Kjersti Lie

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, NAPkjersti!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Kjersti Lie!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

• Image:R Solem.jpg was uncategorized on 26 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Sissel Lie.jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:51, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 05:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

I had problems with the .png-format on Commons(again), so the picture was uploaded as a .jpg file - and the permission sent to the Norwegian wm-group. You may delete the .png-file, if it is not already done. kj 14:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• File:Esdailes bibliotekprosjekt NTH.png

File:Nordre Ekre setra 2.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Kjersti Lie, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 12:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

I think this is sorted now, after I brought it up on Help desk. kj 17:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

File:NTNU UB ARKBIB interior 1.jpg has no license

Hi, I noticed that File:NTNU UB ARKBIB interior 1.jpg and several other images in Category:Items with OTRS permission confirmed but no license has no license. I have no access to your OTRS ticket so I can not look up what it is supposed to be. Could you add those missing licenses? See Commons:Licensing for more information. --Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me! I think I have added the correct (cc-by-sa 3.0) license to all the photos now! By writing to me, you also made me aware of all the other warnings on my user page! I had better take a look at them as well! kj 13:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing this up. --Jarekt (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Skiboli sections A and B.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Skiboli sections A and B.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Skiboli section 3.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Skiboli section 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Skiboli plan.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Skiboli plan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Media fra NTNU Universitetsbiblioteket

Hei! Jeg har sett at det ikke er opprettet kategori på commons for media som du har lastet opp fra NTNU Universitetsbiblioteket. Det er egne kategorier for dette, du kan se på Category:Image sources of Norway for å se hvordan det fungerer. Jeg har tenkt å opprette en kategori for det og legge de aktuelle filene i kategorien, men vil gjerne at du foreslår/bestemmer hva den skal hete. Et eksempel kan være Category:Media from NTNU Universitetsbiblioteket Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Oops! Det er dessverre ikke de eneste jeg har glemt, ser jeg. Ja takk, opprett gjerne - og teksten er fin! :) 129.241.221.99 14:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Ja da, det var meg! Jeg åpnet commons-lenken fra mailen - uten å være pålogget, da, sjø! kj 14:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Ler.. ;-) Jeg har opprettet kategorien og lagt noen bilder der, kommer litt etter hvert. Når det står NTNU Hovedarkivet som kilde; skal disse filene i samme kategori? Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Hm... egentlig ikke. Jeg har ikke "partout"-tillatelse til å laste opp bilder fra Hovedarkivet. Det er egentlig en annen avdeling enn universitetsbiblioteket, såååæææ jeg tror ikke det. Kjersti L. 11:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Den er grei. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Kjersti L. 11:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Tor-Arne Moen Natural selection.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Torstein (talk) 10:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

How nice! I will tell the artist - who is also the photographer! Kjersti L. 11:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Havlaboratoriet NTNU Trondheim.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Havlaboratoriet NTNU Trondheim.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Kavitasjonslaboratoriet NTNU Tyholt.jpg
• File:Marinteknisk senter NTNU Tyholt.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Oops! Forgot. I will fix it tomorrow! Thank you for reminding me! Kjersti L. 12:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your patience and explanations --Sjokolade (talk) 12:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

thanks! And thank you - for your tireless categorizing and subcategorizing! (I sometimes Wonder why Trondheim interests you so?) You may share the tulips with me! Have a nice weekend. 188.113.106.95 13:35, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

And that was me again, not logged on ... That is what happens when I click on the Commons link in a mail ... Kjersti L. 13:41, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Magasinet BUNAD cover 2015–2.jpg

File:Magasinet BUNAD cover 2015–2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Elisfkc (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Magasinet BUNAD cover 2015–2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Magasinet BUNAD cover 2015–2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

TommyG (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Bare å ignorere denne. Den sendes automatisk når man trykker på "No permission"-lenken i venstremargen. TommyG (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Tusen takk for hjelpen, TommyG! Sender digitale takksigelsesklemmer! Kjersti L. 19:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 02.jpg
• File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 03.jpg
• File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 04.jpg
• File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 05.jpg
• File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 06.jpg
• File:NTHi idrettsplass Gløshaugen 07.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Donald Glenn Byrne 2012.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Donald Glenn Byrne 2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Reidar Andersen - biologist vs ski jumper

Hei og godt nytt år, Kjersti Lie.

I min opprydding av norske vinter-OL deltagere så kom jeg over skihopperen Reidar Andersen som hadde noen rare bilder. Jeg prøvde meg på en henvendelse til Bruker:TommyG på hans Commons brukerdiskusjonsside her. Noe av grunnen til at jeg ikke ønsker å opprette denne kategorien er at jeg er usikker på hva som bør være parentes-formen siden hovedkategorien jo er opptatt. Og siden du er hovedforfatter av den norske og så langt eneste wikipedia-artikkelen så anser jeg deg som den som har mest kunnskap om artikkelobjektet i wikiverden. Og ettersom jeg heller ikke bryr meg så veldig mye om slike personer sånn generelt så kanskje du kunne tenke deg oppgaven med å lage en passende kategori for denne personen som altså ikke er skihopper men ifølge den norske wikipedia-artikkelen er biolog, men muligens er kjent som noe mer enn bare denne profesjonen. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 00:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Godt nytt år til deg også, Migrant – og gjerne også til TommyG! Jeg har bare opprettet én Commonskategori der det var fare for sammenblanding. Der satte jeg inn mannens fødselsår i parentes: Category:Robert Jackson (1945). Er dette et alternativ for "min" Reidar Andersen? Hvis ikke synes jeg Reidar Andersen (biologist) må være naturlig, ettersom stillingen han innehar, og er kjent for (museumsdirektør), er en åremålsstilling. Hva synes du/dere? En annen sak er at biolog Andersen kanskje ikke er aktuell for en egen Commons-kategori (ennå). Det finnes vel bare et par bilder av ham? Fint hvis du bare tar saken, Migrant. Hvis det er noe mer du vil drøfte, er jeg selvsagt tilgjengelig! Kjersti L. 07:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Nå er kategorien laget (Category:Reidar Andersen (biologist), jeg valgte utdanning/yrke i parentes siden det var det som var brukt på andre personer som var i underkategorien for Category:Scientists from Norway) og hvis wikidata-elementet for biologen utvides med verdien for parameteret given name (P735) så kan også defaultsort fjernes manuelt fra innholdet i commons-kategorien men vil fortsatt alfabetiseres riktig. Hvis også Commons category (P373) blir lagt til som et parameter med verdien så vil også den lenkes fra infoboksen, men for tiden har jeg litt trøbbel med redigering på wikidata. For dette får jeg ikke gjort nå, men commons-kategorien og wikipedia-artikkelen er nå ihvertfall lenket på wikidata og det ser du også i wikipedia-artikkelen siden den har lenke til commons-kategorien i venstre-margen. I tillegg kan du jo eventuelt legge til andre relevante kategorier på commons og eventuelt kategorisere flere bilder inn i commons-kategorien om du vet om flere som hører til der ? Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Takk, Migrant, fine greier! Kjersti L. 14:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Audrey van der Meer.jpg

File:Audrey van der Meer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Audrey van der Meer (cropped).jpg

File:Audrey van der Meer (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marie Holst m fl etter examen artium.png

Copyright status: File:Marie Holst m fl etter examen artium.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marie Holst m fl etter examen artium.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me! I did give the source, with an URL, when I uploaded the file. I just forgot to put brackets around the license type! Kjersti L. 07:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:NTNUs litteraturpris 2018.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NTNUs litteraturpris 2018.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

I have informed Patrick Rogel, on his discussion page, that I only forgot to include the OTRS pending template. Permission mail will be sent to permission-no ... within a day or so. I have uploaded around 1000 files, and know how to do this. I just forgot … Sorry! Kjersti L. 15:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bjørn Krogstad Barnets drøm.jpg

And also:

• File:Bjørn Krogstad Maskemaker.jpg
• File:Bjørn Krogstad Barnet drømmer.jpg
• File:Bjørn Krogstad Triptykon.jpg
• File:Bjørn Krogstad Sort jeger 2019.jpg
• File:Bjørn Krogstad Jegeren drømmer.jpg
• File:Bjørn Krogstad Jegerens diffuse nærvær.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

This was an urgent job, because of the artist's ongoing exhibition. I will send the necessary OTRS permission mails tomorrow! So sorry! Kjersti L. 23:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Mariama Bâ.jpg

File:Mariama Bâ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:59, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

File:The Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT Study) English.pdf was recently deleted

File:The Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT Study) English.pdf was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Queen Hangbe.png was recently deleted

File:Queen Hangbe.png was recently deleted by Regasterios for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 6 August 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

---

Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

I take it this was a standard message. I do know that I should sign my postings, after more than 10 years. Just forgot! Kjersti L. 16:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your signature should include your full username and "a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion)."   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Martin Myhre Olsen (cropped).jpg

File:Martin Myhre Olsen (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

A1Cafel (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. This is no copyright violation. The copyright holder (Martin Myhre Olsen) sent his permission to permissions-no@wikimedia.org on May 27th. I don't know why they have failed to process it. I have sent them a reminder today. Kjersti L. 09:40, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Annette Lykknes.jpg

Copyright status: File:Annette Lykknes.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Annette Lykknes.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Annette Lykknes.jpg

Copyright status: File:Annette Lykknes.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Annette Lykknes.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Maschius Trondheimsprospekt m seteritak.svg

File:Maschius Trondheimsprospekt m seteritak.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Barbara Szybinska Matusiak.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Szybinska Matusiak.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Permission on its way! Kjersti L. 10:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lysholmbiblioteket Library desk.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lysholmbiblioteket Library desk.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, if a permission by the true photographer has been sent to ORTS/VRTS, you may replace the no-perm-template on the image-page by {{OTRS pending}}. --Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

yes, but you were so quick!! :D Everything will be OK. I have uploaded hundreds of photos and know the drill! Kjersti L. 10:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Well, patroling recent uploads is best done shortly after upload. If you often upload such kind of images for which the permission-process is already underway, why not include the OTRS-template already in the description at file-upload. I've removed the no-perm-tags from the 2 images now. --Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I forgot, Túrelio! I simply forgot!!! Sorry! Thanks for removing the tags. Kjersti L. 10:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Den tunge samtalen om vennskap og kobber.jpg

Copyright status: File:Den tunge samtalen om vennskap og kobber.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Den tunge samtalen om vennskap og kobber.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Hei, e du dær II.jpg
• File:Rottreet, sola og havet.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Physicist Jacob Linder 2022.png

Hi, did the mentioned photographer sent his mail also to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) ? --Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Wow, you are so quick!!! I am working on it now. Step 1: Agreement with Linder (e-mail, he wanted this more recent photo). Step 2: I uploaded the photo, to give it a precise URL, WITH the information on OTRS pending. Step 3, which is what I was about to do now: Send him a standard permission mail for him to return to me AND permissions-no@wikimedia.org! OK? Kjersti L. 10:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Sure. Now, after you have added the OTRS-tag, it's fine and the image is sort of "protected" against speedy deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 11:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Ingvild Eiring 2019.jpg

Hi, in the description of this image und of your last upload, you had written "Attachment to e-mail from the photographer/copyright holder Ingvild Eiring". However, none had any tag from OTRS. Didn't you forward said permission from the "photographer/copyright holder" to OTRS? --Túrelio (talk) 11:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much, Turélio! I have been ill with COVID-19 for almost a month, and afterwards the whole thing was forgotten. I will fix it right away! Kjersti L. 11:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome back and get fully well soon! --Túrelio (talk) 12:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Kjersti L. 12:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Generalsekretær Ellen Alm DKNVS (cropped).jpg

Copyright status: File:Generalsekretær Ellen Alm DKNVS (cropped).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Generalsekretær Ellen Alm DKNVS (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Generalsekretær Ellen Alm DKNVS.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Sorry! I forgot to add the correct license. This is now done, both for the original file and the cropped version of it! Kjersti L. (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)