LeZibou

Welcome to the Commons, LeZibou!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Serrabone 03.jpg

Hello

thanks for your uploads

Unfortunetaly, when you uploaded pic in reference, you forgot license and by this way this one runs risk of deletion. Could you tag it with a valid license as your other pics.

friendly Oxam Hartog 22:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Idem for Image:Serrabone 04.jpg Oxam Hartog 22:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Idem for Image:Saint Martin du Canigou 02.jpg Oxam Hartog 22:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:StGenisdesFontaines_Cloitre_04.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• OK I've added the license. Thanks for the advice. --LeZibou 13:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Etna

Belles photos ! Un petit peu de flou cependant pour passer en featured amha, mais bon tu peux toujours tenter qui sait? sinon il convient de géocoder les photos pour permettre à quelqu'un d'autre de pouvoir prendre sous le même angle (ou presque) une photo qui peut être sera meilleure ou dans des conditions différentes. Pour géocoder chercher sur un logiciel en ligne la zone (comme google map) zoomer et centrer puis cliquer sur obtenir l'URL de la page enfin remplir ce champ exemple:

{{location dec|45.761159|4.835437|type:landmark_region:FR_scale:1000_heading:29}}

Voila, en plus pour être featured une image doit comporter ces informations généralement. Otourly 18:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Merci ! Faut dire que c'était pas évident de faire des photos sans trop bouger, avec le vent qu'il y a là haut (plus de 2000 mètres) ! ça plus la poussière volcaniques qui vole, et pouvant potentiellement endommager l'appareil... Je vais tâcher de géoréférencer tout ça. Cordialement, --LeZibou 18:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

J'avais pas été chercher plus loin...mais sinon il existe Yahoo map (bien que le zoom est plus faible) peut être auras tu plus de chances? En tout cas je ne sais pas quel appareil tu utilises mais il existe des fonctions sur les appareils qui permettent de raccourcir le temps de prise ( de l'ordre de 100 millisecondes) du coup les images avec des objets en mouvement sont d'une netteté exceptionnelle! Mais c'est sûr que je trouve ces images belles ;) Otourly 19:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Projet Monuments Historiques français

Dear Commons user, We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français ! In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français. We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 22:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Merci ! Je me suis inscrit au projet, excellente initiative qui permettra à terme de faire un bel inventaire ! Cordialement, --LeZibou (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear LeZibou, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 16:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 07:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Best regards. --LeZibou (talk) 13:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Photo pour livre

Bonjour LeZibou. Je prépare actuellement un livre sur l'histoire des Pyrénées-Orientales qui reprend notamment des chroniques parues cet été 2013 dans L'Indépendant et dans un de mes blogs. Il se peut que j'utilise une de tes photos (File:Saint Martin du Canigou 01.jpg), avec mention des crédits, bien sûr et telle que déjà parue dans une de mes chroniques. Je tenai à t'en avertir et j'espère que cela ne te pose pas de problème. Merci d'avance. Culex (talk) 21:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Merci de ta réponse. Rien n'est encore sûr quand à l'usage des différentes photos, puisque le livre vient de partir chez la maquettiste et c'est l'éditrice qui a le dernier mot. Verdict à la fin du mois sans doute avant le départ du projet chez l'imprimeur. Culex (talk) 19:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

chapelle St Etienne de Saleilles

bonjour LeZibou Je prépare un complément d'article sur l'appareil en arête-de-poisson et je viens de trouver tes photos de la chapelle de Saleilles et de son mur de défense. Tu notes dans la description que le mur date du XIIIè siècle, ce qui correspond à ce qu'en dit l'article de Jacques Carbonne que je viens de trouver aussi. Mais dans ta description de la chapelle, tu dis qu'elle date du XIIe, alors que Jacques Carbonne dit qu'elle existait déjà en 927 mais qu'elle a été reconstruite partiellement ou totalement en 1024 , ce qui est corroboré par l'indication de la base mérimée qui donne le XIe siècle comme date d'édification du monument. Donc peut-on rectifier ta description de la photo de l'église? je vois que tu parles parfaitement l'anglais. Peut-être pourrais-tu me donner ton avis sur le vocable anglais qu'on pourrait utiliser pour désigner l'Appareil en arête-de-poisson en anglais. J'ai déjà mis quelques photos dans une catégorie que j'ai baptisée Herring-bone masonry . Mais le mot herringbone en un ou deux mots est utilisé aussi bien pour désigner l'appareil en arête-de-poisson que l'appareil en épi. Et il semble bien que les Français soient les seuls à faire nommément la distinction entre les deux. Bien cordialement--Pimprenel (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)pimprenel

