Jonathan Oldenbuck

Welcome to the Commons, Jonathan Oldenbuck!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 14:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Cats

Category:Media needing categories

OrphanImages

OrphanImages is a web based tool for finding images that are not on a gallery page or in any category. This tool uses the live database copy on the Wikimedia tool server and is developed and maintained by User:Duesentrieb.

• http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/OrphanImages.php — web frontend
• Information and Discussion

Please don't change categories like that!

[1] This picture does show a sculpture, which is more precise than "monument". So please don't do such changes. Thanks for your comprehension. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Well... maybe you're right. But in that case the picture should have both categories... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token d6535acda60e8836828e718a707ccf0f

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Old Wardour Castle → Wardour Castle

FYI — I have emptied the category "Old Wardour Castle" in favour of "Wardour Castle" while I am doing a systematic review of Castles in England (see also Castles, palaces and houses in England) because this name is used at en.wikipedia and it seems to be the more common name of the castle. I hope you're o.k. with this. --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendam (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

File:Great window Parliament Hall Edinburgh.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Doocots

Doocots has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Andrew Gray (talk) 21:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Gifford

Gifford has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~ Nahid ^Talk 08:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Armagh

Armagh has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Laurel Lodged (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)