User talk:Lophotrochozoa

Return to "Lophotrochozoa" page.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lophotrochozoa!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 01:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!Edit

Hallo and welcome to Commons Lophotrochozoa! Please note that I had to revert your change here. See there for the reason. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Cité InternationalEdit

i remind you that you have to ask a deletion for all those pictures. Picking some of the files randomly asking for deletion whilst many pictures of the same buildings (that are much worse as copyright violation, i would say) are still present has no sense. if you think there is a copyright problem it is fine with me, but either you nominate them all or you clearly specify why my pictures from the hill and a picture of a window are more problematic than a snapshot of the whole area from the river... it is less confusing for everyone, don't you think? --Alexmar983 (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

I will nominate the others tomorrow. Now it is late. Lophotrochozoa (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
In most of these images, there is nothing to copyright. They are general views, and any architecural detail would be de minimis. Please do not create so many deletion requests with understanding this. Beside, FOP issues need to get a proper deletion requests. Speedy deletions are not appropriate. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
I am having some trouble understanding your requests for speedy deletion, and it seems that I am not the only one. yours with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Your deletion requestsEdit

Hello, Please stop creating deletion requests when there is nothing to copyright. You need first to learn about basic copyright concepts, including some copyright laws, COM:DM, etc. Yann (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I have read the de minimis policy but it does not expressly support an interpretation as generous as yours. Lophotrochozoa (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Siège d'Interpol.jpgEdit

Hello,
Can you explain the issue here ?
--Gloumouth1 12:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Buildings are also copyrighted. Lophotrochozoa (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:France FOP casesEdit

Hi! Thank you for using this category when opening your deletion requests on cases about FOP and France. We try to maintain the subcategories as explained here, in order to find quickly what still needs to be discuss/close and what was kept/deleted. Do not hesitate to directly add Category:France FOP cases/pending to your new DR instead of Category:France FOP cases (i.e. it's no big deal if you don't, it's just easier for us). --PierreSelim (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


When you add a category to a DR, you must use the following form:

  • <noinclude>[[Category:Undelete in 2019]]</noinclude>

If you not use the noinclude pair, then the category will be transcluded onto the daily and monthly logs and archives as well as the DR itself. This triples the size of the category and, if done widely, could have an effect on performance.

This is true for all DR categories:

and so forth. This means that you cannot use HotCat, but must edit the DR directly.
     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Ecraser mes images de parc Targu -Jiu - RoumanieEdit

Je n'ai pas besoin d'un papier spécial pour faire photos en lieux publiques, étant membre de "Liga Scriitorilor din România" = member of "Writers League of Roumanie" avec la LÉGITIMATION numéro 387, sur le nom Tomoniu N. Nicolae. Si mon numéro de la League n'est pas suffisant, je peux vous envoyer une copie a une adresse e-mail. --Tomoniu (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Pouvez vous en verifier avec l'OTRS, s'il vous plait? Lophotrochozoa (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

FOPEdit

Hej! Ta gärna en titt på Freedom of panorama#Europe och Commons:De minimis innan du sätter {{FOP}} högt och lågt, annars riskerar du att göra både de som tittar på bilderna och projektet i sig en björntjänst, genom att skrämma bort folk från att använda Commonsfiler. MVH V-wolf (talk) 10:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Problemet med mallen {{FOP}} är nog snarare dess utformning än att den används. {{FOP-Sweden}} och andra mallar för enskilda länder kanske är mindre avskräckande.
Eftersom DM är rätt svårtolkad tillämpar jag den inte annat än i uppenbara fall. Lophotrochozoa (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Detta fall är typisk DM. Nordeaskyltarna är små och i fel vinkel för att klippas ut för att kunna användas till något vettigt, och risken är än mindre för DHL-bilen. V-wolf (talk) 11:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Har upphovsrätten till byggnaden gått ut? Det visste jag inte. Lophotrochozoa (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
I Sverige har vi full panoramafrihet på byggnader och permanent utomhuskonst (commons:Freedom of panorama#Sweden), till skillnad mot exempelvis Frankrike (där exempelvis belysningen på Eiffeltornet varit på tapeten) eller Lettland (där bilder på Swedbankskrapan och andra nyare byggnader diskuterats). V-wolf (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Det är ju det som mallen anger.Lophotrochozoa (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Last modified on 19 April 2012, at 19:24