Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Majoritems!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 61097768a77443a17126bbc1421260e5 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Comment edit

Odder has asked you questions at User_talk:Odder#no_copyright_violation. He, as do I, expects an answer to the questions he has asked. Please do not re-upload files until that discussion with him is complete. russavia (talk) 10:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

He asked, I replied. --Majoritems (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Odder#no copyright violation edit

Hi Majoritems, please stop badgering Odder on his talk page. If you are still interested in getting File:Habemus Papam 2013.ogg restored, I suggest to submit a request at COM:UDEL. In this case you should explain why do you believe the recorded speech to be free and how this was recorded. Another admin will close it then. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am not supposed to answer the same question a third time, right? --Majoritems (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
If we cannot be sure that this upload conforms to COM:L, it won't be restored. But this does not need to be dealt between you and Odder but by the community in an open discussion and will be closed by another admin. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Levitan 12 04 1961.ogg edit

 
File:Levitan 12 04 1961.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply