User talk:MJJR/archive 2011 (part 2)

MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2011 (part 2)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Annarei R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good to me. I definitely love this city.--Jebulon 20:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Station R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Poertoren R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Vismarkt R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pudelek 11:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sleephopperzuiger Vlaanderen 3000 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice angle; good detail --Daniel Case 04:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB EMU774 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpening halos, but otherwise good. --H005 11:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Toren R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sleephopperzuiger Vlaanderen 3000 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good details, nice view --Mbdortmund 05:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Temple Neuf R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Temple Neuf R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare Maizieres Metz R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Cathedral R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good level of detail, acceptable noise level in the shade. I'd suggest a little tighter crop on the bottom (to get rid of the man with the hat)--Ankara 21:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Very good quality, perhaps the composition can be improvable--Lmbuga 00:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)  Done Cropped. Thanks for your suggestions. -- MJJR 13:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me--Lmbuga 22:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Porte des Allemands R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 21:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Porte des Allemands R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 21:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Porte des Allemands R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 21:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Chambre de Commerce R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 22:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Chapelle des Templiers R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swimming Pool R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice contrast and colours! --Jovianeye 12:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Arsenal R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it meets the criteria.--MrPanyGoff 13:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare de Metz R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Saint Pierre R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Saint Pierre R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 17:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Avenue Foch R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 17:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Château d'eau R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 18:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Château d'eau R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 18:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare de Metz R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 18:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Metz Porte des Allemands R07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metz Porte des Allemands R07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare de Metz R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper but I think good enough for QI.--MrPanyGoff 09:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Three Corners R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --H005 21:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Station R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Jan van Eyckplein R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Carschten 22:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Station R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, while the tint of clouds could be better.--PereslavlFoto 15:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Three Corners R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MV Najade R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 00:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwankendamme R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice contrast but the sky looks a little bit strange / violet --Mbdortmund 01:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)  Comment The picture was taken with 200 mm tele lens. As the result was rather hazy, contrast has been increased. Maybe is this the explanation for the color of the sky? -- MJJR 18:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)  Done Color corrected -- MJJR 14:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Good and illustrative. QI.--Jebulon 17:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB EMU196 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:16, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge BonneChiere R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:16, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Langerei R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! - A.Savin 06:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Dorp R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 16:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Mons 050424 JPG106.jpg

Beste Marc,

Dank u voor uw vertaling

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 23:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Marc,

Un grand merci pour tout.

P.S. C'est toujours avec plaisir que je découvre vos photos

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scelveringhe R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scelveringhe R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 08:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB EMU644 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:48, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB EMU624 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brugge Langerei R02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brugge Langerei R02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Brugge Koningsbrug R02.jpg

Bonjour Marc,

J'ai promu l'image dont question en objet.

Amicalement.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MV Umm Salal R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --High Contrast 21:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MV Wilson Tees R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--Ankara 22:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB EMU196 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Podzemnik 07:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Koningsbrug R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition - For me QI - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can we get a more specific id? --Quartl 09:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Purple Lupins. --Saffron Blaze 17:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koolkerke Sint-Niklaaskerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB EMU197 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vijgenboom R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- George Chernilevsky 07:45, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Théâtre Bruges 1835.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Théâtre Bruges 1835.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisseweegs Vaartje R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality, in spite of the color of the sky and the image at right side--Lmbuga 10:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7858 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeebrugge Straussbrug R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and useful.--Jebulon 21:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heist Kursaalstraat55 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 21:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heist Oorlogsmonument R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 21:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koolkerke Sint-Niklaaskerk R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 00:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dudzele Kerkruine R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 00:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Oude Pastoriestraat R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. I'm liking the color (especially the whites) of your images--Lmbuga 23:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Pastorie R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me: good quality (or very good), but I'm not sure with the composition, perhaps too tight--Lmbuga 23:22, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Pastorie R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and I like it--Lmbuga 23:18, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station Zeebrugge Dorp R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slot Bossenstein R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vrieselhof kasteel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slot Bossenstein R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damme DamseVaartWest5 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort van Beieren R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Peralta R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Dhanins R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 12:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koude Keuken R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 09:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lissewege Spoorwegbatterij R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 09:49, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenberge Staketsels R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 12:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zuienkerke Schoeringekapel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cropped in the left side, upper part of the trees isn't in good quality. The rest of the picture and the colors are good.--Someone35 12:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC) QI nevertheless.--Jebulon 07:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dudzele Bona Dies R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenberge Staketsels R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 12:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zuienkerke Schoeringekapel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cropped in the left side, upper part of the trees isn't in good quality. The rest of the picture and the colors are good.--Someone35 12:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC) QI nevertheless.--Jebulon 07:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Double surprise !

Bonjour MJJR.

Enthousiasmé par le charme et la qualité générale de cette photo, j'ai pris la liberté de la proposer cette nuit comme "Image Remarquable", et je ne saurais trop t'engager à aller jeter un coup d'oeil à cette proposition ! Visiblement, je ne suis pas le seul à être enthousiaste ! De grands noms de "Commons" me suivent à cet égard. Tant de votes positifs dès maintenant, c'est impressionnant ! Bonne continuation à cette image, qui semble bien partie ! Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poeke Kasteel R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition and technicaly made, the water mirror is wonderfull, this one is certanly a must. --DaMatta 23:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Should be nominated by you in FPC, 09/17 at 9 pm !! I cannot do it myself, and either you, because of the two active nominations --Jebulon 00:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 9,7 megapixels--Lmbuga 01:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damme Schellemolen R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koolkerke Pannemolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poeke Kasteel R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Jakubhal 20:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poeke Kasteel R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 21:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zarren Wullepitmolen R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 14:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oudenaarde Stadhuis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Slot Bossenstein R01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Slot Bossenstein R01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Café du Gaz R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 23:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veurne Sint-Walburga R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the buildings are oversharpened --Someone35 11:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veurne Noordstraat 18 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --A.Ceta 09:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veurne Pannestraat 3 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veurne Markt R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Bonjour, j'ai reçu ceci,

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poeke Kasteel R03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poeke Kasteel R03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

ça t'appartient, je crois. Félicitations, je ne regrette pas d'avoir fait cette proposition !--Jebulon (talk) 12:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: Je suis ravi de cette réussite. Je participe aussi à WLM en France, ça semble y avoir un très grand succès !--Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge PerezdeMalvenda R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 22:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Wollestraat34 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 21:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veurne Landhuis R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 22:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veurne Rozendalstraat2 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 21:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort van Beieren R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Rijkswachtkazerne R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Haan Belle Vue R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 04:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Haan Chantecler R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 04:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Grootseminarie R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Langerei52 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 04:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Magdalenakerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Sfu 20:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge SJH 19deE Ziekenzalen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assebroek Kristoffelkerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sfu 10:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Zandwegemolen R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Male Hoge Huis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:27, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Male Pelderijnstraat 16-18 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Harrison49 18:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenberge Maantjes Kapelletje R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Jebulon 15:10, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge SintPieterskaai37 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition seems a bit too busy to me. Mattbuck 02:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Good image IMO

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear MJJR, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:59, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgian Loc 2743 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 21:34, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Loc2634 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Ralf Roletschek 21:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB EMU697 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Pieterskaai 29 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spoorlijn 63 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good DOF, good lighting, good composition. And geocoded! QI to me. --Specious 10:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haagse PCC R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haagse PCC R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spoorlijn 63 R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but it would be better without shadow --Przykuta 16:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Castillo de las Coloradas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good!--ArildV 22:16, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Marina Rubicon R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualty -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 23:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Castillo de las Coloradas R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --User:LutzBruno--LutzBruno|LutzBruno 22:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Playa de las Coloradas R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 00:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Teguise R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI to me--Lmbuga 19:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Faro de Pechiguera R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Faro de Pechiguera R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Faro de Pechiguera R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Faro de Pechiguera R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Bonne année 2012

Marc, Beste wensen ! -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)