Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Flanders!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

File:Robertomagi.jpg edit

 
File:Robertomagi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 11:18, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Robertomagi2.jpg edit

 
File:Robertomagi2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 11:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyrights of photos edit

I've noticed that you have problems with an Administrator regarding a perssonel photo (Roberto Magi) and I'm also having problems with him. (file Simas.jpg). I realized the the administrator his completely ignorant regarding copyright laws.

In Portugal (And in the european union and in the countries that undersign the Bern Convention) the rule of law, regarding photos stands like this:

The below mentioned articles are from the code of copyright and related rights, Decree-Law No. 63/85 of March 14, and amended by Laws 45/85 of 17 September and 114/91 of September 3, Decree-Law No. 332/97 and 334/97 , both of Nov. 27, and by Laws 50/2004, of August 24, 24/2006 of June 30, and 16/2008 of April 1) and international (Bern Convention and the Universal Copyright Convention, 1886, 1952, revised 1971). and has to be enforced in all Countries that undersigned international treaty.
Section VIII - THE PHOTOGRAPHIC WORK
Article 164 - Conditions for protection
1 - For the a photo to be protected is necessary that the choice of their subject or the manner of their execution can be considered as a personnel artistic creation of its author.
2 - Do not apply the provisions of this section to photographs of writings, documents, business papers, technical drawings and things alike.
3 – Are considered to be photo frames of cinema films.
Article 165 - The rights of the author of a photographic work
1 - The author of the photographic work has the exclusive right to reproduce, broadcast and put on sale with the restrictions concerning exhibition, reproduction and sale of portraits and subject to the copyright of a work reproduced in relation to photographs of works of art.
2 - If the picture is made in implementation of a contract of employment or on commission, it is assumed that the right referred to in this article belongs to the employer or the person who placed the order.
3 - Any person who uses for trade photographic reproduction must pay the author an equitable remuneration.
[…]
Article 167 Mandatory indications
1 - Copies of a photographic work shall include the following:
a) Name of photographer;
b) photographs of works of art, the name of the author of the work photographed.
2 - can only be repressed as abusive to reproduce photographs containing the details above, the author can not, in the absence of such information, require the fees as provided in this Code, unless the photographer to prove bad faith of who made reproduction.
Article 168 - Of the Reproduction of a commissioned photography
1 - Unless otherwise agreed, the photograph of a person, when this photograph to be executed by order, may be published, reproduced, or sent to play by the person photographed or by his heirs or transferees without the consent of the author photographer.
2 - If the photographer's name appears in the original photograph should also be indicated in the reproductions.

Hope this will help you. If by chance you pass on the Simas.jpg page, please put a KEEP on the votation Boni-pt (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

20:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed edit

03:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)