User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive6

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wyspiańskiego, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 16:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wyspiańskiego, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 23:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wyspiańskiego, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Daszyńskiego, kładka 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A geotag would be appreciated. --Cayambe 21:34, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Jasna, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Ptasia, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Łużycka, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Tetmajera, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Tetmajera, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:06, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, szpital, budynek administracji.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, dzwonnica kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Pleclown 11:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, rynek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

)}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, front facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yamaha XV 535 Virago.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Generic1139 18:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, stare miasto 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Ziębicka 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Description in English wood be appreciated. --P e z i 22:36, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, mury obronne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO another crop would be better.--XRay 15:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Significant perspective/tilt issues. Mattbuck 20:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 13:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11-11a Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
32 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
32 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Kłodzku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 18 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 11:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:06, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

{{QICpromoted|File:2014_Nysa,_pałac_biskupi_03.JPG|Bishops Palace in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)| Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 09:33, 26 October 2014 (UTC

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Żelazno, kościół św. Marcina o zmierzchu.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Żelazno, kościół św. Marcina o zmierzchu.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Długosza, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 21:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Drzymały 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Geocoding would be appreciated.) --P e z i 22:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Drzymały 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Korytowska 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Geocoding would be appreciated.) --P e z i 22:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Kromera 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Geocoding would be appreciated.) --P e z i 22:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Św. Wojciecha 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Geocoding would be appreciated.) --P e z i 22:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Św. Wojciecha 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:56, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It must be possible to correct the horizontal lines, but QI anyway. --JLPC 16:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC) --JLPC 16:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, rynek 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 13:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kolegium św. Anny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Brateevsky 19:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 13:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Brateevsky 19:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, pl. Katedralny 8 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 12:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC). Good quality. -- ~~~~

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Lądek-Zdrój, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of parish church in Lądek-Zdrój, nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of parish church in Lądek-Zdrój, presbytery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 21:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful (orientation changed to portrait). --P e z i (talk) 18:06, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
34 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Halavar (talk) 12:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
35 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Halavar (talk) 12:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Halavar (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, główna aleja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 23:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 12 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 14 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 10:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Rodzinna 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me. --Hockei 19:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, dzwonnica kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 16 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 12:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 16 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CA that neede to be removed. I left a note. --Halavar 12:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)  Support I do not see a big difference, but I think can pass as QI --Halavar 16:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 16 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka, fontanna Trytona 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka, fontanna Trytona 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Kłodzku, panorama, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 4-6-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check. There are CAs at the top.--XRay 16:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 4 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the part of the roof at the right is disturbing. And the image could be sharper.--XRay 16:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Warty, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. --Mattbuck 22:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Walecznych, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Szpitalna, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 024.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --Mattbuck 22:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  DoneI'm not sure if I understood you well, but now I think it's better.--Jacek Halicki 12:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC) That works. Mattbuck 22:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz i kolumna maryjna 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 13:27, 24 October 2014 (UTC) Seems fine to me. Mattbuck 08:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 12:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. (Orientation changed to "portrait") --P e z i (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 17:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. (Orientation changed to "portrait") --P e z i (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 17:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7-7a Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. (Orientation changed to "portrait") --P e z i (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 17:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6-6a Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 19:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 17:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Wałowa 3-5 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Wałowa 3-5 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 12:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Wałowa 3-5 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Wałowa 3-5 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, pałac biskupi 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Tetmajera, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 21:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC) OK then. Mattbuck 22:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół Zwiastowania NMP 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail and symmetry --Daniel Case 23:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, dzwonnica kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. There are CAs at the top (cross).--XRay 16:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Perspective correction is overdone too - the tower's leaning out. Mattbuck 22:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC) Good. Mattbuck 21:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 21:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 21:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose I think this scope is too identical from the former one. Sorry. Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
• Then I  Support this one over the other. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
• Then please create a MVR. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support There is only one image in this scope. All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 22:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • @Ikar.us and Halavar: This makes a joke on the whole VI project. How many scopes a simple church like this can have? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • We were talking about this few times... Some kind of buildings (like churches) looks completly different depending on which side you take a picture. I think that all of the people in VIC accept this, except you... --Halavar (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • For me it is obvious that should be that much scopes, how much is pages of an object, from wchich you can take different photos. And if Yann thoughts differently, he should propose rules change and voting this on page of VI discussion. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • For a simple church like this, there should not be more than 2 scopes: one from the front, one from the back. For a cathedral, more scopes are acceptable. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Yann, but we've got 2 scopes: one from the back look here: Commons:Valued image candidates/2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 05.JPG and the second one, from the front (this image). So, everything is good:) Simple church, and 2 scopes. So I don't know why you are doing a problem since 26 October...

Sorry, but no. This is the front. Hope you see what I mean. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:12, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:13, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, statue of the Virgin Mary, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:13, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian Column in Kłodzko, statue of the Virgin Mary, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół klasztorny dominikanów 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół klasztorny dominikanów 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół klasztorny dominikanów 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół klasztorny dominikanów 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół klasztorny dominikanów 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 12:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Lewis Hulbert 12:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, but file only has polsky description and I don't understand it to categorice in QI Recently promoted--Lmbuga 13:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 16:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 10 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kościelna 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well lit, although the street could probably be cropped out --Daniel Case 15:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 07.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 07.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, Brama Wróbla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, brama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality with help of a category I added. --Poco a poco 11:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC) Thx, I forget it.--Jacek Halicki 12:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, brama 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 12:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów Wniebowzięcia NMP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, gimnazjum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, gimnazjum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, gimnazjum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół klasztorny dominikanów 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Apart from the tilt that you applied an adjustment of vertical perspective would have rounded it, but still acceptable for QI, Poco a poco 09:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pillory in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 17.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 17.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Miła Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Miła Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Spacerowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 18:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Spacerowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, covered bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 18:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and QI for me though it seems a bit too bright at the left -- Spurzem 09:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:53, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Kłodzku, panorama, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 6-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Latern is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 07:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 13:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, fontanna w parku zdrojowym 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, fontanna w parku zdrojowym 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Livioandronico2013 20:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ul. Nyska 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ul. Nyska 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Estakada w Kłodzku, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Ignacego w Kłodzku, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A big dustspot. Also a poorly cloned out wire which is still visible. Both fixable. --Cccefalon 11:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 16:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Śląska, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Krzywa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now, thanks --Poco a poco 20:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy. --ArildV 21:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pillory in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Evangelical church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Evangelical church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, fontanna w parku zdrojowym 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, Rynek 4 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, Rynek 3 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, pałac 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But IMO it looks lika a palace, not a castle. --Halavar 13:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Kinda concerned about the shadows, but good enough quality. --Crisco 1492 15:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 18:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Wałowa 3-5 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Yamaha XV 535 Virago.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Sienkiewicza, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Sienkiewicza, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Sienkiewicza, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former lutheran school in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former lutheran school in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk statue in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Okrzei Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kłodzka gate tower in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kłodzka gate tower in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 12:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian chapel in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMO this one is better if English description and geocoding is added. (It's not from N but NE then). --P e z i (talk) 08:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The photograph which suggest have unnatural colors. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:53, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

 Comment In this case I cancel my vote. --P e z i (talk) 23:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kaplica św. Floriana 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica św. Jerzego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is door to the chapel.--Jacek Halicki 21:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, rynek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sufficient quality for QI --Hubertl 22:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok.--ArildV 19:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 8 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 8 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 8 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 18:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC) Probably QI now, and that removal was done pretty well, but it's still just about possible to see the edges of where the bollard was. Could you fix that please? Mattbuck 23:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 22:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Still a bit visible, but ok for QI. Mattbuck 08:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian chapel in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Maybe not great, but it's ok. Useful. --Halavar (talk) 22:50, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pillory in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 14:58, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 16:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rycerska gate tower in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:24, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 16:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 17:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:56, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, układ urbanistyczny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, though I'd probably crop some more off the left. --Mattbuck 23:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ul. Nyska 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 21:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:29, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 14:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, ul Wojska Polskiego 23 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --C messier 15:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A small disturbing branch at the left. --XRay 12:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality, but the dark parts need brightening. --Hockei 21:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:31, 8 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Very good. --Hockei 18:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, układ urbanistyczny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment left end is leaning out. --C messier 14:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Looks ok to me @C messier: .  Support Mattbuck 23:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC) I was referring to the right light post, anyway, not really a big problem as the rest of the image is OK. --C messier 16:23, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

VI votes

Hi,

If you support a nomination, you need to change "nominated" to "supported". Thanks for your support. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
24 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Zieleńcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, krzywa wieża 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kamień Napoleona 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kamień Napoleona 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Subject matter is not exciting, but the image is quality. --Ram-Man 18:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough. --Ram-Man 18:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 17:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support: useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, main facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 20:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Park w Kłodzku.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Park w Kłodzku.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, budynek straży pożarnej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, budynek straży pożarnej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:46, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:51, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:51, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (There are minor CAs at the tablecloths.) --XRay 16:44, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, rynek 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted on left+perspective, a bit overexposed, please decrease a bit the highlights --Christian Ferrer 15:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 18:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 18:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 10:25, 8 November 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of parish church in Lądek-Zdrój, matroneum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Interior of parish church in Lądek-Zdrój, chapel of Mary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Francis Xavier chapel in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, mury miejskie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Two points that might be cloned out. See the notes. --Halavar 18:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:56, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sky should be denoised. --Halavar 18:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ratusz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 21:14, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Kolejowa 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done You've high expectations :-) --Jacek Halicki 17:30, 12 November 2014 (UTC) That is true, but I hope not unreasonably so. Having been judging WLM Ukraine I've become a bit fed up of things in the way (Ukraine seems to only allow you to take a photo if you're standing actually in a tree). Mattbuck 22:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 16:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 22:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wodna 10 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wodna 10 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wodna 10 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 12:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 12:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows chapel in Wolany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. Very nice picture! --P e z i (talk) 22:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Francis Xavier chapel in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 23:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 11:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John of Nepomuk church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John of Nepomuk church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:02, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Defensive walls in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Międzyleśna Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Defensive walls in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Wojska Polskiego Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portcullis, Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : could you complete the scope, please ? --JLPC (talk) 19:15, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. You should add a category for the place. Yann (talk) 11:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kotlina Kłodzka, view from Zieleniec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa park in Polanica-Zdrój, main avenue, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope ? --JLPC (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Subaru model cars.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:13, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golden Venture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Międzygórze, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 16:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 16:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 22:10, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 6 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 6 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 6 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 22 i 23 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Kościelna 1 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Street lights in Poland, Grottgera Street in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Międzygórze, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good quarter shot. --Mile (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Miedzyleśna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Siemiradzkiego Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, mury miejskie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The light is very harsh, but at least everything is sharp enough and it's not overexposed. Borderline OK for me. --Ram-Man 03:20, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parks in Kłodzko, park at Noworudzka Street, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support ok IMO -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Im. / Fav.} 08:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Podmiejska Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Podmiejska Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Sienna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The only one in scope, so it's the best one and useful of course. --Halavar (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. George church in Długopole Dolne, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:28, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. George church in Długopole Dolne, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. P.S. There is almost the same image (File:2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 01.JPG) in that category and I think it should be deleted. --Halavar (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

(poor English) Thanks. Thanks for your pictures. Each passing day your pictures are better. Before long, you'll have more photos of QI than I. Thanks, excellent collaboration and nice and cute pictures--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most żelazny 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Estakada w Kłodzku, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Estakada w Kłodzku, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, zespół klasztorny franciszkanek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:13, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most żelazny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wodna 10 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 22:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 15:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Gorzanów, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Gorzanów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony of Padua in Gorzanów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 15:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle Park Pavilion in Gorzanów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle brewery in Gorzanów, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:29, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, portal przy ul. Czeskiej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:14, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, portal przy ul. Czeskiej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:14, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, portal przy ul. Czeskiej 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, studnia miejska 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, studnia miejska 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Kept it sharp mostly, not easy with this type of subject --Daniel Case 05:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 16:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 18:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Bystrzycka Street in Gorzanów, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Kłodzka Street in Gorzanów, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:39, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Idzików, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Idzików, porch, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)