User talk:Maltaper/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Self-redirected category

Hello. I came across this, which seems like it must have been an error. I hope you can redirect it to the correct target. --R'n'B (talk) 18:50, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Corot - Gypsy Girl at a Fountain, 1865-1870.jpg

hi, nice upload. i would encourage you to use commons:pattypan which allows mass uploads with template:artwork, with better metadata. cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:41, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Wrong license on painting uploads

Hi Maltaper, I noticed you are using {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} on uploads of old paintings like File:Corot - A Breakwater in Normandy (L’Estacade Normande).jpg. That's incorrect. The source actually lists it at "Copyright 2018 Southampton City Art Gallery All rights reserved". You can't just make up a Creative Commons license. You should be using {{PD-art}}. Please have a look at Commons:PD-Art タグを適用する場合. Multichill (talk) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Read Commons:PD-Art タグを適用する場合. Multichill (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

You still seem to be using wrong licenses (example) and you never responded to my messages. Maybe I need to block you to get your attention? Please respond. Multichill (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

I haven't just understood copyright very well, and uploaded files through Upload Wizard without copyright notice. My uploads are limited to artists died more than 70 and works on the catalogues raisonnés. In most cases I should use {{PD-art}}. --Maltaper (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Corot - La bohémienne rêveuse, 1865-70.jpg

---

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Corot - La bohémienne rêveuse, 1865-70.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Elisfkc (talk) 23:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Corot - La petite Jeannette, 1848.jpg

---

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Corot - La petite Jeannette, 1848.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Elisfkc (talk) 23:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Maltaper/Archive 2,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Maltaper/Archive 2,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Maltaper/Archive 2,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:L'Œuvre d'Antoine Watteau, 1735.pdf

Copyright status: File:L'Œuvre d'Antoine Watteau, 1735.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:L'Œuvre d'Antoine Watteau, 1735.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Figures de différents caractères, de paysages, d'études dessinées d'après nature par Antoine Watteau, 1726-1728.pdf
• File:Goncourt - Catalogue raisonné de l'œuvre peint, dessiné et gravé d'Antoine Watteau, 1875.djvu

Yours sincerely, JuTa 02:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Goodrich - Thomas Eakins, his life and work, 1933.djvu

Copyright status: File:Goodrich - Thomas Eakins, his life and work, 1933.djvu

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Goodrich - Thomas Eakins, his life and work, 1933.djvu. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 02:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Lloyd Goodrich (1897 – 1987) but it was on the Internet Archive. --Maltaper (talk) 07:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Caillebotte - Berhaut 1994, 355.png

File:Caillebotte - Berhaut 1994, 355.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abdelhak13k (talk) 11:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Toulouse-Lautrec - YVETTE GUILBERT SALUANT LE PUBLIC, 1894, MTL.163.jpg

File:Toulouse-Lautrec - YVETTE GUILBERT SALUANT LE PUBLIC, 1894, MTL.163.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

William Ellison (talk) 09:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Catalog of Van Dyck paintings

OMG I just saw this and it made me cry! Thank you so much for this work. When I have time I will try to help, though I don't have the Erik Larson one, only the Lekturama one (from earlier in 1980, and lists 966 works). Jane023 (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Swapped images

Hello Maltaper, in the following two files, the images are swapped:

• File:Corot - The Woodcutter, 1856, 1926.2208.jpg
• File:Corot - Scrawl, 1856, 1926.2207.jpg

You can confirm this by looking in the Delteil catalogue, pp. 90, 91.

I can't work out the right URL to upload the correct images, perhaps you can do that or somehow swap them?

The images are also swapped in the source website, so you will need to take account of that if uploading them again from there:

• The Woodcutter (has the Scrawl image)
• Scrawl (has the Woodcutter image)

I will send the art gallery an email tomorrow, it is getting a bit late for me to do that tonight.

Thank you. --Mirokado (talk) 23:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Getty Center makes the same mistakes.

• http://www.getty.edu/art/collection/objects/144773/jean-baptiste-camille-corot-le-grand-bucheron-french-plate-1856-print-1921/
• http://www.getty.edu/art/collection/objects/144772/jean-baptiste-camille-corot-griffonnage-french-plate-1856-print-1921/

I prefer indicating the error of the site in the description to renaming. --Maltaper (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Artwork template

Hi Maltaper, I noticed you upload quite a lot of art, but don't always use {{Artwork}}. I guess it's because you sometimes use the upload wizward. Maybe you can switch these files to the artwork template after upload? A quick and easy trick is to replace "{{Information" with "{{subst:Artwork/subst(information)|subst=subst:" (example). Thanks, Multichill (talk) 08:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Degas - Violinist, Study for The Dance Lesson, ca. 1878–79.jpg

File:Degas - Violinist, Study for The Dance Lesson, ca. 1878–79.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

StellarHalo (talk) 08:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Giovanni Battista Tiepolo catalog raisonné, 1968

Good evening Maltaper

I discovered today the page Giovanni Battista Tiepolo catalog raisonné, 1968. CONGRATULATIONS !!!! You have done a great job !

If you can write below the pictures some information (e.g.: title - location - etc...) I can help you to complete the catalog with some missing item, but at the moment I cannot associate the number to the work. If you like, you can send me this information in a file (any format).

Thanks for your collaboration. YukioSanjo (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Meryon (Delteil 017-A)

Hello. Could you please take another look at Category:Meryon (Delteil 017-A) and its contents? I believe this is a print depicting Charles Meryon, not one created by him. Félix Bracquemond was the artist. I'd make the edits myself, but I don't know the conventions. Thanks! - Eureka Lott 15:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Here is the answer:

17-A. — CHARLES MERYON, par F. BRACQUEMOND

2e — Avec un quatrain, le nom, l'adresse de Meryon et la date, gravés par Meryon lui-même. --Maltaper (talk) 23:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. I think I understand now! - Eureka Lott 15:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Prints by Francisco de Goya...

Hi Maltaper. Thank for your good work on Goya prints.

• There are many uncategorized prints in the Category: Rijksmuseum Amsterdam. For example, we need to review: Category: Japanese prints in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam. Please, your help would be very good. Thanks for your contributions. Best regards --JMCC1 (talk) 06:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Monet - Wildenstein 1996, 818a.png

File:Monet - Wildenstein 1996, 818a.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

StellarHalo (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Categories nominated for deletion

Not sure what is the issue between you and user:Ruff tuff cream puff. Your recent creations have been nominated for deletion and I have rejected them at this time as there should be a reasonable time given for populating categories. That said, categories at that intense depth should only be created when they are necessary, not solely due to someone find a file and thinking that it can have a precise categorisation. Can I ask that you two to discuss what exactly is going on, and find a compromise position for the benefit of the wiki and to save patrollers, and administrators from unnecessary work. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

• I'm not aware there is anything personal going on here, I've never heard of this user; there are a huge number of bad categories that I'm trying to format and it doesn't matter to me who created them. You might be referring to Category:Paintings by Jean Siméon Chardin by museum, which I have been trying to clean up and it looks like this user created it. Step one is that it is an orphan category tree, which is easily fixable, but step two is that is contains a huge number of small categories which will become either useless or redundant once the files themselves are categorized properly. The bulk of this category will be empty subcategories, which are generally deleted. If there is any plan to format all of this bulk to make it useful, let me know. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
  • I have checked all images by Chardin to make Jean Siméon Chardin catalog raisonné, 1983. See no. 29: File:Chardin - Still Life With Cat and Fish, 1728.jpg and File:Chardin - Still Life with Cat and Fish, 1728.png. These are not the same image. Simpler way I took is categorizing these in categories Chardin + the museum. --Maltaper (talk) 15:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)