Hardscarf

Archive

foto's transformatorhuisjes

Hallo, Ik ben bezig met het aanvullen van de tranformatorhuisjes, in eerste instantie met die huisjes die rijksmonument zijn. Bij het huisje Huizingerweg 1T die in de lijst van rijksmonumenten is opgenomen staat een door jou gemaakte foto. Deze is echter van een ander transformatorhuisje. Heb je ook een foto van het bedoelde huisje? Alvast bedankt. Gklinkenberg (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Hoi, Dat zou kunnen, maar ik heb de duizenden foto's die ik in de loop van de tijd gemaakt heb helaas niet van namen voorzien. Ik denk dat ik beter een nieuwe foto kan maken als ik tijdens een wandeltocht weer eens door Huizinge kom. Hardscarf (talk) 18:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Hallo, dat zou mooi zijn, ik heb hem ook wel op mijn lijstje gezet maar het is nogal uit de buurt dus het zal er niet zo snel van komen. Gklinkenberg (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Nog even voor de zekerheid, het gaat dus om het adres Huizingerweg 1T te Huizinge. Coordinaten lat=53.34868|lon=6.66664, Monumenten nr=517410 Gklinkenberg (talk) Gklinkenberg (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Undeletion Reqeust

Hello,

I have responded on your undeletion reqeust and I am trying to handle it, but I need some more information. Could you please answer my question(s) on your reqeust so we could continue with the undeletion.

Best regards, Abigor talk 19:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Potd/2009-11-11 (nl)

Hoi Hardscarf,

Als ik het goed lees, staat in het artikel dat nl:Wilhelmina der Nederlanden van 1890 tot 1948 Koningin der Nederlanden was. Klopt je tekst wel?

Grz, Ciell (talk) 07:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Dat moet inderdaad 11 jaar zijn. --Hardscarf (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Iron image

Hello Hardscarf,

the "6N" is a description for the purity for metals or other inorganic compounds. It is simply the number of the "nineth".

99,9999% = 6N

99,999% = 5N

99,995= 4N5

99,99% = 4N

and so on ...

Best regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Aha. Thanks for the clarification. I'll keep it in mind. Hardscarf (talk) 22:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Geen lijst van wierdedorpen

Zoals ik al schreef op Category talk:Wierde in Groningen (province), zijn categoriën op Commons bedoeld om afbeeldingen te vinden. Niet om een lijst van wierdedorpen te maken. Daarom verwijder ik deze categorie van de meeste dorpen. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Je bedoelt dat je alleen de afbeeldingen van de wierden in wilt hebben? Dat mag natuurlijk ook, maar dan wordt het wel een volle categorie. Overigens bevat lang niet elk van de 235 Groningse wierden een dorp. --Hardscarf (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Dat valt nogal mee. Er zijn niet zo vreselijk veel fotos waar het relief te zien is. En ja, natuurlijk zijn er onbewoonde wierden, of met alleen een boerderij. Daarvan zijn er te weinig fotos. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Nog wel inderdaad, maar 235 wierden zijn in elk geval potentieel 235 foto's. Ook vindt ik 'zichtbaar reliëf' nogal beperkt; wat mij betreft is dit bijvoorbeeld ook kenmerkend voor de betreffende wierde, evenals bijvoorbeeld kerken en andere gebouwen die erop staan (onderdeel van het ensemble; niet voor niets is bijvoorbeeld Niehove in zijn geheel een beschermd dorpsgezicht), rondwegen om de kerk, ossengangen, grachten om het kerkhof en andere elementen die ermee samenhangen. --Hardscarf (talk) 19:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Dat is wel zo, maar als je het niet aan de foto kunt zien, is het niet erg illustratief voor "wierde". Voor de vorm van een wierdedorp is een kaart veel beter - daarvoor kun je Open Street Map goed gebruiken. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Middelstum - Burchtstraat 26.jpg

Ik heb hem maar even als Rijksmonument in Groningen gecategoriseerd, want ik wist niet of het de moeite loont om Middelstum apart van Loppersum te houden. Zou je daar even naar willen kijken. --Stunteltje (talk) 09:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Middelstum telt 28 monumenten, waarvan een aantal (beeldbepalende gebouwen, interieur) waarschijnlijk meerdere foto's kan krijgen, zodat het totaal potentieel op ongeveer 50 kan komen. Daarvoor zou je wel een aparte cat in het leven kunnen roepen inderdaad (vergelijk cat. Garnwerd). --Hardscarf (talk) 12:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Santa Clara Photography

Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing you to inquire if it is possible to buy you this photographies, or if you know the email of the person who take this picture.

Yours faithfully

Cécile DUPRE

I'm not sure which photographs you mean. Coeld you post a link to them. Certainly I didn't make them myself. If you saw my name it is quite possible that I transferred them from the English Wikipedia. --Hardscarf (talk) 16:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Syntax error

Hi Hardscarf. Please fix your last two uploads. --Leyo 16:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for notifying me. Hardscarf (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Beeldbank Groningen

Beste Hardscarf,

Ik zie dat je een aantal afbeeldingen uit de Beeldbank Groningen over hebt gezet naar Wikimedia Commons. Ik heb een tool ontwikkeld, de Dememorixer, die het mogelijk maakt de volle resolutie en zonder watermerk uit die database te downloaden. Voor de Beeldbank Groningen is het de bedoeling dat de permalink ingevoerd wordt, deze kan je vinden door op de website op de knop voor "deel via e-mail" of "deel via Twitter" te klikken. Zie ook het overzicht van databases die deze image-viewer gebruiken. In de onderhoudscategorie Dememorixer zijn de volgende afbeeldingen te vinden die door jou zijn geüpload en waarschijnlijk onder een hogere resolutie te downloaden zijn:

• File:Bonaventum Petri met Bellingwolderschans, Booneschans en Langeakkerschans (Nieuweschans).jpg
• File:Bonerschans met syn steene reduyt.jpg
• File:Commandeurshuis - Boschhuis.png
• File:Friedrich Julius von Kolkow (edit).jpg
• File:Grijpskerk - stoomzuivelfabriek de Kievit.jpg
• File:Haubois Pekela.png
• File:Hendrik Guichart Abresch.png
• File:Henri Daniel Guyot.jpg
• File:Henric Piccardt (Starrenberg).jpg
• File:Johan de Mepsche (1520-1585).jpg
• File:Johannes Knijff.jpg
• File:Johannes Koning Uilkens.jpg
• File:Kokshuis - Groot Caarteboek.png
• File:Krewerd - cafe maathuis.jpg
• File:Kruiskerk Eexta.jpg
• File:M Tesselschade-Visscher - borststuk naar links.jpg
• File:Poelepoort (1828).jpg
• File:Poelepoort - replica 1879 (binnenzijde).jpg
• File:Postkaart Niebert.jpg
• File:Potkast Poelestraat 10.jpg
• File:Rusthoven - tichelborg ca. 1895.jpg
• File:Scholtenshuis ca. 1895.jpg
• File:Wigbold Aldringa.jpg

Met vriendelijke groet, --Vera ^(talk) 11:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Hoi Veertje. Goed idee deze tool! Bedankt! De links "deel via e-mail" of "deel via Twitter" stonden standaard geblokkeerd door Adblock, maar hiervoor zijn ze wel handig. --Hardscarf (talk) 16:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Ik heb een Greasemonkey script geschreven dat de Facebook-knop in de permalink-knop veranderd. Het script is hier te vinden.--Vera ^(talk) 13:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

File:RussianNationalParksmap.jpg requires updating

Hi Hardscarf,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:RussianNationalParksmap.jpg is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. ELEKHH^T 00:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Belgie territorriumclaims 1919.jpg|

Hallo Hardscarf, wil je eens een kijkje nemen naar deze revert en het commentaar van de gebruiker? Ik maakte de revert ongedaan en voegde een googlelink toe. Kan je achterhalen waar exact je de afbeelding vandaan haalde? Rechtstreeks van de Mundaneum site? Misschien wil je de informatie toevoegen aan het bestand. Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 05:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Herfststijlloos op het Martinikerkhof.jpg

Beste Hardscarf,

Jouw foto, die je als "Herfststijlloos op het Martinikerkhof" op 25 september 2016 geüploadet had, is niet van herfsttijlozen (Colchicum autumnale), maar van herfstkrokussen, nl. Crocus kotschyanus. Ik heb jou upload hernoemd als "Herfstkrokussen op het Martinikerkhof" en herclassificeerd.

Beste groeten, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 10:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Ac.blyukher.jpg

File:Ac.blyukher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ac.blyukher.jpg

Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Triandafillov.jpg

File:Vladimir Triandafillov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Paterskerk - luchtfoto.png

Copyright status: File:Paterskerk - luchtfoto.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Paterskerk - luchtfoto.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Hereplein - luchtfoto.png

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:06, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hereplein - luchtfoto.png

Copyright status: File:Hereplein - luchtfoto.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hereplein - luchtfoto.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Paterskerk - luchtfoto.png

Copyright status: File:Paterskerk - luchtfoto.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Paterskerk - luchtfoto.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Hereplein - luchtfoto.png

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mechet pavlodar.jpg

Vraag/request

Is het bestand Houwerzijl_-_silhouet.jpg in grotere resolutie beschikbaar? Is this file available in higher resolution? Pleas mail to boek@houwerzijl-dorp.nl. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:1C01:2219:8E00:FCFE:5307:480A:3C7D (talk) 10:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)