Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lexusuns!

File:Albina Dzhanabayeva.jpg edit

 
File:Albina Dzhanabayeva.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Tetyana Naynyk.jpg edit

 
File:Tetyana Naynyk.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:26, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Lexusuns!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


File:MakSim.jpg edit

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:MakSim.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Tm (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

African Cup of Nations Map edit

Hi Lexusuns,

Some user named [User:Karakizi]] changed your original map of African Cup of Nations

 

by one of his own. Among other things, new colors are ugly and your original design is not respected. Adding nothing but morocco overlapping western sahara.

He has been doing that for weeks now. Spoiling many maps and many wiki pages just to make morocco overlap western sahara. This goes against all the other maps of africa on wikipedia. After some time, I figured out, he's doing this for political reason only. I guess he's moroccan and want to advance his POV and political agenda. We had a discussion about this subject here but still does not want to recognize his political bias and does not seek consensus and keeps changing others' maps.

Just as a hint, CAF recognizes morocco and Western sahara as being seperate on here (official CAF web site) (sorry, only in french though easily understandable by an anglophone)

 

Cheers, Pacific kiribati (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Yuriy Vaks.jpeg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yuriy Vaks.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Меморіальна дошка А. В. Головку (Кременчук).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jafeluv (talk) 14:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Nokia Lumia 920.jpg edit

 
File:Nokia Lumia 920.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 18:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Statues in Uzhhorod edit

Вітаю Вас! А навіщо ви звільнили від файлів цю категорію? Аналогічні категорії існують для інших міст і країн, чому вона не потрібна для Ужгорода? Category:Monuments and memorials in Uzhhorod - це не теж саме, бо не всі монументи та меморіали є статуями, і не всі статуї - є монументами або меморіалами. Тому мені здається така категорія має бути, навіть якщо вона частково дублює Category:Monuments and memorials in Uzhhorod. З повагою. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 08:08, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Вітаю. Мені здається, що необхідно чітко зрозуміти ці поняття. Monuments це ж не тільки власне монументи, а й пам'ятники в цілому. За визначенням у Вікіпедії, до них відносяться також і скульптури. --Lexusuns (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ну, якщо глянути, то категорія називається Category:Monuments and memorials in Uzhhorod. Пам'ятник Геркулесу наврядчи можна назвати меморіалом, як і статую ліхтарника. Меморіал присвячений події або особі. Але я акцентую на тому, що статуя - це не завжди монумент або меморіал. Статуя - це витвір мистецтва, в той час як меморіал може бути лише меморіальною табличкою, або звичайним хрестом на гробі. Хрест, куплений в магазині ритуальних послуг, не може вважатись витвором мистецтва, але може бути меморіалом (якщо він вже встановлений, а не лежить на полиці магазину). Категорія про статуї є підкатегорії мистецтва. Тому я не бачу необхідності її видаляти, вона не перешкоджає. Навпаки, якщо людину цікавлять не меморіали, а саме статуї, то людина буде шукати їх у цій категорії, а не в меморіалах і монументах. Осьо як структурована ця категорія для всієї України, осьо приклад для інших країн. Мені здається для міст дає бути за аналогією. З повагою. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 07:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Погоджуюсь. Не варто було поспішати. Приношу свої вибачення. Поновив. --Lexusuns (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Дуже дякую за розуміння! З повагою. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 16:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

І знову таки повертаючись... Я сам не знаю, чи можна відносити статуї Гермесу і Гераклу монументами або меморіалами. Ну, "меморіал" тут точно відпадає. А стосовно монументу я не знаю. В принципі - герої міфології. Статую Лаокоона я не відніс до монументів, користуючись аналогією із інших копій, хоч би і ця. Тут слід передивитись аналогічні випадки, може із кимсь проконсультуватись. Я і сам не знаю, сподіваюсь разом вирішимо. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Питання здається і складним і простим водночас. Читаємо Вікіпедію: «Монумент — значний за розмірами пам'ятник штучного походження», далі: «Пам'ятник — твір мистецтва, створений для увічнення пам'яті про людей і події. Найпоширеніші види пам'ятників — скульптурна група, статуя, бюст, меморіальна дошка, тріумфальна арка, колона, обеліск тощо». «Гермес — один з найдавніших богів грецької міфології», «Геракл, Геркулес — найпопулярніший із грецьких героїв». «Меморіал — об'єкт або архітектурна, скульптурна споруда, архітектурно-ландшафтний ансамбль в пам'ять про щось або когось, як правило, людину, яка померла або події». Отже, якщо виходити лише з цього, то тут швидше навіть «меморіал». Але, знову ж таки, авторитетність та стовідсоткову правильність цих визначень я стверджувати не можу. Навіть те «як правило» виглядає як мінімум незрозуміло. Тому, мені важко максимально коректно відповісти, але, на цей момент, я б категорію «Monuments and memorials in Uzhhorod» поки лишив. --Lexusuns (talk) 21:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014 edit

 

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 10:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Пам'ятник Тарасу Шевченку в Москві (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Krem Flood.JPG edit

 
File:Krem Flood.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Juggler2005 (talk) 01:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey edit

 

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 
File:Меморіальна дошка на честь 50-річчя Великого Жовтня і встановлення Радянської влади на Україні (Кременчук, вул. Леніна).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

アンタナナ 17:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Пам'ятник О. Пушкіну (Кременчук).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 00:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply