User talk:Doc James/1

Re: White balance

Yes, you can fix the white balance with a program (Gimp, Acdsee...): 1, --Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 06:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I speak poor english and I cannot explain the subject in English--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 06:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks will give it a try. Jmh649 (talk) 13:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Non-comercial images

Yes. Non-comercial images are not admitted in commons. COM:L Platonides (talk) 08:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you :)

Thanks, James! I hope this finds you well, on-wiki and off. --SJ+ 11:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Kawasaki, etc

I think the uploader misunderstood what we mean by 'own work'.

"I scanned it in myself", you know?

I've had to tag just about all her images thusly.

"sigh" indeed. Thanks for being understanding. DS (talk) 04:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Breast_changes_during_pregnancy.png

File:Breast_changes_during_pregnancy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Powers (talk) 20:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Doc James!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

• Image:HRCT scans of diffuse panbronchiolitisCropped.jpg was uncategorized on 28 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Pensils.JPG was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Pyuria2011.JPG was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Diplopia2a.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:March edema.JPG was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Overlapoffingers.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Buddchiari.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:LungCACXR.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:StoneCT.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Volvulus.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Menigioma.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Supraspinatustear.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:LungcaCT.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Cardiomegally.PNG was uncategorized on 17 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Loosing Weight

Assuming both

Obesity6.JPG

and

James_5_(Final_4)a.png

are pictures of yourself (as it says in their descriptions) you have been able to loose a lot of weight.

Since I look more like the "before" picture myself I would very much like to know how you became like the "after" picture. Just the regular "eat less and exercise more"?

A tip to make it easier would be appreciated. Algotr (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I created the derivative of the original works that where created by User:FatM1ke. Both images are not me :-) --204.239.148.2 04:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Rorschach1WithMarks.jpg

File:Rorschach1WithMarks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 13:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

CT Images

Hi James,

Thanks for the heads-up about my images. Seems they are still there, despite efforts to delete them :-) If you want me to contribute to the current discussion (which doesn't seem to mention my images directly?), let me know. gervat gerv dot net is best.

Gerv

File:GlobePuzzle.jpg

---

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:GlobePuzzle.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Funfood ␌ 10:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

File:GlobePuzzle.jpg

File:GlobePuzzle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Funfood ␌ 12:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Picture Use: September 2012

I have used your x-ray of the left superior hip dislocation in a class presentation on hip dislocations. You were attributed with a link back to the image page which also declares the CC licence. Thank you for making this image availiable. ITasteLikePaint (talk) 02:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

No worries James Heilman, MD (talk) 02:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Inguinal hernia image

Thank you for donating your image of an inguinal hernia. Am writing to ask for clarification: the description of the image states that the hernia is on the left, but the small black arrow on the image is on the viewer's right hand side. Is the arrow actually pointing at the hernia? If so, is the left/right confusion just one of semantics? I would be grateful if you could clarify. Thank you! KDS444 (talk) 01:39, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

It is on the persons left, which means the right side of the image. The arrow is pointing to the hernia. The image is that of looking straight at a person in front of you. James Heilman, MD (talk) 01:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

NOW I understand better! How would you feel about replacing the existing image with this one? (for the sake of us lay people who do not know how to easily spot black arrows on x-rays).

Sure feel free. James Heilman, MD (talk) 07:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Dystonia

Hi Doctor,my name is Mike, sorry for bad english.You have incorrect posted this image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dystonia2010.JPG

I ask you to delete photo from 2 sections on ru.wikipedia.org - 

Нейролептические экстрапирамидные расстройства Острая дистония because the photo does not match the description of the disease. Correct to move it to a section - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_dystonia

Feel free. I only uploaded the image. Did not add it to russian wiki. James Heilman, MD (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Frost bite.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Frost bite.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Masur (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Photo 5 - edit.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Photo 5 - edit.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Masur (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Photo 3 (2) - Edit.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Photo 3 (2) - Edit.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Masur (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:61569264 jamesheilman-224x2991.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:61569264 jamesheilman-224x2991.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Masur (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Permission sent. James Heilman, MD (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• Don't remove npd tags - an OTRS operator will do it, once the permission is processed. Masur (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Map Generator

