User talk:Julian Herzog/Archive 2013

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cactus from Macanao Peninsula.jpg

Hi Julian, thank for your review. I uploaded another version, what do you think?, thanks --The Photographer (talk) 13:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for putting so much work into this, answer in FP-candidature. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christen Eagle II N49AE EDST 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisunov Li-2T HA-LIX Hahnweide 2011 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yakovlev Yak-11 D-FMAX Hahnweide 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

File:PIA16239 High-Resolution Self-Portrait by Curiosity Rover Arm Camera.jpg

Hi there, if you did some white balance correcting could you note it at the file page? Thanks.Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Technically, I would say a white balance adjustment is not a modification, so I don't think adding a "retouched picture" template is necessary. Every digital camera image is white-balanced in some way, and whether this happens in-camera, NASA does it or I do it really doesn't make a big difference. I added a note in the file description, though. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

• Alright, thanks. Someone asked about it at the Featured Picture nomination on the English Wikipedia, so I figured we may as well have it explicit.Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Christen Eagle II N49AE EDST.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Christen Eagle II N49AE EDST.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nord 1002 Pingouin II D-ELLM Hahnweide 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 19:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christen Eagle II N49AE EDST.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- George Chernilevsky 19:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An-2 OK-HFL EDST 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small size, otherwise very good and nice composition.--ArildV 21:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Consolidated PBY-5A „Catalina“ N9767 Hahnweide 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NASA helmet for T-38 Speyer front top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 7XC D-IFSA Hahnweide 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 08:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Messerschmitt Me 262 replica D-IMTT ILA 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A6-EDC Emirates Airbus A380-861 ILA 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not fully convinced about the bottom crop but I couldn't make a better proposal --Poco a poco 19:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Rathaus Stuttgart Heumaden side 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you add geolocation? --NormanB 22:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC) Done, thanks for the note. --Julian Herzog 11:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC) High quality (especially sharpness and noise). Which camera do you use? No metatags are visible. --Tuxyso 22:15, 21 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks, I use a Nikon D5000. I don't really know how the EXIF was lost. --Julian Herzog 08:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Messerschmitt Me 262 replica D-IMTT ILA 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichshafen panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, especially the arriving ship as compositional element in combination with the promenade of Friedrichshafen. I would think about an FP candidature. --Tuxyso 11:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HN-438 F-A-18C Hornet Finnish Air Force ILA 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (even if the crop is quite tight) --PierreSelim 17:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Frage

Hallo Julian!

Manchmal hat man ja selbst einen verstellten Blick und überschätzt sich. Zwei meiner FP-Nominierungen enden heute und morgen vermutlich erfolglos. Allerdings möchte ich zwei neue Bilder nominieren. Auf jeden Fall nominieren möchte ich das Detailpanorama vom Tiegelgussdenkmal, s.

, das Schritte der Tiegelstahlproduktion zeigt (s. auch Markierungen).

Bei der zweiten Nominierung kann ich mich nicht entscheiden. Beides zwei HDRs vom Schloss Broich:

File:Schloss-Broich-2013-01.jpg

Wie ist deine Einschätzung? Welche würdest du nominieren, oder würdest du es direkt bleiben lassen? Danke schon mal. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Vorneweg: Eigentlich ist genau für solche Fragen der Bereich Commons:Photography critiques gedacht.
Zu den Bildern: Das erste würde ich persönlich vermutlich positiv bewerten (ich kann wirklich nur für mich sprechen), wobei ein kleiner Stitching-Fehler etwas rechts der Mitte oben drin ist. Gerade mit den Anmerkungen im Bild ist der Nutzwert hoch. Beim zweiten sehe ich das Problem, dass die Bearbeitung komische Dinge mit den Bäumen anstellt, aus meiner Sicht müsste man das bei niedriger Sonne oder bei bewölktem Himmel aufnehmen, weil hier HDR nicht gut funktioniert. Deshalb kann es aber trotzdem Erfolg haben, nur meine Meinung. Besonders gefällt mir aber das dritte, abgesehen von dem blauen Punkt unten links am Ende des Fallrohrs und vielleicht abgesehen von dem Mann mit einem Bein, aber der ist klein und unauffällig.
Insgesamt kann ich dir die Entscheidung nicht wirklich abnehmen, ich habe selbst erst ein Bild erfolgreich nominiert und kann nur für mein eigenes Voting sprechen. Ich hoffe das hilft dir irgendwie weiter.
Gruß und viel Erfolg. :) --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:15, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Einschätzung. Es ging mir gar nicht um eine umfangreiche Bildkritik (dennoch freue ich mich natürlich darüber), sondern nur um eine kurze Einschätzung. Ich habe mal das Tiegelgussdenkmal nominiert, mal schauen. Wenn man genau hinsieht sieht man den Stitching-Fehler, ich denke aber, dass er so marignal ist, dass es daran eigentlich nicht scheitern sollte. Im DSLR-Forum, falls du das kennst, habe ich einem Panorama-Spezi auch mal das Panorama gezeigt und selbst ihm ist es nicht aufgefallen. Welche komischen Dinge an den Bäumen meinst du? Mir persönlich gefällt übrigens auch das dritte Foto am besten. Ich denke mal, dass ich das morgen nominieren werden. Die Person unter dem Bogen kann man notfalls wegretuschieren, ich finde es aber nicht so wild. Ebenso wie den blauen Punkt, für den ich aber nichts kann. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Klar Commons:Photography critiques wäre eine Möglichkeit so eine Frage zu stellen. Ich glaube aber, dass man trotz aller Internationalität immer noch am präzisesten in der Muttersprache Bildkritik über kann, da es manchmal auf sehr schwer beschreibbare Nuancen ankommt. Bei den deutschen exzellenten Bildern scheint die Stimmung momentan recht vergiftet zu sein (war bisher selbst nie aktiv), zudem die Aktivität dort recht gering ist. In dem Sinne noch mal Danke für die Zeit, die du dir genommen hast. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Sehr gerne. Mit den Bäumen meine ich, dass die Äste dort durch den geringeren Kontrast sowohl miteinander als auch teilweise etwas mit dem Hintergrund verschmelzen, optisch. Ist schwer zu beschreiben, aber es wirkt, als würden sie immer ein wenig die Helligkeit des jeweiligen Hintergrunds annehmen, vor dem Himmel werden sie zumindest irgendwie blass und schwammig. Vielleicht bin ich da aber auch irgendwie überempfindlich. --Julian H. (talk/files) 13:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonov (PZL-Mielec) An-2 D-FWJM Hahnweide 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 14:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus A400M EC-404 ILA 2012 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RUAG Aviation Do 228 NG D-CNEU 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect now, QI. --Kadellar 16:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NHIndustries NH-90 NFH MM81581 ILA 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American P-51D Mustang G-SIJJ 472035 Hahnweide 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Godot13 21:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peoples Viennaline ERJ-170 OE-LMK LSZR 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-WWIQ Airbus A320 sharklet ILA 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --PierreSelim 06:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus A350 Nose Landing Gear Mock-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 06:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus A400M EC-404 ILA 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Douglas Trumbull FMX 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  This photo is just under minimum size requirement. Danrok 00:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)  Sorry, I uploaded a higher resolution version. --Julian Herzog 11:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 01:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Mercedes Benz Museum window.JPG

File:Mercedes Benz Museum window.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindauer Löwe 2011 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau Harbor Lake Constance MS Konstanz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 18:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau Harbor Lake Constance MS Schwaben 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Selbymay 16:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenwaldring Gastdozentenhaus Universität Stuttgart Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 14:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenwaldring 32 Universität Stuttgart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz C197 SLS AMG Mercedes-Benz Museum 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfänder radio tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 19:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindauer Löwe 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:An-2 OK-HFL EDST 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:An-2 OK-HFL EDST 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindauer Löwe 2011 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Lighthouse Lindau Harbor Lake Constance 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Lighthouse Lindau Harbor Lake Constance 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Air China B747-4J6 B-2447 EDDS 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --The Photographer 13:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau Harbor Lake Constance 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Godot13 06:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell 429 GlobalRanger C-FTNB cockpit center stick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peoples Viennaline ERJ-170 OE-LMK LSZR 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peoples Viennaline ERJ-170 OE-LMK LSZR 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- MJJR 21:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! V57 Universität Stuttgart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austrian Arrows DHC-8-402Q Dash 8 OE-LGB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 14:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southern Air Boeing 747-230B(SF) N760SA 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southern Air Boeing 747-230B(SF) N760SA 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality Arcalino 20:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Germanwings Airbus A319-112 D-AKNQ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --A.Savin 13:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poznan University of Technology Zurau UAV ILA 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment distraction left side imo --Rjcastillo 03:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment I removed the distraction and also corrected the crop, thanks for the review. --Julian Herzog 09:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna 560XL Citation XLS CS-DXK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Low part not perfect, but ok --Poco a poco 20:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tecnam P2006T HB-LBU Hahnweide 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 115 Hawker Fury FB10 F-AZXJ Hahnweide 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CASA 1-131E Jungmann D-EGRM Hahnweide 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Silvester 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 15:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Silvester 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 15:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentrum für virtuelles Engineering, Fraunhofer IAO, Stuttgart 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Three stiching errors, all easy to fix imo ( see notes written while Poco was promoting). --JLPC 18:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, I tried fixing them, and they are less obvious now, but the patterns around are way off. Can't get hugin to fix this lens distortion properly. --Julian Herzog 22:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentrum für virtuelles Engineering, Fraunhofer IAO, Stuttgart 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp halos over building, some CA at left side. --Nino Verde 13:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the review. Not sure if I found CAs but I tried to fix the issues. --Julian Herzog 17:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC) Sorry, my fault. I pointed where they are via note on the image page. --Nino Verde 17:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Fixed - I hope. --Julian Herzog 20:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC) CommentNice! --Nino Verde 16:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama V57 Mensa Vaihingen Universität Stuttgart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

renominating an image for QI

Hi Julian,

I posted this question on the QI talk page and it hasn't been answered. maybe you'll know...

A lot of images which are nominated for QI, are not assessed (positively or negatively) and after the 8 day period they are assigned to the Unassessed QI Images Category. Can these images be renominated?

--SuperJew (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

I saw your question, but I don't know the answer to it. Sorry. Personally, I would think that it is ok if you try to slightly improve them (their editing) before re-nominating, but I don't remember reading any rule about this anywhere. --Julian H. (talk/files) 20:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

The thing is that they weren't assessed at all. and i don't understand if that makes them not good, or were just ignored in the influx of files on QI nomination page... --SuperJew (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Yuri Gagarin German Titov Bus To Launch Pad

New foto. Space.ru

Thanks for the info. Could you please update the source, too? --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Please delete the following uploaded by me on Vikislad files (because they violate copyrights):

file 1 file 2 file 3. Space.ru

I can't. You'll have to find an admin to do that. --Julian H. (talk/files) 19:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Yuri Gagarin German Titov Bus To Launch Pad.png

File:Yuri Gagarin German Titov Bus To Launch Pad.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Huntster (t @ c) 02:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks a lot for your edits to File:ISS034E016601 - Stratocumulus Clouds - Pacific Ocean.jpg! Pine✉ 06:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, thank you for your great nominations. --Julian H. (talk/files) 10:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

FPC nomination

I looked over your QIs and I picked out one for FPC, now at Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:NASA_helmet_for_T-38_Speyer_front_top.jpg. --Pine^✉ 19:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Template:Paris Air Shows

Hi,
Thank you for your improvments to the template:Paris Air Shows I created. I searched how to managed series of 2 years and not 1 year. I did not find, but you did. I put my new template only in Paris Air Show 2013, because I was not sure that this new template was OK. I saw that you put it into several Paris Air Show. Fine ! I went to the Paris Air Show 2013 last friday and I will upload some photos, especially about the flight of the A350. One question : for creating my template with series of 2 years, I looked to Olympic games. I thought that I can find templates with series of 4 years. But there is not. What do you think to create this one ? In order to change easily from an Olympic game to the previous or the next one. --Tangopaso (talk) 14:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I took the content of Template:Decade years navbox (that was used by your template) and copied it into the Paris Air Show template, removing every mention of an even year (so I deleted 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and also moved the link to the next decade from 0 to 1). I also replaced all the arguments with the values that were given for Template:Decade years navbox by Template:Paris Air Shows. With a four-year period, that's a little more difficult because it's not a pattern that repeats by decade, so you might have to make it span two decades.

