Gb89.2

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gb89.2!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:59, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Joseph Mills FGR2018-19.jpg

File:Joseph Mills FGR2018-19.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Vegetable TALK 09:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:R reid FGR2019.png

File:R reid FGR2019.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.thetrafficseo.com/gloucestershire-news/reuben-reid-cheltenham-town-sign-forest-green-striker-on-free/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:18, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Joseph Mills FGR.png

File:Joseph Mills FGR.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.metro.news/joseph-mills-has-wembley-in-his-sights/1542524/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Davidson malam.png

File:Davidson malam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Melquíades (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SimbaFC stemma.png

Copyright status: File:SimbaFC stemma.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SimbaFC stemma.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 07:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

File:SimbaFC stemma.png

File:SimbaFC stemma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Villarroya ubicación.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Villarroya ubicación.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

And also:

• File:Burgos ubicación in Spain.png
• File:Burgos ubicación.png

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Nathan Baxter Yeovil.png

File:Nathan Baxter Yeovil.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:AdamCliffordSmith.jpg

Copyright status: File:AdamCliffordSmith.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:AdamCliffordSmith.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

File:FGR stemma.png

File:FGR stemma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

And also:

• File:Llanfairpwll FC.png
• File:Logo FGR V.png

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marcus Tavernier.jpg

Copyright status: File:Marcus Tavernier.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marcus Tavernier.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mo Eisa.jpg

Copyright status: File:Mo Eisa.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mo Eisa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nihad islamovic odderIGF.jpg

Copyright status: File:Nihad islamovic odderIGF.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nihad islamovic odderIGF.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Odder IFG stemma.png

Yours sincerely, JuTa 09:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Odder IFG stemma.png

File:Odder IFG stemma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:2020 year gold.jpg

File:2020 year gold.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:La Bombonera BOCA 12.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La Bombonera BOCA 12.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:La Bombonera BOCA 12.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Hallstatt air.jpg

File:Hallstatt air.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Vuoto.png

File:Vuoto.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bosnia mappa.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bosnia mappa.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Lord Belbury (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Kepler-442.jpg

File:Kepler-442.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 02:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Arcb-0136.jpg

File:Arcb-0136.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre cb (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Gb89 - could you add some details of the location where you took File:Albe-0011.jpg, please? It would make the photo much more useful. Grazie! - MPF (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

@MPF: Done! Hope it'll be more useful! --Gb89.2 (talk) 07:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Molto grazie! - MPF (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Misiliscemi-Stemma.svg

File:Misiliscemi-Stemma.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antonio1952 (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Categorie stemmi

Ciao, sto vedendo il grande lavoro che stai facendo sugli stemmi. Complimenti e grazie! Ti volevo segnalare che potresti aggiungere più categorie per i file, in modo da 1) poter tenere traccia degli stemmi per provincia e 2) per usare categorie di servizio che usano il riuso.

Per esempio: va aggiunta anche la categoria Coats of arms of the province of XXX oltre a quelle relative alle figure araldiche utilizzate. Vedo che l'hai fatto per Talamona-Stemma.svg, ma non per San Michele al Tagliamento-Stemma.svg ad esempio.

Siccome sto facendo, nel mio piccolo, lo stesso lavoro tuo di rifare gli stemmi non liberi presenti su it.wiki, queste categorie mi aiuterebbero a sincronizzarmi col tuo lavoro. Grazie! --Ruthven (msg) 19:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Ruthven: ok, grazie delle dritte! Provvederò a categorizzare le varie immagini. Se c'è qualche altro problema, avvisami pure! --Gb89.2 (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Stemma del Comune di Napoli

Caro Gb89.2, ho notato il tuo lavoro sullo Stemma di Napoli (). Purtoppo ci sono delle discrasie ed errori rispetto allo Stemma in uso, che è invece così: . Andiamo in ordine...:

1. nello scudo ci sono 2 grazie aguzze sulla sommità;
2. la corona in uso non è quella ufficialmente definita, oggi, dalla normativa italiana di Città (Articolo 43 del Regolamento Tecnico Araldico del Regio Decreto n° 234 del 13 aprile 1905; Articolo 96 del Regio Decreto n° 652 del 7 giugno 1943 e Articolo 5 del Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri del 28 gennaio 2011: "corona turrita, formata da un cerchio d'oro aperto da otto pusterle (cinque visibili) con due cordonate a muro sui margini, sostenente otto torri (cinque visibili), riunite da cortine di muro, il tutto d'oro e murato di nero"), ma è quella assegnata con l'Articolo 12 delle Massime e Deliberazioni della Consulta Araldica del Regno del 4 maggio 1870, una corona turrita così definita: "un cerchio di muro aperto da quattro porte e quattro finestre semi-circolari, sostenente otto torri merlate, il tutto d'oro; le torri unite da muriccioli d'argento, ciascuno con una guardiola d'oro.". C'è da dire che almeno dal 1488 fino al 1866 la corona era di tipo ducale, e che dal 1866 al 1870 ebbe una torre al posto della detta corona ducale. Dal 1870 ad oggi 2022, pur essendoci state altre normative (1905, 1943, 2011) sulle corone di Città, esse non sortirono alcun effetto su quella (1870) utilizzata a Napoli, anzi quello stemma (versione 1870) fu confermato nel 2005 con la realizzazione del logo della Città;
3. con lo stemma del 1866 e con quello del 1870 (che dura fin'oggi) non c'è stata mai stato un elemento decorativo vegetale (serti di quercia ed alloro o altre essenze come olivo, palme, etc.).

Sarebbe bello, ed il caso, che si utilizzasse il vero stemma della Città di Napoli (ufficiale dal 1870 ad oggi) e non uno che ha elementi sia di fantasia sia legislativamente errati. Grazie --Delehaye (talk) 22:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Ciao @Delehaye: , grazie per avermelo fatto notare! Ora come ora io sono impegnato, e non riuscirei a creare un nuovo stemma. Potresti magari chiederlo ai Wikigrafici oppure portare questa discussione su quella del progetto araldica, dato che non è solo lo stemma di Napoli che presenta questo problema. Si potrebbe anche usare la versione raster, ma ti consiglio comunque di chiedere. --Gb89.II ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 08:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Vodka rove.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Vodka rove.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Bandiera di Monza

Ciao, mi sono reso conto di aver caricato l'immagine della banidera di Monza in modo sbagliato, ora ho sovrascritto il file con l'immagine corretta. Porteeti fare la stessa cosa con la tua versione vettoriale svg? Grazie Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

@Giorgio Pallavicini: Fatto, grazie per avermelo fatto notare! --Gb89.II ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 14:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Grazie a te! Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Scusami, tu riusciresti a fare una versione vettoriale svg anche di questo? Grazie anticipatamente Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Ciao nuovamente @Giorgio Pallavicini: , il logo vettoriale è già presente su it.wikipedia (questo). Non so però se sia libero dal copyright, in caso sarebbe meglio esportare il file su Commons (ma non sono proprio ferrato in queste cose, sarebbe meglio chiedere a qualcun altro). --Gb89.II ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 15:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Ciao, l'ho gia esportato io su commons, tu dovresti solo farne una versione vettoriale svg, potresti farmi questo piacere? Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 22:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

@Giorgio Pallavicini: Ricapitolo, il file vettoriale è presente su it.wikipedia (sempre qui). Basta solo andare sulla pagina del logo e cliccare Esporta su Wikimedia Commons (di fianco a modifica, cronologia ecc.). Personalmente, esporterei il file, ma non sono sicuro del fatto che non superi la soglia di originalità (bisognerebbe chiedere a qualcuno che ne sa qualcosa in più).--Gb89.II ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 11:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Ciao scusa ancora, riusciresti a fare una versione svg anche di questa? Scusa per il fastidio che ti arreco Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Ciao, spero di non averti infastidito con le mie richieste, ovviamente queste sono solo proposte che ti faccio perchè sei molto gentile (e più capace di me ;) ). Scusa ancora e grazie per tutto Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 09:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@Giorgio Pallavicini: nessun problema, non mi hai infastidito. Sto avendo un po' di problemi attualmente, dunque mi son dovuto distaccare da wikipedia per un po'. Appena potrò tornare "effettivo" ti farò sapere.--Gb89.II ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 11:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Ciao, com stai? Spero niente di serio. Fammi sapere! 151.36.78.38 18:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Ciao, come vai? Ti sei ripreso? Quando hai tempo riusciresti a creare la versione vettoriale della bandiera di Monza? Grazie Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

