Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Franzi-45!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Kirche-innen001.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Kirche-innen001.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kirche-innen001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lizenz/Urheber edit

Bitte für die Dateien File:Kircheninventar.jpg, File:Gemälde-Schellenberg-Zwiebelturm.jpg, File:Kirche-Neubau.jpg und File:Kirche-alt002.jpg die entsprechenden Angaben für Urheber und Herkunft ergänzen und eine entsprechende Lizenz auswählen! --Luitold (talk) 07:25, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

URV edit

Bitte für die heute hochgeladenen Bilder Bob/Angerer die Genehmigung der jeweiligen Urheber nachreichen! --Luitold (talk) 07:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:ANGERER Karl, Bobpilot.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ANGERER Karl, Bobpilot.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ANGERER Karl, Bobpilot.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Luitold.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bitte Richtlinien beachten edit

So geht das nicht!

  • Du kannst nur Dateien zweifelsfrei als eigenes Werk kennzeichnen, die Du auch selbst fotografiert hast UND für die es nicht andere Urheberrechte zu beachten gilt!
  • Innenaufnahmen von Gebäuden (auch öffentliche oder "halbwegs öffentliche" wie Kirchen) müssen vom jeweiligen Rechteinhaber genehmigt werden, bevor Du diese veröffentlichen darfst. Leider reicht nicht: "Der Mesner/Pfarrer hat gesagt, das paßt schon". Im konkreten Fall sollten solche Aufnahmen durch das Erzbischöfliche Ordinariat als Grundbesitzer schriftlich genehmigt werden!
  • Außenaufnahmen von öffentlichem Grund aus (Straße etc.) sind (FOP/Panoramafreiheit) sind i.d.R. unbedenklich, laut jüngerer Rechtsauffassung evtl. auch aus der Luft.
  • Wenn es ein Problem mit einer Datei gibt, bitte diese Probleme beheben und nicht noch mehr Probleme verursachen, indem man die gleiche Datei mit neuem Namen und NOCH mehr Baustellen in Sachen Ersteller/Urheber hochlädt!
  • Bitte aussagekräftige Dateinamen verwenden! Dateien wie File:Kirche-Neubau.jpg können so definitiv nicht bleiben, das trifft auf Millionen Kirchen zu. Zweckmäßig ist es, den Klarnamen der Kirche und den Ort im Dateinamen zu erwähnen. Leer- und einige Sonderzeichen und Umlaute sind möglich. In dem Falle also z.B. Marktschellenberg Nikolauskirche Neubau 01.jpg oder Nikolauskirche Marktschellenberg Neubau.jpg.
  • WICHTIG ist es auch, die Dateien gleich in die passenden Kategorien einzusortieren. In dem Fall MINDESTENS die Kategorie Marktschellenberg, aber im zweiten Schritt gehören diese Dateien in eine passende Unterkategorie. Bei Bedarf anlegen und BITTE vorher bitte andere Kategorien als Vorlage nehmen!

mfg --Luitold (talk) 15:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nochmal zur Ergänzung: Für Innenaufnahmen etc. benötigt man meist die Genehmigung des Grundbesitzers o.ä.
Für die Reproduktion bestehender Werke (z.B. Bilder) gibt es entsprechende Richtlinien, die bei einer Veröffentlichung zu beachten sind. Genaueres steht hier in der Hilfe. Grob gilt aber: Weder das Salzbergwerk noch das Pfarrbüro können eine Veröffentlichung genehmigen, das kann nur der Urheber, der zudem namentlich genannt werden muß. Nach dem Tod des Urhebers gibt es entsprechende Grenzen (70/100) für den Ablauf der Schutzfrist. Ansonsten benötigt man die Genehmigung des Rechtsnachfolgers (Erbe/n). --Luitold (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Akzeptiert edit

Ja mei, dann lass mas guad sei. Iss halt so. Schöne Griaß, Franzi-45 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franzi-45 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ja mei, es gibt eben gesetzliche Vorschriften und WP-Richtlinien, an die wir uns alle halten müssen. --Luitold (talk) 08:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Bobpilot Karl Angerer.jpg edit

 
File:Bobpilot Karl Angerer.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Luitold.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schellenberg-Friedhof001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Kunterweg-Altar von der Empore.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Kunterweg-Altar von der Empore.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kunterweg-Altar von der Empore.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Kirchengeschichte001.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Kirchengeschichte001.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kirchengeschichte001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Kirchengeschichte001.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kirchengeschichte001.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 23:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Blick zum Altar, Seitenwände mit Skulpturen und Gemälden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply