Joma2411

Neue Farben

Könntest du bitte meine Frage an dich beantworten?

• File_talk:Wappen_Eschenburg.svg

Ich hätte die Farbe problemlos selbst geändert, doch hätte ich mich damit über die Gemeinde Eschenburg hinweggesetzt. Da ich ebenfalls die Grafik der Gemeinde Diezhölztal in deren Auftrag vektorisiert habe, hatte ich die Farbalternative damals schon vorgeschlagen. Aber ich hatte mich an die gegenene Farbvorgaben zu halten. Leider besteht die Informatik-Firma und damit der E-Mail-Verkehr nicht mehr.

• 

Damals war eine Umfärbung mit den Farben wie bei der Flagge von Ewersbach, die ich ebenfalls vektorisierte, nicht erwünscht. -- Mjchael (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Ich war heute in Eschenburg vor Ort und fand dort ausschließlich, an den verschiedensten Orten, das Wappen in der dunkelblauen Version vor. Nach kurzer Recherche im Internet fand ich auch noch ein Bild der offiziellen Gemeindeflagge, auch in dieser Ausführung. Also habe ich mich kurzerhand dazu entschlossen die Datei auf die passende Version zurückzusetzen. Die Datei hat schließlich von 2007 bis 2015 schon so existiert (da frage ich mich sowieso warum der User Fränsmer diese Datei dann ohne Begründung auf die hellblaue Version zurückgesetzt hatte). Die Flagge hatte ich sowieso von Anfang an vollständig nach dem Bild von der Webseite der Gemeinde erstellt, wo sie eben in dunkelblauer Ausführung zu sehen ist. -- Joma2411 20:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Ich habe jetzt die Gemeinde via E-Mail angeschrieben.

Zitat

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

auf der Wikipedia (genauer auf den Wikimedia Commons, wo die Bilder gespeichert werden) wurde die Farbe der von mir damals vektorisierten Grafik ihres Logos verändert. Sie gleicht nun mehr der Farben auf ihrer aktuellen Homepage.

Ich meine mich noch daran erinnern zu können, dass eine solche Farbanpassung (wie beim Wappen der Gemeinde Diezhölztal, welches ich ebenfalls in der selben Zeit vektorisierte) nicht erwünscht war.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Wappen_Eschenburg.svg#Neue_Farben%3F

Ich möchte sie fragen, ob die Farbänderung in ihrem Sinne erfolgt ist.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen Mjchael

Zitat Ende

Mal sehen, was dabei raus kommt. -- Mjchael (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Bitte

Auf Commons gelten kaum "Regeln" aber einige vernünftige Vorschläge. Einer davon ist, immer wenn eine Datei einen {{int:license-header}}-Paragraph hat sollte keine zusätzliche Angabe in permission= gemacht werden; Template:Information#permission sagt; ...please leave that field blank. Also: entweder–oder!
Was hältst du übrigens davon, deine SVG-Fahnen nicht ganz so groß zu machen - ich meine, kleiner als 1000px und weniger als ~50 KB groß ? Und nicht alle als "Civil flag of Hesse" zu beschreiben. Es gibt Entmüllungswerkzeuge, die den schlimmsten Unsinn von Inkscape beseitigen können. mfg -- sarang♥사랑 15:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Also erstmal vielen Dank für die Hinweise! Die Sache mit den Lizenzen wusste ich nicht, macht allerdings durchaus Sinn; werde die Dateien dahingehend bereinigen. Ein großer Teil meiner Flaggen sind unter 1000px oder genauso groß, bei den anderen werde ich das entsprechende verkleinern. Die Dateigröße ist allerdings meistens von den aufgelegten Wappen abhängig, welche ohnehin oft sehr detailreich und damit groß sind. Ich werde allerdings auch hier nach einer zufriedenstellenden Lösung suchen. Zum Schluss noch eine Frage: inwiefern habe ich denn meine Dateien als "Civil Flag of Hesse" beschrieben? Danke und Grüße -- Joma2411 16:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Okay, das mit der Beschreibung "Civil Flag of Hesse" hat sich jetzt auch erledigt. Hatte vorhin ausgerechnet bei einer Datei geschaut, bei der es nicht der Fall war. -- Joma2411 17:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:4 geben alles Logo.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:4 geben alles Logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:4 geben alles Logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Amalienhütter Weiher.jpg

Copyright status: File:Amalienhütter Weiher.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Amalienhütter Weiher.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flagge Fürstenberg (Lichtenfels).svg

Copyright status: File:Flagge Fürstenberg (Lichtenfels).svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flagge Fürstenberg (Lichtenfels).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Da kommst Du nie drauf Logo.jpg

File:Da kommst Du nie drauf Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DCB (talk) 18:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ITA Eppan COA 2.svg

Copyright status: File:ITA Eppan COA 2.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ITA Eppan COA 2.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ITA Eppan COA 2.svg

Copyright status: File:ITA Eppan COA 2.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ITA Eppan COA 2.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Schweine LWH 2022.jpg

Copyright status: File:Schweine LWH 2022.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Schweine LWH 2022.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Schafe LWH 2022.jpg
• File:Schriftzug LWH 2018.JPG
• File:Landwirtschaftliches Hauptfest 2022.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Vermeintlich redundante Kategorien

Hallo. Da Du die Kategorie:Gerlingen bei der Datei:Ein Zug der Stuttgarter Straßenbahnen neben dem Stadtmuseum Gerlingen.jpg gelöscht hast: Ich halte das für einen Fehler, der oft begangen wird: Da die Tram nur einen in dem Fall kleinen Teil des Fotos ausmacht und ansonsten viel Straße und Architektur zu sehen ist, halte ich die zusätzliche Kategorie:Gerlingen für gerechtfertigt. Noch besser wäre statt "Gerlingen" natürlich eine bestimmte Straße und ggf. das Gebäude. P170 (talk) 16:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Guten Tag und erstmal sorry für die verspätete Antwort! Ich sehe deinen Punkt und gebe dir da überwiegend recht, mir ist das Bild bei der Umkategorisierung mehrerer Straßenbahnbilder m. o. w. durchgerutscht. Grüße -- Joma2411 (talk) 13:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Ein Zug der Stuttgarter Straßenbahnen neben dem Stadtmuseum Gerlingen.jpg

Guten Morgen! Es wäre sehr hilfreich, wenn dir die Kategorisierung des Bildes nicht ausreicht, was nachvollziehbar ist, dir wenigstens die Mühe zu machen, eine passende Unterkategorie (z.B. Buildings in ...) zu erstellen. Was du jetzt gemacht hast, ist eine Überkategorisierung, die uns nicht weiterhilft. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Lukas Beck (talk) 07:25, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Schon fast lustig, sehr schön... Siehe den letzten Diskussionspunkt auf dieser Seite. Da wurde ich aufgefordert, das so zu machen, weil das ja ein häufiger Fehler wäre, nur die eine Kategorie zu behalten (Ich hatte die von dir bemängelte Kategorie vorher eigentlich entfernt.). Klärt das mal unter euch... -- Joma2411 (talk) 07:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Ich hatte mit ihm kurz ebenfalls darüber diskutiert und wir wurden uns nicht wirklich einig, wie Du siehst :-) VG P170 (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flagge Hatzfeld (Eder).svg

Copyright status: File:Flagge Hatzfeld (Eder).svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flagge Hatzfeld (Eder).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Konstanz hat ein neues Wappen

Hallo, Du beherrschst anscheinend die Magie des Uploads einer neuen Version einer Datei, die andere erstellt haben :-)

Konstanz hat seit gerade eben ein neues Wappen. Würdest Du bitte die Version in Wikimedia überschreiben, damit alle Stellen in Wikipedia, die es verwenden, die neueste Version kriegen? Pressemitteilung: [1] Quelle: [2]

Ich nehme an, der korrekte Weg ist, die Datei „Wappen Konstanz Farbe.svg“ von dort herunterzuladen und unter dem Namen „Wappen Konstanz.svg“ hier als neue Version hochzuladen: [3] --Pakwesi (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)