User talk:Matthew T Rader/Valued Image Promotions

Valued Image Promotions

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caterpillar 330.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --August Geyler (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Fixed format of scope. Matthew T Rader, thank you for your contribution and please have a look at my edit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caterpillar 950K.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Leica M Typ 262 - back.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Leica M Typ 262 - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roscoe Wind Farm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Please note how I edited your scope: "Category" should not be visible in it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment That's right, thank you for fixing that, I'll watch out for that in the future Matthew T Rader (talk) 02:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Cool. Thanks for the nomination! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sillapathikaram Art Gallery, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Cool photo. User:Archaeodontosaurus, do you think "facade" should be added to the scope, or as the only photo currently in scope, is this a sufficient scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, that seems to me justified and sufficient for us to have a good scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for your opinion. OK, so Matthew T Rader, please add ", facade" to the scope, and then I'll gladly support this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks for the feedback Ikan Kekek, when you say add facade to the scope, do I need to create a category page for that or just type in facade in the scope on this nomination page? --Matthew T Rader (talk) 15:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment No, you don't change the category. The suggestion is: "Sillapathikaram Art Gallery, façade". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Got it, thank you! Done. --Matthew T Rader (talk) 15:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
N255S (aircraft).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose too cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Only in scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iron Bridge Dam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful, but please add geocoordinates. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: I've added them.--iMahesh (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 06:16, 29 November 2020

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heroin paraphernalia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I don't think broad concepts like "substance abuse" can have a "best in scope" photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Oh okay, I see what you mean, maybe I misunderstood some of the limitations of valued image scopes. I wonder if there is another scope more appropriate you could suggest. Matthew T Rader (talk) 14:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm not sure, but the other thing to consider is that this photo shows objects, not abuse. So what does it show, and is it best in scope in showing that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment That makes sense, I updated the category to one that better represents what is in the photo.

•  Comment Great. Now, if you would please talk us through what makes this photo best in scope. I don't mean to be difficult; I'm just having trouble picking between that photo, File:Who needs a virtual world?.jpg, and I suppose someone could make an argument for the very grim File:Kolizej narkomanska meka.JPG (I suppose it's between the other two, though). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think you are being difficult. I appreciate your questions and challenging me. I thought this one was best because it's an authentic image of found heroin paraphernalia, not a set up image like File:Kolizej narkomanska meka.JPG, though I do agree it is a great image, I just think the authenticity of mine has a slight edge over it. Also, I think the unique details in the image like the scratched up spoon, cigarette butts and ashes, and the folder paper gives it more atmosphere and enhances the tragic story of addiction. And the other image, File:Who needs a virtual world?.jpg, also great, has too much other garbage in it, literally, which dilutes the ability to bring focus to the actual heroin paraphernalia.

• One quick request: Please sign your posts by typing 4 tildes (~) in a row at the end of each one. Your arguments are good. I'll think about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
• Thank you and yes, I apologize for that, I forget to add it sometimes. I'll be better about that, thanks for the reminder --Matthew T Rader (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment After thinking about it, I've decided that even though File:Who needs a virtual world?.jpg is not as sharp as the photo you nominated, the fact that all the objects are labeled makes it more valuable. But perhaps you'd like to label the objects in your photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

• That's cool they did that. I just added annotations also. --Matthew T Rader (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. I'll support this photo as best in scope now. The labeling could be easier to read, if you'd like to work further on it on your own time. Thanks a lot for taking the photo, nominating it and working with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you very much, I will work on it a bit more. I really appreciate the time you dedicate to Wikimedia Commons! --Matthew T Rader (talk) 16:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 06:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valley View Center Mall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
• The first point is resolved. The second point concerns the scope: it is too wide. It must be reduced to what the image represents. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
• I see what you mean, sorry I was new at submitting to Valued images. I corrected the scope to be that particular mall. --Matthew T Rader (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
• We are almost there. Last point: you need a geocoding in the caption and, this time, it will be perfect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
• It's been added, I'll make sure I have that in there next time. Thank you! --Matthew T Rader (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice-looking mall! I miss the days when it was this bright out at 6 o'clock. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you very much! Me too, I love those long sunny days. --Matthew T Rader (talk) 17:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 06:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)