Martsniez

I invite everyone that wants to discuss or ask me something to just add a topic.

Cheers,

Maarten

Institution:Europeana

Martsniez, The {{Institution}} template are for "brick and Mortar" institutions to mention where physically artifacts reside. Your Institution:Europeana template seem to be more of a source template to mention where the image come from. I think something similar to {{WGA link}} would work better for you. If you agree, I would like to delete Institution:Europeana. --Jarekt (talk) 03:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt, we are in a pilot/explorative process with Europeana. Europeana holds millions of images that could potentially be added to the commons. As of now the template only applies to 25 images. I will discuss your remark with Multichill. Who will do the ingestion of Europeana content in a few months. Is this okay? Cheers --Martsniez (talk) 11:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Sure no problem. Good luck with Europeana project. --Jarekt (talk) 12:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Singapore PD tool?

Would you like to try and make one for Singapore? See "Commons:Licensing#Singapore". — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 09:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

It is not a simple as just making one. Check out the media page on http://www.outofcopyright.eu/media.html where you can see the documentation we've made on our 13 available jurisdictions. You can download one of our flowcharts there. If you create a flowchart in the same format (using yEd) using only the objects that are used those files we already made and have this flowchart checked by an expert on your jurisdiction we can use that for our calculators. Mind you, we have been working close to two years on making 30 jurisdictions available.

Oh, looks like I misunderstood your message at "Commons talk:Licensing" which said "A new calculator is relatively simple to build and add. I will require some authoritative source in your jurisdictions to verify a new calculator before I can add it to our site." I therefore thought it was quite a straightforward process. What is yEd? — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 10:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Once you have an authoritative source (e.g. copyright law professor/scholar) that is willing to put some effort into this than it is not that difficult. Please read our research pages to see how we developed these calculators.

Category:Pictures and images

Why are you putting images in a very non-specific category Category:Pictures and images? Following the name, you could put almost all files in that category. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jan,

I believe I made a mistake. I used cat-a-lot in the wrong way I realize. I tried to update the cat by categorising all images created by him into that category. Sorry, How can I correct this?

Thanks for noticing! --Martsniez (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't know of an easy way, I never use cat-a-lot. But maybe it offers the same easy way to undo what you did? Else, you will have to do it by hand. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Fixed it, thanks again for noticing my nobery! --Martsniez (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:BP191 Vrouw en man vechten met krokodillen - Open Beelden - 105576.ogv

Beste Maarten,

Bedankt voor het destijds aanbrengen van deze video op Commons, onder licentie {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-nl|1=[http://www.openbeelden.nl/media/105576 eye film instituut nederland]}}. Later haalde ik als Wikipedian in Residence de andere Bits & Pieces van eye.openbeelden.nl over, met licentie {{PD-old-70}}{{Anonymous-EU}}.

• Vind je het goed als ik jouw licentie vervang door die andere, omdat EYE geen auteursrechten heeft? (Vergelijk een boek uit een bibliotheek, bibliotheek heeft geen rechten. Pd-old-70 slaat hier op publicatie van een ondanks naspeuring anoniem werk tenminste 70 jaar geleden.)

Groeten en bedankt, Hansmuller (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Hans,

De licentie is overgenomen van Open Beelden. Hoewel ik geen bezwaar heb tegen je verandering kan ik je niet zeggen dat ik enige juridische toestemming verleen, ik ben immers ook niet de rechthebbende. Ook is PD-old misschien niet geschikt. Gezien de clip ongescript is is er alleen sprake van naburige rechten en niet van auteursrecht op teksten, scripts of bladmuziek. De rechten zijn in (in Nederland) dan ook na 50 jaar verlopen, of 50 jaar na publicatie als deze binnen 50 jaar zijn verschenen.

Groet, --Martsniez (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Legislation in Spain

Hello Martsniez.

Please, see: File talk:World copyright terms.svg#Legislation in Spain.

Thank you. Regards. --. HombreDHojalata.^talk 21:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Martsniez,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Martsniez,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Martsniez,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Collectie Fotoburo de Boer van het Noord-Hollands Archief

Op de site van het Noord-Hollands Archief lees ik nergens dat de licentie CC0 1.0 Universeel van toepassing is op Collectie Fotopersbureau De Boer, maar op Commons is die licentie wel aan meer dan 20.000 bestanden meegegeven. Misschien kun je de uploaders even vragen of ze kunnen laten zien waar deze licentie staat. Eissink (talk) 21:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC).

Dag Eissink, bedankt voor je bericht. Daar ben ik mee bezig. Zoals ik het zie heeft mijn voorganger bij het archief rechtstreeks toestemming gegeven aan Wikimedia voor die upload via het OTRS systeem. Het is die bevestiging die ik probeer te achterhalen in mijn bericht op het notice board. Martsniez (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Vragen over verweesde werken

Beste Martsniez, In De Kroeg heb ik vragen gesteld over het in Commons mogen opnemen van verweesde werken die niet eerder zijn gepubliceerd (of alleen in een beeldbank van een archief) en 70 jaar of ouder zijn. Daar heb ik tot nu toe geen handzaam antwoord op gekregen. Nu las ik dat u rechten hebt gestudeerd met als specialisatie Auteursrecht. Zou u daarom uw licht eens willen laten schijnen over deze kwestie? JopkeB (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kalshoven, Frank.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kalshoven, Frank.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kalshoven, Frank.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Agora (talk) 13:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)