Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ehud Amir!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:1890 gustav ermann kaiser soldier saarbrucken Germany.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1890 gustav ermann kaiser soldier saarbrucken Germany.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

the photo was taken at 1890. if the creator lived even 50 years later, it's sill over 70 years since hid death.
a clarification: this is a family photo. the man in the photo is my grand-grand-dad, gustav ermann. he was a soldier at the end of the 19th century at the german kaiser's army, wilhelm the 2nd. he survived the holocaust. 2 of his 3 sons were murdered in auschwitz. he passed away at ca. 1956 in jerusalem.
as i said, the photo is in our family albums and it survived the holocaust because it was sent to trieste in italy at 1939 when my geandpa and grandma escaped germany. they sent the albums to trieste and the albums were there until they survived the holocaust, running for their lives thru belgium, france and finally switzerland, where, in a sort of a refugee camp for jews, my mother was born.
then, in 1949, they (with the 75 years old gustav ermann) took the albums from trieste and immegrated to israel. that's how the photo survived the nazis and got to israel.
i have no idea who took the photo in saarbrucken in ca. 1890, 125 years ago. if my description here is not enough you can delete it. i thought copyrights are null after 70 years. now i see that 125 years is not enough. ok. i don't argue with the law that forbids uploading a 125 years old photo that no one knows who created it and whose creator is dead for at least 80 years. a law is a law.

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for letting me know. I visited the pages that you've mentioned and made a remark there. Ehud Amir (talk) 19:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Binksternet (talk) 23:17, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to you I've learned a bit about US copyrights laws. Thank you. Ehud Amir (talk) 06:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


File:Please delete - mistaken upload.jpg edit

Jahobr (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it should be deleted. It's a good photo of a tree planted at Yad Vashem in honor of a W:Righteous Among the Nations. Ehud Amir (talk) 06:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Please delete - mistaken upload.jpg edit

 
File:Please delete - mistaken upload.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:סמדר רייספלד.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:סמדר רייספלד.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

-- Geagea (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

עברית: שלום Geagea,

סמדר רייספלד שלחה לי את התמונה וביקשה שאעלה אותה לויקיפדיה. עזרתי לחברה, זה הכל. לא ציפיתי להודעת מחיקה. בכל אופן, פניתי אליה וביקשתי שתשלח את אישורה ל-
permissions-he@wikimedia.org.
בברכה,
Ehud Amir (talk) 06:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

תודה. אם אתה מעלה קובץ שאתה לא צילמת אותו אזיי זה מצריך אישור OTRS מבעל זכויות היוצרים. קובץ כזה ללא אישור היה מועמד במוקדם או במאוחר למחיקה. עדיף במוקדם כדי שיהיה אפשר לדאוג לאישור. קיבלתי את הפנייה של סמדר וזה בתהליך אישור. 12:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
תודה רבה על עזרתך ועל הסבלנות. קשה הדרך בנבכי האישורים בוויקימדיה   LikeEhud Amir (talk) 12:33, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Berlinski klosova.png edit

Copyright status: File:Berlinski klosova.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Berlinski klosova.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is a family document. It is a certificate given by the managers of the Klosova (Klesow) Jewish pioneers working camp (Hachshara Chalutzit) to my grandfather in 1925. All the creators of the document are dead for almost a century. No copyrights issue exists, therefore. Ehud Amir (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open! edit

 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Nazi passport of leo ermann 01.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Nazi passport of leo ermann 01.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nazi passport of leo ermann 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:אלכס דנציג חטוף.jpg edit

 
File:אלכס דנציג חטוף.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

OK, Delete it. 2A0D:6FC7:337:8467:978:5634:1232:5476 07:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

OK, Delete it. Ehud Amir (talk) 19:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply