FMSky

Deletion messages

You are getting messages about deletions because you either modified or uploaded an image that has been tagged for deletion. In the case of File:Nataliadpg8 (cropped).jpg, and File:Natalia (Belgian singer).jpg, these are images that you cropped from another image. You are the uploader of these images because it looks like you used the crop tool to crop and upload these as new images. The original image was a copyright violation, and so the cropped images you created need to also be deleted because the original uploader provided a false license. -- Whpq (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Presidential portraits

Please do not tag obviously old paintings (such as File:Presidential portrait of Franklin Pierce.jpg) as copyvio, even if the copyright tag is incorrect. Instead, you are welcome to replace the copyright tag with the correct one. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

The two versions of File:Syafiq Kyle for ReChannel.jpg

In this edit you wrote "This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of: File:Syafiq Kyle for ReChannel, stretched.jpg There should be only one exact copy of a file. After replacing all instances with the preferred file, this file will be speedily deleted." Please look again.

• 
  File:Syafiq Kyle for ReChannel, stretched.jpg
• 
  File:Syafiq Kyle for ReChannel.jpg

I humbly propose these are not exact duplicates. The second is the original, while the first is my edit to it because as far as I know, Syafiq Kyle is not wider than he is tall, so I stretched it upwards a bit, to my best guess. --GRuban (talk) 19:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Yamla from the English Wikipedia

Yamla is Maximo from website Gonoodle SinLu22 (user) (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bruce G. Blowers (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bruce G. Blowers (cropped).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bruce G. Blowers (cropped).jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Explicit.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 23:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Question about File:Yoshihiko Noda 20110902.jpg

Hello. I have some questions about File:Yoshihiko Noda 20110902.jpg and relevant file. You have reverted the file at Special:Diff/786904442 ("former") and Special:Diff/786904368 ("latter"). Regarding the former, you left a comment "better before"; I cannot grasp how this is better than before. I have reverted to the "03:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)" version because it was uploaded first as new version, which had the same resolution as the previous one had, and I thought it was the closest portrait to the original. To me, those files' differences seem to be just subtle different colours and the file size. Could you explain what improvements you have made to that image? Regarding the latter, basically, my point is the same as the former, but I have another point to make. Japanese Wikipedia uses such cropped portraits on pages like ja:内閣総理大臣の一覧. On this page, as is customary, about 3:4 cropped images are used for portraits of post-WW2 prime ministers. Therefore, I wanted to standardise the aspect ratio of the images, but the current File:Yoshihiko Noda 20110902 (cropped).jpg is 730 × 1011 and not 3:4. So please understand that the image should be in that ratio. Thank you. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 08:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, i just thought the colors looked more natural but its really not that important to me, so go ahead and revert it again if you like --FMSky (talk) 08:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt response to my question. I am sorry for bothering you. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 08:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ronaldo Oliviera (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ronaldo Oliviera (cropped).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ronaldo Oliviera (cropped).jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Adeletron 3030.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Harvey-mason-jr-interview (cropped).jpg

File:Harvey-mason-jr-interview (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : A1Cafel.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Paolo Maldini 1994 (cropped).jpg

File:Paolo Maldini 1994 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : IagoQnsi.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Joe Rogan 2021.jpg

File:Joe Rogan 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JamesTheLaptop.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 13:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Crop

Please take a look at your Willie Nelson crop and at the current version of the original in Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 11:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:DJ Envy (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:DJ Envy (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DJ Envy (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Reppop.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Vlade Divac 1990 (cropped).jpg

File:Vlade Divac 1990 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Günther Frager.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:PRZ-002276 (4462890465).jpg

File:PRZ-002276 (4462890465).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 20:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Luke Wilson.jpg

Hello FM -- Do you have another, better, source for this file? Your new upload has higher resolution than the previous versions, but the contrast is too extreme. The highlights of the new version are blown and the eyes almost disappear into the shadows of the eye sockets. All things considered, I think the lower res version may be the more satisfactory image. -- WikiPedant (talk) 07:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

@WikiPedant: Hi, no i looked all over the place, this was the only one i could find. i still think its an improvement over the tiny original. i already tried to tweak the contrast a bit but this is the best i was able to do. maybe you could give it a try, i got the file from here https://i.pinimg.com/originals/2b/fe/47/2bfe47f86efd4160cdaadc6dcca0ca8b.jpg FMSky (talk) 21:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, FM. I downloaded the original file. I'm not sure how much can be done with it; you can't really recover detail that just isn't there any more. But I'm curious and will take a run at it. May not get to it until after Christmas. Regards -- WikiPedant (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

OK, I took a run at it. Comparing the original web version to the one you uploaded here, I can see that you did improve it significantly with your contrast adjustment. I dialled the overall contrast down a little more and dialled down the saturation which IMO was contributing to the contrastiness (or, contrasty-nastiness) too. Then I added a pinch of black back to some of the blacks. And I also did some extra work on those deep, dark eye sockets. I didn't replace your cropped version. Just decide for yourself if you approve of my full-size version and go from there. (I will not be the least bit offended if you decide to revert it.) Best -- WikiPedant (talk) 04:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes looks pretty good, the eyes are a lot better visible now. I think this version should be a improvement now over the small original FMSky (talk) 10:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

I agree. When I was working on it, I realized that the difference in resolution between your upload and the small previous version was even more pronounced than I had thought. You can really see it, for example, in a magnified view of the dial of his watch. Nice work! It was good working with you on this. Thanks for the opportunity. -- WikiPedant (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Steven-Wilson (cropped).jpg

File:Steven-Wilson (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: no evidence of licence at source Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mewhen123.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Misty Mundae Random Fan (cropped).jpg

File:Misty Mundae Random Fan (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Trade.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 04:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Celldweller (cropped).jpg

File:Celldweller (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JamesTheLaptop.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)