Le Petit Chat

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Le Petit Chat!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Request

Sorry to be bothering, I am wondering if you could add two more images to the Tongo Tongo ambush article? I don’t have the time currently right now. I am requesting that the first image from this article https://metro.co.uk/2018/03/05/isis-video-shows-four-u-s-soldiers-shot-dead-niger-ambush-7364155/amp/ of a soldier aiming over the Toyota be added if possible to the ambush section. I also request that if possible the image of the teams broken down SUV in this article be added to the Recovery of equipment section https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2018/03/tuareg-alliance-claims-recovery-of-us-special-forces-vehicle-from-niger-ambush.php Once I have the Time, I will add images from the drone feeds in the animation video, so we can continue to get this article to good article status. Weathin (talk) 03:28, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Weathin: Hello. Thank you for your message. The second image is copyrighted by the Movement for the Salvation of Azawad so it can't be uploaded to Commons as such. You should contact them to ask if you can upload the image to commons under a CC-BY-SA license. Here is their Facebook page (in French), here their Twitter account and here is their website. You can also upload it on Wikipedia as a non-free image under fair use.

For the first image, I suppose it is a PD-USArmy and I will upload it soon.

Thanks for your work on the article. Do not hesitate to ask me if you need some French translations.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 06:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Sorry to be bothering but please don't change the or revert the picture in 1st Armoured Division (France). It is the same insignia as old version but with Better quality Shreejank (talk) 07:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Shreejank: I disagree. In particular, the repartition between white and yellow in the cross is completely different. Please read Commons:Overwriting existing files. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Serge Espoir Matomba's campaign bus in Yaounde, 22 September 2018.jpg

File:Serge Espoir Matomba's campaign bus in Yaounde, 22 September 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto _talk 20:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Opération Barkhane - engineering trucks.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Opération Barkhane - engineering trucks.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

And also:

• File:Opération Barkhane - VAB 2.png
• File:Opération Barkhane JTAC.png
• File:Opération Barkhane - VAB.png
• File:Opération Barkhane - tireur VAB.png
• File:Opération Barkhane 05.png
• File:Opération Barkhane - engineers.png
• File:Opération Barkhane - VAB 3.png
• File:Opération Barkhane PVP - 3e RG.png
• File:Opération Barkhane 3e RG.png

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

@Patrick Rogel: I do not undertstand. Isn't the CC-BY license indicated on the youtube page?

I read (French version of youtube) :

Licence: Licence de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée) --Le Petit Chat (talk) 14:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

You are right. My bad! --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags

---

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from images that you have uploaded yourself. If you do not believe the image deserves to be deleted, then click "Challenge speedy deletion" to convert the tag to a regular deletion request. Thank you.

--Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour. J'ai transformé ces demandes de suppression immédiates en demandes de suppression normales; merci de vous y exprimer si nécessaire. Sachez cependant que l'on ne reverte pas sur Commons. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Soit. Par contre, ce n'est pas moi qui ait uploadé ces documents.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Vrac

Help:VisualFileChange.js.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Le Petit Chat,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Le Petit Chat,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Benin_Naval_Forces

Benin Naval Forces has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Please leave this category as it is for the moment and bring your comments to the discussion above. If there is consensus for your position, your move can be completed with due process. Thanks! Josh (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:FN_FAL_in_Libyan_service

FN FAL in Libyan service has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sanandros (talk) 05:53, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Le Petit Chat,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. jdx ^Re: 12:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

@Jdx: Thanks for your trust. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:MacKenzieAngolaUnita.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:MacKenzieAngolaUnita.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MacKenzieAngolaUnita.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: I had some doubts on its license when I copied it from en.wikipedia. No problem to delete it. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

I can't delete it on the Commons; I am not an admin on that wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Category reviews

Thanks for taking a peek at some recent edits such as Category:Politics of Mali. The template is still being refined, so if there are any improvements you would recommend, please don't hesitate to share your input! Thanks, Josh (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Joshbaumgartner: . Your template seems to work very well. Thanks for creating it.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:50, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

File:M56 Scorpion, Moroccan berm, circa 1986.jpg

File:M56 Scorpion, Moroccan berm, circa 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wickey (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Close-up of defensive positions along the ceinture.jpg

File:Close-up of defensive positions along the ceinture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wickey (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Close-up of defensive position along the ceinture.jpg

File:Close-up of defensive position along the ceinture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wickey (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

File:A portion of the ceinture near Bu Craa.jpg

File:A portion of the ceinture near Bu Craa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wickey (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 01.jpg

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 02.jpg

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 03.jpg

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 04.jpg

File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Rotation des tiff

Bonjour, le robot qui tourne les images semble cassé. Je me suis dit que peut-etre il n'aimait pas les tiff. Il me semble me rappeler que ce n'est pas conseillé de tourner les tiff, qui sont en général des fichiers très lourds. Si l'image est utile, il vaut mieux en tourner une copie jpeg. Je n'ai pas retrouvé d'endroit où ceci soit ecrit, donc je divague peut-etre.. F (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

@Kilom691: Merci de l'explication. J'ai annulé mes annulations. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

categories in present day moselle

Chère Petit chat, c'est du nonsense à moi. Ce départemennt existe depuis les 1800s. Et j'ai creé des categories pour deacdes avant, comme pour autres départements. Ca cerait une immense travail de reorganizer tous les caegories par département avec le suffix "present day". cordialement --anro (talk) 23:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

@AnRo0002: Ich verstehe dieses Argument. Wir werden tun was Sie gesagt haben. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

File:A fighter of the MNLA guards the regional assembly in Kidal, 2013.jpg

File:A fighter of the MNLA guards the regional assembly in Kidal, 2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: source=https://pictures.reuters.com/archive/MALI-REBELS--GM1E96O1KPM01.html Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Remitamine.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Niger's special forces prepare to fight Boko Haram in Diffa, March 26, 2015.jpg

File:Niger's special forces prepare to fight Boko Haram in Diffa, March 26, 2015.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: source=https://pictures.reuters.com/archive/NIGER-BOKOHARAM--GF10000039531.html Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Remitamine.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Fact disputed in File:Cañonazo en el Rif.png

Dear Le Petit Chat. I took the information about the gun from the magazine that published the photograph. I don't understand about guns but, if 1897 is the year when the gun was created I suppose Spain might have had some of them in 1911. I don't know.--Chamarasca (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Chamarasca: I forgot to reply, excuse me. I suppose that that cannon is another 1897 design since I am rather sure that the French official 75 mle 1897 was not exported before 1914.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Kamanyola, South Kivu. On 7 March 2018, MONUSCO troops facilitated the safe passage of more than 2000 asylum seekers relocating from Kamanyola refugee camp to Rwanda.jpg

File:Kamanyola, South Kivu. On 7 March 2018, MONUSCO troops facilitated the safe passage of more than 2000 asylum seekers relocating from Kamanyola refugee camp to Rwanda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

File:LumiereAlgerijnen.jpg

File:LumiereAlgerijnen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: What was the problem ? The author died more than 70 years ago.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 06:08, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

According to Article L123–1, L123–3, L123–4 of French law, the 70 years counts on the start of the year following death. This is the case in most if not all countries. Thus this work would not be in the public domain until January 1, 2022 at the earliest. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Salonika photos

Thank you for your thank you. There is an expression in english: "to disappear down a rabbit hole". It is a metaphor for when you get distracted, and follow the distraction rather than continue with the original task.

My most recent distraction has been to try and to identify the modern names and locations of the villages mentioned in the <<J.M.O.>> In some cases, as a result of rural exoduses, some of those villages no longer exist. If they do not have an existing article in en.wikipedia, then I create one, and translate from the articles on bg.wikipedia and el.wikipedia

Concerning photos of Zouaves, it was my understanding that in general, they were in one of the five battalions in the two régiments de marche d'afrique. Although the 1er R.M.A. had been part of the organisation also known as 17e D.I.C. in the Dardanelles, I believe they had transferred to 156e D.I. in October 1915. Whilst it is useful when a photo is labelled as Zouaves, unfortunately I do not know of a way to determine the specific battalion, or the specific R.M.A. in which that soldier was serving. There's also the 2e bis R.M.Z. but I do not know if there were engagements where they fought alongside the two battalions of R.M.A. present in Salonika.

It is fantastic that so many great photos have survived, and that they have been shared on wikimedia commons, too. There are some great Imperial War Museum photos, but their indexing is really poor, notwithstanding their Directeur d'Informatique having previously worked at Google. You are more likely to find a great photo by accident rather than by design. The good thing about IWM photos on here is that crowdsourcers can add tagging.

Have a nice day Keith H99 (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

About the order of battle of the French divisions, you can find that there:

• https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k63495098/f876.item 156e D.I.
• https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k63495098/f1008.item 17e D.I.C.

About the 2e bis de zouaves: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k63495098/f989.item.r=zou%20#

Le 2e bis de zou.(zouaves) n'a en réalité jamais combattu avec la 11e D.I.C. et fut surtout organe de C.A.A. (commandement des armées alliées en Orient) [The 2e bis de zouaves actually never fought with 11e D.I.C. and was mostly under the orders of the Allied Armies Command in Orient.]

and Le 2e bis de zou. détaché à la division provisoire Venel, depuis mai 1917, ne fait plus organiquement partie organiquement de la 11e D.I.C., depuis janvier 1918. [The 2e bis de zouaves dispatched to the provisional division Venel, since May 1917, and is no longer part of the 11e D.I.C., since January 1918.] The division Venel was dispatched for the occupation of Thessalia https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6278886c/f503.item --Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Western Sahara situation October 1979.svg

What is the source for these maps?--Antemister (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

@Antemister: References are given here (in French): fr:Bataille de Smara (1979)#Situation militaire difficile pour le Maroc.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

OK, seems that you drew these maps only from text sources and you didn't have a base map? I am looking for a depiction of Morocco-Polisario frontlines for these years (although rather difficult to define in desert areas, of course)... What are the sources for the other two maps?--Antemister (talk) 17:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Indeed, I did not have access to a map. The map only displays some populated places since it was rather difficult to draw "lines" in the desert until the en:Moroccan wall was built. Some references about the control of the localities:

• https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/17005/9/09_chapter%205.pdf#page=154
• "Outre l'attaque des garnisons et des convois , les pilonnages systématiques des positions marocaines, les combattants sahraouis libèrent complètement, entre janvier et juin , les localités de Farsya, Bir Lahlou. Haouza Tifariti et Amgala, et le 5 juin la ville de Jdirya. Ces libérations, même si elles ne s'accompagnent pas d'une occupation durable (tout est détruit et aucune population civile n'y séjourne), consacrent le recul de l'armée marocaine qui n'occupe que quelques points qu'elle renforce régulièrement: Guelta Zemmour, Bou Craa, Smara, Boujdour, El Ayoun ; et dans le Sud: Dakhla , Aussert , Bir Enzaran." http://web.archive.org/web/20180413130054/http://aan.mmsh.univ-aix.fr/Pdf/AAN-1979-18_64.pdf#page=12

--Le Petit Chat (talk) 19:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

OK, continue my research. Probably someone has drawn such a map for pre-berm-times.--Antemister (talk) 20:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Have made progress on this issue but no breakthrough yet. Have you, when drawing these maps, made something like a list of chronology when possesion of the mentioned settlements changed?--Antemister (talk) 14:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Apart from "Farsia en avril 1977, Haouza en octobre 1977, Bir Lahlou en mars 1978, Tifariti fin mars 1979, Amgala en avril 1979, et Jdiriya en juin 1979", I don't remember I took any notes.

WeshMani (talk · contribs) also did some maps (for instance File:Sahara occidental en janvier 1976.svg), he might have done a chronology.

@WeshMani: ? Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

OK let's waot for a reply by WeshMani.--Antemister (talk) 17:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Another question, did Front Polisario, Une Réalité irréversible : la République arabe sahraouie démocratique à son quatrième anniversaire contain am map?--Antemister (talk) 14:04, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

I knew about flick2commons and I also used it ([1]). I did not download the photographs to my computer, since I used the option of Commons:Upload Wizard to upload files from flickr to commons. That tool has a better interface.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

14e régiment de chasseurs parachutistes

Bonnes fêtes. J'indique juste que j'ai placé la catégorie 14e régiment de chasseurs parachutistes que vous avez créé dans Airborne units and formations of France. Cordialement. L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 05:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Timbre de 1975 sur les parachutistes zaïroises.jpg

File:Timbre de 1975 sur les parachutistes zaïroises.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

PD-BNF

Hello, je vois que tu as commencé à donner un coup de main pour le nettoyage de la catégorie Category:Files tagged as PD-BNF to be checked, ce dont je te remercie. Le problème est que si tu laisses le modèle, quelqu'un d'autre remettra le fichier dans la catégorie. Soit il existe un autre modèle de licence et ce modèle est superfétatoire, et donc à enlever, soit il n'existe pas un autre modèle, mais tu sais quoi mettre et on se retrouve dans le cas précédent, soit tu ne vois pas quel autre modèle mettre ou tu hésites, alors mieux vaut ne pas y toucher ou proposer la suppression. Mais retirer de la catégorie et laisser PD-BNF me semble être une mauvaise solution. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 17:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

@Racconish: Ah ok, le but était de supprimer le modèle. J'avais enlevé tous les cas où il y avait un autre modèle de copyright type PD-old, en faisant une recherche avec les mots clés "expired"+"Files tagged as PD-BNF to be checked". Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

D'ailleurs, un problème est que pendant longtemps certains fichiers de la BNF portaient une mention "domaine public", qui a depuis disparu. Le template PD-BNF ne couvrait-il pas ces cas-là, qui ne correspondaient pas toujours aux conditions du PD-France ? -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Safety seals on the Greek submarine Xiphias.jpg

Bonjour ;) Comment puis-je télécharger des fichiers avec une résolution aussi élevée depuis Gallica comme dans ce cas ? Zala (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Vous pouvez voir sur ma page : User:Le Petit Chat#Télécharger un fichier en haute résolution depuis Gallica.

English version:

1. Observe the url (for example https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53030961g/f1.item)
2. Copy the ID (btv1b53030961g here) and the page number (f1 here).
3. Open https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/[ID]/[page number]/full/full/0/native.jpg, which gives in my example https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b53030961g/f1/full/full/0/native.jpg
4. Save the picture

Yours, Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

File:094 Opération Paille en Bourgogne (4061207176).jpg

File:094 Opération Paille en Bourgogne (4061207176).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre cb (talk) 12:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Electoral poster Ouagadougou Nov 2015.jpg

File:Electoral poster Ouagadougou Nov 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

blacklisted flickr account

Hi Le Petit Chat, I noticed that you removed the flickr link that I added to the information in this file. But I would like to say that just because that flickr account uploads files that don't belong to him doesn't mean that all the files he uploads are untrustable. This is an old photo that can be found from a source other than flickr, however, the flickr page provides detailed information about this photo that cannot be found elsewhere, so the flickr linkd are essential for us to understand the photo. Thank you for understanding. 源義信 (talk) 06:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

I understand. But I would prefer not to link anything from that account. Do as you prefer. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Maurice Pellé 1920.jpg

Hello. It is quite possible that the photo File:Maurice Pellé 1920.jpg is a family heritage, but its author is definitely not User:Garitan. The fact that the photograph is dedicated to somebody does not mean that they are copyright owners. If the user is really the copyright owner and wishes to release the rights under {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licence, they can contact the Commons:Volunteer Response Team and prove it for them in some way. However, that is not necessary, as the photograph is so old that it can be hosted here as {{PD-anon-expired}}. For these reasons I am going to revert the information about the author and the licence back. -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 14:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Ok. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 14:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Old photos

In general, any photo of unknown authorship older than 70 years (so 1952 or earlier) has a theoretical possibility of being PD in a 70 pma country (either because it is actually anonymous or because the author died before 1953), so COM:DR is preferred over "no permission" in order to give people an opportunity to find more information about its authorship and copyright status. Also note that any photo of unknown authorship older than 120 years (so 1902 or earlier) from a 70 pma country is automatically assumed to be PD under {{PD-old-assumed}}. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: I understand. However, uploading other's work as own work, or as anonymous work even when the name of the photographer is printed under the image, is illegal in French law. Since the indicated cc-by-sa licence was a nonsense, I considered that these files could be speedy deleted. What can be done for such illegal mass uploads? Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't know what the French law is, but there is no requirement to properly attribute public domain works in the United States, and per COM:NCR we are not required to follow any law other than United States law on non-copyright issues (any requirements on using PD works are not considered copyright restrictions). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:30, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Azienda_ospedaliera_Sant'Andrea_(Rome)

Azienda ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (Rome) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

La photo des essais de de Guiche

Bonjour Le Petit Chat. Tu as téléversé une photo HD des essais du duc de Guiche sur un véhicule routier. Je fais ça parfois pour avancer le schmilblick, aussi je t'en remercie. Cette version HD a-t-elle la même provenance que le mienne (Gallica) ? En général, mais depuis un an à peu près, j'utilise pour télécharger les images de Gallica un bouton qu'un gars de chez Gallica m'avais conseillé (un add-on). C'est nettement mieux qu'avec la copie d'une partie de l'image (un cadre rectangulaire) qui est également proposé. Il faudra que j'essaye la procédure que tu décris dans ta page utilisateur. C'est peut-être la même, en fait...
Il y a quand-même quelque chose qui m'embête avec ta version HD, c'est qu'elle est 10 fois plus lourde que (ma) version. Or, d'un point de vue écologique, si d'aventure elle est utilisée un jour (on pourrait la mettre dans la page du personnage), elle sera téléchargée ainsi et cela sans grand intérêt (il n'y a pas de détails particulier à observer sur la photo). Par contre, du point de vue de la connaissance et de la recherche, ta version gagne à être connue ! Donc, et uniquement pour cette question d'écologie, on pourrait "reverter" les versions. Et sur les commentaires on indiquerait visiblement l'existence de cette image HD car cela peut servir à un chercheur ou un autre... À cet égard, moi qui fait souvent des animation .gif, j'optimise souvent ces dernières pour diminuer leur poids (sur le site "Ezgif"). J'ai fais, par exemple, une animation gif du dirigeable de Giffard que je n'ai osé publier qu'en Webm car ce format est plus léger... Qu'en penses-tu ? Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Bonne question. En général, je crois que les navigateurs des utilisateurs ne téléchargent pas l'image entière mais une version thumbnail.

J'ai l'impression que l'habitude sur Commons est de ne pas se soucier de la taille des images tant qu'on ne dépasse pas la Maximum file size. Si on lit Commons:File types#Highest resolution et Commons:Why we need high resolution media, on ne voit pas de limite mentionnée (mais rien non plus qui interdise de téléverser des versions basses définitions). Je serai plutôt pour compresser l'image que pour en faire une version basse définition. Le Petit Chat (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Merci pour ta réponse, Le Petit Chat. Tu me rappelles qu'en premier lieu c'est la version thumbnail qui est téléchargée. C'est vrai, mais en deuxième lieu un certain pourcentage de connecteurs va télécharger la belle photo ; c'est là que l'on pourrait télécharger la première version (il n'y a pas de différence au premier coup d’œil). Ce n'est qu'en grossissant les deux images qu'on peut faire la différence en observant certains détails.

C'est vrai que WP, dans son actuelle politique, ne se soucie pas du poids de ses téléversements mais il faudrait que ça change, c'est du moins ma vision de la catastrophe qui frappe à nos portes... Cet été, en France, tout va flamber... Et il ne faudra pas compter sur l'aide de pompiers étrangers : ce sera pareil chez eux...

Tu écris : "Je serai plutôt pour compresser l'image" : mais elle est déjà en jpeg (compression non conservative) ; existe-t-il un autre codage plus économique ?

En tout cas merci pour ta réponse. Au fait, tu ne me dis pas si ta version vient de la même source que moi ? Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bernard de Go Mars: désolé, j'ai oublié de répondre.

Ma version vient bien de Gallica, j'ignore si c'est la même technique que le bouton dont tu parles. Honnêtement, 4 Mo de plus c'est négligeable du point de vue écologique (même si on multiplie par le nombre de visites sur les pages de Wikipédia [*]). Le problème c'est les vidéos en HD, pas les images en HD.

[*] Je me rends compte que je n'ai quasiment jamais téléchargé d'images HD depuis Wikipédia, sauf justement quand je voulais voir un détail. Si quelqu'un prend le temps de télécharger l'image plutôt que la version thumbnail, autant qu'il ait la version où on peut zoomer au maximum car c'est que cette image l'intéresse et je trouve qu'il serait "injuste" de le priver de la meilleure information dont on dispose.

Je ne m'étranglerais pas si tu mettais un ligne une version en résolution limitée mais je pense qu'il faudrait auparavant poser cette question à d'autres utilisateurs de Commons (sur Commons:Village pump ou Commons:Bistro). Le Petit Chat (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Merci, Le Petit Chat, pour cette sympathique réponse. La photo, pour ne faire que 4 Mo de plus pèse quand même 10 fois plus.

>>>>>>>>>>>>mais je pense qu'il faudrait auparavant poser cette question à d'autres utilisateurs de Commons>>>>>>>>>>>> : Oui. J'ignore s'il y a une politique à ce sujet, même si personnellement je mets un point d'honneur à publier des fichier de poids "raisonnés" comme on dit pour l'agriculture... Bref, ne faisons rien ou plutôt je te laisse choisir. Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 09:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Comme je suis très intéressé par ta façon de télécharger des images HD, j'ai essayé de télécharger l'image en HD avec ta méthode (mon bouton magique n'étant pas accessible). Le lien devient :

https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/ btv1b9042301g/full/full/0/native.jpg

Mais ça ne renvoie qu'un message d'erreur.

Si l'on tente d'ajouter f1/ avant full/full/ même chose.

La question est donc : Comment as-tu fait pour obtenir cette image ?

Il faut savoir que je récupère souvent des images dans les publications Gallica...

Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 09:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Ouhhh ! Grosse bêtise ! : Mon bouton était bien disponible et je télécharge bien, par ce moyen, une image jpg de 4,4 Mo !!

Reste que je ne sais plus comment j'ai téléchargé ce bouton, qui donne accès à la plus précise numérisation effectuée par les petites mains de Gallica.

Cet add-on s'appelle IIIF Download d'après mon FireFox. Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 10:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Le bon lien est https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b9042301g/f1/full/full/0/native.jpg (peut-être avais-tu ajouté un espace entre 12148/ et btv1b9042301g). Le Petit Chat (talk) 10:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

L'add-on est disponible en effet : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/iiif-download/. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 10:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Oui j'avais, comme un débutant, ajouté une espace où tu dis. Merci pour tout. Essaye ce bouton et fais-en publicité si tu le trouves bien. En principe il ne marche pas que sur Gallica, si je comprends bien, mais je viens de le tester sur Internet Archive et il n'y est pas activé. À suivre ! Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 10:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Oui, ce bouton est très pratique. J'ai lu dans la présentation de Firefox que ce même bouton était valide dans d'autres librairies, mais je n'ai pas encore pu le constater... Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 09:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Je l'ai ajouté sur la présentation donnée sur ma page utilisateur . Pour la discussion, je n'ai pas le courage de la lancer... -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Tout est bien ! Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 09:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Ps 123

Hi, I don't understand why you added the Category Psalm 123 to the picture of the Mbandaka Cathedral. Thanks for an answer. Greetings, --Sokkok (talk) 10:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

@Sokkok: Hello. The words baiso baala nkolo, written above the church entrance, are the beginning of Psalm 123 in Mongo language. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the fast answer! - Can you add this information in the description of the picture? Thank you! - Greetings, --Sokkok (talk) 12:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue du Président Thomas Sankara2.png

File:Statue du Président Thomas Sankara2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:908:122:55C0:468A:5BFF:FECC:62BA 02:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue du Président Thomas Sankara1.png

File:Statue du Président Thomas Sankara1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No freedom of panorama in Burkina Faso COM:FOP Burkina Faso Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Titlutin (talk) 20:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Wreck of the BNS Vigilance.jpg

File:Wreck of the BNS Vigilance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Indy beetle (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Palais du peuple (4763752526).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Service photographique de l'armée roumaine

Bonjour,

Je me permets de solliciter ta connaissance au sujet des photos de la Première Guerre mondiale.

Le ministère de la Culture de France héberge une collection de photos du Service photographique de l'armée roumaine. Une recherche sur Commons montre que plus d'un millier des ces photographies ont été copiées sur Commons. Les photographes sont identifiés par un code de lettres, de manière similaire à ce qui se faisait au Service photographique de l'armée française. Par exemple, les photos attribuées à opérateur A.

Je me demandais si, par hasard, tu aurais déjà vu un endroit où les noms réels des photographes de ces photographies roumaines sont reliés à leurs codes, comme ce qui existe pour les photographies de l'armée française.

Merci à l'avance de ton aide.

-- Asclepias (talk) 16:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

@Asclepias: excellente question. Je n'ai malheureusement aucun indice... Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)