User talk:Halavar/Archive13

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 11:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 11:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 11:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 11:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 11:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Świątynia Kwan Im (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 20:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duo Yun Xuan Auction House, Malacca, Malaysia. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baphuon, Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

<Date category> photographs

Hello Halavar, what is the point of flooding the watchlists with this kind of editions? does the project benefit from them? are you talking care of the (let's say) 50 million edits required to add the suffix "photographs" to all time-related categories? Are you aware of the issues we had in the past due to the same edit partner best, Poco² 21:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 21:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 15:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stadhuys (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Park KLCC, Fontanna na jeziorze Symphony (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It looks like leaning in a little bit. --XRay 17:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Hotel Wana Riverside (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit tight on top, but ok --Poco a poco 18:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 04:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (72).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness at the right could be better. --XRay 05:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better too. --XRay 05:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (60).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (57).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO problems with noise and sharpness. May be you can improve your photograph. --XRay 05:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)  Done New, better version uploaded. Hope it's better now. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)  Support IMO good enough now. Thank you. --XRay 20:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sharpness could be improved. --XRay 05:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)  Done OK. New, better version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 14:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)  Support Thank you. I think it is OK now. --XRay 20:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Meczet Surti Sunni Jamah (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Budynek mieszkalny (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (76).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 10:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (79).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 10:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me --Trougnouf 00:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Kościół Armii Zbawienia (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Szkoła Średnia Podstawowej Edukacji nr 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enoughh for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Drewniany budynek (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynek Sekretariatu (Budynek Ministrów) (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 15:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynek na skrzyżowaniu ulic- Anawrahta Road i Bo Aung Kyaw Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 15:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (85).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Szkoła średnia Thambara Reddiar (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (50).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynek Sekretariatu (Budynek Ministrów) (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 14:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Kościół Armii Zbawienia (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, the sky could use a little bit of denoising --Trougnouf 11:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica nr 47, Budynki mieszkalne (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Świątynia Maha Vishnu (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Siedziba "The Myanmar Times" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynek Sekretariatu (Budynek Ministrów) (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Świątynia Maha Vishnu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Świątynia Sri Sri Durga Bari (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Szkoła Średnia Podstawowej Edukacji nr 5 i Świątynia Arya Samaj (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek ądu Najwyższego (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek ądu Najwyższego (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek Sądu Najwyższego (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek Sądu Najwyższego (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Kościół Armii Zbawienia (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Świątynia Arya Samaj (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No real problens; proper perspective --Daniel Case 23:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (62).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Edges get a little soft but otherwise OK --Daniel Case 23:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stupa in Botataung Pagoda. Yangon, Myanmar..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek Sądu Najwyższego (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Bank AYA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek Sądu Najwyższego (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pomnik Niepodległości (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (49).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.A weak one on the left side which might be a moskito as well. --Ermell 20:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. But it's a little bit unsharp. --XRay 15:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Budynek mieszkalny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kościół baptystów Emmanuela (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek Sądu Najwyższego (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Park Maha Bandula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pomnik Niepodległości (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek Sądu Najwyższego (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pomnik Niepodległości (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentIf you will change the Level (with a gauge) and maybee erase the dark point at the sky (2/4 down under, then You get my PRO-Vote. It´s more then QI (seen smth too many times, but´s that´s not counting) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)  Comment Sorry but I don't understant:( What Level? What do you mean by gauge? Where is that dark point (please add a note) --Halavar 20:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)With "to gauge" i mean water level. I added two notes at the image...--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 04:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the explanations:) New version is uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 11:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC Not far away from perfect. Hope You agree only onside --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kościół baptystów Emmanuela i Bank AYA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Świątynia Shri Satyanarayan (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Meczet Mogul Shia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica nr 30, Budynki mieszkalne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 20:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Meczet Mogul Shia (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:56, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 18:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 18:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Świątynia Shree Jain Shwetamber Murtipujak (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 20:34, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 22:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynek Sekretariatu (Budynek Ministrów) (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Najświętszej Maryi Panny (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Centrum, Meczet Surti Sunni Jamah (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynek na skrzyżowaniu ulic- Maha Bandula Road i 32nd Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI -- DerFussi 21:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support -- QI to me -- DerFussi 20:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica nr 47, Budynki mieszkalne (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Kościół Armii Zbawienia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Uniwersytet Medyczny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:06, 2 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment BTW: Sharpness could be better for example with f/8. --XRay 06:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dargah Bahadura Szaha Zafara (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support the left side seems leaning out a bit, but ok for me --Christian Ferrer 07:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Maha Bandula widziana z Pagody Sule (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, this one works. Nice street scene. Could probably crop a little off the top, though --Daniel Case 17:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Uniwersytet Medyczny (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Szkoła Średnia Podstawowej Edukacji nr 5 i Świątynia Arya Samaj (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 16:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Świątynia Arya Samaj (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Hall in Yangon, Myanmar. View from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Tant Taw Mu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Maha Wizaya (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Maha Wizaya (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Maha Wizaya (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Uniwersytet Medyczny (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (84).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Generally sharp throughout and ncie symmetry --Daniel Case 03:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Maha Wizaya (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 19:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Rzeźby strażników przed wejściem (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak Pro. Really good quality, I only don´t like such straight crops --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Skrzyżowanie dwóch ulic Ann Siang Hill i Club Street (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Maha Wizaya (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two things 1. it looks deformed and it needs a negative correction 2. the colours are really too strong for me. Like this no Q1 for me --Michielverbeek 22:16, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Very good image if the disturbing lamps were cropped. -- Spurzem 11:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 12:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Yes it is better, you have tackled both problems --Michielverbeek 12:53, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Meczet Mogul Shia (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No good perspective correction. The image tilts to the left. Further the big notice-board at the left seems too bright. -- Spurzem 14:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)  Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC) O.K. – I am not inspired but QI now -- Spurzem 20:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Ulica Khaosan (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama północna (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been sharper between f/8 and f/11. but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (68).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Sułtana (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Motivation for removing dating categories?

You remove the category 'May 2017 in Romania' for File:Focșani station 1.jpg, while for File:Deda station 2.jpg you replae the category with 'Romania photographs taken on 2017-05-23'. I dont understand the logic. On all these pictures there the rail transport dating category. If there is another dating category I prefer it to be a regional one. The precise date is specified in the file description and no category is necessary. Rail subject users want a broad year categorisation, while more local users are interested in what happened in the region, also for rail. It helps when you specify the reasoning behind the mutation.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Kerbau, Była rezydencja Tan Teng Niaha (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus to main object is well done --Michielverbeek 20:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Maha Wizaya (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Ulica Yaowarat (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Rzeźby strażników przed wejściem (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (051).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough --PetarM 16:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masonic Hall in Singapore. Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynek-memoriał Proklamacji Niepodległości (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Zewnętrzna galeria, Płaskorzeźby (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (032).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and QI -- Spurzem 18:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (071).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:49, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Rzeźby przy drodze do świątyni (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (095).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (089).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:40, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (080).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (087).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat, Małpa (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (104).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (117).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Fischer.H 18:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (115).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Som (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The feet a bit on the light side. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 19:04, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Hachpat, Klasztor Hachpat (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Lmbuga 12:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Ulica Yaowarat, Świeżo wyciskane soki z granatu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not technically the best but an ideal street-life capture --Daniel Case 19:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (143).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (010).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Thanks --Moroder 07:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Old Yay Tar Shay, Budynek i taksówka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Jezioro Kandawgyi (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (144).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (60).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Budynek na skrzyżowaniu ulic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Maha Wizaya (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 15:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (032).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Fullerton Heritage Promenade, Window of Hope (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (229).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 17:58, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Cerkiew Metechi (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (134).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 17:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (026).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:59, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (089).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół św. Pawła (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Fischer.H 11:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Fischer.H 11:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (178).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 12:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Budynek (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Lanmadaw (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Świętej Trójcy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Market Bogyoke (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (139).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect but not so much that I won't promote it --Daniel Case 04:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kościół baptystów Emmanuela (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:46, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kościół katolicki św. Jana Chrzciciela (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture with a frightening contrast -- Spurzem 10:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (136).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture, but please remove the tower with scaffolding on the left side. --Fischer.H 14:33, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha, Budynek (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Bank AYA (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 07:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (138).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Bank AYA (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:31, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama północna (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe you could add some statue or monument-related category. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Dawny budynek Sądu Najwyższego (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Nikhil B 02:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (086).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kościół baptystów Emmanuela (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Bank AYA (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Nikhil B 05:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Katedra Świętej Trójcy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (232).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Kerbau, Domy-sklepy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Zarząd Portu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Urząd Celny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 15:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Byłe Biuro Regionalne Rangunu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 15:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Nagore Durgha (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Comment you please remove the halo to the left building?--Famberhorst 15:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)  Done New fixed version is uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 22:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC) OK. Thanks.--Famberhorst 05:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Maha Bandula, Budynek mieszkalny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Oddział-3 Banku Ekonomicznego Mjanmy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Urząd Celny (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Klubowa, Domy-sklepy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Kategoria Gdańsk

Hej, widzę że jesteś zasłużonym i doświadczonym użytkownikiem, z którym ja się równać nie mogę, ale w tym wypadku... moim zdaniem usuwanie takich (4) plików z głównej kategorii "Gdańsk" nie jest dobrym pomysłem. Specjalnie piękne te zdjęcia nie są, ale powinny być raczej wrzucone do jakiejś właściwej merytorycznie podkategorii (np. Gdańsk ulica xxxx), niż do "worka" typu 2016 in Gdańsk. Może jednak w wypadku takich zdjęć, mających jedynie kontekst archiwalny, się mylę? --Jasc PL (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Hej Marcin, dzięki za odpowiedź - o ile na Gdańsku jakoś tam się znam, to na strukturze gdańskich kategorii (a jest ich sporo) już niekoniecznie :). Mógłbym zająć się kategoryzacją przy okazji pojawienia się większej ilości "gdańskich" plików które załatwiłem, tyle że nie wiem do końca jak to optymalnie obsłużyć technicznie i licencyjnie - a ci którzy wiedzą mają to w nosie, co widać choćby po dyskusji u mnie i w paru innych miejscach. Wiem że m.in. główna powinna być pusta, choć sam tak czasem wrzucam - znajdując np. na flickrze, przy okazji, ładne pliki których ja nie potrzebuję - ale elektronikom mogą się bardzo przydać. Dodałem do tych 4 plików Gdańsk, choć chyba jednak 2016 in Gdańsk będzie w tym wypadku właściwsza, jako poczekalnia; tu czy tam, łatwo je będzie znaleźć po opisowych nazwach.

Przy okazji jeszcze jedno: lepsza na Commons jest nazwa kategorii typu "FETA (festiwal)" (polska impreza w Polsce) czy jednak angielska "FETA (festival)" zrozumiała dla większości? Mam na myśli ogólną zasadę, nie tylko ten konkretny, prosty przypadek. Pozdrowienia, --Jasc PL (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Dzięki za wszystkie odpowiedzi, podpowiedzi i edycje :). Gdańskiem się zajmę, w dalszej kolejności niestety; póki co mam zbyt wiele otwartych wikitematów - włącznie z "rozgrzebaną" kategorią Raspberry Pi, wymagającą jeszcze wiele pracy. Udanego wieczoru --Jasc PL (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Hej Marcin, miło że działasz trochę przy kategorii Gdańsk. Ściągnąłem jakiś czas temu z Flickra setkę dobrej jakości fotografii, głównie z zamiarem podmiany gorszych wersji w Wikipediach - leżą w mojej roboczej kategorii Category:Jasc-Gdańsk. Chciałem je sam dokładnie skategoryzować ale... coraz bardziej mi się odechciewa robienia tu czegokolwiek; gdybyś miał więc ochotę... zanim ktoś myślący inaczej uzna że należy to wszystko skasować... Pozdrowienia, --Jasc PL (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynki wzdłuż ulicy Strand (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 11:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Bank KBZ na Strand Square (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Byłe Biuro Regionalne Rangunu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Park Maha Bandula (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been a bit sharper on the left. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Park Telok Ayer, Pomnik "Procesja chińska" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:25, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Budynki wzdłuż ulicy Strand (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Sąd rejonowy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kheng Hock Keong (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ratusz (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 16:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica nr 26 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One would wish for a better handling of the sky color, but maybe there's notthing you can do about it and it's still a great shot --Daniel Case 19:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (097).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good one. -- Ikan Kekek 01:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Oddział-3 Banku Ekonomicznego Mjanmy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Powiat cieszyński, Marklowice Górne, Tablica wjazdu do miasta Jastrzębie-Zdrój.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Uniwersytet Medyczny (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pomnik Niepodległości (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Tant Taw Mu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Oddział-3 Banku Ekonomicznego Mjanmy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 15:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Meczet Mogul Shia (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (49).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective not perfect and a bit of noise, but QI overall to me --Poco a poco 18:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (046).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been sharpened at the top. In my opinion f / 4 was not the best choice. But for me the photo is good enough.--Famberhorst 16:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Park KLCC, Fontanna na jeziorze Symphony (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done!! The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 02:02:09 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Miejsce pamięci żołnierzy Armii Czerwonej i Czechosłowackiej poległych w 1945 roku (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (058).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 22:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 17:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2018 (UTC)