This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thanks for uploading File:Loreto chapel Fribourg illustration.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Das ist das Original, wo sich Angaben zur Quelle + Lizenz finden. Danke für deinen Hinweis. Diese Datei ist eine von mir digital bearbeitete Kopie. Das Original befindet sich auf Commons unter File:Battles of the nineteenth century (1901) (14760555201).jpg. Das Bild hat eigentlich nichts mit dem filename (battle ...) zu tun. Weil ich das Gebäude kenne, dachte ich, ich könnte es identifizieren und vom (abgeschnittenen) Text, der neben dem Bild erscheint und nichts zur Bildbeschreibung beiträgt, befreien.
Habe ich noch etwas vergessen zu kopieren? Falls dem so ist, könnte ich das aus dem Original noch kopieren und beim bearbeiteten Bild einfügen. Matutinho00:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Möglicherweise heisst der Autor der Zeichnung Andrew Hilliard Atteridge. So nennt sich zumindest einer der Autoren mit mehreren Beiträgen im Sammelwerk. Unten rechts ist die Unterschrift des Zeichners zu sehen, aber leider nicht leicht zu entziffern. Matutinho01:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:File description page 01.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Latest comment: 1 year ago15 comments4 people in discussion
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Vitraux de l'Adoration (Stained Glass Windows of the Adoration), Józef Mehoffer, Cathédrale Saint-Nicolas (Fribourg). If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
QuestionMatutinho, what's your scope? It's impossible to have a valued image without a scope, and please look at any other nomination in edit mode to see how scopes are formatted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Info Thank you for your help. I changed the code, but I see that this don't work. I don't see the mistake. Do I have to correct the code here above or on an other side? Matutinho12:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment You need to put a relevant Commons category that includes this image in your "scope" line, preceded by a colon (:). Do you see how others are doing it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Info Thank you for your hint. What I see first, is this:
{{Section resolved |1=~~~~ }}
=== Stained glass windows of ''The Adoration'' ===
{{VICs
|Cathedral Fribourg vitrail Dreikönig 01.jpg
|Cathedrale vitraux mehoffer rois entier.jpg
}}
I can see others did it also like this. But I don't understand well on which side I am reading/writing.
Now, I propose the scope (cf. above) Vitraux de la cathédrale Saint-Nicolas (Fribourg). It's a category on Commons. Is it OK? Matutinho 19:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC) Matutinho20:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
I try it once more.
You should link the category by using double square brackets on both sides of it and then format the view as others do, so that we don't see "Category," but after that, you should state which windows we are viewing. It looks like they are depicting The Adoration, but since French is the most common language in Fribourg, the standard is to use the French title with English in parentheses unless the original title was in German, in which case, use German with English in parentheses. So perhaps you would use the following format: ''Vitraux de l'Adoration'' (Stained Glass Windows of the Adoration), Józef Mehoffer, [[Category:Vitraux de la cathédrale Saint-Nicolas (Fribourg)|Cathédrale Saint-Nicolas (Fribourg)]]. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Excuse me, I didn'n understand the whole procedure of this candature.
I linked the category in the field scope and put the English translation in parenthesis. My question: Where do I state which windows we are viewing? I think I stated it before (cf. red text above). Have I to indicate the 2 images (filenames) in other place/site? Or have I to create a new site called Commons:Valued image candidates/Cathedrale vitraux mehoffer rois entier.jpg manualy? Matutinho08:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. I focused on the stained-glass windows of the cathedral Saint-Nicolas in Fribourg. Your proposition aims the same category. But I did'nt unterstand the part after the pipe. Do you prefer the focus on the whole cathedral with sculptures, paintings, organs, choir stalls, architecture ect.? From the Middle Ages to modern time? Is the focus I proposed not acceptable? Matutinho20:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
I really don't understand your question. Do you see what I put within the "nowiki" codes (visible in edit mode)? That's my proposed scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Actualy, I changed the scope by copy+paste your proposition; I did it on both sites. But unfortunately, I did'nt understand well. I hope it's OK. Thank you for your patience. Matutinho06:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
You haven't linked any Commons category. You must put a colon before the word "Category". I'm sorry, that was my error above. I just fixed it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsDone Thanks for your comment. I corrected the inclination; the face is not in sunshine to avoid cast shadow from the nose. --Matutinho 15:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Ok now --Imehling19:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC))
Thanks for uploading File:Biel Gueterstr 4-10 FR Eingang 06 FR 01.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Ich habe die vergessene Lizenz sofort verlinkt und den Baustein zum Löschen entfernt. Matutinho13:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
_(14760555201).jpg)
