Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jrmuro!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Madrid Metropolis.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Madrid Metropolis.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Edificio Capitol.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Edificio Capitol.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tranquilo que aquí todo se puede arreglar :-)
Voy a solicitar el desborrado indicando que ya has mandado la autorización. Un saludo --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hola, todos los ficheros han sido restaurados :-) --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Un lugar donde refugiarse.jpg edit

 
File:Un lugar donde refugiarse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Strakhov (talk) 10:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hola, Jrmuro, lo sé. Pero la que he marcado en concreto es una obra derivada de otra que no está en dominio público (un póster de una película), por lo que, he abierto una petición de borrado. Puedes aportar en ella tus argumentos de por qué debería ser conservada. Un cordial saludo, Strakhov (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
La imagen sólo podría acogerse a:
  • De minimis y argüir que el poster es un elemento menor en la foto. No lo creo.
  • Freedom of Panorama, que al existir libertad de panorama en España, toda fotografía tomada en exteriores estaría en dominio público, al igual que sus obras derivadas. No me parece viable, pues esto sólo se aplica a obras expuestas permanentemente y un cartel de promoción de una película no entra en esta categoría a mi entender.
  • Por último felicitarle por sus excelentes trabajos donados a Wikimedia, me encantan sus pinturas. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Coméntelo aquí, en la respectiva consulta y el administrador que la cierre decidirá en uno u otro sentido, después de leer los argumentos de cada parte. Sinceramente... opino que no se puede acoger a esa excepción, pues no es una obra de carácter permanente (la ley dice: Las obras situadas permanentemente en parques, calles, plazas u otras vías públicas pueden ser reproducidas, distribuidas y comunicadas libremente por medio de pinturas, dibujos, fotografías y procedimientos audiovisuales), pero desde luego usted es libre de opinar lo contrario. Un cordial saludo y perdone todos estos trámites burocrático-legales, pero es importante para la fundación el ofrecer contenido realmente libre de derechos de autor, Strakhov (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply