LivingShadow

Archive till April 2010: click

Kaltfontokklusion (sic!)

Sollte eigentlich "Kaltfrontokklusion" heißen. Der Text ist auch in der Bilddatei (Überschrift mit hinterlegten Wolken) zur Kaltfrontokklusion falsch geschrieben --Tahome

aaah! Da passt die Tatsache, dass ich die Quelldateien nicht mehr finde, ja perfekt dazu. Danke, hab das selber nicht gesehen. Vielleicht finde ich ja irgendwo doch noch etwas. – Simon / ?! 15:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

PS: Original-XCF-Datei ist weg. Darum bis jetzt noch nicht geändert. Vielleicht mach ich das mal ganz neu. – Simon / ?! 11:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, sind die Originaldateien schon wieder aufgetaucht bzw. hat sich evtl. etwas Zeit gefunden die Okklusionen neu zu zeichnen? Bei der Kaltfrontokklusion hat sich nämlich ein grober Fehler eingeschlichen, mehr dazu auf der Diskussionsseite http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Okklusion_%28Meteorologie%29#abbildungen Vielen Dank für die Mühen! --Nevermind198x (talk) 22:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Nevermind, Nein, die sind wohl endgültig verschollen. Die Zeichnung habe ich jedoch noch, denke ich, und ausserdem habe ich mir gerade ein dickes PostIt auf den Bildschirm geklebt als Erinnerung, dass ich die Bilder jetzt neu mache, auch mit korrekter Wetterkarte. Danke für den Hinweis! – Simon / ?! 12:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Was ja tatsächlich auch etwas genützt hat ;)

– Simon / ?! 08:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Nachfrage

Hallo, solltest Du derjenige sein, der mir den Hinweis auf meiner Talkpage gegeben hat, schau bitte nochmals kurz auf meinen Kommentar dazu auf meine Talkpage. Falls die Nachricht nicht von Dir kommen sollte, lösche bitte einfach diese Nachfrage --Llez (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey Llez, Nein, laut History war das User:Gulbrillo. Gruss, Simon (unangemeldet)

File:Arbeit Claude Monet.pdf

File:Arbeit Claude Monet.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Permission to use File:Sharpening Angle Guide.jpeg

Hi, I am from Malaysia & I am an editor. I would like to use one of your photo of File:Sharpening Angle Guide.jpeg in the school textbook. I will credit you in the book, please advice on how I should put it. Please email me at jouehuey.yeoh@pearson.com Regards, Joue Huey

OK

use your pictogram

Hello Eugene, I'm seeking permission to use your pictogram of the running man on our logo for a fitness class. The fitness class is for 60+year olds and I intend to use the logo on their polo shirts. The polo shirts will be bought by me and sold to the participants at cost price- we are a non for profit organisation- ECH Inc Greenacres- Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Please contact me at mpivetta@ech.asn.au for your opinion and possible approval

kind regards

Mauro Pivetta Physiotherapist ECH Inc

OK

File:Pfefferminze Mentha piperata.jpg

Hi LivingShadow,

Could you tell me whether the following statement corresponds to your expectations for a publication in my next book in French-speaking countries, or if it lacks an element declaration :

« Photo by Simon Eugster, Pfefferminze Mentha piperata.jpg. Source https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pfefferminze_Mentha_piperata.jpg. Reproduced under license cc-by-sa-3.0 Unported - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en ».

I thank you in advance, Arevalb

Hi Arevalb! Please add an «A.» in my name: «Simon A. Eugster». Otherwise perfect :) Thanks! – Simon / ?! 12:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi LivingShadow,

I thank you very much indeeed for your prompt reply. Best regards. Arevalb. Arevalb (talk) 09:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Location

Hi LivingShadow - do you have a location for File:Trauerschnäpper auf Esche.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Uzwil, Switzerland. :) – Simon / ?! 15:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Danke! - MPF (talk) 19:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Btw, just saw that you are interested in pines. I'm writing an identification tool for trees as my master thesis. Are you interested in identifcation? I should soon have an early beta where feedback is precious. – Simon / ?! 11:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Laser pointer green with Rayleigh (crop).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Laser pointer green with Rayleigh (crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint, added the license data. – Simon / ?! 12:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Grand marnier.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirrus clouds with 3D look.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curcuma longa roots.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There are severe overexposed areas, even some jpg-artefacts (shadows left) allthough Qi for me! Second opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 11:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schokolade-weiss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but in future studio works, please avoid out of focus objects in the foreground. --C messier 09:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Auf der Suche nach Wolkenbildern bin ich auf deine Fotos gestoßen und war wirklich beeindruckt - nicht nur von den Wolken. Vielen Dank für die vielen tollen Fotos, die du hier im Laufe der Jahre hochgeladen hast! Tkarcher (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, Tkarcher! – Simon / ?! 18:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Datei:Bupalus piniaria on Picea abies.jpg falsch kategorisiert?

Hallo LivingShadow, ich bin auf Dein Foto zur Kiefernspannerraupe (Bupalus piniaria) gestoßen. Ich habe selber so eine Raupe fotografiert. Diese sieht aber ziemlich anders aus. Du kannst ja mal die Fotos zu Bupalus piniaria auf www.lepiforum.de anschauen. Vielleicht findest Du ja bei einer anderen Art die Raupe?! Dort kann man übrigens auch im Forum 1 eine Bestimmungsanfrage mit einem hochgeladenen Foto (spezielles Format - siehe dortige Webseite) stellen. Viele Grüße,--Slimguy (talk) 18:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis! Ich habe dort nun mal nachgefragt.– Simon / ?! 19:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Wiki-Kugel.svg

File:Wiki-Kugel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lordtobi (✉) 10:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Typo in image?

I'm not very familiar with MQTT but I believe you have a typo in your image https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MQTT_protocol_example_without_QoS.svg -- the first publish from the broker to client a should say 35 degrees in the box I think 68.37.52.229 04:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Aww, right that was pretty wrong, just fixed it. Thanks a lot for pointing it out! – Simon / ?! 05:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Many thank yous for your great works and photos! Jim1138 (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Jim! – Simon / ?! 21:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relais-Finder-12A.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parker-76R Safety Razor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Double-edge safety razors.

review

•  Support per nom. I was surprised how many images of razors there are in Commons. IMO the focus stacking and careful composition shown in this one is the better of the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRDN711 (talk • contribs)
•  Support Nice clear image. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Chrome-Safety-Razor.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Parker-76R Safety Razor.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Chrome-Safety-Razor.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Parker-76R Safety Razor.jpg: Promoted.

---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

-- Veikk0.ma (talk) 12:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Vielen Dank / Thank you very much!

Vielen Dank für deine tollen Bilder und Illustrationen / Thanks for your wonderful photos and illustrations! Hippie2000 (talk) 22:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Danke! :) – Simon / ?! 06:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

You are needed on Gerrit

Hello LivingShadow and apologies to bother you. I am writing you on this project as you have most recently been active here. Could you please take a look at this change and review it? Thank you! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Done! Thanks! – Simon / ?! 09:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Glad I could help! :) --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Sun shining through thick Stratus.jpg

Hi, könnest du bitte bei diesem Bild noch Mal vorbeischauen und eine möglichst genaue Ortsangabe ergänzen, bestenfalls sogar die Koordinaten? Danke Lukas Beck (talk) 11:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Done – Simon / ?! 20:56, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Danke Lukas Beck (talk) 04:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)