I hope this helps somehow. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! British Airways Airbus A380-841 F-WWSK PAS 2013 03 Trent 970 engine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 20:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yakovlev Yak-130 134 White PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qatar Airways Boeing 787 Dreamliner A7-BCD PAS 2013 01 Door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lack of contrast between the aircraft and sky. --Steindy 20:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)  CommentI increasted the contrast, thanks for the review (I don't think it has to be strong, the photos is about the door after all). --Julian Herzog 06:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC) Well done. Mow QI for me. --Steindy 09:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IAI Harop PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yakovlev Yak-130 134 White PAS 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 23:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RAFO EADS CASA C-295 901 PAS 2013 04 PW127G turboprop engine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --JLPC 20:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RAFO EADS CASA C-295 901 PAS 2013 03 PW127G turboprop engine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! British Airways Airbus A380-841 F-WWSK PAS 2013 07 Trent 970 engine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mauritania AF Embraer A-29B Super Tucano 5T-MAW PAS 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeronautica Militare AgustaWestland HH-139A CSX81798-15-42 PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:39, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AgustaWestland AW169 PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The background is a little disturbing, but good quality IMO--Lmbuga 20:59, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukhoi Su-35S 07 RED PAS 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukhoi Su-35S 07 RED PAS 2013 08 Cockpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 23:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukhoi Su-35S 07 RED PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 23:07, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Safran Honeywell EGTS Airbus A320-212 F-HGNT PAS 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Is there a link about EGTS? --Kadellar 00:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC) QI for me, but there is perspective distortion IMO --Lmbuga 01:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Unavoidable. --Kadellar 14:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Safran Honeywell EGTS Airbus A320-212 F-HGNT PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Is there a link about EGTS? --Kadellar 00:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)  Comment There's a website: [1] but nothing on any Wikipedia, apparently. --Julian Herzog 18:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Thanks. --Kadellar 18:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Beechcraft AT-6B Texan II N610AT PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lindau Harbor Lake Constance MS Schwaben 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lindau Harbor Lake Constance MS Schwaben 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukhoi Su-35S 07 RED PAS 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukhoi Su-35S 07 RED PAS 2013 10 front landing gear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok although f/5.6 would have been better --Poco a poco 20:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Thanks, not with this lens sadly, but I agree that more background blur would be better. --Julian Herzog 20:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus A400M F-WWMQ PAS 2013 03 Probe and Cockpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! German Army Eurocopter EC 665 Tiger UHT 98-18 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I thought that was just a fake from Goldeneye... --Mattbuck 20:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurojet EJ200 for Eurofighter Typhoon PAS 2013 01 free.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 13:34, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulfstream G280 N280GD PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO. Very minor CAs (see note)--Lmbuga 18:23, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurojet EJ200 for Eurofighter Typhoon PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm Stuttgart and Full Moon Summer 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Impressive. --Steindy 11:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm Stuttgart Summer 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NHIndustries NH90 TTH Italian Army MM81540 EI-223 PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing 737 Next-Generation Carbon Brake PAS 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evgeny Tarelkin XXVI Planetary Congress 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment In my opinion it needs a little crop: The area between the head and the top is large. It can be QI--Lmbuga 15:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, will do that tomorrow. --Julian Herzog 07:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)  Done I hope that's better now. --Julian Herzog 09:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 22:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delta Air Lines B767-3P6-ER N1501P EDDS 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 10:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharklet of F-WWIQ Airbus A320 ILA 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 10:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NHIndustries NH90 TTH French Army Air Corps EAD PAS 2013 04 tail rotor detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Mattbuck 20:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NHIndustries NH90 TTH French Army Air Corps EAD PAS 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit tight but ok. --Mattbuck 20:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Clipped Reds

Hallo Julian! Noch mal zu dem von dir angesprochenen Problem (danke zunächst für deine Mühe und bereits jetzt ausführlichen Antworten). Ich sollte vorwegnehmen, dass ich mich zwar durchaus intensiv mit Fotografie beschäftige, allerdings kein Bildbearbeitungsprofi bin. Ich nutze fast ausschließlich Lightroom (und NIK-Filter). Ich habe das besagte Bild jetzt noch mal in einer älteren Photoshop-Version geöffnet und dort ist auch auf dem Histogram eine Rot-Überbelichtung zu erkennen, s. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6ybfup0gp7o7rzu/sWmuBkrdes Wenn ich in Lightroom eine SW-Umwandlung durchführe sehen einige Bereiche in der Tat recht hell aus. Für mich ist allerdings die Frage viel entscheidener: Wie kann ich Überbelichtung einzelner Kanäle erkennen und vorab korrigieren? Ich könnte dir heute Abend mal das RAW File zuschicken, allerdings würde ich dir Schritte gerne in meinen Workflow einbauen. Die Lichter-Korrektur von Lightroom hat diesbzgl. scheinbar wenig gebracht. Es muss doch eine Möglichkeit geben so etwas auch in Lightroom zu korrigieren. Wie würdest du sonst in GIMP oder Photoshop damit umgehen? Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 08:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Danke für die Rückfrage. Ich nutze auch hauptsächlich Lightroom für die Bildbearbeitung, das scheint aber auf diese Übersteuerung recht unempfindlich zu reagieren. Die einfachste Korrektur ist wohl, entweder die Gesamtsättigung oder nur die Sättigung roter Farbbereiche zu reduzieren.
Wegen der Analyse: Die Sache ist, dass ich (da ich gewissermaßen aus dem Bereich der 3D-Grafik komme) ungewöhnliche Tools verwende, das heißt im konkreten Fall schaue ich so etwas im Blender nach. Das ist aber eher abwegig, deshalb mein Vorgehen in Gimp, was genauso gut geht: Ich gehe dort in die Kurven-Bearbeitung, gehe oben auf Grün und Blau und ziehe jeweils die Kurve ganz auf 0. Dann gehe ich auf den roten Kanal und ziehe den linken Punkt nach rechts, um den Kontrast zu erhöhen, bis alles bis auf die oberen 1-2% des Histogramms schwarz sind. Was dann übrig bleibt ist idealerweise fast nichts, bzw. bei überbelichtetem Rot-Kanal eben einige Bereiche, die den Kanal voll aussteuern.
In Blender ist das vorgehen noch etwas direkter, dort sieht die Prüfung aller Werte >0.999 für einen Kanal so aus: 1
Ich hoffe das hilft dir irgendwie weiter. Aber wie schon in der Diskussion gesagt, der Effekt scheint nicht besonders auffällig zu sein bzw. nicht unbedingt wahrgenommen zu werden, insofern ist es vielleicht nicht zu tragisch, solche Bereiche zu haben. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Antwort. Ich werde ich Zukunft auf solche Übersteuerung achten. Blumenmotive (gelb ist auch ganz schlimm) sind teilweise recht anfällig dafür. Ärgerlich ist, dass diese in LR nicht direkt erkennbar ist. Die Sättigung einzelner Kanäle kann man in LR ja über die HSL ohne Probleme korrigieren. Ich verstehe aber gerade nicht, warum ich die Sättigung verringern muss und nicht die Helligkeit des Rot-Kanals. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Nun, das ist zugegebenermaßen beides möglich, wofür man sich entscheidet ist eher eine gestalterische Entscheidung. Ich hatte die Sättigung genannt, weil das Bild vom Helligkeits-Histogramm perfekt neutral belichtet ist, es gibt also eigentlich keinen Grund, es (partiell) abzudunkeln. Der Grund für das Clipping liegt eher in der Unterschiedlichkeit von R-, B- und G-Kanal, und die würde man eben mit der Sättigung verringern. Wenn man aber die Sättigung so erhalten möchte, ist das Reduzieren der Helligkeit des Kanals auch gut möglich. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich werde mich heute Abend noch mal dransetzen und ggf. eine neue Version hochladen. Besten Dank für deine Auskunftsfreudigkeit. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe mich noch mal eingehender mit dem Problem (und wie ich es in Lightroom lösen kann) auseinandergesetzt. Ein kleines Tutorial bzw. eine Info dazu findest du unter: Channel Clipping in Lightroom. Kurzum: LR zeigt ein Histogramm im proFoto-Farbraum. Bei der Konvertierung in sRGB kann es im Extremfall passieren, dass einzelne Kanäle (insbesondere rot) extrem ausfressen. Ich freue mich über ein kurzes Feedback. Mit der Softproof-Funktion kann man vorbeugen.

Eine sehr schöne Erklärung und Lösung. Den Weg in Lightroom kann ich nicht testen, da ich noch mit Version 3 arbeite, aber der Anzeigemodus ist dann auf jeden Fall der bessere Weg. Danke. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Das Thema hat übrigens im deutschsprachigen DSLR-Forum noch größere Wellen geschlagen, mit teils interessanten Ausführungen dazu, s. http://www.dslr-forum.de/showthread.php?t=1308527 Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Car2Go Charging Station Stuttgart 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schillerplatz und Stiftskirche Stuttgart 2013 Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volksbank Stuttgart eG Börsenplatz 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! U4 Stuttgart 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Spurzem 14:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Car2Go Charging Station Stuttgart 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtag Baden-Württemberg 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunstmuseum Stuttgart 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linden-Museum Stuttgart 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps the WB could be slightly cooler, or had the light such a warm mood at this time? --Tuxyso 09:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC) I'm not really sure, cooled it down a little bit. Julian Herzog 11:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC) IMHO better now. --Tuxyso 11:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtag Baden-Württemberg 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kommandowagen VW T5 Caravelle Feuerwehr Stuttgart 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Level of detail and sharpness is good. But the photo looks a bit washed out (especially if I look at the trees). It is summer, not autumn :). --Tuxyso 09:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks, that's true. The trees don't look healthy, but not that bad. Fixed I think. Julian Herzog 11:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC) IMHO better now. --Tuxyso 11:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunstmuseum Stuttgart 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Nice and useful. There's nobody there! --Kadellar 17:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunstmuseum Stuttgart 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkpartner Hans-Joerg Limbach Stuttgart 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Russian Orthodox St. Nicholas Cathedral Stuttgart 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the left is leaning in (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 18:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Fixed Julian Herzog 18:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 21:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landesmuseum Württemberg Eingang 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Wirtschaft 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-WWIQ Airbus A320 sharklet ILA 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need WB and minimal ++Exposure --The Photographer 05:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks, hopefully Fixed, WB is on the grey area of the horizontal stabilizer. Julian Herzog 16:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC) OK for me. Mattbuck 22:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BW-Bank am Kleinen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Uninspiring but ok. --Mattbuck 22:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yakovlev Yak-130 134 White PAS 2013 03 front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichsbau Stuttgart 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Börsenplatz Friedrichsbau Stuttgart 2013 01 Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feinkost Böhm Stuttgart 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 13:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eurojet EJ200 for Eurofighter Typhoon PAS 2013 01 free.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eurojet EJ200 for Eurofighter Typhoon PAS 2013 01 free.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, exterior by day.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope IMO --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
NASA T-38 pilot helmet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope : good choice. --JLPC (talk) 17:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interflug PZL-106AR 2M Kruk D-FOAB OTT 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interflug PZL-106AR 2M Kruk D-FOAB OTT 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZL-Mielec M-21 Dromader Mini SP-YFK OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sehr gut! --AngMoKio 16:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interflug PZL-106AR 2M Kruk D-FOAB OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 18:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing-Stearman N2S-2-R985 Kaydet D-EMDV OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing-Stearman E75 N5729N OTT 2013 02 Jacobs R-755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and interesting. Very "clean" picture. Quality image to me.--Jebulon 08:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beech D17S Staggerwing N69H OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American AT-6G Texan N6593D OTT 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American AT-6G Texan N6593D OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yakovlev Yak 11 F-AZNN OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yak 52 T7-XXX OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some tight panning here, QI for me. --Yerpo 12:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yak 52 LY-FUN OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Kadellar 11:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yak 52 LY-FUN OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing N2S-5 Kaydet E75 N67193 OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing N2S-5 Kaydet E75 N67193 OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aer Lingus De Havilland DH-84 Dragon 2 EI-ABI OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blériot XI Thulin A Mikael Carlson OTT 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing N2S-5 Kaydet E75 N67193 OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blériot XI Thulin A Mikael Carlson OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blériot XI Thulin A Mikael Carlson OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yak 52 T7-GER OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but slightly CA om the mountain.--ArildV 21:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolp SA.300 Starduster Too N2361 OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stampe SV-4C D-EBHJ OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice --Christian Ferrer 20:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interflug PZL-106AR 2M Kruk D-FOAB OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F4U-Corsair OE-EAS OTT 2013 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F4U-Corsair OE-EAS OTT 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American Super Six D-FHGV OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 15:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna 337D Super Skymaster N991DM OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blériot XI Thulin A Mikael Carlson OTT 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC) I like it also. I added it to sv:Mikael Carlson --ArildV 22:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American AT-6G Texan N6593D OTT 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American AT-6G Texan N6593D OTT 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curtiss P40N Warhawk F-AZKU OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:38, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DFS Kranich II-B1 HB-475 OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 16:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F4U-Corsair OE-EAS OTT 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 16:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

FPC Paisley Abbey

Just a courtesy notice that I've modified the Paisley Abbey image you reviewed. I've taken out the boost to overall contrast that I'd applied, as I felt it made the shadows too dark. -- Colin (talk) 17:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, good choice. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Wilhelma

Hallo Julian H. Die Wilhelma verbietet nur die kommerzielle Nutzung. Meine Bilder sind aber unter cc-by-sa - Lizenz. d.h. jeder kann sie frei nutzen, es steckt kein Geld dahinter. Damit sind sie meiner Meinung nach nicht kommerziell. Etwas anderes wäre es, wenn ich die Bilder verkaufen würde oder ein Buch damit illustrieren, das ich dann verkaufe.
Schau mal unter folgender Kategorie Category:Wilhelma Zoo und den darin enthaltenen Unterkategorien. Dort findest Du eine Vielzahl von Bildern aus der Wilhelma. Wäre das Veröffentlichen in Wikimedia verboten, gäbe es die Kategorie nicht in dieser Form bzw. es gäbe entsprechende Löschanträge. Das nominierte Bild ist nicht das erste, das ich hochgeladen habe, es gab bisher noch keine Probleme. Mit den besten Grüßen und lade die Bilder unter einer freien Lizenz einfach hoch. --Llez (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe das Copyright-Recht immer so verstanden, dass das erlauben kommerzieller Nutzung hier bereits Probleme bereitet, aber ich werde versuchen, das zu klären. Danke. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM-3E Avenger HB-RDG OTT 2103 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, although the back part is slightly unsharp (compared to the front part) --Tuxyso 21:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fairchild PT-19 N50429 OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 21:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American P-51D Mustang N6328T OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 21:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stampe SV.4 D-EBHL OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CASA 1-131E Jungmann D-EFJR OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Very good! --Iifar 15:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SIAI-Marchetti SF260B N800RH OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Very good! --Iifar 15:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna 337D Super Skymaster N991DM OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me--Lmbuga 19:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

German Angst

Hallo Julian! Dich habe ich auf Commons bisher als übergenauen (und überaus kompetenten) Mitstreiter wahrgenommen. Ich spiele mit dem Gedanken dieses HighRes-Panorama vom Yosemite als FP zu nominieren. Fällt dir irgendetwas unangenehmes (außer no Wow) auf, das man im Vorfeld noch korrigieren sollte. Ich werde vermutlich die Farbtemperatur in den Schatten noch etwas erhöhen, die sind noch ein wenig bläulich. Ausrichtung? Offenkundige Stitching-Fehler? Grüße und vielen Dank schon mal, --Tuxyso (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Vorneweg: Das ist für mich so wie es ist FP-würdig, schon aufgrund der Qualität. "Wow" ist definitiv da.

Stitching-Fehler hab ich auf die Schnelle keine gefunden, ein kleinerer irgendwo in diesem riesigen Bild wäre aber auch wirklich nicht tragisch. Die Ausrichtung passt so genau, wie ich das feststellen kann. Rechts oben sieht es aus, als würde das Bild etwas nach unten abfallen - ob das Erdkrümmung, die tatsächliche Form des Geländes oder Tonnenverzeichnung ist, weiß ich nicht, aber ich finde es sogar gut, es verstärkt das Gefühl der erhöhten Betrachtungsposition.

Optimierungspotential sehe ich eigentlich nur darin, diesen etwas fahlen und entsättigten Eindruck zu verringern, den solche Fotos über große Distanzen genau mit der Sonne oft haben (durch atmosphärische Streuung in Kombination mit geringem Kontrast). Die Patentlösung habe ich dafür noch nicht gefunden, und für die Bearbeitung müsste vermutlich die rechte und linke untere Ecke maskiert werden, sonst wird dort der Kontrast zu hoch. Ich hatte manchmal Erfolg mit etwas wie: Himmelblaue Ebene mit ca. 10% subtrahieren und dann neuen Weißabgleich machen, vielleicht etwas lokale Kontrasterhöhung.

Ich hoffe das ist jetzt irgendwie hilfreich. Ich bin nicht wirklich länger hier als du, oder habe mehr Erfahrung, deshalb weiß ich gar nicht, inwiefern ich das beurteilen sollte. In den FPs bewerte ich oft relativ kritisch und achte auf bestimmte Aspekte relativ genau, weil ich denke, dass eine von vielen Stimmen auch gern etwas überkritisch sein darf. Wenn alle so genau wären, wäre ich vermutlich das Gegenteil. Ist vielleicht so eine Eigenart von mir, in der Diskussion relativ direkt zu sein, weil ich denke, dass das in der Regel das Gesamtergebnis weiterbringt. Ich hoffe dann immer, dass es zumindest als konstruktiv wahrgenommen wird. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Julian! Vielen Dank für deine ausführliche Antwort. Vorneweg: Von mir wird deine Arbeit und deine Anmerkungen definitiv als konstruktiv wahrgenommen, sonst hätte ich dich mit meinem Anliegen nicht angesprochen. Du hast fast immer (bis auf die Halos, die du sehr oft siehst für die ich einfach blind bin und die ich meist auch nicht für besonders kritisch halte) einen sehr guten und genauen Blick und triffst von wunde Punkte von Nominierungen. Das ist für den Nominator manchmal ärgerlich, weil man mit einer guten sachlichen negativen Bewertungen schon mal eine FP-Nominierung kippen kann, gerade wenn es sich um technische Aspekte handelt. Ingesamt bringst du damit Commons aber enorm nach vorne. Ich unterstütze diesen hohen Qualitätsanspruch (gerade für FPs) ausdrücklich und finde es gut, dass du genau hinschaust.
Zu deinen Anmerkungen: Krümmung: In der Tat es sieht etwas gekrümmt aus. Allerdings habe ich kein wirkliches Rezept dies zu beheben. Hugin wendet mitunter ja recht komplexe perspektivische Transformationen an. Z.B. ist es auch ein riesen Problem bei Aufnahmen mit exakten vertikalen Linien: Erkennt Hugin diese nicht und richtet falsch aus, so lässt sich das nach meiner Erfahrung im Nachhinein praktisch nicht mehr beheben. Da hilft dann nur er erneuter Stitch mit manueller Auswahl von vertikalen Linien.
Fahler Eindruck: Sehe ich genauso. Ich arbeite ausschließlich in Lightroom und werde heute Abend noch mal schauen, was ich noch drehen kann. Erfolg habe ich z.T. mit Erhöhung von Schwarz und Klarheit in solchen Fällen (die bereits dunklen Bereiche, da hast du völlig recht, sollten dann davon aber unberührt bleiben), beides Einstellungen, die sich auf den Mikro-Kontrast auswirken. Herzlichen Dank auf jeden Fall für deine wertvollen Hinweise. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Blériot

Hello, Julian. Is it possible to darken the overexposed wing in this picture? It is an outstanding panning. By the way, I like very much your pictures from the 17th Oldtimer Fliegertreffen Hahnweide. --Kadellar (talk) 12:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kadellar, thanks, yes I think I can darken it a bit more - since it's not clipped (if I remember correctly), that shouldn't look bad. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Done, should be better. Although I'm not 100% happy with the look. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:18, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, beautiful photo -- Spurzem 16:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, beautiful photo -- Spurzem 16:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 D-EQXL OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Kadellar 11:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ju-Air Junkers Ju-52-3m HB-HOS OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but there's CA on the rudder and the upper edge of the plane, can you fix it please? --Kadellar 13:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review, should be fixed (although the new file isn't displayed yet for me). Julian Herzog 15:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Better now, thanks. --Kadellar 15:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

German Angst

Hallo Julian! Dich habe ich auf Commons bisher als übergenauen (und überaus kompetenten) Mitstreiter wahrgenommen. Ich spiele mit dem Gedanken dieses HighRes-Panorama vom Yosemite als FP zu nominieren. Fällt dir irgendetwas unangenehmes (außer no Wow) auf, das man im Vorfeld noch korrigieren sollte. Ich werde vermutlich die Farbtemperatur in den Schatten noch etwas erhöhen, die sind noch ein wenig bläulich. Ausrichtung? Offenkundige Stitching-Fehler? Grüße und vielen Dank schon mal, --Tuxyso (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Vorneweg: Das ist für mich so wie es ist FP-würdig, schon aufgrund der Qualität. "Wow" ist definitiv da.

Stitching-Fehler hab ich auf die Schnelle keine gefunden, ein kleinerer irgendwo in diesem riesigen Bild wäre aber auch wirklich nicht tragisch. Die Ausrichtung passt so genau, wie ich das feststellen kann. Rechts oben sieht es aus, als würde das Bild etwas nach unten abfallen - ob das Erdkrümmung, die tatsächliche Form des Geländes oder Tonnenverzeichnung ist, weiß ich nicht, aber ich finde es sogar gut, es verstärkt das Gefühl der erhöhten Betrachtungsposition.

Optimierungspotential sehe ich eigentlich nur darin, diesen etwas fahlen und entsättigten Eindruck zu verringern, den solche Fotos über große Distanzen genau mit der Sonne oft haben (durch atmosphärische Streuung in Kombination mit geringem Kontrast). Die Patentlösung habe ich dafür noch nicht gefunden, und für die Bearbeitung müsste vermutlich die rechte und linke untere Ecke maskiert werden, sonst wird dort der Kontrast zu hoch. Ich hatte manchmal Erfolg mit etwas wie: Himmelblaue Ebene mit ca. 10% subtrahieren und dann neuen Weißabgleich machen, vielleicht etwas lokale Kontrasterhöhung.

Ich hoffe das ist jetzt irgendwie hilfreich. Ich bin nicht wirklich länger hier als du, oder habe mehr Erfahrung, deshalb weiß ich gar nicht, inwiefern ich das beurteilen sollte. In den FPs bewerte ich oft relativ kritisch und achte auf bestimmte Aspekte relativ genau, weil ich denke, dass eine von vielen Stimmen auch gern etwas überkritisch sein darf. Wenn alle so genau wären, wäre ich vermutlich das Gegenteil. Ist vielleicht so eine Eigenart von mir, in der Diskussion relativ direkt zu sein, weil ich denke, dass das in der Regel das Gesamtergebnis weiterbringt. Ich hoffe dann immer, dass es zumindest als konstruktiv wahrgenommen wird. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Julian! Vielen Dank für deine ausführliche Antwort. Vorneweg: Von mir wird deine Arbeit und deine Anmerkungen definitiv als konstruktiv wahrgenommen, sonst hätte ich dich mit meinem Anliegen nicht angesprochen. Du hast fast immer (bis auf die Halos, die du sehr oft siehst für die ich einfach blind bin und die ich meist auch nicht für besonders kritisch halte) einen sehr guten und genauen Blick und triffst von wunde Punkte von Nominierungen. Das ist für den Nominator manchmal ärgerlich, weil man mit einer guten sachlichen negativen Bewertungen schon mal eine FP-Nominierung kippen kann, gerade wenn es sich um technische Aspekte handelt. Ingesamt bringst du damit Commons aber enorm nach vorne. Ich unterstütze diesen hohen Qualitätsanspruch (gerade für FPs) ausdrücklich und finde es gut, dass du genau hinschaust.
Zu deinen Anmerkungen: Krümmung: In der Tat es sieht etwas gekrümmt aus. Allerdings habe ich kein wirkliches Rezept dies zu beheben. Hugin wendet mitunter ja recht komplexe perspektivische Transformationen an. Z.B. ist es auch ein riesen Problem bei Aufnahmen mit exakten vertikalen Linien: Erkennt Hugin diese nicht und richtet falsch aus, so lässt sich das nach meiner Erfahrung im Nachhinein praktisch nicht mehr beheben. Da hilft dann nur er erneuter Stitch mit manueller Auswahl von vertikalen Linien.
Fahler Eindruck: Sehe ich genauso. Ich arbeite ausschließlich in Lightroom und werde heute Abend noch mal schauen, was ich noch drehen kann. Erfolg habe ich z.T. mit Erhöhung von Schwarz und Klarheit in solchen Fällen (die bereits dunklen Bereiche, da hast du völlig recht, sollten dann davon aber unberührt bleiben), beides Einstellungen, die sich auf den Mikro-Kontrast auswirken. Herzlichen Dank auf jeden Fall für deine wertvollen Hinweise. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Blériot

Hello, Julian. Is it possible to darken the overexposed wing in this picture? It is an outstanding panning. By the way, I like very much your pictures from the 17th Oldtimer Fliegertreffen Hahnweide. --Kadellar (talk) 12:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kadellar, thanks, yes I think I can darken it a bit more - since it's not clipped (if I remember correctly), that shouldn't look bad. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Done, should be better. Although I'm not 100% happy with the look. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:18, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, beautiful photo -- Spurzem 16:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, beautiful photo -- Spurzem 16:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 D-EQXL OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Kadellar 11:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ju-Air Junkers Ju-52-3m HB-HOS OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but there's CA on the rudder and the upper edge of the plane, can you fix it please? --Kadellar 13:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review, should be fixed (although the new file isn't displayed yet for me). Julian Herzog 15:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Better now, thanks. --Kadellar 15:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morane-Saulnier D-3801 HB-RCF OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Douglas A-1D Skyraider AD-4NA F-AZHK OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 10:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polikarpov Po-2 HA-PAO OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments dust spot in upper right corner? --P e z i 10:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review, whatever it was, it should be gone. Julian Herzog 17:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC) SupportO.K. now --P e z i 18:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra T-131PA Jungmann OE-ALF OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Nice in-motion unsharpness on propeller --P e z i 10:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American P-51D Mustang N6328T OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North American AT-6G Texan N6593D OTT 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice --Lmbuga 17:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Bull Noorduyn AT-16 Harvard IIB D-FHGK OTT 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM-3E Avenger HB-RDG OTT 2103 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morane-Saulnier D-3801 HB-RCF OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 D-EQXL OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:39, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM-3E Avenger HB-RDG OTT 2103 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful composition, but lost details in highlights. Perhaps a better development from raw is possible? --Smial 20:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC) This is developed from RAW for these parts to be bright (because they are, obviously) but not clipped or suffering from loss of detail. I can see every line of nuts and every bit of the paint job on top of the wings. Julian Herzog 21:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC) Sorry, that was a little negative, I'll see that I can improve the contrast in these areas a little tomorrow. Julian Herzog 22:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC) Would be worth it. I tried it with the jpg, but that did not work. -- Smial 22:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC) I brought it down from around 95% brightness to about 90%. Julian Herzog 11:49, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Near perfect now ;-) -- Smial 17:55, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM-3E Avenger HB-RDG OTT 2103 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Smial 20:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM-3E Avenger HB-RDG OTT 2103 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though somewhat too warm colours. --Smial 20:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Douglas A-1D Skyraider AD-4NA F-AZHK OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 21:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F4U-Corsair OE-EAS OTT 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 16:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grumman TBM-3E Avenger HB-RDG OTT 2103 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blériot XI Thulin A Mikael Carlson OTT 2013 08b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonov PZL-Mielec An-2TD D-FWJM OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 D-EQXL OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 17:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 8 D-INKA OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 8 D-INKA OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 8 D-INKA OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 D-EQXL OTT 2013 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 D-EQXL OTT 2013 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 16:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Request for comments...

Hallo Julian! Ich bin noch mal an deiner Meinung interessiert. Was hälst du von dem Foto: File:Altstadt Mülheim Teinerstraße 2 und 4 2013.jpg? Man hat ja selbst manchmal einen verstellten Blick auf eigene Fotos. Ich hatte es auch mal auf KEB nominiert und dort z.T. Kritik erhalten, die ich inhaltlich gar nicht nachvollziehen kann. Und das von Leuten, die ich eigentlich für hochkompent halte. Vielen Dank schon mal für deine Einschätzung (gerne hier). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok, ich hab es mir jetzt mal ausführlich angeschaut. Schärfe und Auflösung sind auf alle Fälle sehr gut und die Bildgestaltung funktioniert aus meiner Sicht auch, wobei etwas mehr Platz rechts und links nicht schaden würde. Spektakulär ist sie nicht, aber dafür ist ja das Licht spannend. Abgesehen davon, dass man natürlich nie weiß, wie viele Abstimmende sich finden, sehe ich eigentlich nur eine richtige Schwachstelle für eine FP-Kandidatur, und das sind die objektivinternen Reflexionen, die das linke untere Viertel des Bildes befallen haben. Man sieht da einige etwas aufgehellte Bildbereiche wie Flecken auf dem Kopfsteinpflaster und an der linken unteren Gebäudeecke ist stellenweise der Kontrast dadurch sehr viel geringer. Ich weiß nicht, wie mühselig die Korrektur dieser Stellen ist/wäre. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung. Ich habe inzwischen eine neue Version hochgeladen, s. File:Petrikirchenhaus Teinerstraße 2 und 4 2013 Alternative.jpg. Die hellen Bereiche (auf Höhe des Gully-Deckels) kommen von den beleuchteten Fenstern. Ich sehe nachdem du das schreibst tatsächlich ein paar kleine bunte Flecken. Ich bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob wir über die gleichen Stellen sprechen. Kannst du diese mal auf dem alten Bild markieren? Danke, --Tuxyso (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

. Vielen Dank für deine Markierungen. Aktuell weiß ich nicht so recht was ich daran ändern soll. Stempeln ist auch nicht wirklich eine Lösung bei der großen Fläche. Ich frage mich nur ernsthaft, was bei der Aufnahme passiert ist. Ich vermute fast, dass direkt hinter mir eine Laterne stand, die ggf. gestört hat. Ansonsten handet es sich bei dem 14-24er um das beste Nikon-Ultra-WW-Zoom, dem ich eine solch ausgeprägte Glare / Flare-Bildung eigentlich nicht zugetraut hätte. Das Teil hat sogar eine fest verbaute Gegenlichtblende. Merkwürdig. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lockheed P-38L Lightning N25Y OTT 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful warm colours, pleasant subject, nice and sharp. Good work! Lewis Collard 16:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 7XC D-IFSA OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stampe SV.4 D-EBHL OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr schön. --Frank Schulenburg 03:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 15:33, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing-Stearman E75 N5729N OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing-Stearman E75 N5729N OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:33, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Bull Noorduyn AT-16 Harvard IIB D-FHGK OTT 2013 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:50, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Hurricane Mk2B G-HIII XP-L OTT 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:50, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 7XC D-IFSA OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:50, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beech D17S Staggerwing N69H OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 16:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolp SA.300 Starduster Too N2361 OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolp SA.300 Starduster Too N2361 OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ju-Air Junkers Ju-52-3m D-CDLH OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent -- Spurzem 20:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udet Flamingo D-EOSC OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F4U-Corsair OE-EAS OTT 2013 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonov An-2 formation OK-XIG OK-HWB OK-HFL OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interflug PZL-106AR 2M Kruk D-FOAB OTT 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Smial 15:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aer Lingus De Havilland DH-84 Dragon 2 EI-ABI OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-89A Dragon Rapide D-ILIT OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-89A Dragon Rapide D-ILIT OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aer Lingus De Havilland DH-84 Dragon 2 EI-ABI OTT 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 22:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra T-131PA Jungmann OE-APS OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 21:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 8 D-INKA OTT 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:04, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aer Lingus De Havilland DH-84 Dragon 2 EI-ABI OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--ArildV 13:04, 25 October 2013 (UTC)!

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 05:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryan PT-22 Recruit N46502 OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! -- Felix Koenig 19:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flying Bulls Aerobatics Team OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slepcev Storch HB-YKQ OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lee Fields & The Expressions (Haldern Pop 2013) IMGP3844 smial wp.jpg, uploaded by Smial and nominated by you on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lee Fields & The Expressions (Haldern Pop 2013) IMGP3844 smial wp.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 06:26, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 N54945 OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful picture -- Spurzem 13:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fokker Dr.I D-EFTJ OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fokker Dr.I D-EFTJ OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 13:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna 337D Super Skymaster N991DM OTT 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top is a bit odd, but good quality. --Mattbuck 23:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ju-Air Junkers CASA 352A-3 Ju-52 D-CDLH OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Qflieger 19:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonov An-2 D-FKME OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:26, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-17 Kaydet A75N1 N54945 OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Qflieger 19:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
EJ200, lateral view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good work. It seems useful to add to the scope:" Lateral view". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

done. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Very useful. Halavar (talk) 12:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonov An-2 D-FKME OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Congratulations, perhaps not perfect, but really nice. Cute IMO. Dificult picture--Lmbuga 23:00, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryan PT-22 Recruit N46502 OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality (perfect inmotion unsharpness IMO) --P e z i 21:25, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slepcev Storch HB-YKQ OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DFS Habicht E D-1901 OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 23:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonov An-2 D-FKME OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 14:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH-104 Dove 7XC D-IFSA OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not the best perspective and minor CAs (see note), but QI IMO--Lmbuga 19:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DFS Habicht E D-1901 OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Congratulations again--Lmbuga 19:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fokker Dr.I D-EFTJ OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 17:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agusta AB-47G-2 D-HELO OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flying Bulls Aerobatics Team OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd prefer it brighter, but nice shot. --Mattbuck 14:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice.--ArildV 10:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F+W C-3605 HB-RDB OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Max Holste MH-1521M Broussard F-GIBN OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:48, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yakovlev Yak-55 LY-TOY OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryan PT-22 Recruit N46502 OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Max Holste MH-1521M Broussard F-GIBN OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it. --Hockei 18:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker Sea Fury FB 10 F-AZXJ OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ryan PT-22 Recruit N46502 OTT 2013 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ryan PT-22 Recruit N46502 OTT 2013 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Sandhamn

FYI: I restored your vote here because the nomination was not correctly closed (and is now re-opened). Thanks for your review, I'll see what I can do about the moiré. Best regards --ArildV (talk) 19:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and for restoring, I'll keep an eye on it. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 22:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

FPC

Could you explain to me why on those two diffs : [2] and [3] you removed my !votes ? Could you please put them back ? Pleclown (talk) 19:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm very sorry, that was not my intention. I had clicked the "undo" button on the last revision in both cases, something went wrong there. I restored them both. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 22:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Pleclown (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Meinung

Hallo Julian! Ich bin an deiner Meinung interessiert. Welche dieser drei Aufnahmen (auch hinsichtlich einer möglichen FP-Kandidatur) gefällt dir am besten?

• File:Death Valley view from Zabriskie Point with people 2013.jpg
• File:Death Valley view from Zabriskie Point 2013 01.jpg
• File:Death Valley view from Zabriskie Point 2013 02.jpg

Ich kann mich nicht recht entscheiden. Alle drei Aufnahmen haben irgendwie ihren Reiz. Ich freue mich über deine Rückmeldung. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:59, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Tuxyso, wirklich interessante Fotos. Ich finde es schwer, zu entscheiden, welches der Bilder am besten ist. Das zweite zeigt aus meiner Sicht das Motiv am besten und die Komposition überzeugt mich am meisten, das erste ist aber fast interessanter, da es mit den Personen im Bild einen Größenbezug gibt. Das dritte überzeugt mich nicht ganz, da es oben sehr knapp beschnitten ist. Ich weiß aber nicht, ob ich dir irgend etwas neues erzählen kann, das sind eigentlich nur die offensichtlichen Beobachtungen. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Einschätzung. In der Tat schwanke ich auch zwischen 1 und 2 :) Ggf. nominiere ich beide oder ich weise bei der Nominierung auf das andere Bild hin, sie zeigen ja immerhin unterschiedliche Motive. Ich finde es bei Landschaftsaufnahmen generell interessant, wenn ein paar Personen darauf zu erkennen sind - immerhin wurden die Nationalparks ja für Menschen erschlossen. 1 ist für mich als Thumb etwas überzeugender, bei zwei gefällt mir das Licht-Schattenspiel im Hintergrund und die vielen Details besonders gut. Alle drei Aufnahmen sind übrigens eine Art "Unfall", weil ich eigentlich ein sehr großen Panorama erstellen wollte, dann aus der Hand aber offenbar zuviel verschwenkt habe. So musste ich mir ein paar interessante Teilmotive heraussuchen. Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ju-Air Junkers Ju-52-3m HB-HOS OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-13D Kaydet N5345N OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fokker D VII SE-XVO OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fokker Dr.I D-EFTJ and Fokker D VII SE-XVO formation OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DHC-1 Chipmunk 22 F-AZQM OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Julian Herzog, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agusta AB-47G-2 D-HELO OTT 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It lacked a bit of sharpness, however, sufficient quality to my IMHO --The Photographer 17:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fokker D VII SE-XVO OTT 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Mattbuck 17:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-13D Kaydet N5345N OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 21:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonov An-2 D-FKME OTT 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and a nice motion blur. --Cccefalon 09:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Bay Psalm Book

Hi,

This is a very rare book (only 11 copies still known), which is one of the criteria for a FP, and a high resolution scan. So I don't understand your critic. Could you please explain? Yann (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of the specific guidelines for historical documents. I will correct my vote accordingly. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:53, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Streisand Estate.jpg/2

Please revisit Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Streisand Estate.jpg/2, as there is an ALT proposed by Alchemist-hp which edited the image to improve its quality, thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 21:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Julian Herzog, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Merry Christmas

Dear Julian, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum 201312 08 blue hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Exellent. Mattbuck 09:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC) Maybe FP?--ArildV 09:58, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W463 G 350 BlueTEC 07 Mercedes-Benz Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum 201312 04 blue hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 13:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum 201312 06 blue hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great--ArildV 13:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W463 G 350 BlueTEC 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W463 G 350 BlueTEC 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted clockwise. Not sure, if there is additionally a perspective correction necessary. --Cccefalon 12:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC) What, would you suggest, should be horizontal? I'm not sure myself. Wheels? Chassis? Perspective correction on a car seems wrong to me. Julian Herzog 13:25, 26 December 2013 (UTC) No. The car is standing on a slope and you made the slope horizontal. As a consequence, the whole background is rotated. --Cccefalon 13:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC) I changed that now, although that slightly changes the purpose of the image. Julian Herzog 10:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Thank you, QI now. And I think that it is still a good representation of the car. Even at IAA exhibitors put their cars on an artifical slope to get them better presented. No need to worry about that. --Cccefalon 10:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum 201312 05 blue hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum 201312 07 blue hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the dust spot first (see annotation) --Cccefalon 11:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Done. Julian Herzog 11:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)  Support --Cccefalon 12:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum 201312 02 sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some green CA (left), otherwise good quality.--ArildV 09:58, 25 December 2013 (UTC) Thanks, hopefully fixed, please clarify otherwise. Julian Herzog 10:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Thanks, nice photo. --ArildV 10:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W463 G 350 BlueTEC 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W463 G 350 BlueTEC 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Removing files from categories like Aircraft facing left

Hi, thanks for your comment. The purpose is to reduce overcategorisation, in which categories are judged to be excessive or redundant for anyone wishing to find a particular image. For most aircraft images, the aircraft type plus perhaps registration and/or operator, is sufficient to find a suitable image. Descriptive categories such as taxying or facing left should only be used if there are insufficient other categories to enable the image to be found. Similarly, Aircraft in flight could be applied to a large proportion of aircraft images, and the general rule is to minimise category size to 200 images or fewer, to enable users to quickly find images. The article Commons:Categories should provide some suitable policy guidance in this matter, and I hope that will help explain my actions. PeterWD (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

For convenience, I have copied the above with new comments to my talk page to provide a single location for our discussion.PeterWD (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikorsky S-70i Black Hawk SP-YVC ILA 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 11:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Isn't it overexposed? Mattbuck 10:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment I don't think it is. The subject (helicopter) is actually mostly in the lower part of the histogram. Apart from that, in my opinion, the only benchmark for overexposure is that no whites should be clipped, so no part of the image should be fully white. That's not the case here. Even the brightest areas have structure. --Julian Herzog 08:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC) OK then. Mattbuck 10:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)