Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Madame Grinderche!

Article France edit

Bonjour,

Pas très adulte cet ajout d'un paragraphe "madones du partie socialiste" dans l'article France.--Pline (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Vous avez rangé ces personnes dans un paragraphe "Madones du Parti Socialiste" alors qu'elles étaient classées dans "Hommes politiques". Qui manque de neutralité ?
Cette page est destinée à présenter la France dans tous ses aspects à un public plutôt étranger. Sur le plan politique mettre des représentants de l'opposition actuelle est logique.
Si deux "madones" du PS figurent sur la page France, c'est que la page a été créée alors que la candidate aux élections présidentielles étaient le leader de l'opposition. Je crois que l'ajout d'Aubry est le fait d'une tierce personne. Je ne fais pas d'actualisation car je serais en train de changer cette partie tous les mois.
Je suis effectivement + ou - l'auteur de cette page mais je n'ai strictement aucune sympathie pour les personnes que vous vouez aux gémonies. Mais Wikipédia n'est ni ma page personnelle, ni mon blog.
Soignez votre paranoïa galopante ou allez vous défouler ailleurs que dans Wikipédia.

--Pline (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

exposer des faits n'est pas de la paranoia, mon action était totalement justifiée, si vous avez un problème avec les esprits égalitaristes allez vous faire voir. Madame Grinderche (talk) 20:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rama (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Amgot french algeria 2fr.jpg edit

 
File:Amgot french algeria 2fr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Feral Dog of St. Domingo.png edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Feral Dog of St. Domingo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply