GiMa38

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GiMa38!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:COA_archbishop_Hughes_John_Joseph.png edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:COA_archbishop_Hughes_John_Joseph.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GiMa38 (talk) 20:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:COA_archbishop_Kopacsy_Jozsef.png edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:COA_archbishop_Kopacsy_Jozsef.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GiMa38 (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:COA_bishop_SK_Hopko_Vasil.svg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:COA_bishop_SK_Hopko_Vasil.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GiMa38 (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ahoj Szia edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear GiMa38!

I see that you are developing coats of arms in wiki commons mostly of ecclesiastical people of historical Hungarian Kingdom and present Slovakia. I would like to ask you what program do you use for drawing these very good quality pictures? As I don't know what languages do you speak I wrote my request in english, slovak and hungarian.

Milý GiMa!

Ako vidím prispievaš na wiki commons najmä erbami cirkevných hodnostárov z bývalého Uhorského kráľovstva a dnešného Slovenska. Chcel by som sa spýtať aký program používaš na prípravu týchto obrázkov veľmi dobrej kvality? Kedže neviem presne aké reči ovládaš svoju otázku napíšem anglicky, slovensky aj maďarsky.

Kedves GiMa!

Ahogyan látom a wiki commonsban főleg a történelmi Magyar Királyság és a mai Szlovákia területéről származó egyházi személyek címereivel járulsz hozzá. Szeretném megkérdezni, hogy milyen programot használsz ezeknek az igazán jó minőségű képeknek az elkészítéséhez? Mivel nem tudom, milyen nyelveken beszélsz, kérdésemet angolul, szlovákul és magyarul is leírom.

With best regards/S pozdravom/Üdvözlettel

Poganyp (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

COA Bishop Slovakia edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo GiMa, leider spreche ich kein englisch. Die Bischofswappen sind wunderschön, ich habe sie bei Liste der Bischöfe von Košice und den anderen Diözesen, eingebaut. Dort sind aber auch Wappen mit Galero, Quasten, Kreuz und Wahlspruch (Wappenzier) dargestellt. Wenn es dazu passt, habe ich mir erlaubt Dein Wappenschild in die entsprechende Wappenzier zu stellen. Wie steht es jetzt mit dem Urheber? Sollen wir beide als Dateiversionen abspeichern? Beste Grüße--Ekpah (talk) 10:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, GiMa38!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image:COA archbishop US Keough Francis Patrick.png was uncategorized on 12 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:COA cardinal FR Dubois Louis-Ernest.png was uncategorized on 29 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:COA bishop SK Palffy Tamas3.jpg was uncategorized on 13 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:COA bishop HU Batthyany Vilmos.png edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Wiki Loves Monuments in Slovakia edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi GiMa38, I saw, that you have some photos which are showing parts of Cultural Heritage Monuments in Slovakia. It would be very nice, if you can categorize these photos and perhaps also add the info as Heritage monument in Slovakia. (see Template:Cultural Heritage Slovakia) The correct number you can find out in [[:sk:Zoznam kultúrnych pamiatok na Slovensku}} or in adaequate lists in german Wiki de:Denkmalgschützte Objekte in der Slowakei.

In the time till 30. september such photos can partizipate on Wiki Loves Monuments in Slovakia I am very glad, if you can spent us some photos for this worldwide challenge, where Slovakia participate since few days. --many thanks in advance (from Vienna) K@rl (talk) 11:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear GiMa38,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Coats of arms of bishops of Slovakia edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello GiMa38, I have a request for you. Please write your e-mail address at my user talk. I will send you e-mail with further information. Hosmich (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The request is uploading CoAs of Slovak bishops listed here in section "Zahraničie". Four bishops have placeholders instead of CoA. I know CoA of J. V. Adamec, you can redraw it. For other CoAs please find model on your own. Thanks a lot! Hosmich (talk) 16:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:COA bishop SK Hopko Vasil.gif edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:COA bishop SK Hopko Vasil.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hosmich (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Coat of arms of Manfred Scheuer2 edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hola/Hello GiMa38!

Gracias por haber creado el nuevo escudo de monseñor Manfred Scheuer, por suerte el cambio fue para bien, pues su anterior emblema tenia elementos externos en desuso. A tu archivo le hice algunas mejoras, esta optimizado, ahora pesa menos, y mejoré el lema, si esta conforme, puede subirlo.

Online Translation: Thanks for creating the new shield of Bishop Manfred Scheuer, fortunately the change was for the better, as their previous emblem, had external elements into disuse. In your file I made some improvements, is optimized, now it weighs less, and improved the motto, if you agree, you can upload it.

--SajoR (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gracias por la corrección del lema. Nuevo archivo ha sido subido. --GiMa38 (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:COA_bishop_SK_Erdody_Laszlo_Adam.png edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Legyen szíves a címert lecserélni, az Erdődy család címerében nincs 6 ágú csillag ami félre értésre adhat okot. Lásd egy eredeti cimer :https://www.kozterkep.hu/~/26147/Erdody_cimer_Varasd_1705.html#photo-215385 öt ágú csillaggal. Mellesleg nem látok hívatalos linket se arról, hogy honnan szedte a 6 ágú csillagot? Köszönöm! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.3.5.119 (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

6-pointed star is in the armorial deed issued by Rudolph II, see: http://www.hkv.hr/reportae/lj-krinjar/18047-sarkofazi-grofova-erdoedy-u-franjevackom-samostanu-u-klanjcu.html ("štit podijeljen na četiri polja, a u sredini štita je peto polje u kojem je na crvenoj podlozi zlatni jelen koji se propinje iznad polovice crvenog kotača; u gornjem lijevom polju na zlatnoj podlozi je crni orao s raširenim krilima; u donjem desnom polju na zlatnoj podlozi bijela utvrda s kulom s dva prozora; u gornjem desnom i donjem lijevom polju modre boje između dvije valovite srebrne grede su dvije zlatne šesterokrake zvijezdice; iznad štita su tri kacige s krunama, a iz njih se diže desnica s mačem i ruka sa zastavom te u sredini crni orao s raširenim krilima"), see also here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COA_bishop_HU_Erdody_Laszlo_Adam2.jpg and here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COA_bishop_HU_Erdody_Laszlo_Adam4.jpg

--GiMa38 (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Coat of arms of Vlastimil Kročil.svg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Coat of arms of Vlastimil Kročil.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

185.33.137.2 07:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:COA archbishop AT Salm-Salm Wilhelm Florentin.png edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:COA archbishop AT Salm-Salm Wilhelm Florentin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Veverve (talk) 03:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:COA bishop SI Tomazic Ivan Jozef.png edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:COA bishop SI Tomazic Ivan Jozef.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TadejM ^(t/p) 15:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

COA Fuzy Bela : location edit

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Few years ago, you took a picture of COA Fuzy Bela (File:COA Fuzy Bela.jpg). Could you share with me the accurate location of this coat of arm in the city ? I'm not able to find it.

Laszlo (talk) 07:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic