Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Willkommen in Straßburg ! edit

Fotos edit

Servus zusammen, toll wäre es, wenn Ihr bei Euren Aufnahmen noch den Beschreibunsgtext ergänzen würdet. Ich hatte das mal exemplarisch für File:Gallo, Marielle-9971.jpg erledigt. Gute Grüße diba (talk) 08:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Wow! Hut ab für Eure Fotos! Grüße vom Wikiprojekt OWL!
Joe-Tomato (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bätzing-Lichtenthäler,Sabine-0534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tauber, Peter-8785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trittin, Jürgen-0126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strothmann, Lena-0682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strengmann-Kuhn, Wolfgang-0360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albsteiger, Katrin-1825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahr, Ulrike-9287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Müller-Gemmeke, Beate-8912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riesenhuber, Heinz-9904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zimmer, Matthias-0623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerin, Landesbibliothek-6877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerin, Marstall-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerin, Schloss-2-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freudenstein, Astrid-1681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheuer, Andreas-1407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampmann, Christina-9983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßelmann, Britta-1146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulmahn, Edelgard-9482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerin, Altes Palais-9468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Glückwunsch und Danke edit

Hallo, ich wollte euch meine Anerkennung zu eurer Foto-AG und ganz besonders für die Abgeordentenporträts ausdrücken. Und auch dafür danken, dass ihr die Fotos der Allgemeinheit zur Verfügung stellt! --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Schulz, Martin-2047.jpg edit

Hallo Foto-AG,

erstmal vorweg: was ihr da macht ist unterm Strich sehr gut!!!

Ich denke, ihr solltet hier und da den Bildausschnitt mehr im Blick haben. Ich werde als Beispiel gleich eine zugeschnittene Version von File:Schulz, Martin-2047.jpg hochladen (also das Bild überschreiben). Wichtig: das ist nur eine Anregung! Wenn ihr in der AG zu der Überzeugung kommt, das „euer“ Format besser ist, dann könnt ich gerne meinen Edit zurücksetzten. Anderes formuliert: es ist durchaus möglich, das ihr mit eurem Format den allgemeinen Geschmack besser getroffen habt als ich. Guckt es euch einfach mal an ... --Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 20:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

PS zur Info: ich habe das Seitenverhältnis von 2:3 auf 3:4 gewechselt. -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Verwendung Eures Fotos durch die AfD edit

Die AfD hat Euer Bild von Martin Schulz in bearbeiteter Form in einem Facebook-Post verwendet. CC-Lizenz und Name werden zwar angegeben, aber es fehlt der Hinweis, dass das Bild bearbeitet wurde, sowie der Link zur Lizenz. Dies als Hinweis an Euch, da nur der Urheber selbst Rechteverletzungen abmahnen bzw. die Löschung verlangen kann. Viele Grüße, --Nobody perfect (talk) 10:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Manderla, Gisela-9554.jpg edit

 
File:Manderla, Gisela-9554.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Appunto! (talk) 09:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Hirsch, Nadja-9870.jpg edit

 
File:Hirsch, Nadja-9870.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nadda80 (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senyszyn, Joanna-2405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serhii, Koba-2437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kozlowski, Jan-9860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nevedalová, Katarina-2417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handzlik, Malgorzata-1763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klute, Jürgen-2066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sehnalová, Olga-2526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bratkowski, Arkdiusz Tomasz-1775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PetarM 17:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skrzydlewska, Joanna Katarzyna-1599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thun und Hohenstein, Róza Gräfin von-2304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalinowski, Jaroslaw-2504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olejniczak, Wojciech Micha-9530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Záborská, Anna-2569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wlosowicz, Jacek-2383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply