Hellevoetfotoshoot

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hellevoetfotoshoot!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Categorie Hellevoetsluis (vesting)

Hoi Hellevoetfotoshoot, als je een categorie maakt die een subcategorie is van een andere categorie, dan is het de bedoeling dat je de foto's die je daarin plaatst uit de 'hoofd'categorie haalt. Doordat ze in de subcategorie staan, staan ze indirect al in de hoofdcategorie, en ze daarin laten geeft alleen verwarring. Dus kan je alle foto's in Category:Hellevoetsluis (vesting) uit Category:Hellevoetsluis halen. Alvast bedankt, Akoopal (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC) (p.s. assumed you are dutch, english translation on request)

Ik heb jouw vraag op mijn OP beantwoord. Akoopal (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Antonius van Paduakerk

Hallo Hellevoetfotoshoot, ik zie dat je een paar mooie foto's van Hellevoetsluis hebt geplaatst. Ik heb een verzoekje, hopelijk kun je me helpen. Ik heb een foto nodig van de Antonius van Paduakerk in H'voetsluis, uit 1891. Kun jij daar een of meer plaatjes van maken en uploaden als je er een keer langskomt? De kerk staat hier op een foto: [1], die helaas niet overgenomen kan worden op Wikipedia. Ik zou overigens blij zijn met foto's van alle kerken in de plaats, maar met name deze wil ik gebruiken bij een nog te schrijven artikel en op een lijst. Met vriendelijke groet, Joris (talk) 21:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Meisjesfiguur, gemaakt door Pier Pander in 1894, Ryksargyf Fotos, Tresoar.JPG

File:Meisjesfiguur, gemaakt door Pier Pander in 1894, Ryksargyf Fotos, Tresoar.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Multichill (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hellevoetsluis ansichtkaart Vestingkerk6.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hellevoetsluis ansichtkaart Vestingkerk6.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hellevoetsluis ansichtkaart Vestingkerk6.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Wknight94 ^talk 03:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hellevoetsluis Antonius van Padua1.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hellevoetsluis Antonius van Padua1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hellevoetsluis Antonius van Padua1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Wknight94 ^talk 03:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Response

First, the burden is on the uploader to ensure the image is free. Second, that site's license says non-commercial only, which is not compatible with our license. That means everything at http://reliwiki.nl needs explicit COM:OTRS permission for use here. Wknight94 ^talk 10:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

So I am understanding fine. Wikimedia's licenses say everything on all of the sites can be used for commercial purposes. Since that is not true for the Reliwiki pictures, they cannot be on this site. If you want them to make an exception for these particular photos, ask them to contact COM:OTRS. Wknight94 ^talk 20:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Reliwiki says "no commercial use". We cannot host pictures that say "no commercial use". Wknight94 ^talk 10:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

You can replace no-permission with {{OTRS pending}} on all the images if you'd like. The Reliwiki permission needs to go to COM:OTRS. Wknight94 ^talk 13:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

@others: The responses are here : User_talk:Wknight94#images

Whether they can be used on _Wikipedia_ is not relevant. They need to be freely usable for any purpose anywhere. A Wikipedia-only license means it's not freely usable, and for that reason we don't have a license called "Wikipedia-only". Please read Commons:Licensing. The key-point here is the "non-commercial"-part in the license. If the source site changes it's license and/or if they release it under a different Creative Commons-license via COM:OTRS then the material may be loaded here. –Krinkle^talk 21:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Liebestod_from_Tristan_und_Isolde_(1968).ogv

File:Liebestod_from_Tristan_und_Isolde_(1968).ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 03:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)