Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mahmoudalrawi!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Intouchables2011.jpg edit

 
File:Intouchables2011.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Link to landing page edit

Hello Mahmoudalrawi, I saw you provided two links for the CentralNotice. The CentralNotice can only contain one, the one all visitors should go to. So the information of both pages should be merged together if possible. Can you make sure that such happens? If done, make sure only one link is left in the table here. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

رد edit

نعم سأضع أسماء أفضل لأن تلك المرة كانت أول مرة أرفع صورة إلى كومنز ونسيت أن أغير الأسم. --1999fran (talk) 16:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

مرحباً مَحمود، رفَعتُ صورَتين لِنفس المكان هل هَذا مسموح أو لا. --1999fran (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
مَرحَباً مَحمود أكتَشفتُ إنَ كُلَ صُوَري عائِلِية فَلِذَبِك لا يُمكِنُني رَفعُها أتمنىَ أن تَعذِرَني. --1999fran (talk) 13:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Why do you keep removing information from Wikimedia page? edit

Dear Mahmoudalrawi

Why you insist on removing the text I added from the page of Iraqi monument 2014? Was it containing wrong information? Or simply you do not like these information?

It is not removing my ID that I'm objecting about, I am objecting about why you remove the categories I added. These historic sites can be useful for volunteers in coming years contests and this page is not your personal page, it is a page for everyone interested with the Iraqi history.

I demand your reply on this.

Thank you.

Ahmed Karadi

Re: onuments 2014 in Iraq edit

I think it was rather misunderstanding of the Commons role than intended vandalism. However, I hope the problem has already been resolved. Ankry (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rawa (Iraq) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 winners edit

Thanks a lot for your attention :)

Signature help edit

How to add the "signature in other pages"? do you have any help links? thanks in advance.

wle-iq edit

السلام عليكم Yes off Course, i will do it soon.--Vikoula5 (talk) 21:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done.--Vikoula5 (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

السلام عليكم الحل في يد منظمين المسابقة، إني إتصلت بهم البارحة بلا إجانه منهم.

الأن إن كتبت في صفحت المسابقة.

هذ حدث، لأنهم لم يضموكم إلى المسابقه بشل كامل.

هي الجزءالأول و فيه جزء يعملوه منظمين wle-iq --Vikoula5 (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

ويكي تهوى الأرض العراقية edit

السلام عليكم أخي محمود

يمكنك التقرب من

user:vikoula5

سيساعدك و هو هو المكلف بالدعم التقني 

هو رضا كربوش من الجزائر شارك معنا في ويكي عربية

--Bachounda (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

WLE categories edit

Hello, please do not add WLE categories directly like [1], instead add the template {{Wiki Loves Earth 2015|iq}}. Holger1959 (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open! edit

 

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Mahmoudalrawi,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

سماء العراق الجميله edit

تحت سماء مدينة البصرة جنوب العراق هناك قد كبرت هناك قد مدت لي الهة الحب يدها للمرة اﻻولى وهناك كان بيتي هناك كانت كلماتي اﻻولى تحت سماء مدينتي الجنوبية الغائمه امنه حميد (talk) 11:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Osama al safi.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Osama al safi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Osama al safi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

hiàn 22:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

File:Oran protests.jpg edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mahmod aljalili.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mahmod aljalili.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mahmod aljalili.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 11:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:أحمد راضي.jpg
أحمد راضي
edit

Why on earth you want to delete a picture that is already being published on ar.wikipedia.com. if wrong license, you can simply correct it. https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A3%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF_%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B6%D9%8A#/media/%D9%85%D9%84%D9%81:%D8%A3%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF_%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B6%D9%8A.jpeg Abdulaziz Alwafaee (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


Images du Hirak edit

Salut

Vous n'auriez pas des photos de l'été ou de septembre ? --Panam2014 (talk) 11:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Al-Qibla Newspaper page from 25 August 1921.jpg edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Al-Qibla Newspaper page from 25 August 1921.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Baghdad Monument.jpg edit

 
File:Baghdad Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply