Jean-Marc Pascolo

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jean-Marc Pascolo!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jean-Marc Pascolo!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Eugenio Gairinger ok.jpg was uncategorized on 13 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Monteaperta Hagioscope.jpg was uncategorized on 19 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Monteaperta casa della croce rossa bavarese.JPG was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Norbert Festor conseiller municipal à Carling de 1965 à 1971.jpg

File:Norbert Festor conseiller municipal à Carling de 1965 à 1971.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Vera (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

L'image a été transmise par ma famille au Républicain Lorrain qui n'est pas l'auteur de la photographie et l'a simplement reprise pour illustrer la rubrique nécrologique. Ne sachant si la transmission de l'image entraîne une perte des droits, je propose dans le doute de la supprimer du fichier. Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 11:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Monteaperta et palazzo Cobai.jpg

Hi Jean-Marc, did you really shoot the original photography of which File:Monteaperta et palazzo Cobai.jpg is a reproduction? If not, who is the photographer? Where did you get it? --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes it was my own shoot but only a bad copy of a old paper photography because negative is lost during terrible earthquake 1976. No problem.Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 08:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

O.k., could you then add the date (year) of the original shot to the date entry in the description, as the reproduction date is of no interest. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

But who is the photographer of the original photography, of which you made the reproduction? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Catégorisation de vos images

Bonjour. Comme l'a indiqué le premier message de cette page, vous devez prendre attention à la classification de vos images dans les catégories adéquates. Les catégories ne sont pas des "tags" indiquant un lien vague entre le sujet et le contenu de l'image. Chaque image doit être rangée dans la catégorie la plus proche du sujet de l'image. Voilà pourquoi je dois enlever toutes vos images de bâtiments de Carling de Category:Architecture pour les mettre dans des catégories plus précises comme "houses in Moselle" par exemple. Vous trouverez plus de détails ici : Commons:Catégories. Merci d'avance. Mel22 (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Louise Bloch, née Lévy.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Louise Bloch, née Lévy.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Louise Bloch, née Lévy.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Marc Pascolo, surely you did not shoot the original photo. Where did you get it? --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Louise Bloch sent this photo to my gran-parents in Carling before the last World War as gift and souvenir. Regards, Jean-Marc Pascolo

Well, then you cannot write "own work" and that you are the author. You need to research to date, when this photo (the original) has been shot/created. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gori Tita.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gori Tita.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gori Tita.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Marc Pascolo, surely you did not shoot the original photo. Where did you get it? --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm a friend of Catarina Gori and I get original photo from my father. Regards. Jean-Marc Pascolo

Well, then you cannot write "own work" and that you are the author. We need to know when this photo had originally be shot and who is the true photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Ça suffit comme ça !

Monsieur Pascolo, plusieurs contributeurs vous ont déjà écrit pour vous demander cordialement de bien vouloir faire un effort de catégorisation de vos photos. Au lieu de donner suite à leur requête, vous continuez à balancer vos photos n'importe comment en vous fichant de vos collègues contributeurs qui doivent passer derrière vous pour classer correctement les images que vous fournissez. Exemples : [1], [2]. Ce manque de respect élémentaire n'est pas plus apprécié ici qu'ailleurs. Pour la dernière fois, faites l'effort qu'on vous demande ! ! ! --Edelseider (talk) 20:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Je suis surpris par le ton de votre message. Je vous réponds courtoisement et vous prie de faire de même. L'absence de catégories que vous me reprochez dans l'exemple que vous donnez [3] relativement à un vitrail est absolument infondée. J'avais placé 5 catégories et vous en laissez 3. Vous corrigez "Ott frères" en "Ott Frères", je vous l'accorde. Par contre transformer "église Saint-Nicolas de L'Hôpital" en "Saint Nicholas church" me stupéfait. La langue française est-elle censurée? Le mot "Nicolas' doit-il devenir "Nicholas"??? Le mot église devient-il "church"? Quand j'importais des "files" on me corrigeais le mot anglais en "images" ou "fichiers". Alors je m'applique à respecter le français. Quand vous transformez "vitrail" en "stained glass" je reste tout aussi étonné. Wikimedia et Wikipedia doivent-ils être rédigés en anglais? Doit-on transformer les noms de lieux et des gens pour les "angliciser"? Dois je transformer mon propre prénom de Jean-Marc en John Mark? Il est heureux que le mot "Frères" ne devienne pas "Brothers". Et vous me dites que "plusieurs contributeurs" me reprochent mon approche des catégories. Il n'y en a eu qu'un seul qui me parlait des catégories (en 2012) et depuis son message j'essaye de faire de mon mieux. J'ai rattaché ce vitrail à: 1° son auteur; 2° sa nature; 3° le lieu où il se trouve; 4° le lieu où il a été fabriqué (que vous avez supprimé) ; 5° au motif qu'il représente (que vous avez également supprimé). J'ai donc mis 5 catégories (en langue française!) à ce vitrail, essayant de faire un effort certain. Je me débrouille tout seul, peut-être maladroitement sur la création d'articles et l'import d'images n'ayant jamais eu de "parrain" (pourtant je l'ai bien demandé) et en me fiant aux messages des autres contributeurs, ce qui me permet de corriger mes erreurs. Par contre je suis étonné par le ton de vos remarques et votre position par rapport à l'anglais. J'accepte avec plaisir votre effort de m'écrire, mais je reste réservé relativement aux anglicismes extrêmes relatifs à des noms français dont l'usage reste légitime. Vos reproches ne me semblent donc pas tout à fait justifiés. Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Cordialement, Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Cher Jean-Marc, continuez à catégoriser comme vous l’entendez. C’est exactement ce que je fais, je n’ai pas des heures à perdre à rechercher des catégories qui vont bien en anglais.

De plus on ne retrouve plus rien à force d’enterrer nos images dans des sous-sous-sous catégories !

Les mecs font ce travail de leur plein gré, et si cela ne leur convient pas, il peuvent toujours aller jardiner ailleurs. D’autres, moins agressifs dans leur ton et manière de communiquer avec les autres finiront par les remplacer. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Merci

Merci pour votre petit message très sympathique. Parfois on aimerait mettre un visage sur des mots. En tous les cas c'est un plaisir de vous lire et de lire vos contributions. Et qui sait au plaisir de vous croiser virtuellement ou encore à Strasbourg. Excellente journée à vous et cordialement,Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 09:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Cher Jean-Marc, recontactez-moi en MP afin que nous convenions d’un rendez-vous, maintenant qu’une structure de Wikipédiens, appelée la Cab’Alsacienne, existe à Strasbourg. A très vite, et tout aussi cordialement --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cim-us-memorial-roi david.jpg

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 18:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Platt.jpg

File:Platt.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Hangsna (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mosquée de Farébersviller.jpg

File:Mosquée de Farébersviller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Napoléon à cheval (tableau de Gaston Ploquin).jpg

File:Napoléon à cheval (tableau de Gaston Ploquin).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.43.128.157 14:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Étang de Hoste-Haut.JPG

File:Étang de Hoste-Haut.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Borvan53 (talk) 20:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Blason de L'Hôpital (Moselle).jpg

File:Blason de L'Hôpital (Moselle).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 17:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)