Haabet

User talk:Haabet/Old User_talk:Haabet/Sandbox

PNG

Why are you now uploading grayscale page scans as PNG? It's not really required, and it can create technical problems (See Template_talk:BadGIF). Churchh 14:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes I know this problem, but I have removed the problem.

I give "Gamma" 0, substitute "Gamma" 55 Gamma is 55 on windows(ms) but 0 on linux.haabet 18:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

• 
  Gamma 55
• 
  Gamma 0

Image:LesDessousElegantsMars1912.png and others

Hi Haabet. You did not provide source information for Image:LesDessousElegantsMars1912.png and several other images which you uploaded recently. It is not sufficient to simply tag an image as being in the public domain. You must say where the image came from and who the original copyright holder was.

We (others on Commons) cannot assume that an image is in the public domain simply because it looks old or has an old date on it. For all we know, the image could've been a recent work of art, intended to look old. Please tag all of your images with the appropriate information. Thanks. ~MDD4696 22:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The law follow the internet-server. And the in USA all image from before 1935 is PD-old.haabet 21:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct. The year is actually 1923 for PD-old, but that's not what I'm asking about. I was wondering if you could please provide information on the images themselves, such as who the publisher was or where you obtained the image. It is helpful to provide some information on what the image is, so that others can verify that the image is indeed PD. I do not know anything about your images, and there was nothing on the image description pages to help me learn what they are. ~MDD4696 01:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Why did you remove my comment and call it vandalism? I brought up a valid concern, and I would appreciate it if you would address the issue. What's the problem? ~MDD4696 18:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

because it is vandalism if you remove the Category:Brassiere from a brassiere illustration.

haabet 21:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are talking about... perhaps you've mistaken me for another user? If you look at the history for Image:LesDessousElegantsMars1912.png you'll see that it was never in that category. ~MDD4696 01:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Editing my PNGs

Why are you now editing my previously-uploaded PNGs? You haven't shown conspicuous prowess as an image editor in the past, and you didn't provide an explanation for your actions, and the first one I looked at (Image:1913-Dictates-of-Fashion-Calvert-Life-cartoon.png) was not improved by your editing (compare the hair of the woman standing to left of center in foreground in your version vs. my version to see what I mean), so I just reverted all of them. Churchh 08:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Can you scan the image in a higher resolution?haabet 12:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I scanned it from a library book several years before Wikimedia Commons even existed. At the time, 830x667 seemed quite adequate for a web-page graphic.

I know I've edited a few of your graphics, but it was always for one of two simple reasons: 1) To reduce the size of the image so it will display in the Wikimedia GIF/PNG resizing software (i.e. size of the unthmbnailed image must be reduced below about 3400x3400 pixels), or 2) To change the "ink" color from gray to solid black. In the images you recently edited, I didn't see any such obvious motivations, nor any clear improvement in image quality. If you want to make substantial edits, please upload your new edited version under a different name (as I did with Image:Mercure_des_salons_1830-enh.jpg, Image:Fashion_1796-enh.jpg, and Image:Marie_Antoinette-children-1785-6-Wertmuller.jpg... Churchh 18:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Today I have no time to edit old images, under 6150px. Feel secure.haabet 21:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:LesDessousElegantsMars1910page53cutB.png

What the heck is it? Churchh 16:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Heck? My dictionary do not know that word.haabet 20:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

It's a rather jocular "gosh-shucks" euphemism for "hell", perhaps used more often in America than Britain. "What the heck?" is an interrogation of befuddlement... Churchh 04:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

"befuddlement" My dictionary do not know that word. :-( English is heavily!haabet 12:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

If your dictionary doesn't include the word "befuddle" or "befuddled", then it's time to get a new dictionary... Churchh 13:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:AuBonMarcheCorsetsPage5b.gif

It's interesting, but what year is it from? All I can guess is "probably before 1910"... Churchh 23:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:AuBonMarcheCorsetsPage5.gif It is from 1902, but that type is older.haabet 08:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

OK... Churchh 14:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions

I noticed you've uploaded Image:GrandsMagasinsLaboriePage6.jpg and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used in more than one way. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing! -- Bryan (talk to me) 22:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The image is a parts of a booklet, and have need of the same name as the booklet. haabet 22:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Corset 15th century France.gif

Is that even really a corset? It looks to me like a padded/quilted undergarment whose main function was probably warmth... Churchh 15:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

A corset in that era was a armour, on the body. Corset mean body or body clothing in old French. The image is from a old French encyclopedia. I think the old French encyclopedia is wrong, as the image is a Corselet, and Corset vas a armour of plates. But I am not French as I do not like to change a French encyclopedia about thing of old French subject.18:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Jesus Christ! I'm sorry I misspelled "constrict", but if you had a suitable knowledge of the English language, then you would have easily detected the error, and not been confused by it (especially in the given context: "CORSET... WOMAN'S UNDERGARMENT... constrict ...THE TORSO). Churchh 12:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

translation done

as requested. won't you vote for the picture on Featured candidate page? --Diligent 22:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Tank you. If you put the image on Featured candidate page, i vill vote. But because the [Law] I do't like to put one of my own images on that page.haabet 23:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Unfassbar1891.png

What's the original caption? Churchh 17:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Unfassbar

Tante: ,, . . . Und drei Lieutenants fielen bei dem Angriff!"

Backfisch: ,,O Gott, o Gott! Wie man es nur über's Herz bringen kann, einen Lieutenant zu tödten!!"

(I have hard to read the letters, and she is not a Backfisch. The image is painted before the text is writed)

haabet 17:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

OK, that's a kind of gender-role / social-classd based satire which would be difficult to explain in 21st-century terms... I sympathize with the difficulty of reading Blackletter. Churchh 04:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I just saw your dialogue. I added the translation into English to the image (feel free to improve). Maybe you could also upload the original including the original caption? Just for the interested "reader" (like me ;o)) ... Thanks. --Ibn Battuta 01:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lightship.gif

Hi Haabet, I've seen the pretty picture that you've uploaded. Do you have any further information about it? (source/artist, description/motif, etc.) Thanks in advance, Ibn Battuta 20:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

RE: Category:Photographers_from_unkown_countries

Thank you for your help. If you know who Reutlinger and Stebbing were, you could maybe provide their first names too? Thank you in advance. --G.dallorto 21:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC) (PS remember to alwaus sign your posts, to make it easier to answer you).

All people about 1900 well-known Reutlinger and Stebbing as their first names was not necessary.haabet 00:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Sources

Image:AuBonMarcheCorsetsPage8g.gif

Bonjour,

Il faut donner la source originale. Wikipédia n'est pas une source valable. Cordialement, Yann 10:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello,

The original source is needed. Wikipedia is not a valid source. Regards, Yann 10:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

The source is on this page:

http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Au_Bon_March%C3%A9_%E2%80%94_Corset http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Image:AU_BON_MARCHE_CORSETS.gif

Image:Portraits_of_herMajestyQueenVictorica_and_theDuchess_ofSutherland.png

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 03:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I added tag... Churchh 17:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Children in dark scrub.jpg

That can't be "PD-self" unless you're Kvint, or Kvint signed off copyright to you. Churchh 16:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Jump-rope categories

Why did you create BOTH Category:Skipping rope and Category:Jump rope, when only one was needed? That's like when you created both "Dressmaker's dummy" and "Dress form"... Churchh 17:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Because I do not known the correctly name. The one is English English and the second is American English.haabet 17:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I understand your uncertainty, but adding two new redundant categories at the same time is always the incorrect thing to do... Churchh 17:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Anyway, I added some additional images and categories to Category:Jump rope (partly because that's the name of the article on English Wikipedia), and commented "Skipping rope" as redundant... Churchh 17:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions

I noticed you've uploaded Image:LYS49fungus.JPG and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used in more than one way. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

This also applies to your other images. Yonatanh 23:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

"True life" tight-lacing experiences

I'm afraid that the letters of "true-life" tight-lacing experiences published in Victorian scandal rags could be the Victorian equivalent of the letters detailing "true-life" sexual experiences published in the back of 1970s girlie magazines -- I really wouldn't put too much trust in the veracity of either type of letter (and in both cases, some of the "letters" probably weren't letters from ordinary readers at all, but were pieces of pure hack-fiction commissioned and planted by the editors). I know nothing about the Family Doctor and People's Medical Advisor, but it's very obvious that if the issue price was one penny, then it wasn't a real professional medical publication at all... Churchh 07:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The veracity of The Family Doctor is the Sexual fetishism in The Victorian Era. The letters from The Family Doctor is reprinted often, first reprint about 1890. The tight-lacing is a sexual fantasy. I Think The Family Doctor was a one-man firm. Two of the anonymous writers been married, but how they meet? I think least the one was the editor. haabet 14:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Picture of the Week

A picture that you uploaded entitled Dajak children.jpg has been selected as Picture of the Week on the Portal Indonesia for the Week 3, 2007. Thank you for your contribution to promote images of Indonesia.

Indon 12:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:FestialDressOtaheite1801.jpg

Does that have anything at all to do with traditional Tahitian costume? It looks like a hideous parody of European styles that were already over ten years out-of-date by 1801... Churchh 23:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Cook's Geography, was a serious work. And Tahiti is well-known for big ugly grass skirt. --haabet 23:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I didn't mean "parody" in that sense, but rather Tahitians partially trying to imitate Marie Antoinette court dress (see Image:1778-jeune-dame-de-qualite-en-grande-robe.jpg etc.). I guess they grafted certain hideous features of European fashions onto certain hideous features of native Tahitian traditions... Churchh 14:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

It is a example of parallel evolution in dress.--haabet 16:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:WarnerBrosCoralineCorsets_pageI.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WarnerBrosCoralineCorsets_pageI.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The problem is not the licensing, {{PD-old}}, but the information supplied. Please add all the relevant information, such as where the image came from and when it was created, and if the image is from the web, also the link to the image description page. We need to be able to verify that the PD-old claim is correct. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

---

I left a note on his user talk page which should clear things up... Churchh 21:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:CorsetLeonJulesRAINAL_Freres.png

That's a book published in 1907 outside the U.S. If it were published within the U.S. in 1907, then there would be no question that it was now Public Domain. However, since it wasn't, the general rule which applies is 70 years after the author's death. However, if there's no author listed, then this rule is of course difficult to apply, and it may in fact be a work of collective corporate authorship. So technically you would have to find out what the rules are governing copyright of works with collective corporate authorship. However, in my personal opinion, there should be little real difficulty in using scans from that work on WikiMedia Commons. Churchh 14:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

---

Apparently it is; see: Commons:Village_pump#1916_magazine. Churchh 17:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

"Victorian porno"

That category is poorly-named, and duplicates some better-named categories -- and most of the images you've added to the category are not real pornography. Churchh 23:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

(swearword) If your know those, tell about those. It was pornography in that era. --haabet 09:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Haabet, drawings or caricatures of handsome women coquettishly displaying a well-turned ankle as they get into or out of a carriage, or of men helping handsome buxom women in off-the-shoulder gowns into or out of their outer wraps, are simply not "porno" in any ascertainable meaningful sense. Such illustrations appeared in the pages of moderately respectable magazines which were openly advertised and sold above the counter. Pornography was rather more explicit, and with different and more furtive distribution channels in most cases. Churchh 23:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

chronic backache

hi Haabet

the text corresponding to Image:ChronicBackache1033.png should not go here on commons, but on wikisource, eg en:s:Page:ChronicBackache1033.png

and so on for the other pages...

ThomasV 16:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

On wikisource I have get the opposite instructions!

All the self-imposed bogeys hunt the workmen, on all wikis.

I copy the text to wikisource, when it is finished.

--haabet 16:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:TheLadiessWorldMarch1896page18.gif

That image is pretty funny -- wonder how long silk gloves would last in saltwater! Churchh 20:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

find a mermaid and ask her!

haabet 20:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:The_heay_outline_is_the_tracing_of_the_corseted_woman_the_light_same_without_corsets.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The_heay_outline_is_the_tracing_of_the_corseted_woman_the_light_same_without_corsets.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yuval Y § Chat § 23:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Please tag your images

---

Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you. Yuval Y § Chat § 11:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:10mmSpiralStay2400px-inch.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:10mmSpiralStay2400px-inch.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Padaungfrauen_mit_schwerenMessingringen_umHals_undBeine.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Padaungfrauen_mit_schwerenMessingringen_umHals_undBeine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rotkraut 15:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Categories

Hi Haabet, please be careful of accusing other users of vandalism. If you could take some time to explain your concerns regarding the categorisation of these files to user:Juiced lemon he could be able to help you getting this right. He is very experienced in categorising media files at Commons, and gives good advice. If you disagree even after discussion, you should seek advice from a third party. Thank you, Finn Rindahl 13:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

A book is not a corset

Hello,

The subject of Category:L'éducation Physique Féminine is a book, and this book don't mainly deal with corsets. So, your edit (categorization in Category:Corsets) is irrelevant. Each picture have to be categorized according its own features, and you must assume that every picture in Category:L'éducation Physique Féminine is correctly categorized. A category never inherits features from its contents. --Juiced lemon 16:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I believe JL is correct here, this book-category should be included (as a subcat of) category:Corsets only if the book solely deals with corsets, which appears not to be the case. Corset realted images from this book should therefor be in both Category:L'éducation Physique Féminine AND a relevant corset-category. The edit JL pointed out above will therefore be reverted, but I'll await doing so until you've had a chance to express your opinion on the matter. Regards, Finn Rindahl 17:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:10mmSpiralStay2400px-inch.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:10mmSpiralStay2400px-inch.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cecil 15:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:10mmSpiralStay600px-inch.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:10mmSpiralStay600px-inch.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cecil 15:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:AEgtering.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AEgtering.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Patstuart 20:34, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:AEgtering.gif

Hi, and thanks for your contributions to commons. Could I ask you to provide an English translation on this page? I'm sorry for the hassle; however, I cannot read Danish even a little bit. Thank you. Patstuart 17:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

It is hard to translate a old joke. The woman wake her husband, because she search for her wedding ring. Point is: She have need of the wedding ring to sleep, because is in that era was wrong if a woman as sleep together by a man without a wedding ring. In this groups you can ask for the text and Point, ask for several translation:

http://groups.google.dk/group/dk.kultur.sprog/topics?lnk=srg haabet 20:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

No, that actually works very well. I appreciate the effort; thanks. Patstuart 17:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Sourcing on Image:Barcley custom corsets04 .png e.a.

Hi. Could you please source your uploads a little better? On Image:Barcley custom corsets04 .png you source it A catalogue from 1927. That will be very hard to verify. Please add more detail. Cheers! Siebrand 06:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

It is not possibly to verify when I put old rare catalogues on wikisource, but what can I do?haabet 21:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, you could for example scan the first page and the page with the copyright. Then you can upload those. On your scans from content pages you can refer to those pages and you can clearly identify the page the scanned image was on. Please take responsibility for this. Cheers! Siebrand 13:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:20th_century_Models02.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:20th_century_Models02.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Back_lace_corset3.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Back_lace_corset3.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 10:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove problem tags

---

Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that the page doesn't have enough information about the source of the image and/or doesn't have information about the license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have put back the warning(s). You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you. Siebrand 12:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

you are ridiculously, I have those image as a part of a booklet on wikisource. haabet 12:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop uploading images without a proper source. If you continue, your permission to upload and edit here will be revoked. Cheers! Siebrand 13:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:En_Trædemoelle.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:En_Trædemoelle.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Science_fiction_kloge_aber.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Science_fiction_kloge_aber.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 04:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Warner's55.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Warner's55.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 20:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Press1520.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Press1520.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Science_fiction_city.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Science_fiction_city.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Science_fiction_kloge_aber.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Science_fiction_kloge_aber.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:50, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Warner'sAAA.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Warner'sAAA.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 02:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Warner'sWaistStyle42.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Warner'sWaistStyle42.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 02:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Warner'sLENOX.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Warner'sLENOX.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 02:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Strammer.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Strammer.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 02:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

What's the date and who is the author?, Please? thanks!--OsamaK 15:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Barcley_custom_corsetsB.png etc.

Image:Barcley_custom_corsetsB.png , Image:Barcley_custom_corsetsF.png , Image:Barcley_custom_corsetsT.png , Image:Barcley_custom_corsetsY.png are standard printer's initials, and have nothing specifically to do with corsets. Churchh 02:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Correctly! It is difficult as put book, om en.wikisource.org .-haabet 10:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

What was the source used for these letters? --Mrchak (talk) 10:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Barcley Custom Corsetshaabet 18:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Image:Frauen aus demSpreewald.jpg

Hello, you've uploaded this image about two years ago. Do you remember where you have it from? I'm asking because this doesn't look like the Spreewälder Tracht (Image:Trachtengenerationen.jpg) but more like the Schleifer Tracht (Image:William Krause - Wendisches Mädchen (1912).jpg). A source could help me to find out were this image was taken. Best regards 32X 00:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC) Image:William_Krause_-_Wendisches_Mädchen_(1912).jpg This image show the traditional dress but in fashionable industrial textile. Note, the fine skoe. 1912

Image:Frauen aus demSpreewald.jpg This is homemade made dress from about 1900. Note: the naked feets. This dress or wery correspondingly dress was the dress of most peoples in Europa from 1800 to about 1950 in some place. I think this image is from a other edition of Die Frauenkleidung, C. H. Stratz, my edition is 3th. from 1904.

Image:Trachtengenerationen.jpg This is church/Sunday dress from today. upper-class dress, note the embroidery. haabet 05:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:ModebilledeModerBarn1894.png

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:WarnerBrosCoralineCorsets page13.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WarnerBrosCoralineCorsets page13.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:WarnerBrosCoralineCorsets pageII.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WarnerBrosCoralineCorsets pageII.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

this goes for all the Warner Bros Coraline Corset images from wikisource. The reference to the source is now circular and points back to commons -- Deadstar (msg) 15:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

You are right - if they are from 1880, and from the US, that's fine. Can you mention the name of the booklet (or a description of it), and perhaps that you scanned it on all those images? That's all that's needed. Thanks for your help. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

If it doesn't have a name, just call it whatever is on the front page :) What about "Warner Bros Coraline Corsets booklet. Published 1880."? Would you think that covers it? -- Deadstar (msg) 18:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

1880 is only approximate. And the contents is about the whalebone substitute, the Coraline-bone.haabet 20:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:DerWeiblcheKorperDrGPanzer.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The effect of corseting

I notice that on a couple of the images, you have remarked that the narrowness of the ribcage relates to the way in which the skeleton has bbeen handled after death, rather than deformity due to corseting.

• If the narrow ribs are caused by drooping as the result of boiling the skeleton, then the same deformation would be seen in male skeletons.Mandy 10:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes; of that cause the ribs been connected by wire on skeleton. But the ribs of female is softer than the ribs from men, as the woman do not been choke by four children in midriff.haabet 16:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Many females were corsetted from the age of two years, and were almost never without a corset, except when sleeping.Mandy 10:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

No; but boys and girls use the same clothes to that age when the boy begin to ride a horse (about 6-7 years). The advertisings tell as the upper-class girls use a specially corset for beginners, at age 6 to 18, normally 15, by the confirmation.haabet 16:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• The shape that the female form took on is dependent on the desired effect. Some corsets simply pulled the waist in, but others compressed the whole lower thorax.Mandy 10:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

No, The normal common corset was a belt by extreme broad edges. The upper-class had lengthen waist from the use of the specially corset for beginners. And some woman had serious problem because a dressmaker not was a corsetmaker, when he copy a corset for lengthen waist to a beginner.

It possible as I had make a mistake in some image text. But I have more than 1000 images, if I have make a mistake: Tell about that problem, by a list of images.haabet 16:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Your message on Infrogmation talk page

Hello. If you think some of my edits are a problem, could you please give examples on my talk page? Or is there something I should do? Thank you, -- Infrogmation 22:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Vandalisme

¿Perhaps you can talk about the subject, instead of talking about me? Thanks. Also I'll apreciate if you read the help page, Commons:Categories#Over-categorization, and tell me what you think is wrong in my editions. If we follow the rules, of course. --Tano4595 20:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Mind your manners, Haabet. You should assume good faith and not call such edits as Tano4595 recently has done "vandalism". Furthermore you should follow Tano4595s advice and read the page about over-categorization. I agree with the edits Tano4595, but will not re-revert - this time. Regards, Finn Rindahl 21:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Siden du har dansk som modersmål går jeg ut fra at du kan forstå norsk bokmål, jeg kan i alle fall lese dansk uten problemer. Det er to ting jeg vil minne deg om i forbindelse med din kommunikasjon med Tano4595.

1. Vandalism er et sterkt uttrykk, som er forbeholdt redigeringer som bevist er gjort i den hensikt å ødelegge eller forfalske artikler, bilder eller bildebeskrivelser. Selv om du mener at Tanos fjerning av kategorier ikke tjener noen positiv hensikt, gir dete deg ikke rett til å beskylde ham for vandalisme. Det er tvert i mot slik at du ved å bruke et utrykk som vandalisme om redigeringer som er gjort i god hensikt bryter med den omgangsform som skal være oss brukerne i mellom. Jeg må advare deg om at dersom du fortsetter å bruke slikt språk om andre bidragsytere vil det være mer forstyrrende for dette prosjektet enn om en og annen kategori skulle bli flyttet/endret på en måte som andre brukere mener er feil. Å rette slike beskyldninger mot andre brukere kan i verste fall ende med at man selv blir blokkert fra å redigere for kortere eller lengre perioder.

2. Les Commons:Categories. I korthet handler det om at kategoriene utgjør en trestruktur, og at bilder, bildegallerier og underkategorier normalt ikke skal være på flere nivåer av treet på samme tid. Jeg er klar over at du er den bruker på Commons som har den suverent største kunnskap om korsetter og korsettets historie, og dersom du gi tydelig beskjed om hvorfor et bilde eller en kategori bør være dobbelkategorisert vil dette med all sannsynlighet bli respektert. Men Wikimedia Commons i likhet med alle andre wikiprosjekter er basert på at vi i fellesskap skal komme frem til gode løsninger, det forutsetter at vi samtaler med hverandre og vennlig forklarer hvorfor dersom andre gjør noe som er feil.

Dersom du opplever at du kommer i konflikt med en annen bruker fordi det er vanskelig å forklare hva du mener på engelsk, så skriv gjerne på dansk og be meg eller en annen dansk/norsk-språklig bruker om hjelp til oversettelse. Med vennlig hilsen Finn Rindahl 16:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:LYS30old village church.JPG

Hi, while I have categorized danish churches (see: Category:Churches in Denmark) I wonder if you know the name of the church at this Image you have uploaded at wikimedia. It is the single picture in this category I couldn't identify!

tnanx. --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendam (talk) 16:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

My mother has forget the name. I am sorryhaabet 21:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello Haabet!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Vamemesterbeskaening_1983.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vamemesterbeskaening_1983.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -Nard 04:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

English: This image is not {{PD-DenmarkEVH}}, it's a photograph with an author, and we need to know the source for this image to confirm that it is really PD-old. In which book or web-page did you find this image.

Norsk bokmål: Dette billede er ikke {{PD-DenmarkEVH}}, det er et fotografi som er tatt av en navngitt person. Vi må vite kilden for dette bildet for å kunne bekrefte at det virkelig er PD-old. Fra hvilken bok eller web-side kommer dette bilde?

Finn Rindahl (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello Haabet!

I just discovered the category "Le Corset de Toilette". Did you ever here of "distributed Proofreaders"? [[1]] They are a punch of people who are scanning, proofing and formatting books without copyrights. After that, they are posted at the "Project Gutenberg" page. Maybe that is the right place for your scanns (at least the textpages). Akinom (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

No, the wikipedia have need of the images for the articles.haabet 18:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

No, The illustrations have no sense on pgdp and Gutenberghaabet 17:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Category 02.03.04

The Commons:Image_classification_system is actually somewhat defunct... Churchh (talk) 18:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but if somebody start, perhaps a second continue.haabet 22:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Brassiere-Girdle-Style1322.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Brassiere-Girdle-Style1322.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 01:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Art_Model_2.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Art_Model_2.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 06:05, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Art_Model_3.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Art_Model_3.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 06:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Haabet!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Ugly.gif is uncategorized since 4 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Graph Greenland.png was uncategorized on 11 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
• Image:A Burmese child smoking.jpg was uncategorized on 29 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
• Image:WOMAN DEVIL-WORSHIPPER OF MOUNT ARARAT.jpg was uncategorized on 29 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
• Image:BurmaMap1922Black-White.png was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:BurmaMap1922.png was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Tjenestelaesning.jpg was uncategorized on 8 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Kold Straale.jpg was uncategorized on 8 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ungt Selskab.jpg was uncategorized on 9 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Det unge Kjobenhavn.jpg was uncategorized on 10 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Forsigtig1896.jpg was uncategorized on 6 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Fropraeken.jpg was uncategorized on 6 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Fig97Japanerinnen beimBaden.jpg was uncategorized on 23 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Fig132Srimpi amHofe desSultans vonSolo.jpg was uncategorized on 9 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Fig124BirmanischeDame in chinesischerTracht(RhotMFerrars).jpg was uncategorized on 9 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Group ofTaung-Thu(Pa-O)villagers.jpg was uncategorized on 10 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:La'hu(Muhsö)woman.jpg was uncategorized on 11 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:LoiLingKaren womenWearingBrass-rodArmlets andLeg-rings.jpg was uncategorized on 11 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Group ofRiang(Yang-Wan-Hkun).jpg was uncategorized on 12 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Zayein Karen women.jpg was uncategorized on 15 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:DenModerløse.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Mere praktisk.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:GammelVane.jpg was uncategorized on 14 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Returneret.jpg was uncategorized on 19 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Oejensvaghed.jpg was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:LeCorsetBARATdepose.png was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:LeCorsetBARAT back.png was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Art_Model_2.gif

File deletion warning

File:Art_Model_2.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Burmese Textiles - cover.png

This was bot-deleted because of being in Category:Unknown - February 2009. You haven't specified any license template for a couple of days, so the picture was still in the category. I have now restored it and fixed the description. odder 21:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

• But you're hereby asked to fill it in a better way, still. odder 21:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

It is PD but what license template is that?haabet 22:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

• • You can try {{PD-old}}. For now, just please fix the description. odder 22:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:USpatent494397a1893.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:USpatent494397a1893.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Infrogmation (talk) 03:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Coronet Corset Co.gif

Haabet, no matter how many entries are listed in the image "palette", there are still only six distinct shades in that image -- and two of these six serve little or no useful role in the overall image. I'm not aware of any evidence that a full grayscale palette did anything to aid resizing of GIF images when that was allowed, and it certainly doesn't do anything to help using large GIF images in articles now, when GIF's are not resized. Churchh (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:HusmoderensBlad1902page1.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:HusmoderensBlad1902page1.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Nillerdk (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomson1896Ventilating.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Your archive

Hey, I moved your archive from "User talk:Haabet:Old" to "User talk:Haabet/Old" because it needs a slash as separator. Otherwise this makes it the user talk page of the user "Haabet:Old". --The Evil IP address (talk) 08:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

File:MedievalWarmPeriod500.png

File:MedievalWarmPeriod500.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Graph Greenland.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Graph Greenland.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--2over0 (talk) 13:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Marriageable girls, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

 

--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 10:16, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Marriageable girls

If you have plans for this page -- adding more material to it -- feel free to remove the {{Delete}} which you added after my {{Speedy}} -- and I'll take a look at it in a day or two. When I first saw it, it looked like so many of the new page experiments that I see, that I just hung the speedy along with the rest. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 11:47, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

nude woman?

Is a woman nude if she have a thickly skirt?haabet 20:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I don't understand what you're talking about... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Well those examples are, in fact, partial nudity. I guess the best thing would be to create a Category:Black and white photographs of topless women. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:23, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

File:AEgtering.gif

File:AEgtering.gif: What is the reason for the given license PD-old-70? What is the date of death of the artist? if not known: Change the license to {{PD-1923}}. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File:LesCorsetsLeFuretParis11.jpg

File:LesCorsetsLeFuretParis11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

trialsanderrors (talk) 15:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Jungle_tribe_of_Mishmi_Assam.jpg

File:Jungle_tribe_of_Mishmi_Assam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vssun (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

File:HusmoderensBlad1902page1.png

File:HusmoderensBlad1902page1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.178.233.110 12:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Huslig Uoverensstemmelse.jpg

Haabet, the "English" translation is garbled and almost completely incomprehensible. Helliggæstes is almost certainly "Holy Spirit"; other than that, I have no idea... Churchh (talk) 06:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

the Danish text is too difficult. That was fun in 1877.haabet 15:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Ravnen

Hei! Jeg har sittet og sett på de fine tegningene du har lastet opp i kategorien Ravnen. Kunne du skrive en beskrivelse øverst på siden av kategorien? Med f.eks. hvem som ga ut bladet (?), hvor lenge det kom ut osv. Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Takk. :-) Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 22:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

adding Category:Cartoons in 1878

They were usually called "caricatures" then... Churchh (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

"Karicature" (caricatures) in Danish is grotesque drawings of politicians. I do not know the English in every details.haabet 09:59, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

