Last modified on 30 November 2014, at 10:18

User talk:Eugene a

File:3 Maestro dell'Osservanza. Crucifixion. 1440-44, Kiew, Khanenko Museum.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove warningsEdit

العربية | Català | Deutsch | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−

Dialog-warning.svg Hello. This is a reminder for you to not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page without adressing the issues you received these warnings for. Please read Commons:Licensing if you have received these warnings for copyright issues. Note that removing warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the talk page's history.

You are welcome to archive your talk page. You can have this done automatically for you - simply place {{subst:User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details).


Если это МОЯ страница, то почему я не могу делать на ней то, что сочту нужным. А если это ВАША страница, то при чём тут я вообще? Ещё одна вики-заморочка лишенная всякой логики.


Здравствуйте! Заметил, что вы размещаете изображения на тему: итальянская живопись Возрождения. Может быть, у вас есть возможность показать какие-либо портреты правителей Италии этого периода. В отличном качестве. Заранее спасибо. --IgorSokol (talk) 19:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Song Huizong two finches.jpgEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Song Huizong two finches.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 23:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright requestEdit

Dear Eugene,

First of all, I just wanted to say thank you for your work in making pictures available on Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to use one of your photos in a publication I am working on at the moment, and since it will be produced by a charity organization my royalties are not large (and would quickly be swallowed up if I had to pay for images).

My publisher, however, has requested that I confirm with you that you are willing to give me permission to use the following:,_nativit%C3%A0_tra_i_profeti_isaia_e_giobbe.jpg

Are you fine with this? If so, could you please email me at

Once again, thanks for your work and I look forward to hearing back from you.

All the best,

Dr Aaron Chalmers

  • Dear Dr. Chalmers

I see no reason to refuse your request. Please use this picture as much as you need.

Eugene A

File:1 Alberto Sotio. Crucifix. 1187. Spoleto, Cattedrale di S. Maria Assunta..jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1 Alberto Sotio. Crucifix. 1187. Spoleto, Cattedrale di S. Maria Assunta..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 16:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


this is not York scan. What is the source?

Is this the York scan? You never specified a new source... I nominated it as a FP but I have too withdraw it because to clarify the source. --Hafspajen 22:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Find Alt, but still.. would be nice to update source - it is not a York scan. --Hafspajen 00:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

  • If, instead of the good files you like bad, do what you think is necessary. I do not care.

No, you don't understand. I LIKE THIS: but if you nominate for Wikipedia:Featured pictures, - you have to have SOURCE. I don't like York scan. But this file is NOT the York scan, it is something else. I ask, what is that? what is the source of this nice picture. Because it is not York scan. --Hafspajen 17:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

This is the YorK file, 2,024 × 2,671 (406 KB) This is bad.
This is Eugene's file, very good. 3,121 × 4,226 (2.99 MB), best version, yes. - but it is NOT a York scan as the description say. Do you remember YOUR SOURCE, Eugene? What museum, what place, what file address. --Hafspajen 17:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Eugene a".