Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, HenSti!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

IMO 8705383 edit

You regategorised this ship as being built in 1988. But www.equasis.org (the official site) as well as www.shipspotting.com and www.vesselfinder.com and the www.ferry-site.dk give as year of completion 1989. Do you have a special reasen why you choose for 1988? --Stunteltje (talk) 09:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category edit

Remember to add back the new category after you removed the old one. Thanks a lot. --B dash (talk) 01:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ships built in ... edit

  • Hi HenSti, eine schlechte Idee bzw. Lösung von dir, seit Jahren hatten wir ein ordentliches System mit dem Schiffsnamen in der Liste, IMO Nummer sagt keinem was, ich würde das so lassen, wie es früher war, alle Positionen kannst du sowieso nicht ändern, und wir bekommen ein buntes MultiCulti-Gemisch, Gruß,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 05:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok, die IMO-Kategorie lasse ich dann erst einmal, wie sie sind. 07:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Robin_Hood_(ship,_1995-2014) edit

 

Robin Hood (ship, 1995-2014) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Broichmore (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  HenSti (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Robin Hood (ship, 1995) edit

Category:Robin Hood (ship, 1995) is IMO 9087477, Category:Nils Dacke (ship, 1995) is IMO 9087465.

The Nils Dacke, is a different ship, sometimes photographed with its sister ship the Robin Hood. On marinetraffic.com there are images of Nils Dacke IMO 9087465, also loads of pictures of the Robin Hood IMO 9087465. One or two actually show both vessels together.

Cat Robin Hood (ship, 1995-2014) proclaims Robin Hood to be IMO 9087465, which it's not; as does Cat Robin Hood (ship, 1995-2016), also in error.

There are only six images in Category:Robin Hood (ship, 1995), it doesn't need three categories.

After sorting this mess out, you just come back in and revert my work???? Broichmore (talk) 12:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Robin_Hood_(ship,_1995-2016) edit

 

Category:Robin_Hood_(ship,_1995-2016) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Broichmore (talk) 12:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Schiffe im NOK edit

Moin HenSti, irgendwann ist die Oberkategorie Ships in the Kiel canal falsch angelegt worden und du folgst mit deinen Unterkategorien der falschen Schreibweise. Die richtige Bezeichnung ist Kiel Canal, siehe auch Category:Kiel Canal. Gruß --Ein Dahmer (talk) 09:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Trotz meines gut gemeinten Hinweises hast du wieder Kategorien mit der falschen Schreibweise erstellt. Warum, fragt sich --Ein Dahmer (talk) 20:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  HenSti (talk) 05:50, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Shipyard categories edit

Hi. Would you please open the logic of this edit?

Sandvikens Skeppsdocka och Mekaniska Verkstad operated during 1895-1938 and Helsinki Shipyard was founded in 2019 (81 years later). The only common link between these companies is that they operated the same facility (Hietalahti shipyard). The ships built by a previous operator must not be credited to the current one - it is incorrect and makes no sense. --Gwafton (talk) 08:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well, that was am mistake. I thougt, it would make more sence to have one category Category:List of ships built at Hietalahti shipyard instead of only one Category:Hietalahti shipyard. But yes, you're right. My edit doest't make sence. HenSti (talk) 11:45, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Abgewrackte Schiffe edit

Moin HenSti, vielleicht ist es dir noch nicht aufgefallen, aber du bist der Einzige, der bei den abgewrackten Schiffen die IMO-Kategorie mit einem „Key“ nach dem letzten Schiffsnamen ergänzt. Damit fallen die von dir bearbeiteten Passagierschiffe in der Übersicht immer aus der Rolle. Vielleicht ist es ja möglich, in Zukunft auf diese persönliche Besonderheit zu verzichten. Noch eine schöne Adventszeit wünscht --Ein Dahmer (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hallo ;) Das ar mir tatsächlich nicht so ganz klar. Aber ich werde zukünftig darauf achten und nicht "aus der Reihe fallen". Schöne Adventszeit noch. HenSti (talk) 13:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reminder edit

Hi HenSti. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I note that for the future. HenSti (talk) 10:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Meyer Werft Carnival Jubilee Disney Treasure.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 07:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I've commented my opinion at the talking page. 09:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)