Hi Doc,

I finally picked up the Map Generator project again and pushed it through to a point where it should now be ready for testing by other people. Send me an e-mail through "E-mail this user" if you're interested in trying it out and I'll send you the files. /Lokal_Profil 13:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

As an aside: when archiving my talk page I spotted your request for injuries by death (rather then DALYs). These are now available at User:Lokal_Profil/WHO2004#III. Injuries (Deaths). /Lokal_Profil 13:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

F/U

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=68391754 --James Heilman, MD (talk) 07:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Re:new logos

Hello, I noticed your email, And I will do it during next week. Probably under another name, because the current is used with imagemap (as you see on my userpage, you can clic on the logos). Many users on different projects have this imagemap. So the update of the logo will disturb it. Beside, for wikivoyage a talk on the logo is still running meta:Talk:Wikivoyage/Logo#Round_2_results. Otourly (talk) 21:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia_logo_family_complete-2012.svg Otourly (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

ECHOpedia up

See Commons:Bots/Requests/Smallbot 8.Smallman12q (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Good work bro

As above, cracking wikipedia work ...

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: Graph

I like that graph a lot too. I did not create it though. I looked around a bit and could not find later stats. See the description part of the graph page. This is part of what is there currently, and it is what I have found so far:

Separate columns are needed for monthly edit totals for registered users, anonymous users, and bots. This link goes to the section concerning anonymous contributors. It states: "No detailed statistics for anonymous users are available for this wiki (performance reasons). All together 109,370,998 article edits were made by anonymous users, out of a total of 366,162,033 article edits (30%)" That is what it said on June 30, 2013. Those are totals since Wikipedia started in January 2001. --Timeshifter (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. James Heilman, MD (talk) 00:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. You might ask for help here: en:User talk:Erik Zachte. I believe he is in overall charge of the vast Wikimedia stats empire. --Timeshifter (talk) 00:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

(unindent). Chart was updated July 23, 2013, and so I uploaded a new version. --Timeshifter (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wonderful will include it in the presentation. James Heilman, MD (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Graphics village pump/GIF thread

That's an archive; I'm moving your question to the Current Graphics village pump... -- AnonMoos (talk) 22:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Mentioned you

James, I mentioned you here.

Query1: File:Rhinopyma.JPG has got the black bands you know I hate so much. The file description says you got consent. If you have consent, why are the black bands required -- is it just a courtesy to provide a small degree of anonymity? Or did the patient agree to their use?

Yes have signed consent and the person in question agreed to it use under a CC BY SA license. It is as a courtesy. James Heilman, MD (talk) 04:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Query2: I know now how you achieve so much. You can time travel! File:HandsEBS.JPG was taken in the future. Next time you go, can you bring back some lottery numbers for me, thanks. Colin (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

I guess the date on my camera is wrong. Thanks James Heilman, MD (talk) 04:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Angioedema

Dear Dr. Heilman,

Thank you for your many photos. I am particularly interested in your picture labeled "File:Angioedema2010.JPG"

I am making a video trying to explain allergies and showing reactions so that people can recognize the signs and symptoms. Would you give me permission to use your photo? I would be happy to list you in the credits at the end of the video if you would like.

I am asking permission specifically to:

1. verify that you were the creator of the image and therefore have all rights to grant permission use

2. ask if the subject (or subject's family) of the photo would give permission for my use of the image (I see that all your patients gave permission for Wikimedia Commons usage; I am not clear if they also gave permission for other uses).

2. ask that I be released from the "share alike" condition that you stated on your Wikimedia Commons licensing. I am putting a great amount of work into an accurate video that can be a helpful tool and I don't want people taking excerpts of my finished video and sharing, remixing, and adapting freely, especially without being able to verify that the information remains medically correct. (My daughter is an allergy patient at Johns Hopkins University Hospital and I have shown a draft of my video to Dr. Robert Wood and he was in full support of the information contained and the presentation method.)

Thank you for your time and consideration. I am very grateful for your commitment to education and information sharing and hope that you will consider letting me use your image. I'm new to doing Wikimedia Commons requests so I hope I am following the proper procedure and etiquette.

Sincerely, Anne

Yes I am the creator of this image. And yes I have sign consent for the release of this image under a CC BY SA license. Please email me by the button on the side and we can discuss further. James Heilman, MD (talk) 22:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Dear Dr. Heilman, Thank you for your prompt reply. I truly appreciate your kindness. I did not see a button but I think I figured out how to email you per your request. Thank you again for considering sharing your image. I truly appreciate it. Sincerely, Anne Anne b design (talk) 02:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Attribution of image

Dear Sir,

I would like to use your images of Aedes aegypti mosquito, available at "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AAedes_aegypti_feeding.jpg", in an extension-outreach publication related to pests in community environments. This publication is purely for educational purposes and has no commercial interests whatsoever.

However, the suggested attribution formats, "By Muhammad Mahdi Karim (www.micro2macro.net) Facebook (Own work) [GFDL 1.2 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.2.html)], via Wikimedia Commons" is very different from the style I will be following for other pictures in my publication, which will most likely be much shorter and in the format:

"Photo by Abc Defghijk", or "Photo by Abc Defghijk, Lmnopqr.org".

Therefore for the sake of consistency, kindly let me know whether I may cite the images in the above formats, and if so, what name/affiliation should I use.

Thank you! Sincerely, Shaku

Shaku Nair, Ph.D. Assistant in Extension, Community IPM University of Arizona - Maricopa Ag. Center 37860 W. Smith-Enke Road Maricopa, AZ 85138-3010 Cell: (520) 840-9429 Office: (520) 374-6299 nairs@email.arizona.edu

I just cropped the photo. Please contact Karim with respect to attribution. Best James Heilman, MD (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Bell's Palsy Book

Hello Dr James,

I would like to use your Bell's palsy photo in my upcoming Bell's Palsy Book.

Can you please tell me if this is ok and if so what are the requirments

Thanks

You need to attribute myself an Wikipedia and technically you need to release the book under the same license. James Heilman, MD (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

The above is not accurate

• There is no legal requirement to attribute Wikipedia (or Wikimedia) as they are neither the author nor owner of the image and so cannot be claimed to be such. However you should say where you got the image from (which is Wikimedia Commons), ideally with a URL to the image page.
• There is absolutely no requirement to release your book under the same licence: your book can be "All rights reserved" or released under a completely different licence. Lots of commercial books legally make use of CreativeCommons-liensed images.
• You must attribute James Heilman MD as creator of the image, ideally with a link or URL to the author's page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Doc_James)
• You must choose which of the two licences (CC BY-SA 3.0, or GFDL 1.2) you are taking advantage of when publishing the image. This is an easy choice as GFDL 1.2 is really only a licence for software manuals and Wikipedia, and quite impractical for a book.
• You must document which licence the image is used under. This is particularly necessary for "share-alike" licences like CC BY-SA because people must know they are free to copy the image from your book and use that copy under the same licence terms. So if you pick CC BY-SA 3.0, then you are required to say that the image in your book is "licensed CC BY-SA 3.0". Ideally, you should spell out the full name and URL of the licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)
• It is good practice to say which website you got the image from (Wikimedia Commons) and provide a link back to the author's user page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Doc_James).

So an example credit would be

'Bells palsy' by James Heilman MD from Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bellspalsy.JPG) under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0).

In an online book or hyperlinked PDF, this can be condensed:

'Bells palsy' by James Heilman MD from Wikimedia Commons under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

-- Colin (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC) (unwatching now, James)

Thanks Colin. James Heilman, MD (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Patient consent form

Hi Doc,

I'd like to contribute some photos of children with an autism-related disorder to wikimedia, and heard you'd be a good person to ask about subject consent (from discussion at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Help_desk#Obtaining_consent_to_post_photos_of_children_with_special_needs).

Do you have a standard letter/form that you use to ask patients for consent to upload your images? If so, could you send a copy to me (peter@yellowdogphoto.com), so we may adapt it for our purposes?

Best wishes

Peter

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaurav_Kotli

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaurav_Kotli discuss about this page why u deleted this ThakurSaabji (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)