Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KAS-ACDP!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:KAS-Arbeitsplätze-Bild-33364-2.jpg edit

 
File:KAS-Arbeitsplätze-Bild-33364-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:KAS-Zehlendorf-Bild-4422-1.jpg edit

 
File:KAS-Zehlendorf-Bild-4422-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Foreign Species (talk) 17:24, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nachfrage zu File:KAS-Altherr, Walter-Bild-19092-1.jpg edit

In der Beschreibung zu dem Bild steht, es sei ein Wahlplakat zur Bundestagswahl 1998. Nun ist Walter Altherr bereits 1994 aus dem Bundestag ausgeschieden, wird aber auf dem Plakat als MdB bezeichnet, obwohl er 1998 MdL in Rheinland-Pfalz war. Das lässt mich an der Jahresangabe in der Bildbeschreibung zweifeln. Kann es sein, dass es sich in Wahrheit um ein Plakat aus dem Bundestagswahlkampf 1994 handelt? Über eine Prüfung würde ich mich freuen. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Das ist wohl wahr, die schwarz-rot-goldenen Pinselstriche entsprechen eigentlich überhaupt keiner der gängigen Designlinien der Bundes-CDU, wenn ich das richtig überblicke. Aber vielen Dank für die Überarbeitung. --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:CDU Wahlkampfplakat - kaspl010.JPG edit

 
File:CDU Wahlkampfplakat - kaspl010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:KAS-Magdeburg-Bild-38697-1.jpg edit

 
File:KAS-Magdeburg-Bild-38697-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

54.239.6.185 16:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 00:56, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 19:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

POTD Notification edit

 
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Antonio Segni and Konrad Adenauer by Giuseppe Moro, August 1959.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:KAS-Vertriebene-Bild-5876-3.jpg edit

Hello KAS-ACDP, looks like work from/after Eugène Laermans, so the spelling Künstler Grafiker: Eugen Laermanns would be incorrect. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Something like this perhaps?   Lotje (talk) 05:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
You're very welcome Lotje (talk) 10:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:KAS-Mairose, Ralf-Bild-1699-1.jpg edit

 
File:KAS-Mairose, Ralf-Bild-1699-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Berlinschneid (talk) 11:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:KAS-Fahr, Wolfgang Alber, Siegbert Wurm, Martin-Bild-1055-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply