User talk:High Contrast/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Image:Flackpanzer Gepard.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please upload the new version (without c in name) first and replace all usages of the old file (Use Checkusage). Then mark it with {{speedydelete}} Reason: error in filename, new version Image:Flakpanzer Gepard.jpg --Denniss 21:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Image license

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Instead of the PD-self, now Copirightedfreeuse license on some of your images with reupload please consider using a Creative Commons license. Your images will then be fully copyrighted but have some small restrictions of usage by others. Or use a dual-license like GFDL + Cc-by-sa-2.5 by tagging images with {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5}}. More info at Commons:Copyright_tags --Denniss 14:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Golf von Neapel 2002.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

Thank you for the upload of this photo
Informations are good but you have missed the license.
Could you give a correct license. If not this file run the risk of delation.
sorry for my short english.
Friendly. Oxam Hartog 23:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Just happened! Thanks for your commendatory words... -- High Contrast 19:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Night view of Taipei City.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Night view of Taipei City.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

H.T. Chien (Discuss|Contributions) 10:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Well that's ok. But I uploaded the oldest version of that image where the creator is named. Somebody edited this image. You can test it by investigating its file history. I have never ignored any Copyright notifications, that is important for me to recognize for anyone else. -- High Contrast 12:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I can see you are correct. The image you uploaded did have the name of the creator on it. However, the creator (Jerome Chen) told me the following requests for the image:

No derived works from this image. Also his name cannot be removed from the image.
Every redistribution and/or copy of the image must notify him in advance.
He does not wish to release the image in GFDL.

So it still not meet the license requirements in commons. Sorry to bother you.--H.T. Chien (Discuss|Contributions) 14:37, 15 October 2006 (UTC)