@Giorgio Pallavicini: Adesso sto meglio, grazie. Ho caricato il file vettoriale (qui), spero vada bene. --Gb89.II ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 16:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Mi fa piacere sapere che stai meglio. La bandiera è perfetta come sempre. Grazie mille Giorgio Pallavicini (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Few logos needed

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CONCACAF_Caribbean_Shield#

https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung-ss&sca_esv=577336729&sxsrf=AM9HkKk7oRiw8-7LZhUULNeAlyxezEGQ2A:1698453485204&q=CONCACAF+Caribbean+Shield&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjUt5ylwJeCAxWG2qQKHcwKCjEQ0pQJegQICBAB&biw=360&bih=649&dpr=3#imgrc=eEGCh0omqG4ZjM

......

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravshan_Kulob#

https://www.flashscore.com/team/ravshan-kulob/4l0geWLm/

.......

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%BDNK_Neretva

https://hr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datoteka:%C5%BDNK_Neretva.svg#mw-jump-to-license

........

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK_Metkovi%C4%87

https://hr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datoteka:RK_Metkovic_Mehanika.svg#mw-jump-to-license

......

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapfenberg_Bulls

https://www.flashscore.com/team/kapfenberg-bulls/voY5D8E8/

.....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravshan_Kulob#

https://www.flashscore.com/team/ravshan-kulob/4l0geWLm/

.....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSKA_Pamir_Dushanbe

https://www.flashscore.com/team/cska-pomir-dushanbe/WvIEWp21/

..... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.143.67.248 (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Stemma di Castello di Brianza

Ciao, volevo segnalarti un piccolo errore nello stemma Castello di Brianza-Stemma.svg. Confrontando la blasonatura e le immagini del gonfalone sul sito del comune le api andrebbero ordinate 2 e 1 e con ali aperte. Cordialissimi saluti Baseluna014 (talk) 23:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Piantina Reggia di Monza

Ciao, volevo chiederti un favore, se ti mando alcune immagini della piantina della Reggia di Monza di scarsa qualità, tu potresti provare a "sistemarle"? Grazie mille in anticipo e fammi sapere! 151.48.5.227 17:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Centro Valle Intelvi

Ciao, mi sfugge dov'è che lo stemma del suddetto comune File:Centro Valle Intelvi-Stemma.png sia stato rilasciato in cc-by-sa-4.0 / il sito araldicacivica risulta sotto altra licenza, mi chiarisci pf il punto? Vale93b (talk) 08:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@Vale93b: Ciao, io mi ricordo di aver semplicemente caricato in formato .png un file di CHARLIEGOLF1 (originariamente in .jpg), che era sotto licenza cc-by-sa-4.0, che ora è stato cancellato. Se quel file è stato eliminato per un problema di licenza, allora anche quello che ho caricato io dovrebbe essere eliminato, presumo.--Gb89.II ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 14:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@Gb89.2 ah ho capito, CG1 è il webmaster di araldicacivica, ma purtroppo non aveva chiaro che se il suo sito è settato su licenza nc-nd non si possono copincollare i file qui rilasciandoli in cc-by-sa. Vale lo stesso anche per questo (che comunque mi riprometto di vettorializzare asap) Vale93b (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Snowmanonahoe (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Provincia di Milano-Stemma.svg

The red is too light https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Provincia_di_Milano-Stemma.svg#mw-jump-to-license

See https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Province_of_Milan.svg#mw-jump-to-license Fleyzk (talk) 10:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)