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Comment 1) The image was geocoded. 2) Though the topic of façade hoists/suspended scaffolds has the notability, currently there were no articles devoted to this topic in English and Russian wikipedias, and, may be, in German Wikipedia (here I’m not quite sure, for my German is very bad). Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 16:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC).

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavilions of VDNKh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavilions of VDNKh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Military uniforms of the Russian Federation, summer uniform of the Kremlin Regiment..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Fine photo. But I am not sure that it is ceremonial uniform. On a photo a summer uniform of the military personnel of a regiment. На фото летняя форма одежды военнослужащих полка[1]. Церемониальная выглядит иначе:[2], [3]. --KSK (talk) 06:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Military uniforms of the Russian Federation, the ceremonial uniform of the Federal Protective Service of the Russian Federation. to Military uniforms of the Russian Federation, the uniform of the Kremlin Regiment, the summer uniform for the service at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. --Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 16:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment The scope is too specific. May I suggest "Summer uniform of the Russian Federation Army, Kremlin Regiment". The reference to the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier does not add anything to the scope - please see the comments here about the words "... in a bowl". Martinvl (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

@Martinvl. Good suggestion.  Support --KSK (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

@KSK: . When you wrote "Support", did you support my suggestion that the scope should be changed or did you support the nomination as it is now? Martinvl (talk) 06:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

@Martinvl: . First of all, I vote for your suggestion on changing the scope. If scope will be changed as you suggested, I'll support the nomination. I apologize for any ambiguity.--KSK (talk) 13:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Change of status to supported prematurely. I will support the nomination only under certain conditions, see above. --KSK (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Military uniforms of the Russian Federation, the uniform of the Kremlin Regiment, the summer uniform for the service at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. to Military uniforms of the Russian Federation, summer uniform of the Kremlin Regiment -- Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Comment The scope "Military uniforms of the Russian Federation..." instead "Uniform of the Russian Federation Army...", proposed by Martinvl, seems to be more preferable for 1) the official name of the Russian Federation Army is the Ground Forces of the Russian Federation if we are talking about the Russian land forces or the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation if the matter is the armed forces in whole; there is no structure with the official name "Russian Federation Army"; 2) the Kremlin Regiment as a unit of the Federal Protective Service is not a part of the Russian Federation Army/Ground Forces/Armed Forces. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support, best in scope. --KSK (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

2016

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavilions of VDNKh, Pavilion No. 35 Tobacco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, it is a good image, but with so many pavilions I think we need a narrower scope - to cover just this one. DeFacto (talk). 11:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
• ----

Scope changed from Pavilions of VDNKh to Pavilions of VDNKh, Pavilion No. 35 Tobacco --Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 13:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support, perfect now, and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 14:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavilions of the VDNKh, Pavilion No. 59 Cereals.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)