File:SAMME BESTEMMELSE Til Slagtebaenken.gif

Do you have the author information for File:SAMME BESTEMMELSE Til Slagtebaenken.gif? Nirvana2013 (talk) 17:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC) A. Roubille

File:SAMME_BESTEMMELSE_Til_Slagtebaenken.gif

File:SAMME_BESTEMMELSE_Til_Slagtebaenken.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.198.174.122 16:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Art_Nouveau_animals

Art Nouveau animals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

NVO (talk) 14:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Normale feminine d'apresRicherJavanaise de dix-huit ans environ.gif

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Normale feminine d'apresRicherJavanaise de dix-huit ans environ.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 17:20, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Silk in satin weaving

Dear Haabet,
I would be very grateful to you if you could kindly answer the following question: how can you tell that the glossy fabric is indeed a satin-weave silk? Thank you.
--Thorvaldsson (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I have collections of fabric samples from that era and later. The word "Satin" in picture text in that era means satin-weave silk. Would you believe me?haabet 22:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

I completely agree with you, dear Haabet. However, looking at the lithographs alone, except ‘Hornet’ perhaps, it is not so obvious that the glossy fabric is satin, rather then silk or silk satin.
Since ‘Category:Silk in satin weaving’ combines silk (fabric) and satin (technique), I would suggest:
to add ‘Category:Satin’ to ‘Category:Silk in satin weaving’;
to rename ‘Category:Silk in satin weaving’ into ‘Category:Satin-weave silk’ or even ‘Category:Silk satin’;
to add all content of ‘Category:Satin clothing in art’ to ‘Category:Silk in satin weaving.’
--Thorvaldsson (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

File:LYS12colour.jpg

File:LYS12colour.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Bapti ✉ 16:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

You have delete one of my mothers photos. Why?haabet 21:36, 21 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haabet (talk • contribs) 21 novembre 2011 à 22:36 (UTC)

Les explications sont ci-dessus : il n'est pas possible d'importer des images dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur.--Bapti ✉ 16:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

The original work of Kandinsky is still under copyright, so you can't take a picture of it.--Bapti ✉ 16:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Victorian_porno

Victorian_porno has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trijnstel (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Cartoons by year

Hello. Please see Category talk:Cartoons by year. I think you, me, and User:Queeg are the only ones who ever used the category, and Queeg seems gone. I think "Category:[year] cartoons" is better than "Category:Cartoons in [year]", to match "Category:[year] works" etc. Please comment if you wish. Thank you, -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

I have any opinion about this.haabet 17:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I am being bold and starting to use the format Category:[year] cartoons". Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Abb182Strasze mitBordellen inHamburg.jpg

Hallo Haabet,

auch wenn das schon fünf Jahre her ist, dass Du die Datei hochgeladen hast, trotzdem die Frage, ob Du weißt, um welche Straße es sich auf dem Bild handelt. Ich tippe darauf, dass es eine Straße im Gängeviertel in der Neustadt sein könnte, wüsste aber - zwecks besserer Kategorisierung - gerne Näheres. Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe vom Mogelzahn (talk) 09:22, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Ich weiß nicht, auf die Straße. Aber ich denke es war in der Nähe des Hafens. Sailors, wissen Sie.haabet 13:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:LYS91Painting.JPG

And also:

• File:LYS92Painting.JPG

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Commons page Domestic servant

I noticed that you added "manor shooter" as a category of domestic servants but unfortunately I can't figure out what you mean. So could you please describe the type of job a "manor shooter" would have so that we can get the proper English word for it. Feel free to describe it in Danish if you're more comfortable with that, because I have no problem reading Danish (I'm not Danish though...). Thomas.W (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I noticed that you removed your own additions to that page so it probably doesn't matter anymore, but what you probably meant by "manor shooter" is gamekeeper. But gamekeepers are not domestic servants since they don't work within the household, nor are bailiffs or coachmen domestic servants. Thomas.W (talk) 15:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

• Huslærer (house teacher) was a Domestic servant
• Amme wet nurse was a Domestic servant
• Kusk coachman/driver was a Domestic servant
• Karl man, guy, farmhand was a Domestic servant for the horses.
• Syerske seamstress was a Domestic servant

haabet 23:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

• selvskabsdame company lady.haabet 15:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

You seem to have misunderstood both domestic and servant. Domestic servants worked, and to a lesser extent still work, in the household, that is in the house where the family lived, and were servants, putting them at the lower end of the social ladder. As an educated person a governor/governess (huslærer) would have a higher status than a servant and a farm hand (karl) worked in the stable and not in the household, as did a coachman. And very few, if any, families would have a full time seamstress (syerske). To give you a starting point housekeepers (hushållerska), maids (tjenestepige/husassistent, hembiträde) and cooks would be typical domestic servants. Thomas.W (talk) 09:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Here is a cultural difference. Few Danish servants slept with lords, it was only the butler. But the servants ate almost the same food as their lord. For that they could not complain about the food. From 1660 it was normal in Denmark, the service people could read and write. The seamstress was hired for a period before the party. It was hand sewing so it took a lot of time. haabet 15:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

I choose not to comment on Danish lords sleeping with their butlers since doing so would be taking cheap shots, but a lady's companion (selskapsdame) was not a domestic servant either but always of high social rank, usually equal to that of the lady they were hired to keep company, and would never be expected to do domestic work. Thomas.W (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your uploads

Hi, I've been looking at some of your uploads and I've found some issues with sourcing etc that need fixing. User:Rd232/sandbox3 gives some indication of the sorts of issues. You're obviously the best person to address these issues - please let me know if you're willing to make the effort to go through all your uploads one by one and check that the necessary sourcing and author details and copyright tags are in place. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have about the general issues or specific cases (or you can always go to COM:VPC). thanks, Rd232 (talk) 19:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Image usage

Dear Haabet,

I am writing on behalf of Fagbokforlaget publishing house, Norway.

We are currently working on a book about art, crafts, technology and design for higher education. The title of the book is Kunst, håndverk, teknologi og design (9788245012880). The foreseen print run of the book is 2000 copies. The book will be available on the Norwegian market only. The publication is planned to be released in April 2013. Authors of the book, Janne Lepperød, Trude Kallestad and Øystein Gilje, would like to use an image “Le Rayonnant Nouveau Corset”. We have found this image here:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LeRayonnantNouveauCorset1902.gif

We hereby ask for your permission to publish the above mentioned image in our book in first edition and following reprints.

Please respond to: Anna.Sontowska@fagbokforlaget.no

Best regards, Fagbokforlaget Anna Sontowska

It is PD. It is yours image and all people's image.Jesper7 (talk) 17:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dahomey-amazoner.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dahomey-amazoner.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

File:LYS16dolls house.JPG

File:LYS16dolls house.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fashion1880.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fashion1880.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fashion1880.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cathy Richards (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:RFpatent.gif

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RFpatent.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 04:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:RFpatent 1911.gif

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RFpatent 1911.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 22:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

File:LYS12colour.jpg

Haabet, about File:LYS12colour.jpg which was deleted you wrote that it is your mother's photo. However it is a photo of a painting which is still copyrighted, and we were contacted by the copyright holders requesting it's deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File:La meme avec corsetGaches-Sarraute.jpg

File:La meme avec corsetGaches-Sarraute.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blueye (talk) 20:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:DessousElegants1904page137.png

And also:

• File:DessousElegants1904page150.png
• File:DessousElegants1904page150c.png
• File:DessousElegants1904page150Corsetiere.png
• File:DessousElegants1904page154.png
• File:DessousElegants1905n8p119.png
• File:DessousElegants1905n8p130.png
• File:DessousElegants1905n8pXII.png
• File:LesDessousElegants1906page104.png
• File:LesDessousElegants1906page105.png
• File:LesDessousElegants1906page97.png
• File:LesDessousElegantsJanvier1914page12.png
• File:LesDessousElegantsJanvier1914page2.png
• File:LesDessousElegantsJanvier1914page4.png
• File:LesDessousElegantsSeptembre1917page143.png

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Abb. 317. Berberin aus südlichen Algier.jpg

File:Abb. 317. Berberin aus südlichen Algier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Abb. 325. Kabylin vom südlichen Algier mit negroidem Einschlag..jpg

File:Abb. 325. Kabylin vom südlichen Algier mit negroidem Einschlag..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:SerDuStoffer naar man drikker saa meget.jpg

File:SerDuStoffer naar man drikker saa meget.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Orientalist_nude_photographs_of_Bedouins

Orientalist nude photographs of Bedouins has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

PD because heirs dead

Could you clarify the copyright-legal basis for "In all countries his photo is PD because all heirs are dead."? That is not a default assumption for en:orphan works. This particular person appears to have published in multiple countries, and I don't see any US or EU law that makes orphan==PD. Instead, they are either completely restricted, or else allow limited use. DMacks (talk) 02:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

File:GARBYANG 207.jpg

File:GARBYANG 207.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

File:GARBYANG 211.jpg

File:GARBYANG 211.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

File:KULU, KANGRA 208.jpg

File:KULU, KANGRA 208.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Padaung-girl in Pekong.jpg

File:Padaung-girl in Pekong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Haabet, 1 week after contacting the Swiss Fotostiftung they replied by confirming that they represent Hürlimann's copyright since 1991. Their reply is recorded in OTRS. You'll find the ticket # linked in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Padaung-girl in Pekong.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:George_Scott

George Scott has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Archie02 (talk) 17:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

File:LYS19children in bathing.JPG

File:LYS19children in bathing.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amada44  ^{talk to me} 19:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Karen of Burma and Thailand.png

File:Karen of Burma and Thailand.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 11:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

File:LYS22totem pole.JPG

File:LYS22totem pole.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Tinanweib von Malabar.jpg

File:Tinanweib von Malabar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

50.65.104.10 14:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Scheme of things1475.gif

Hi @Haabet, you uploaded this file in 2005. Can you possibly address the questions at File talk:Scheme of things1475.gif regarding where you got it from? Thanks. Doric Loon (talk) 19:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)