Лицензии edit

В файле ([1]) вы проставили свободную лицензию, сославшись на исходный файл ([2]). Его автор выложил как "собственную работу", однако это неверно. Это работа, основанная на существующих картах. Недавно такой же мой файл выставили на удаление по той причине, что я не указал источник, которым пользовался. Советую вам как-то исправить ситуацию, иначе и ваш файл как и исходный могут быть удалены админами.

Аналогичные проблемы у всех ваших файлов - первичные файлы, на которых они базируются, загружены с фейковыми лицензиями. Это понять очень просто: Если некто грузит КАРТУ земной поверхности, то он использует картографический сервис. Его и надо указать. Если карта загружена как "собственная работа", то это недопонимание. Удивленный1 (talk) 09:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • @Удивленный1: Спасибо, буду знать, что контроль за картами ужесточился (обычно указания на свободную карту-исходник с Commons хватало). Если у кого-то возникнут претензии к моим картам, буду их перерисовывать вручную (по контурам полупрозрачного слоя исходника, который потом удаляется). Что касается авторских прав на земную поверхность, то едва ли это касается контуров и очертаний. И, разумеется, полагаюсь на добрые намерения автора, загрузившего первоисточник. Homoatrox (talk) 10:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
    • Увы, контур и очертания тоже, как я понял, защищены АП. В таком случае рекомендую указывать как источник контура карты начала 20 века.))) Независимо от того, откуда этот контур реально взят. Удивленный1 (talk) 11:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:2019 European Games milk chocolate Spartak.jpg edit

 
File:2019 European Games milk chocolate Spartak.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:PACKAGING
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Roy17 (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
For your images about Belorussian police automobiles! 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:2020 anti-Lukashenko street poster.jpg edit

 
File:2020 anti-Lukashenko street poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative, no author’s permission
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

VLu (talk) 22:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Протесты edit

Здравствуйте! Прежде всего, большое спасибо вам за оперативный и качественный фотоматериал с акций протеста в Белоруссии.

Я вижу, что одна из этих фотографий была удалена. На Викискладе строгие правила в том числе и по производным изображениям, и поэтому не стоит загружать такие фото, где крупным планом видны другие авторские произведения, если неясно насчёт авторства и разрешения. Если вдруг у вас возникнут сомнения по поводу какого-то изображения, можете спросить у меня, охотно помогу.

При случае, хотел бы выразить солидарность с белорусским народом. Я категорически против любого насилия, а тем более заведомо нацистских методов удержания власти. И мне крайне стыдно за страну, гражданином которой я являюсь, что её власть открыто поддерживает этот бесчеловечный режим. Впрочем, стыдиться за свою страну мне, к сожалению, не привыкать. Берегите себя. --A.Savin 02:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Добрый день! Спасибо за тёплые слова! Не подумал о лицензиях при загрузке, т.к. половину листовки занимал простой текст. Homoatrox (talk) 10:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Добрый вечер! Да, большое спасибо за множество качественных иллюстраций! Если бы не вы, подавляющего числа свободных изображений протестов бы не было...--Brateevsky {talk} 20:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Подписываюсь почти под всем политическим комментарием коллеги Анатолия, кроме слов "заведомо нацистских", которые я бы заменил на "напоминающих нацистские". Ain92 (talk) 23:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

100.40.130.102 21:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Mural Minsk-Moscow in Minsk 1.jpg edit

 
File:Mural Minsk-Moscow in Minsk 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Mural Minsk-Moscow in Minsk 2.jpg edit

 
File:Mural Minsk-Moscow in Minsk 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

A cupcake for you! edit

  Спасибо за освещение идущих ныне белорусских протестов! Сам освещал протесты в России в 2010-е гг. и хорошо представляю, насколько трудоёмко категоризировать множество фото при заливке, и это уже не говоря о риске задержания, которому я почти не подвергался, и риске побоев, которому я не подвергался вовсе. Ain92 (talk) 23:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Благодарю! Мне пока что везёт оставаться не побитым и на свободе. Homoatrox (talk) 12:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • Надеюсь, что ничего в этом отношении не переменится) Если вдруг ещё есть фотки техники силовиков на улицах, может быть, архивные — заливайте, я с удовольствием помогу с категоризацией (и да, категорию August 2020 in Minsk я в основном очистил от файлов, которые уже есть в подкатегориях). Ain92 (talk) 18:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Kastryčnickaja street (Minsk, Belarus) — Вуліца Кастрычніцкая (Мінск, Беларусь) — Улица Октябрьская (Минск, Беларусь) - p07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Kastryčnickaja street (Minsk, Belarus) — Вуліца Кастрычніцкая (Мінск, Беларусь) — Улица Октябрьская (Минск, Беларусь) - p08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Kastryčnickaja street (Minsk, Belarus) — Вуліца Кастрычніцкая (Мінск, Беларусь) — Улица Октябрьская (Минск, Беларусь) - p09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Kastryčnickaja street (Minsk, Belarus) — Вуліца Кастрычніцкая (Мінск, Беларусь) — Улица Октябрьская (Минск, Беларусь) - p10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Kastryčnickaja street (Minsk, Belarus) — Вуліца Кастрычніцкая (Мінск, Беларусь) — Улица Октябрьская (Минск, Беларусь) - p12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Kastryčnickaja street (Minsk, Belarus) — Вуліца Кастрычніцкая (Мінск, Беларусь) — Улица Октябрьская (Минск, Беларусь) - p14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

«Вікі любіць фальклёр-2021» edit

 
Запрашэньне да ўдзелу ў «Вікі любіць фальклёр-2021»

Паважаны вікімэдыец! Ад імя ўдзельніц і ўдзельнікаў спаборніцтва
«Вікі любіць фальклёр-2021»

маем гонар запрасіць Вас да супрацы.

--User:W 10:29, 4 лютага 2021 (UTC+3) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.84.188.66 (talk) 07:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
File:2020 Belarusian protests — Minsk, 20 September p0022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
File:2020 Belarusian presidential election street information stand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Minsk social advertising 03.jpg edit

 
File:Minsk social advertising 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Фотографии с сайта president.gov.by edit

Добрый день. Так как вы активно участвуете в съёмках фотографий для иллюстрирования статей о Белоруссии в Википедии, то вы бы не могли ответить на вопрос о лицензировании файлов с сайта Президента Республики Беларусь ввиду следующих утверждений:

1. Материалы Портала могут использоваться в средствах массовой информации, распространяться в сети Интернет без каких-либо ограничений по объему и срокам публикации. Единственным условием является ссылка на первоисточник. Никакого предварительного согласия на использование материалов Портала со стороны пресс-службы Президента Республики Беларусь не требуется. (https://president.gov.by/ru/about)

2. Данный раздел портала Президента Республики Беларусь предоставляет журналистам, редакторам печатных изданий, интернет-порталов, а также всем иным пользователям уникальную возможность получить для использования оригинальные фотоматериалы. Здесь вы можете найти фотографии в высоком разрешении – для скачивания и использования без согласования с пресс-службой Президента Республики Беларусь. Все материалы разделены на две категории: в первой из них - «Президент» - фотографии, которые будут представлены на нашем сайте для скачивания постоянно. В разделе «Актуальное» - постоянно обновляющиеся материалы из текущего графика Главы государства. (https://president.gov.by/ru/photos-for-press)

Фактически же, файлы являются свободными, но не лицензированными по Creative Commons (для примера, материалы сайтов президентов России и Украины распространяются по CC-BY 4.0, президента Армении - CC-BY-SA 3.0 (аналогична Википедии)). Вы бы не помогли уточнить лицензионный статус фотографий с данного сайта ввиду данных положений дел, поскольку я это уже вынес на форум. Timur Rossolov (talk) 14:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Добрый день! Я, к сожалению, не обладаю достаточными познаниями в вопросах авторского права и не могу дать квалифицированный комментарий. Homoatrox (talk) 14:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Здесь скорее всего, нужна прямая связь через пресс-службу Администрации Президента для уточнения лицензионного статуса, поскольку очень немного сайтов Беларуси лицензированы по Creative Commons для их дальнейшего использования в продуктах Фонда Викимедиа (для Викисклада - это фотографии): https://president.gov.by/ru/president/administration/obrascheniya Timur Rossolov (talk) 14:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Например, вы не пробовали обращаться в электронную приёмную Мингорисполкома с уточнением лицензирования по Creative Commons? Белорусских сайтов, лицензированных по нему, крайне мало или вообще таковых нету. Timur Rossolov (talk) 20:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Не пробовал. Homoatrox (talk) 05:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Если что, к администратору сайта по поводу его лицензирования обратиться не получится, а он рассматривает только технические вопросы его работы. Поэтому единственный путь - электронная приёмная (https://minsk.gov.by/ru/feedback/10/), где вам всё разъяснят. Далее же запрос к команде VRT (бывшей OTRS). Timur Rossolov (talk) 06:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
    По электронной почте press@president.gov.by вы сможете попробовать написать обращение в пресс-службу. Поэтому вся надежда только на Вас. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Извините, я к этому не готов. Homoatrox (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Переписные листы переписей населения в Белоруссии edit

Привет. Я на Викисклад загрузил формы переписных листов 1999 года и планирую загружать формы 2009 и 2019 годов. Так как это официальные документы, то это не противоречит белорусскому законодательству? Timur Rossolov (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dyrrhachium edit

Hi, I would like to have more information about your map (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dyrrhachium_48_en.png). Where did you find information on the location of the port of Dyrrhachium: your map shows an access to a coastal lagoon on top of your map ? Where did you find information about the location of the camps ? Please contact me at arthur.degraauw@gmail.com. Thanks a lot for any help you may provide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artreve (talk • contribs) 10:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Белорусско-польская граница edit

Добрый день, в файле File:Belarus-Poland border (be).png ошибка — в Бресте в надписи «легкавыя и аўтобусы» русское «и» вместо «і». Можете исправить?--Artsiom91 (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Прошу отрецензировать мои первые загрузки edit

Здравствуйте, уважаемый Homoatrox! Загрузил на Викисклад первую серию своих фото - это музейный комплекс "Мельница и кузница"[3] в Заславле. В том числе добавил и снимки интерьеров помещений, их до сих пор в соответствующих категориях было маловато. Возможно Вы могли бы просмотреть добавления, всё ли там грамотно оформлено и все ли снимки допустимы на складе (я, к сожалению, с правилами копирайта на публично выставленные объекты мало знаком). Если какие-то снимки недопустимы - то что из этого можно передислоцировать в ру.Википедию для дальнейшего использования в статьях о Заславле? С благодарностью за внимание, Призрак Св. Лаврентия (talk) 21:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Добрый день (прошу прощения за поздний ответ)! На мой взгляд, с оформлением загруженных фотографий всё хорошо! Разве что было бы замечательно добавлять описания и на других языках, которыми Вы владеете — это поможет найти их через поисковики. Homoatrox (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ничего страшного. :) Я недостаточно, к сожалению, владею другими языками. Ну, вернее, не уверен в том, что смогу перевести описание с русского на другие языки вполне грамотно, чтобы это не выглядело как "моя по твоя". Если в сообществе есть участники, способные и готовые сделать это грамотно - я ни в коем случае не против. Призрак Св. Лаврентия (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
К слову, я бы смастерил в Gimp'е нормальную заставку для карточки Заславля из нескольких фото, как это сделано для многих городов. Можно ли для этого употреблять только свободные снимки, или допускается "добросовестное" использование (тогда туда можно было бы добавить одно-два фото нового города)? Призрак Св. Лаврентия (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
В коллажах должны использоваться исключительно свободные фотографии с совместимыми лицензиями. Homoatrox (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Сделал вот такое[4]. Как считаете, пойдет для заставки? Призрак Св. Лаврентия (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Сложно сказать, я не специалист в коллажах. Homoatrox (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

К слову. Немного отсортировал фотки этого комплекса по подкатегориям. Там есть подкатегория 'Sviran'. В то же время, белорусская Википедия говорит, что свиран - это всего лишь одно из названий амбара, наверное диалектное. Слово это, очевидно, никому кроме белорусских лингвистов и этнографов будет непонятно. Стандартное название таких строений по-русски и по-белорусски - амбар, по-английски - granary. В связи с этим, стоило бы переименовать категорию в 'Granary', но что для этого требуется? Нужно где-то открыть обсуждение или просто обратиться к администратору? Заодно, возможно, стоит как-то переименовать категорию 'Zavoznik House'. Слово "завозник" не знакомо даже белорусской википедии, поэтому логично было бы дать английское название категории в соответствии с правилами английского языка, что-то вроде 'Mill Hotel'. Ведь, насколько я понял правила Викисклада, следует избегать всяких диалектных и прочих сугубо локальных слов в названиях категорий - они способны только запутать читателя. Призрак Св. Лаврентия (talk) 13:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Правила и, что не менее важно, сложившаяся практика именования категорий на Викискладе оставляют много свободы в таких вопросах. Не знаю, была ли возле амбара табличка с соответствующей версией названия на английском языке, такие вещи могут быть решающим доводом. "Mill Hotel" — честно говоря, такое название категории не станет понятнее. Homoatrox (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Насколько я помню, в музее есть только стандартные таблички на белорусском языке в форме гербового щита, сообщающие о том, что здание охраняется законом, и стенды на 3-м этаже мельницы, почему-то, на белорусской тарашкевице. Но я, кажется, нашел нужную страницу[5] на сайте музейного комплекса в интернете. Если верить ей, то они называют свой амбар по английски 'barn', а этот несчастный "дом завозников" - 'house of the suppliers'. Я думаю, это достаточно авторитетный источник для переименования. :) Только я не знаю, как это делается на Викискладе - и имею ли я вообще доступ к переименованию категорий? Призрак Св. Лаврентия (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Minsk edit

Доброе утро! Вы как активный белорусский участник Викисклада, не могли бы решить проблему переполнения первичной категории о Минске? По дочерним категориям не распределено около 1,5 тысяч фотографий, что является сверхвысоким рубежом для городов с населением более 2 миллионов человек. Даже по более крупным городам мира число распределённых фотографий намного меньше. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 05:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Доброе утро! Попробую на этой неделе разложить большую часть фотографий по категориям улиц и парков и, по возможности, по не-географическим категориям. Homoatrox (talk) 06:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
    При распределении фотографий обращай также внимание на географические координаты, что также значительно облегчит поиск необходимых категорий. Вдобавок же через реестр объектов культурного наследия Беларуси создавайте необходимые категории Викисклада и элементы Викиданных. И в принципе нераспределённых файлов должно быть минимум, но это большая рутинная работа с таким количеством. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 09:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Invasion of Ukraine edit

Hi, I'm updating this file based on the Russian ground advances. Could you share with me your sources on where Russians are crossing the border please? Thanks. Viewsridge (talk) 11:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

What software is used to create maps like these? edit

Hi, I would like to know what software can be used to create PNG maps like this one? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/War_in_Ukraine_%282022%29_en.png — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.1.176.167 (talk) 12:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

You did a good work there, Homoatrox. Can you also upload it as a SVG file? SVG files can be edited more easily and allow it to be translated to another languages if I understand it correctly. --Sven792 (talk) 11:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Uploaded as File:War_in_Ukraine_(2022)_en.svg, but I see several problems with the text (will try to fix them, although they are not always visible during preview). And please don't pay attention what goes beyond the borders. Homoatrox (talk) 13:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
(updated) Sorry, inscriptions are still different from the preview in the editor and I can't fix this prolem. Feel free to use and modify this file. Homoatrox (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Логотип телеканала Беларусь 1 edit

Доброе утро! Вы бы не могли поставить шаблон на w:ru:Файл:Belarus-1.jpg для последующего переноса файла на Викисклад? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Полагаю, что с учётом наложенной на Вас в рувики частичной блокировки нужно разрешение Вашего наставника. Homoatrox (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Belarusian chocolate and candies (Kommunarka factory) — Шоколад и конфеты фабрики Коммунарка (Беларусь).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Liebiadziny reserve (Belarus) 28 — Swan monument and real swan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Liebiadziny reserve (Belarus) 29 — Swan monument and real swan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:D3 residential complex in Minsk (low quality).jpg edit

 
File:D3 residential complex in Minsk (low quality).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Dormitory in Minsk.jpg edit

 
File:Dormitory in Minsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, i'd like to ask if you have a larger version of an image you posted. edit

The image in question is titled "Russian helicopter in Minsk, Belarus (23 February 2022).jpg" and i wanted to ask if you have the original, unless that is the original and if i could download it. Rockybrown (talk) 22:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the original file was a Raw image with heavy noise (my camera did its best but it's not suitable for planespotting). I adjusted the Raw file (lighting and shadows) and cropped a bit to export into this JPEG file. The full-size lossless photo won't be better than this file due to noise. By the way, I'm not even sure if the original Raw file still exists, but can't check right now. What for this photo, you can download it in full size, share and use it without any permission, because I used the public-domain-like CC0 1.0 licence. Homoatrox (talk) 17:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can understand the difficulty of capturing a moving target with a phone, i have tried and failed many times myself. It is however easy to see all the details in the cropped and adjusted photo, i usually seek out the original too for comparison. Rockybrown (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Pieramožcaŭ avenue (Minsk) 18 — Lazurit.jpg edit

 
File:Pieramožcaŭ avenue (Minsk) 18 — Lazurit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

FYI, your image has been uploaded to the English Wikipedia as en:File:Lazurit Belarus.jpg where it is usable as a free image since the English Wikipedia only goes by US copyright on freedom of panorama which allowable for architectural works. -- Whpq (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Niasvizh Yakub Kolas.jpg edit

 
File:Niasvizh Yakub Kolas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 11:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Former cemetery Zalataja Horka sign (Minsk).jpg edit

 
File:Former cemetery Zalataja Horka sign (Minsk).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Temporary altar (Minsk).jpg edit

 
File:Temporary altar (Minsk).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply