User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive28

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, rynek, pomnik Świętej Trójcy, 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Duszniki-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Motocykl WSK 125 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Motocykl WSK 125 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zespół cieśni kanału nadgarstka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Korfantego 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ccw tilt --Poco a poco 09:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal — Invitation

		Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal
		Hi Jacek Halicki, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2018 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2018. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address. Kind regards, The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Hałda w Nowej Rudzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rondo Wolności w Nowej Rudzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zapora w Międzygórzu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zapora w Międzygórzu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zapora w Międzygórzu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zapora w Międzygórzu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Wojska Polskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom w Szalejowie Górnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom w Szalejowie Górnym 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom w Szalejowie Górnym 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Wielkiej Sowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Wielkiej Sowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica na Wielkiej Sowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica na Wielkiej Sowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 BTS na Wielkiej Sowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko Sowa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko Sowa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Panorama ze Śnieżnika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kłodzko, ul. Kościuszki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kłodzko, ul. Kościuszki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 09:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zapora w Międzygórzu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looking at the lamp post, it's tilted.--Peulle 14:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)@Peulle:  Done--Jacek Halicki 18:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Yep, OK now. --Peulle 13:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wiadukt kolejowy w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wiadukt kolejowy w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wiadukt kolejowy w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wiadukt kolejowy w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom w Ludwikowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica w Skopaniu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:43, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica w Skopaniu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 5 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 17:58, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Dusznikach-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 17:56, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Dusznikach-Zdroju 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Wojska Polskiego 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 09:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek Wypoczynkowy Blachownia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek Wypoczynkowy Blachownia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:04, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Hotel Fryderyk w Dusznikach-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Koścół Polskokatolicki w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Koścół Polskokatolicki w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Koścół Polskokatolicki w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Koścół Polskokatolicki w Dusznikach-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna wotywna Matki Boskiej z Dzieciątkiem w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna wotywna Matki Boskiej z Dzieciątkiem w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna wotywna Matki Boskiej z Dzieciątkiem w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna wotywna Matki Boskiej z Dzieciątkiem w Dusznikach-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna wotywna Matki Boskiej z Dzieciątkiem w Dusznikach-Zdroju 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna wotywna Matki Boskiej z Dzieciątkiem w Dusznikach-Zdroju 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rynek w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rynek w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rynek w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pręgierz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pręgierz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom seniora Magdalenka w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 08:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom seniora Magdalenka w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:05, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Słowackiego 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 09:05, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dworek Chopina w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 09:05, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dworek Chopina w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 09:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dworek Chopina w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pomnik Fryderyka Chopina w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pomnik Fryderyka Chopina w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pijalnia wody mineralnej w Dusznikach-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muszla koncertowa w Dusznikach-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 08:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Dalida1954.jpg

File:Dalida1954.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, gilotyna do cięcia papieru 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, gilotyna do cięcia papieru 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The description needs improving. OK that this is a museum, but what does the picture actually show?--Peulle 09:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)@Peulle:  Done--Jacek Halicki 15:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, gniotownik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, holender 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it would be helpful if the description said something about what this is, not just that it's in a museum.--Peulle 09:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC) All of the pictures taken in museum are described in English and Polish.--Jacek Halicki 10:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC) OK.--Peulle 11:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, holender 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, kalander.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, kamień ze ścieraka łańcuchowego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, ścierak prasowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rbrechko 10:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, rafka 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Tsungam 09:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Muzeum Papiernictwa w Dusznikach-Zdroju, rafka 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dawne schronisko górskie „Szarotka” w Lasówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dawne schronisko górskie „Szarotka” w Lasówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Antoniego w Lasówce 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 10:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Lesicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 10:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Lesicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Wray Castle

Hi Jacek,

I reformatted your question to get rid of an unwanted <CR>. I trust that you don't mind. Martinvl (talk) 16:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Lesicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 10:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Lesicy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Lesicy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but it needs an additional category, it also looks a bit squeezed, you may try to enlarge the statue changing the aspect ratio --Poco a poco 10:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)  Done --Jacek Halicki 12:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Lesicy 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dawna strażnica WOP w Lesicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But is it a watchtower? --ArildV 10:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Międzylesiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Międzylesiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Międzylesiu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Międzylesiu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Międzylesiu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
WSK motorcycles, WSK 125 Kos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dam in Międzygórze, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bismarck tower on Wielka Sowa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schronisko Sowa, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schronisko Sowa, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

10 Wojska Polskiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from E 

It is a beautiful image It would be useful to be able to place it at least in one project. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Międzylesiu 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Fontanna w Międzylesiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Fontanna w Międzylesiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:21, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Jana Pawła II w Międzylesiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:22, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Jana Pawła II w Międzylesiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:22, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway viaduct in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramic view from Králický Sněžník.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Łącznik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bożków, John of Nepomuk statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bystrzyckie, Czuba and Ubocze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek w Międzylesiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:08, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek w Międzylesiu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek w Międzylesiu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Mikowice 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Mikowice 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bottom could have been darker. But image quality is good for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House No. 47 in Szalejów Górny, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Sprzymierzonych Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:45, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Kłodzka Street in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Kłodzka Street in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Słowackiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przejście graniczne Mostowice-Orlické Záhoří.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dzika Orlica w Mostowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dzika Orlica w Mostowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Droga w Piaskowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:46, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Roztoki.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niemojów, John of Nepomuk scuplture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roztoki, John of Nepomuk sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Wojska Polskiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Międzylesie, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Czuba i Ubocze, Góry Bystrzyckie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek w Międzylesiu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP w Niemojowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP w Niemojowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP w Niemojowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That's not a church, I miss an specific category here --Poco a poco 13:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Międzylesie, Virgin Mary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Duszniki-Zdrój, Saint Florian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zajazd Gościniec w Niemojowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Niemojowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dwór w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Roztokach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Duszniki-Zdrój, Saint Sebastian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Visitation in Niemojów, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, Tournasol7 (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polish Catholic church of Our Lady of the Rosary in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polish Catholic church of Our Lady of the Rosary in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

explanation

I'm sorry, I teased you a little. But I realize, that I took you for another person. I now support your image. all my excuses.--Picte (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marcina w Roztokach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dwór w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Obora w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Obora w Roztokach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Obora w Roztokach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony of Padua church in Lasówka, corner stone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John Paul II church in Międzylesie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Lesica, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Lesica, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Plebania w Roztokach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Plebania w Roztokach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 09:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Roztokach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 47 w Szalejowie Górnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szczytnik, Góry Stołowe, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Duszniki-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Duszniki-Zdrój, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój, bandshell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Międzylesie, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment it's just this lighting right that disturbs me a little.--Picte (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Commentdo you want me to take off post?
•  Comment Insufficient technical quality due to the post. No answer to my questions.--Picte (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  @Picte: I didn't answered because you didn't asked any specific question. It's not possible to take a picture of the column from the front side the other way because a streetlight and bushes made it impossible. In my opinion the place of taking a picture is perfectly chosen.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  @Jacek Halicki: it is possible to remove the post I have proposed to you--Picte (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  @Jacek Halicki: I speak and I prove. It is possible to remove the post, it is actually less than 5 minutes of work. but if you do not like it you are free to put back the old version--Picte (talk) 21:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  @Picte: What you did was falsification of reality. Also, look at my notes in the picture.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  @Jacek Halicki: then you can retaurer your version, but I maintain my opinion on the qualities this technique is not enough. the histogram is not correct. contrast quality is low.these criteria are written into the rules.--Picte (talk) 22:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment @Picte: Cette image est de qualité suffisante pour VI. On peut faire des remarque sur la forme mais pas voter contre sur le fond au vu du règlement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

   Comment@Archaeodontosaurus: Maintenant que j'ai enlevé le poteau elle est lisible, mais il n'en veut pas comme ça. Son poteau tombe en plein dans la ligne de force à droite, du coup l'image et illisible. il est assez virulent dans ces commentaires sur les autres photos mais ne réponds pas aux questions qu'on lui pose. c'est simplement pour lui signifier que la démocratie n'est pas à géométrie variable, je modifierai ce soir en neutre quand il aura remis sa version.--Picte (talk) 07:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support--Picte (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Chopin Golf Szczytna w Szczytnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ślepowron, Góry Stołowe, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Roztoki, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Picte (talk) 18:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój, guillotine shear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój, calender.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Wow ! I want one. Useful image ! --Picte (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój, pump house.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Roztoki, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope, note that File:2018 Plebania w Roztokach 1.jpg is also a good candidate, but ok Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Visitation in Niemojów, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Droga w Piaskowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przejście graniczne Niemojów-Bartošovice v Orlických horách 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przejście graniczne Niemojów-Bartošovice v Orlických horách 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP w Łączniku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Bożkowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Piaskowiec i Kamiennik, Góry Stołowe, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK Imo. --ArildV 21:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój, press crusher.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój, hollander.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Fryderyk Chopin in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orlické hory, Rozdroże pod Hutniczą Kopą.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niemojów, Niemojów-Bartošovice v Orlických horách border crossing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Duszniki-Zdrój, Madonna and Child.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dzika Orlica w Mostowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be sharper up top, and less exposed, but overall enough --Daniel Case 18:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Droga Dusznicka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rozdroże pod Hutniczą Kopą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dalida1954.jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:57, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, rynek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, stary dom 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, kościół 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, kościół 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, kościół 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, kościół 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, rynek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight cw tilt --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC) DoneJacek Halicki 13:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Tuner Akai AT-2200 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Tuner Akai AT-2200 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Tuner Akai AT-2200 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 E-papieros mod 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Red Army Kazan.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Red Army Kazan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Red Army Kazan.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom w Rogówku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 5 w Gaju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 15 w Gaju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 17:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 15 w Gaju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sixflashphoto 19:15, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rzeźba w Gaju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rzeźba w Gaju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Altana w Gaju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 5 w Gaju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 5 w Gaju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Strumień w Gaju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Akai AT-2200 tuner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:07, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), box mod Lost Vape Paranormal 250C and vaporizer SvoëMesto Kayfun V4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:53, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przełęcz Droszkowska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Sixflashphoto 18:04, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Droszkowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Droszkowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but wrong description -- Spurzem 09:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ruiny zamku w Idzikowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ruiny zamku w Idzikowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przednia i Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pasterskie Skały 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pasterskie Skały 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 10:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pasterskie Skały 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 10:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Mała Wilcza Góra i Dranica, Góry Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pasterskie Skały 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Sixflashphoto 19:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 22 w Jaszkówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 22 w Jaszkówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 22 w Jaszkówce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 18 w Jaszkówce i Kłodzko 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe the spots (birds) should be removed. --Ermell 12:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 18 w Jaszkówce i Kłodzko 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:17, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kłodzko z Jaszkówki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kłodzko z Jaszkówki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kłodzko z Jaszkówki 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zajazd Kukułka w Wojciechowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:17, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zajazd Kukułka w Wojciechowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zajazd Kukułka w Wojciechowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jaszkówka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Franciszka w Jaszkówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Franciszka w Jaszkówce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Franciszka w Jaszkówce 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:41, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 11 w Kamiennej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check for CAs at the wires. --XRay 10:41, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kaplica pw. Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Kamiennej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kaplica pw. Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Kamiennej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Młoty, Bystrzyca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I'll go with the one you chose. Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnis palace and park complex in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, house of servants.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaszkówka, sculpture of Francis of Assisi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Again I'll defer to your choice. Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Droszków, sculpture of John of Nepomuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It needs geocoding. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:49, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bardzkie, Grodzisko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kaplica pw. Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Kamiennej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 11 w Kamiennej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Franciszka w Jaszkówce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Igliczna, exopsure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaszkówka, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I'll go with your choice; Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacred Heart chapel in Kamienna, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacred Heart chapel in Kamienna, tympanum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Wójtowice, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments } Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments } Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Leśniczówka w Młotach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments } Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Leśniczówka w Młotach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Leśniczówka w Młotach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in Rogówek.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Podzamek Palace, park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pasterskie Skały, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Podzamek Palace, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Podzamek Palace, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Bystrzyca w Młotach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Remiza OSP w Nowym Waliszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Floriana w Nowym Waliszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 09:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Podzamek Palace, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:49, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bardzkie, Podzamecka Kopa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice shot; Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Droszkowska Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bardzkie, Kłodzka Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:16, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nowy Waliszów, fire station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Also nice; Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Remiza OSP w Nowym Waliszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:33, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dawna remiza OSP w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:43, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dawna remiza OSP w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 12:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom czeladny w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also somewhat overexposed in the clouds, but in this case not disturbing --Smial 09:42, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle ruins in Idzików.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wzgórza Rogówki, exposure from Rogówek.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Sokolec, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Sokolec, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom czeladny w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 09:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Podzamku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Podzamku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:59, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Podzamku 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Podzamku 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:30, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przełęcz Kłodzka, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Krzyże w Rogówku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Krzyże w Rogówku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Krzyże w Rogówku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wzgórza Rogówki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 09:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 46 w Starej Bystrzycy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 46 w Starej Bystrzycy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 48 w Starej Bystrzycy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 48 w Starej Bystrzycy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Disturbing are the power lines (remove?), --Fischer.H 08:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)@Fischer.H:  Done--Jacek Halicki 15:47, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 16 w Wójtowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 16 w Wójtowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 08:08, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Grodzisko, Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:30, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Witraż więźniowie-02.jpg

File:Witraż więźniowie-02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Catrìona (talk) 07:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Podzamecka Kopa, Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Sokolec, Góry Złote, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Sokolec, Góry Złote, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 16 w Wójtowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Sokolec, Góry Złote, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rzeźba w Gaju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rzeźba w Gaju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good lighting and good quality -- Spurzem 10:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Park w Podzamku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp --Daniel Case 19:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Bystrzyca w Młotach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice detail in foreground; colors realistic --Daniel Case 06:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Droszkowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 11 w Kamiennej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Podzamku 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Remiza OSP w Nowym Waliszowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Remiza OSP w Nowym Waliszowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Podzamecka Kopa i Grodzisko, Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kaplica w Rogówku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ośrodek wypoczynkowy AMW w Młotach 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMO, the composition of the previous photo is much better; a part of the building on the left spoils this picture rather significantly. But it is a QI. Dmitry Ivanov 09:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 11, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 11, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 11, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 12:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 11, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kaplica w Rogówku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szkudła i Sowiniec, Góry Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wojciechowice, zajazd Kukułka 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wojciechowice, zajazd Kukułka 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jaszkówka, figura św. Franciszka 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jaszkówka, figura św. Franciszka 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jaszkówka, figura św. Franciszka 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jaszkówka, figura św. Franciszka 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jaszkówka, figura św. Franciszka 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul.Krakowska 12 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul.Krakowska 12 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Good quality, Tournasol7 06:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul.Krakowska 12 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)