Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jirnov!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Jirnov~commonswiki!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Copyright status: File:Jirnov diplome ena1992.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jirnov diplome ena1992.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Alex Spade (talk) 18:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Не надо просто откатывать шаблон сообщения о проблеме. Будет только хуже. Обладание дипломом и его сканирование не делает вас автором соот. изображения. Alex Spade (talk) 11:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Какие у Вас конретно претензии. Я не откатил, а изменил лицензию. Чем оно отличается от ru:Файл:Diplom2.JPG использованного статье ru:Диплом? Вы хотите чтобы я его снял на фотоаппарат? Нет проблем.Jirnov (talk) 13:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Вы должны указать лицензию оригинала, если он вообще свободен. Сканирование/фотографирование в данном случае не порождает новых авторских прав у вас. От ru:Файл:Diplom2.JPG (или от загруженного вами File:Diplome mguimo1 jirnov.jpg) отличается тем, что на самом деле это {{PD-RU-exempt}}, а не {{PD-self}}. Alex Spade (talk) 11:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Мне кажется у нас тут происходит недопонимание термина сканирование. Вы говорите об отсканированном ИЗОБРАЖЕНИИ, и тогда понятны Ваши претензии по поводу исходной лицензии. В данном случае, речь идет изображении диплома (предмета). Его можно сфотографировать, отсканировать, и таким образом создать ОРИГИНАЛ его ИЗОБРАЖЕНИЯ, который при этом является сканированной КОПИЕЙ предмета (диплома). Ну да ладно, не в этих тонкостях суть. У меня создалось стойкое впечатление, что лично Вы лично МНЕ почему-то хотите осложнить, возможно по каким-то подковерным зеленоградским мотивам, жизнь в Википедии. И этим лично Вы как администратор мешаете Википедии, так как она может лишиться по Вашей инициативе изображения-иллюстрации, с которыми у нее и так большие проблемы, о чем ее руководство регулярно взывает с мольбами (добавить как можно больше), Если это не так, Вам как продвинутому администратору было продуктивнее просто подсказать, ЧТО и КАК надо сделать, чтобы снять возможные вопросы. А может быть просто даже самому сделать. Jirnov (talk) 12:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This file is in the public domain because this image is a copy of a diploma printed by the Imprimerie nationale, the french official printing office. It is accordingly a product issued by the government, granted to the owner of this diploma.

  This template must not be used to dedicate an uploader's own work to the public domain; CC0 should be used instead.

This work must carry justifications for free usability in both the United States and its country of origin.

Copyright status: File:Ena marianne.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ena marianne.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Alex Spade (talk) 20:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This file is in the public domain because this image is a copy of a diploma printed by the Imprimerie nationale, the french official printing office. It is accordingly a product issued by the government, granted to the owner of this diploma.

  This template must not be used to dedicate an uploader's own work to the public domain; CC0 should be used instead.

This work must carry justifications for free usability in both the United States and its country of origin.

Jirnov (talk) 23:07, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Eusr_morel.jpg edit

 
File:Eusr_morel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

21:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed edit

03:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 16:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply