Hellerhoff

Tuberous sclerosis

Thank you for uploading some excellent scans of tuberous sclerosis. I see from your WP talkpage that you are a radiologist. It would be a great help if you could expand the image description to fully name the pathalogical signs, the describe how they appear on MRI and identify them on the image. Some MRI images have red circles round the points-of-interest but perhaps on others you could just describe where.

For example: File:Tuberoese Sklerose 1J T2 axial2.png it would help to know which bits are the cortical tubers (which white smudges are pathalogical and which are expected). Are the subependymal nodules distinctly visible on this picture? (they are clearer on the others).

Another example: File:Angiomyolipome TubSklerose cor.jpg The description mentions both angiomyolipomas and lymphangioleiomyomatosis (I'm guessing, I can't read German) but the lungs don't appear. It would help to point out where the kidneys are in the picture and what the pathalogical indications are.

Although I have seen several such images before, I'm no expert. I'd love to include such helpful information (condensed perhaps) in the caption or body text of a WP article. But I'd be much more confident if an expert had done this. Too much information is better than too little!

Thanks again for donating the pictures. Sorry for this being in English. (BTW: I'm Colin on en:wikipedia too). -- Colin (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Colin! I was thinking of uploading two versions of the images, one with and one without annotations. But my time is limited and my english is not so fluently. File:Angiomyolipome TubSklerose cor.jpg shows a patient, in whose kidneys we found angiomyolipomas on both sides (seen in this image) and changes of the lung (File:Lymphangioleiomyomatose CT.jpg) wich match perfectly to the diagnosis lymphangioleimyomatosis. The combination leads to the very strong suspicion of Tuberous sclerosis. This is, what the german description says. Unfortunately we could not perform an MRI of the brain... File:Angiomyolipome TubSklerose cor.jpg, File:Angiomyolipome TubSklerose cor2.jpg and File:Angiomyolipome TubSklerose cor3.jpg belong to same case. Maybe you can add an english description in an approriate phrasing? I would be very thankfull!--Hellerhoff (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I would be happy to try to add some extra text. But I would really like to know (for sure) what it is you are looking for as a radiologist. I'm guessing the dark splodges on kidneys are the angiomyolipomas. Can you confirm this? What size do you think they are? Similarly, I don't know what is abnormal about the lung picture. If you find it hard to say in English, you could give a detailed description in German using non-technical words, and I'll try to Google-translate it.

The version with annotations would be great if you can find time. Wikipedia is very fortunate when experts like yourself donate images. I hope to take the Tuberous sclerosis article to Featured Article later this year so good images would be treasured. Colin (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Hellerhoff,
meinst du nicht, dass ein "cheek bone crushed" eine Fraktur darstellt? --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio! Ja, doch. Aber ich hab mich gefragt, ob dieses Bild in dieser Kategorie wirklich richtig ist, zumal man ja nicht so sehr viel von der Fraktur selber sieht, abgesehen vom Blut. Ich versuche immer ein bischen in den Kats der Medizin (soweit ich mich da auskenne) aufzuräumen. Aber wenn Du meinst, kann die Kat bei dem Bild auch wieder rein. Ich fürchte bloss, dass diese Kategorie bei dem Bild niemandem hilft. Was meinst Du? Viele Grüße!--Hellerhoff (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok, irgendwo hast du auch Recht. Nein, ich bestehe da nicht unbedingt drauf. --Túrelio (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Vielen Dank!

Hallo Hellerhoff!

Ich bin froh, dass sich jemand vom Fach freiwillig für die Überarbeitung der Medizin-Kategorien zur Verfügung stellt! Ich hoffe du verlierst nicht den Mut. Viel Durchhaltevermögen und Spass beim Editieren!

Apropos: Bist du an Autopatroller-Rechten interessiert? Wenn ja, hinterlasse mir eine Nachricht auf meiner Diskussionsseite. Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Du bist jetzt Autopatroller. Viel Spaß beim Editieren! Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 11:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Template:Imagestack

Bist Du immer noch am arbeiten oder kann die Nachricht raus? Grüße. -- RE rillke questions? 23:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Also im Moment komm ich zu nix... eigentlich wollte ich noch eine Steuerung für Tablets einbauen, aber wie gesagt... Vielleicht erstmal den Hinweis raus. Es scheint ja auch kein ganz schlimmer Bug mehr drin zu sein, oder? Grüße! --Hellerhoff (talk) 18:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Esophageal web

Hi Hellerhoff and thanks for the kind message. I enjoyed the scrollable fluoro images of the esophageal web on your user page. Best regards -- Samir (talk) 04:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Translation: More images of this case

Hi, Hellerhoff

I would translate it as: "Bu vakanın diğer görüntüleri." if it is only to be used in medical context.

or

"Bu serinin devamı" a more general usage such as "more of this series".

Regards, --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I made the template for medical cases. So I put the first translation in. Thank You! --Hellerhoff (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Feltre - Innenstadt 01.jpg

Hallo, das Bild hat Deine Kamera schon richtig markiert: Bessere Digitalkameras erkennen, wenn man im Hochformat photographiert und fügen automatisch einen Exif-Tag hinzu, speichert es aber physikalisch wie ein Querformatbild. Dieser Exif-Tag wird von vielen Programmen, besonders unter UNIX/LINUX (Microsoft ignoriert solche Standards gerne) verstanden. Auch von MediaWiki. Aber von den meisten Browsern nicht. Das führt dazu, dass die volle Auflösung (wenn man auf das Bild auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite klickt) falsch gedreht erscheint aber in der Vorschau richtig. In diesen Fällen ist die Dehnung um 0° zu verwenden (Du musst 0 in das Kästchen eintragen, in dem vorher 123 stand): Rotatebot wird dann das Bild physikalisch so drehen, dass es auch im Browser richtig erscheint und den entsprechenden Exif-Tag zurücksetzen, damit dann nicht plötzlich die Vorschau falsch gedreht angezeigt wird. Grüße -- Rillke^(q?) 11:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Ich glaube ich hab's verstanden. Danke! --Hellerhoff (talk) 06:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Images on Onsurg

Hello Hellerhoff,

I am with OnSurg.com, a free online resource for Surgeons, Residents and students around the world. We love your radiology images and would like to feature them on our site with comments from our founder, a practicing general surgeon. Would this be OK with you? We will of course credit you. Thanks very much,

Rob Froetscher OnSurg Publications Development rfroetscher@onsurg.com www.onsurg.com www.facebook.com/onsurg

• Hello Rob, I'm glad to see You find my radiology images usefull. You may use them for Your website and I'm happy if You do so. Please include a note like "from hellerhoff - commons.wikimedia.org" or similar and have fun! If You find a good way to use my image series (like Category:Anaplastic ependymoma - MRI - case 001, You are encouraged to do so, too. Best wishes! --Hellerhoff (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Permission

Hello, Hellerhof. The American Society of Radiologic Technologists publishes continuing education articles in our journals. We will publish an article about primary bone tumors in adults in the spring 2013 issue of Radiation Therapist and would like to use your image of multiple meloma in the forearm. We want to give you credit in any way that you wish. Please let us know if you agree. Katherine Ott Senior Editor American Society of Radiologic Technologists Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States kott@asrt.org

• Hello Katherine, as You can read in earlier posts I'm glad to see someone find my radiology images usefull. Sure You may use them for Your needs, too and I'm happy if You do so. Please include a note like "from hellerhoff - commons.wikimedia.org" or similar and have fun! But please write my name with double-f :-) Best wishes from munich! --Hellerhoff (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Bild in Artikel Magnetresonanztomographie

Hallo Hellerhoff,

auf der Seite "http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magnetresonanztomographie" wird folg. Bild referenziert: "T2 tse sag 4mm rst flowrec bionerd.jpg", es scheint aber nicht gefunden zu werden.

Verfügen Sie über dieses Bild und könnten Sie die Seite entspr. "repararieren"?

viele Grüße daperata

• Hallo daperata, das Bild ist nicht von mir, aber ich hab mir das mal angesehen. Offenbar wurde das Bild aus Commons gelöscht, wobei als Begründung "No permission" angegeben ist. Ich hab keine Ahnung, was da war, habe aber im Artikel das Bild erstmal ebenfalls entfernt. Meinst Du, da muss ein entsprechendes Bild wieder hin? Es gibt ja genügend... Viele Grüße --Hellerhoff (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Mentioned you

See Commons:Requests for comment/Xrays. I mentioned you should be blocked. In jest of course. Perhaps you could comment on the copyright situation from your experience. The amateur lawyers are trying to get x-rays deleted from Commons. Colin (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

No one asked for all x-rays deleted from Commons; I voted for keeping the file in question because Commons is ignoring the concerning paragraph in several laws anyway and because Wikimedia Germany is actively lobbying against this paragraph. See Wahlprüfsteine -- § 72 is also the one that is claimed to be responsible for protection of x-ray images. -- Rillke^(q?) 20:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

They haven't done so because they are chicken. But taking potshots in your pyjamas is more fun. Plus Hellerhoff's work makes a huge target. Hellerhoff -- we really could use your professional opinion in this debate. Colin (talk) 06:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

My 'professional opinion' is not one from a lawyer's point of view but from a radiologist's one. But I have one Question: When Christo wraps a building in fabric he obviously doesn't do this himself but he 'only' gives the instructions to do it and perhaps how to do it. What is the difference to a radiologist who instructs a radiographer to produce radiological images? In my opinion the crucial point is, that the image would not exist (at least not in this special form as it exists), if the radiologist had not given the instructions do produce it and had not determined the individual parameters for that examination. So I don't understand that discussion about who pushed the button. --Hellerhoff (talk) 18:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Well in my honest opinion there is no creativity or art involved here at all (though skill with all parties). I would expect one radiographer to produce the same image as another one next month, and the only difference be my healed bones -- certainly any differences not due to artistic choices. Similarly I would expect your choice of parameters to be made from evidence-based-medicine rather than because you find one form of x-ray or scan to be aesthetically nicer. But it appears that in Germany we have two laws to contend with. One, copyright, requires creativity and originality, and it is most debatable that x-rays could count for this, though the law isn't much clear. The other lesser protected rights only requires the production of a photograph or similar but could be mechanical like a photo-booth. With this other right, it is the "photographer" who owns the rights. I would suggest this is the radiographer, not the radiologist, but we are not sure. Another analogy: the famous fashion photographer gets the copyright to his photographs, not the editor of Vogue who set him the assignment. It is complex and one could argue all sorts of ways of looking at it.

I would appreciate if you could find out the formal position, perhaps from your medical professional body or your hospital. Have you ever sought permission from the radiographers or from your hospital? Have you published images professionally and been asked to do so? -- Colin (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll talk to the lawyer of my hospital. Maybe he can help making things clearer. But in my honest opinion I think this discussion is rather artificial because I don't see anyone to claim a potential copyright concerning 'my' X-rays. --Hellerhoff (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

That would be very helpful, thanks. I agree with you that it is all rather academic and I wish it would stay academic. Unfortunately people seem to want to apply invented theoretical laws to Commons, even though nobody in the real world does this. The consequence is that images will be deleted unless we can fix either the image licence / permission or change policy. Colin (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm sure that all potentially involved persons in my hospital will give a permission for what I do here if this is really needed. Greetings from munich! --Hellerhoff (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

ICD 10-Cats

Hi Hellerhoff!

I have worked thoroughly on the incorporation of the ICD categories. So I created a set of different templates.

Although I think this is very important, I do not have more time to dedicate. Must be created (as you've seen) a very important amount of categories for each health problem (x-rays, CT images, MRI, gross pathology, histopathology, drawings and diagrams, etc.), and it is a very complex task. It is also advisable to create the correct wikidata links to corresponding articles or categories (for example: Osteochondritis dissecans).

Maybe you continue it?

Thank you for your congratulations!

Jordi.

Endoscopic images

Hi, Hellerhoff! Thank you for your very valuable work. In general, it is very probable (although not confirmed by a legal scholar) that medical and radiological images are copyrighted in Germany, so we can't host them without a permission by the copyright holder. After the above-mentioned discussion I have begun to review them. Your images are mostly ok, because they're your own work, so no need to worry about them. However, the following three images need a permission by the creator:

• File:Riesenfaltengastritis Endoskopie 001.jpg
• File:Riesenfaltengastritis Endoskopie 002.jpg
• File:Riesenfaltengastritis Endoskopie 003.jpg

As you have stated that you can provide the permission by anyone from the hospital that you work at, I've tagged them with {{OTRS pending}}, which gives you some more than 30 days to provide it. Please use the form and the guidelines at COM:OTRS for this. Thank you very much and regards, --Eleassar ^(t/p) 19:03, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

OUP : Hires Image & Permission

Hi,

I am writing to you from Six Red Marbles, the largest development house for learning material in the United States. At Six Red Marbles we are dedicated to bringing the power of natural learning to every classroom, pre-K through adult. The company has developed thousands of creative, effective multi-media educational material for leading publishers including McGraw-Hill, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Scholastic and Pearson.

The book we are at present working on is titled IB Biology Study Guide.

We are interested in using the attached photo. We believe this picture is under your copyright and we would be obliged if you could give us a high-res version and the permission to use it in our book.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Atlasbogenspalt.jpg

I am sending you the details of the project below:

Book title : IB Biology Study Guide Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP) Clearance details: World All languages, Print & Electronic. Usage: Interior Duration: 15 years Print Run : 40,000.

Please do let me know if you would need further information to help process our request.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards, Bhaskar.

---

Bhaskar Chandra Visual Editor Six Red Marbles 317/318, Unitech Trade Centre, Sushant Lok 01, Gurgaon, Haryana, India, 122002 b.chandra@sixredmarbles.com | www.sixredmarbles.com Tel: +91-124-4496850/55 | Mo: +91-9818970659 Twitter: twitter.com/sixredmarbles Facebook: www.facebook.com/sixredmarbles

sixredmarbles FUN IDEAS. SERIOUS LEARNING.

Think Creativity. See Beauty. Explore Learning. Feel Progress

File:John Thomas sign.jpg

File:John Thomas sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EEng (talk) 04:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Duodenallipom Endoskopie.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Duodenallipom Endoskopie.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Duodenallipom Endoskopie.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 17:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: Arabic Versions

My Pleasure Glad to contribute in commons with native language. If you ever thought there is a map or photo that should be used on ar. wiki (or other wikis even) after its translated to Arabic, i would be happy to translate it. Best regards--باسم (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Dislocated hip.jpg

File:Dislocated hip.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you :)

Thank you Hellerhoff <3 :) We are now protected from dangers of wikipedia.

Censorship

--Nevit Dilmen (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Attribution

Hello. I would like to use this image, and I want to speak to you about how you would like to be credited. Please let me know how I should contact you. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SophieDoss (talk • contribs) 22:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Dear SophieDoss. I am not the author of that image and it is in the public domain. As far as I understand there is no need for attribution. Best greetings. --Hellerhoff (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

The radiology barnstar.

Now that I've gotten to look through your uploads, I think you really deserve this one! Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank You very much! I'm happy if the pictures are helpful! --Hellerhoff (talk) 06:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Template:Radswiki-attribution

Template:Radswiki-attribution has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Permission for the radiologic picture

Hello, Hellerhoff

My name is Hugo Fan. I am a pediatric emergency physician in Taiwan. Recently I was invited to edit a chapter introducing common pediatric emergency condition in a book for emergency medical technicians in prehospital setting. This book is for educational purpose, not for the commercial benefits. I need a radiologic film to explain the differences of pediatric fractures, and I found your excellent picutre "Gruenholzfraktur - Unterarmfraktur.jpg" on the web. Of course, I will cite your name in the book. May I get your permission to use this picture in the book? Thanks a lot~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugo Fan (talk • contribs) 16:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello Hugo! You are welcome to use the image as any other I put on WP! Best regards! --Hellerhoff (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Participate in Radlines?

Hello Dr. Hellerhoff!
Due to multiple issues with w:Radiopaedia (mostly its commercial nature), I've created a radiology source in a wiki, which is editable by radiologists: www.radlines.org
See also Radlines:About. I'd be very happy if you could join this too. Particularly, would you like to join in the creation of a board for this project, to give additional ideas for the project and to allow us to officially make it a non-profit organization?
Cheers,
Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Mikael! Is it possible to email You via mikael@radlines.org? You may use paul@hellerhoff.de in return. Cheers!--Hellerhoff (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

It is also possible to reach me through contactradlines.org, but I've now sent you an email anyways. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

X-Ray Image Permission

Dear Dr. Hellerhoff,

My name is Kyle and I am creating a website to help medical students learn how to read and interpret x-ray images. I came across several of your x-ray images on Wikimedia Commons and would absolutely love to use them on my membership-based website. Will you allow me to use 15 of them and how would you like to be attributed on my site? Also, is there any way to remove arrows on crop images? If so, how would I properly attribute the changes to the image?

I also sent you an email that shows which images I am interested in. Thank you so much for your consideration and your work. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Kylebarner1 (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Rückmeldung

Hallo,durch Zufall bin ich auf das CT Bild von dem DFSP gestoßen. Wenn die Aufnahme 2009 entstanden ist entweder in Kiel oder Lübeck(genau weiß ich es nicht mehr) und der Patient eine Frau war,dann ist es von mir. Gruß Jessica Kraus

Hallo Jessica! Die Bilder sind, soweit ich erinnere, nicht aus der Gegend. Radiologisch sind viele Menschen doch sehr ähnlich. Grüße! --Hellerhoff (talk) 16:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Button battery X ray image

Dear Dr Hellerhoff,

I'm Joseph, a paediatrician in London. I'm writing a journal article on button battery ingestion in children and was wondering if I could please use your image of this in my paper?

Best wishes,

Joseph 82.19.229.231 13:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Dear Joseph, I assume you mean this picture? Of course you can use the picture within the scope of the license. And you don't have to ask me. ;-) Best wishes ! --Hellerhoff (talk) 13:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello!

Dear Dr. @Hellerhoff,

I had been meaning to write to you for a long time. A few days ago, I wrote an email to you thanking you for your work, but it happened that the mail did not reach you. Therefore, I am writing this message here on your talk page.

I am a resident in radiology at the Sahlgrenska Academy Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. I edit articles related to medicine on Wikipedia, and I am extremely grateful for the radiology images that you are uploading to Wikimedia Commons. They are very educational and useful for illustrating several important pathological conditions and anatomical structures. I sometimes write English descriptions for your images and sometimes use them in relevant articles on English Wikipedia. The process of adding these images to Wikipedia articles helps me in learning radiology as well.

If there is anything that I can help with regarding radiology images on the English Wikipedia, please let me know. I will be happy to be of any assistance. My email ID is nethahussain gmail  · com.

Thanks again for all your good work, and have a good day! Netha Hussain (talk) 14:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear Netha! You are very welcome! And thanks for the translations! --Hellerhoff (talk) 09:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for uploading so many useful radiology images, I just used File:Morbus Hirschsprung im Erwachsenenalter 37M - CR - 001.jpg while creating an Anki deck for preparation for my pathology exam. ShadyMedic (talk) 12:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)