chapelle de Saleilles

bonjour

Je ne connais pas le livre de Géraldine Maillet, j'ai seulement lu les indications de Jacques Carbonne sur son site première mention de Saleilles et de sa chapelle et la datation de la base mérimée qui donnent la construction de l'église pour le XIe siècle. Quoiqu'il en soit , je pense qu'on pourrait modifier légèrement ta description de la photo où on voit le vestige de mur de façon à bien faire comprendre que c'est le mur qui date du XIIIe et dire que l'église a été construite au XIe ou au début du XIIe siècle puisque la date n'est pas absolument certaine. Qu'en penses-tu ?

bien cordialement --Pimprenel (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2014 (UTC)pimprenel

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Missing Email Contact / N'oubliez pas de saisir votre adresse de courriel

Madame, monsieur, merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Monuments 2014. Il semblerait que vous n'ayez pas saisi votre adresse de courriel dans les préférences de votre compte utilisateurs Wikimedia Commons. Cette adresse est nécessaire afin que nous puissions vous contacter en cas de victoire de l'une de vos images. Vous pouvez la saisir dans vos préférences > options de courriel. Bonne fin de concours.

Hello, it seems you haven't entered your email address in vos préférences. This address is needed so that we can contact you if any of your picture is selected as a winner of the competition. Have fun with the competition.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CapelaSaoJeronimo WestFacade Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisbon AncientRomanTheater 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague House MalaStupartska7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Gimp tutorial

In answer to you question on QIC, the best tutorials for all post processing programs are always found on YouTube. Simply enter "gimp tutorial" in the searchbox to get you started. If you are looking for some specific function, just add that to your search, such as "gimp tutorial perspective corrections". Most users learn these programs on a need-to-know-basis, searching for a short tutorial for their specific need. --cart-Talk 10:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@W.carter: Thanks for your advice! --LeZibou (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puycelsi ChapelSaintRoch 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puycelsi MaisonDesGardes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a bit of perspective correction, vertical lines are tilting a bit. Think you can fix that? --W.carter 08:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC). @W.carter: : thanks for your comment; I tried the best I could to straighten it. --LeZibou 18:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Sorry but that is not enough. You can read about perspective correction here. I can't see what post processing program you use. --W.carter 20:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC). @W.carter: Hello, I first used XnView to straighten up the image. This time I used Gimp+EZ Perspective to correct the distortion (I'm quite new to the program, if you know any worthwhile tutorial, I'm interested). --~~~~ Nice now. I'll leave a note on your talk page.Good quality. --W.carter 10:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Mais de rien :)

Moi aussi j'ai connais pas tout en photographie. Depuis 1 ans j'essaie de faire des bonnes photos. Pour corragier la perspective il faut avoir bonne programme, parce que c'st pas les touts qui font ca. Je vois que tu fais des photos un peu comme moi - des monuments. Pour l'instant j'essaie de faire es photos des monuments historiques chez moi, dans l'Aveyron. Bonne journee a toi! Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prades43 EgliseStAndre ViewSE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CastelnauDeMontmiral CityWalls 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need perspective correction.--Manfred Kuzel 05:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks for your comment.  Done --LeZibou 18:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC) It's better now. Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 05:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CastelnauMontmiral MaisonPlacePublique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need perspective correction. Tournasol7 19:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks, I've straightened it up, hope it's OK. --LeZibou 18:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC) @LeZibou: toutes les lignes verticales en réalité doivent être verticales dans l'image. Tournasol7 22:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks, now is good quality for me, Tournasol7 15:47, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CastelnauMontmiral ChurchNDAssomption 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.- meets QI creteria in my opinion --J. Lunau 14:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SaintArconsAllier EgliseStLoup SouthFacade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs tilt/perspective correction. --C messier 15:42, 11 June 2017 (UTC) @C messier: Hi, I did my best to correct the issue, new version uploaded. Thanks.--LeZibou 12:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)...Looks good now. PumpkinSky 16:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SaintJulienDesChazes ChurchStJulienBrioude BellGable SouthSide2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chanteuges Prieuré Gatehouse SSide InteriorPrioryWalls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SaintJulienDesChazes ChurchStJulienBrioude SouthSideBellGableApse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chanteuges Prieuré Cloister WSide Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue NDChazes Whole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Background's a little noisy, but not too bad --Daniel Case 17:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)