You can find me here too. --JohnManuel 13:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:DOMCastellanoJMK.png edit

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 00:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:TaxonomyProgrammingLanguagesJohnManuel.svg edit

This file is not displaying because its display depends on a reference to a file "StammbaumProgrammiersprachenJohnManuel.png" on your local hard drive. Why not just upload the PNG directly? AnonMoos 02:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your abstract line-art images edit

Please try to use specific descriptions and valid specific categories to characterize your images... AnonMoos 06:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Though your files may be intended to be instructive in some way, adding broad over-general categories like "Category:Learning" to all your images really does nothing to help appropriately classify them, or help other people to easily find them.
I'm not responsible for either the California tartan .GIF or Echo_exit.PNG -- I reuploaded new versions of them to improve technical aspects of images originally uploaded by others (in the case of Echo_exit.PNG, just to make it clear that an image uploaded by someone else was absolutely blank). To see images that I actually substantially worked on, go to User:AnonMoos/Gallery -- AnonMoos 23:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

SVG edit

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. I already explained above why Image:TaxonomyProgrammingLanguagesJohnManuel.svg doesn't display here... AnonMoos 18:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:TracingCrazyThree.png edit

You've got quite mixed up with the details, which also includes 2 sets of licence... Can you choose the one you prefer..?
Yuval Y § Chat § 14:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I moved your template to the 'Source' section, and then I've noticed that there are 2 licence templates... Yuval Y § Chat § 15:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Heptogon edit

 

Hi JMK,

what is the source of the construction above? I mean where did you learn it or what is its proper name. I also know this type of constructions of reg. polgons, but I am completely unable to find out anything about it. Who invented it? etc.

Muitos thank you!!

Enrico

Hi Enrico: (I also replied to you IP page just in case :))


As far as who invented it, I have no clue, some of these constructions come from very old civilizations, even before the ancients Greeks. My father provided me an old book at a very early age, from which I learned technical drafting and geometric drawing. The sad thing is that I learned very wellthe contents but not the name of the author of the book. You see when you use these constructions, I used only a compass and any rule without measures, the compass did everything. Then I study descriptive Geometry with Nakamura's book published by McGraw Hill, I think. I also remember couple books on the subject of Mechanical Drawing and Technical Drawing, in which their first sections introduce the solution to problems like the division of the line in equal parts or golden means, the construction and replication of angles, triangles and other polygons including the division of the circumference in "n" equal parts. I recommend you to read Technical Drawing by Frederick E. Giesecke (Late Prof. Emeritus Texas A&M Univ.), Alva Mitchel (Late Prof. Emeritus Texas A&M Univ.), Henry Cecil Spencer (Late Prof. Emeritus, Illinois Institute of Technology), & Ivan Leroy Hill (Prof. Illinois Institute of Technology). I worked with the sixth edition of this book published by Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. New York and Collier Macmillan Publishers London in 1974. Hope, I did help you. I gave you the names of the authors so you can research more about it.

Greetings. -JohnManuel 16:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply











Image:Andrés Avelino Cáceres.jpg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Andrés Avelino Cáceres.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Mushroom 11:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:José Avelino Cáceres.jpg edit

Image deletion warning Image:José Avelino Cáceres.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Mushroom 11:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Rubén Darío.jpg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Rubén Darío.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--Mushroom 11:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

DocumentObjectModel.svg edit

Hi. I wanted to let you know I've uploaded a new version of Image:DocumentObjectModel.svg, which is now used at en:Document Object Model. I made it solely based off your PNG, before I realized you had uploaded an SVG before. I've been trying to convert PNG diagrams to SVGs lately, where feasible. I looked at your SVG source code, and the reason it didn't render right is that you were using flowed text. This is the default for Inkscape, but it isn't supported by Wikimedia's renderer. In Inkscape, you can convert flowed text to regular text by going to the menu Text, then clicking "Convert to Text". This problem has bitten me repeatedly. Superm401 10:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. You have a great year too, and let me know if I can help you with anything. Best, Superm401 - Talk 08:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:ValentinDogJMK.JPG edit

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Yes I Remember Emely edit

Disculpeme si fue una intromicion mia pero me he tomado la licencia de situar su imagen Yes I Remember Emely.jpg en la categoria de desnudo femenino en dibujo con la intencion de enriquecer mas esta rama del comons.Si no esta de acuerdo por favor no vacile un segundo en retirar mi propuesta.Sin mas y con todo respeto le saluda su colega del comons Vicond. Gracias.Vicond 04:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Ecology_Ernst_Haeckel_version_1.svg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Ecology_Ernst_Haeckel_version_1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Kenmayer 14:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Ecology_Ernst_Haeckel_1.svg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Ecology_Ernst_Haeckel_1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Kenmayer 20:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Ecology_Ernst_Haeckel_1.svg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Ecology_Ernst_Haeckel_1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Kenmayer 20:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Imagen de Ciro Alegría edit

Ciro Alegría:

 File:Ciro Alegría.svg

Hablás español, ¿verdad? He visto la obra derivada que has hecho de un upload mío. Como obra artística puede pasar, pero en realidad no respeta el standard de imagenes que se utiliza para ilustrar biografías. Normalmente, se intenta ilustrarlas con una imagen lo más nítida posible, y se apela a dibujos, etc., a falta de algo nítido. Creo que deberías rever la inclusión de esa obra derivada tuya en las biografías de Ciro Alegría. Saludos. Ferbr1 22:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hola:
Efectivamente, fui expulsado de la es.wiki, pero eso no viene al caso. Si ves mis colaboraciones en ca.wikipedia.org y en commons verás que trabajo con muy buena actitud (de hecho, si ves mis colaboraciones en es.wikipedia.org verás que también trabajaba así en ella; mis ediciones, la mayoría de ellas, eran en artículos, y casi nunca me revertían). Te pediría que antes de dejar de presumir buena fe, vieras mi comportamiento en este tema en concreto.
La foto que he subido, es evidente, no es la mejor, pero se ajusta muchísimo más a los estandares que la foto que tú has subido. Tu versión tiene mucho de pop, mucho de Warhol, pero poco de wikipedia. ¿Has visto muchas biografías ilustradas con fotos con un tratamiento de imagen como el que tú has hecho? Seguramente no, pero sí que las has visto con fotos viejas y deterioradas, como la que yo he subido. He buscado en Internet (por ejemplo así. La mejor que he encontrado es esta, que es bastante pequeña), y no he encontrado una versión mejor que la que yo mismo he hecho, escaneando la portada de un libro suyo editado en Argentina.
Si mi argumentación es coherente, te pido, entonces, que no me preguntes que vengo "a molestar". Si uso el mismo username que uso en todas las wikipedias en las que colaboro, te pido, entonces, que no me acuses de usar títeres.
Voy a subir una nueva versión del archivo, a ver qué te parece. Sigo insistiendo que la estética de tu trabajo no es la usual en las ilustraciones de biografías en Wikipedia. Saludos. Ferbr1 01:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, no hay problemas. De todos modos, sigue en pie mi argumentación anterior. ¿Te parece que respeta los estandares de Wikipedia ilustrar biografías con versiones tan manipuladas digitalmente de las fotografías? Yo creo que no, por lo que, a falta de una imagen mejor, creo que debería primar el upload que yo realicé. He conseguido una versión más limpia, pero más pequeña, de esa imagen. ¿Qué te parece? Saludos. Ferbr1 (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hidden Entrance.jpg edit

Hello. Image:Hidden Entrance.jpg was categorized "Kew Gardens" and "New York". I don't think it can be both places, or am I wrong? Where is this? Thank you. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I see now. The "Kew Gardens" in London is I think the most famous, and the "Category:Kew Gardens" refers to that one. I presume your photo was taken in en:Kew Gardens, Queens. (I notice there is another one in Canada too; Commons has a "Category:Kew Gardens (Toronto)".) I will put the image in "Category:Queens, New York City" for now. If you think we should have a category for the one in New York City too, feel free to create a new category "Kew Gardens, Queens" or something similar and make it a subcategory of "Category:Queens, New York City". Let me know if I can be of help. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:ValentinDogJMK.JPG edit

Image deletion warning Image:ValentinDogJMK.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Laocoonphoto.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Laocoonphoto.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Andrés_Avelino_Cáceres.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Andrés_Avelino_Cáceres.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:MartiJohnManuel K TRestauration.jpg edit

 
File:MartiJohnManuel K TRestauration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Infrogmation (talk) 01:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, JohnManuel!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 16:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Message from Steven Fletcher edit

The following message was actually created as a live article on the English Wikipedia; I've copied it here. I will also advise the user on their talk page about licencing requirements. Cheers, 94.196.109.110 01:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

John

I would like to use your image listed at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bloom%27s_Rose.png#filelinks

as part of a book I am writing about education and healing using short stories.

It really is a work of art and an educational stimulus. I cite it under the guidelines may I have your explicit permission to use it. Because this would be used in a printed form I wasn't sure if it is the same as using on a web page.

There are also three small alignment issues that I would either like to fix or have you fix if possible. These are:

   * an extra leading space before the word "breakdown"
   * an extra leading space before the word "identified"
   * an extra leading space before the word "checked"

I could not figure out how to contact you except for this page. You may contact me through:

link title and then I'll reply with my normal address.

Thank you

Steven Fletcher

See w:en:User talk:Stevenfletcher#Re. Bloom's Rose 94.196.109.110 01:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Rene_Marques.JPG edit

 
File:Rene_Marques.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Damiens.rf 14:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nice image! edit

Thanks for your contribution: File:JohnathanLivingstonSegull.jpg. Beautiful!

--Anna Bauer (talk) 10:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:SculptureJerseyCity.jpg edit

 
File:SculptureJerseyCity.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KTo288 (talk) 14:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jchocano.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jchocano.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:JMKT_on_Gurdjieff_2009.svg edit

 
File:JMKT_on_Gurdjieff_2009.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martina Nolte (talk) 16:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:GurdjieffJMK.jpg edit

 
File:GurdjieffJMK.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

smial (talk) 16:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:JMKT_on_Gurdjieff_2009.svg edit

 
File:JMKT_on_Gurdjieff_2009.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

smial (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:JohnKennedyScuptor.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JohnKennedyScuptor.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JohnKennedyScuptor.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Missvain (talk) 14:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


File:JohnKennedyScuptor.jpg edit

Please do not remove NoPermission tags without fixing the problem. Are you the sculptor, the photographer, or both? If you are both, please say so. If you are only the photographer, then the image infringes the sculptor's copyright.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

[copied from my talk page -- jlw] Hi James, As also you are, I am extremely, busy. I am the photographer, the sculptor John Kennedy has passed sensibly away many years ago, now this is a sculpture in a public place. Hope that this should be enough information for you. I will be grateful for all the help that you could provide about this issue. Thank you. Sincerely, John M. Kennedy JohnManuel (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

In that case, unless you can get Commons:OTRS permission from the sculptor's heirs, the image must be deleted. Although some countries allow for the use of images of works in public places, that is not the case in the USA.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

[copied from my talk page] James, and How you get and OTRS permission? Can you do it? JohnManuel (talk) I Come back next week to read your comments, thank you for all the help and understanding that you may provide over this issue, sincerel JohnManuel (talk)

It is up to the uploader to provide any necessary permissions. Go to Commons:OTRS and follow the instructions there.
And note, please, that it is almost universal within Commons to have conversations on the talk page on which they began. We do this for convenience and so that others may easily read them and participate. Please reply here, not on my talk page.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Georg Cantor.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Georg Cantor.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Georg Cantor.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Damiens.rf 17:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Light_near_Kew_Gardens_Road.jpg edit

Is the Kew Gardens in Greater London, or Kew Gardens in Queens, New York? The categories contradict each other and nothing in your description makes it clear. - Jmabel ! talk 03:27, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:JMK drawing on Géricault-La Folle.jpg edit

 
File:JMK drawing on Géricault-La Folle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shakko (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:KewGardensMoonJune2307.jpg edit

 
File:KewGardensMoonJune2307.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 00:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Parts Musical Notes.svg edit

 
File:Parts Musical Notes.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:R. A. Fischer.jpg edit

 
File:R. A. Fischer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lord Belbury (talk) 11:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 11:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
File:911 from the Jersey City the place where the twin towers were.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Where the Twin Towers Were.jpg edit

 
File:Where the Twin Towers Were.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply