User talk:McZusatz/Archive 5

Latest comment: 7 years ago by McZusatz in topic Bug

Report for files uploaded between December 19 and December 28

[deleteFraction = 0.10918691862673802; IOExceptions: 1 (Fraction: 5.427054954358468E-6);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 22 problematic instances. I was unsure about 3 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 10:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:10, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-03

16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between December 29 and January 07

[deleteFraction = 0.1433875239169275; IOExceptions: 2 (Fraction: 1.2671219858335762E-5);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 25 problematic instances. I was unsure about 13 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 07:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-04

18:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between January 05 and January 14

[deleteFraction = 0.12871928005178282; IOExceptions: 0 (Fraction: 0.0);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 26 problematic instances. I was unsure about 5 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Vœux

  Meilleurs vœux pour 2015 !
Hello McZusatz/Archive 5,
Je te souhaite une très bonne année
Et beaucoup de plaisir à contribuer !
Cordialement,
— 
Racconish 📥 11:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! A happy new year to you, as well! --McZusatz (talk) 03:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

problematic bot edit

FYI, This edit commented out the file's license and categories. --Jarekt (talk) 13:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I think the bot fixed it. There was a nowiki opening tag somewhere in the source and there was no closing nowiki tag; effectively commenting out all content after the opening nowiki tag. Thus, another bot was appending categories in a loop because they were never parsed as such by the software. --McZusatz (talk) 18:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes the other bot was confused too, but your bot commented out the license template and the other category. It is not a big issue, except that images without license templates have to be fixed by hand. --Jarekt (talk) 18:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
It was already implicitly commented out by the wiki parser which assumed a closing nowiki tag after the end of the source text. Therefore, my bot added the closing nowiki tag explicitly, so parsed text and source text no longer seem to contradict. --McZusatz (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-05

16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-06

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Bot request

Would it be possible for YaCBot to run through the whole Category:Official Portraits of Members of the Iowa General Assembly category tree? It's hit several of the images I uploaded there, but it seems to be doing so in a scattershot way, and all of my uploads will have the same issue, as I didn't know about internationalization of headings when I uploaded them. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Should already be   Done by c:user:McPot. --McZusatz (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-07

16:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between January 31 and February 09

[deleteFraction = 0.13827995859788972; IOExceptions: 0 (Fraction: 0.0);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 45 problematic instances. This time I could tag all files appropriately and I won't need your help. --Flock (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, about that, your bot Flock has been tagging images that have been already reviewed. 1989 17:53, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
According to our guidelines such templates should not exist. I think the best way to solve this, is to subst: all 333 transclusions. --McZusatz (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I now see what you mean. Sorry for the confusion. The template has been nominated for deletion. 1989 20:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Estación Rufino

Hello, why did you upload a watermarked version of the files and removed my review ?

Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

The resolution of the original files is a lot higher. I will try to crop those watermarks again... --McZusatz (talk) 20:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Okay thanks, but what about my review ? Why did you remove it ?Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Nothing, I just consistently request a bot review after uploading the original flickr file. ;) --McZusatz (talk) 20:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-08

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-09

16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between February 09 and February 18

[deleteFraction = 0.15323582831469268; IOExceptions: 0 (Fraction: 0.0);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 56 problematic instances. This time I could tag all files appropriately and I won't need your help. --Flock (talk) 17:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-10

16:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

  Thanks for your review of my valued pictures; I had a problem last night with Upload Wizard but now it is alright and working; I have a very fast Upload internet now of 10 Mbps with regular 1.0 Mbps Download from our Globe provider here in Philippines; hence I do trust this Commons Wizard, but it is very rare it would fail like this; I had uploaded more than 120,000 of the total Uploaded here in Commons of 245,000 files of the photographer who donated to me all these for sole Upload to Commons due to its integrity and education philosophy without ads; sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 03:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Error?

[63] . --Keysanger 11:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

No, I think you already noticed what the problem was. Though, I will make the edit summary more clear. --McZusatz (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between February 21 and March 02

[deleteFraction = 0.14269913903406997; IOExceptions: 0 (Fraction: 0.0);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 108 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 12:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-11

15:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between March 02 and March 11

[skipFraction = 0.11992654204538958; deleteFraction = 0.1198836677528154; IOExceptions: 0 (Fraction: 0.0);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 379 problematic instances. I was unsure about 30 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 06:57, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between January 23 and February 01

[deleteFraction = 0.13481402330433012; IOExceptions: 1 (Fraction: 8.480469478790345E-6);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 80 problematic instances. I was unsure about 5 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 00:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:President Obama Delivers Remarks on the 50th Anniversary of the Selma Marches.ogv

Can we keep both files, please?

Apparently there are problems playing the video file for the full larger version. As noted at Village Pump by (talk · contribs).

Therefore, it would be helpful to our readers to keep the smaller version archived, as well, as an educational resource -- as it's easier to play the video of that file.

Thank you,

-- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Are you aware of the transcoded versions offered, which should be selectable through the video player, too? -- Rillke(q?) 00:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, that's awesome, just don't see why we can't also retain the other file? -- Cirt (talk) 00:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
That's pretty much the standard procedure we do here, I guess. As I understand com:dupe, it tells me to use {{Duplicate}} for files that are exactly the same or scaled down. --McZusatz (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately though, seeing as we're having problems with playback from multiple people, could we please keep the smaller file that's easier to playback, as well? Please? -- Cirt (talk) 03:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
See my reply at the VP: 1. If appropriate, bug reports should be filed. --McZusatz (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I agree with your comment there, but could we also please have the other file back? Please? -- Cirt (talk) 02:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
McZusatz, would you please be so kind as to restore the OGV file? Please? :) -- Cirt (talk) 02:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate your kindness, but this is not reason enough for me to restore the file. If you think I deleted the file in error, you may contact another administrator and ask them for a second opinion. --McZusatz (talk) 02:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, but what about the reasoning to have an alternative form of playback for those it doesn't work for? -- Cirt (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
That is pretty much the point of the transcodes. If webm is not working for you, you can play the 360p ogv directly: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/transcoded/1/1a/President_Obama_Delivers_Remarks_on_the_50th_Anniversary_of_the_Selma_Marches.webm/President_Obama_Delivers_Remarks_on_the_50th_Anniversary_of_the_Selma_Marches.webm.360p.ogv --McZusatz (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thank you very much for the helpful link and explanations! :) -- Cirt (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Balder Joerg.jpg

Hallo und Danke für den Hinweis. Die Datei hatte ich ganz vergessen, sorry. Die kann weg! Danke! --Balder de (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

My files

Hi, on my user page I got the information that my images were suggested for deletion. I'd like to keep them as I use at least one of them at my German user page of Wikipedia. Regards, Dionysos1988 (talk) 08:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-12

15:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between March 03 and March 12

[skipFraction = 0.11742298657599763; deleteFraction = 0.11742298657599763; IOExceptions: 0 (Fraction: 0.0);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 7 problematic instances. I was unsure about 3 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 01:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between March 08 and March 17

[skipFraction = 0.0; deleteFraction = 0.09423921238192381; IOExceptions: 1 (Fraction: 6.335409235759584E-6);]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 33 problematic instances. I was unsure about 1 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 00:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-13

15:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:00, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

c:file:VjacheslavWolski1.jpg

Hello McZusatz. This is my only profile picture on wikipedia. Is it restricted to use profile picture? --VjacheslavWolski (talk) 06:48, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

As far as I can see, it is not used right now (and was not used when I filed the DR). Do you want me to restore it? --McZusatz (talk) 07:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
It's used on https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:VjacheslavWolski page. Please, restore. --VjacheslavWolski (talk) 11:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 11:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Doppeltilden

Hallo McZusatz. Könnte dein Bot bei den ausstehenden Korrekturen bei solchen Fällen auch gleich diese Korrektur übernehmen? Dieser Syntaxfehler kam/kommt zehntausendfach vor. --Leyo 22:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Habe das mal nur in regex geschrieben. (Ein genereller Template-Parser mit Syntaxkorrektur waere wohl angebrachter...)
Das sieht dann bspw. so aus. --McZusatz (talk) 03:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Danke. --Leyo 00:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between March 14 and March 23

[skipped: 0; deleted: 12.617 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 248 problematic instances. I was unsure about 1 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-14

15:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-15

15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between March 25 and April 03

[skipped: 0; deleted: 10.469 %; IOExceptions: 1;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 26 problematic instances. I was unsure about 7 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 00:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 07:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

YaCBot bug - international indirection introduced when replacing wikilink URLs

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Straight_engine.svg&curid=2252894&diff=156821832&oldid=118806766

.png version from [http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafika:Silnik_rzedowy.png pl.wiki]

is being replaced by

from [[w:pl:Grafika:Silnik_rzedowy.png|pl.wiki]]

rather than

from [[:pl:Grafika:Silnik_rzedowy.png|pl.wiki]]

It works after a fashion, as the :pl: pseudo-namespace is recognised at en:WP as well as at Commons, but it's not optimal. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, it is not mandatory for *.wikipedia but for *.wikibooks etc.
Thus, fixed. --McZusatz (talk) 10:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 07:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-16

16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 07:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-17

15:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between March 28 and April 06

[skipped: 0; deleted: 10.875 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 28 problematic instances. I was unsure about 5 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between April 04 and April 13

[skipped: 0; deleted: 10.338 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 44 problematic instances. I was unsure about 19 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--54.201.238.161 17:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/158330212

Hallo McZusatz. Das |nobold=1}}) auf der neuen Zeile halte ich für etwas suboptimal. Magst du mal schauen, weshalb dein Bot dies so macht? --Leyo 08:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Der regex ist zu gierig. Ich werde den Bot evtl. am Wochenende neu kompilieren. --McZusatz (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Re: McTopot and Top 200 images that should use vector graphics

@McZusatz: Hey, I wanted to contact you regarding your McTopot bot that currently does the Top 200 images that should use vector graphics page. I'm not sure how you're pulling your data, so I don't know how easy or hard it would be. I had a request, I was wondering if you could have your bot/script exclude all the different language User and Talk pages when determining the Top 200 images? When looking for images to turn to a vector format, want to try to focus on those that are used in actual articles instead of user/talk pages, which is why I'm making this request. If this request is too much, no problem, just thought I'd ask. Thanks for your time. Offnfopt (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Will hava a look at this within the next couple of days. --McZusatz (talk) 07:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Should be fixed now. --McZusatz (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it.Offnfopt(talk) 16:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/158524589

Hi McZusatz. Ich weiss nicht, wie viele solcher Fälle es gibt, aber zumindest hier wäre ein : besser gewesen. --Leyo 22:09, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Ich mache das ab jetzt mit dem : generell so. Eventuell "überschüssige" Links müssen dann von Hand entfernt werden, falls unerwünscht. --McZusatz (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

YaCBot error

Hi McZusatz, I just spotted this wrong edit on one of the files my bot had uploaded. Please can you look into it to stop the bot moving categories out of logic templates. --99of9 (talk) 02:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done. --McZusatz (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between April 11 and April 20

[skipped: 0; deleted: 8.019 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 26 problematic instances. I was unsure about 16 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Uncategorized or categorized?

Hello, is the bot correct in this case when it adds "uncategorized" next to two categories? --ssr (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, your feedback is greatly appreciated! Sadly, I could not trace the cause for this misbehavior. This seems super sketchy to me because I restarted the instances on WMFlabs without replacing the bot's executables. It turned out there was at least one other instance which got then reverted by the restarted bot... My best guess is to blame the API --McZusatz (talk) 01:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Edits ineligible for copyright

On Commons:Deletion requests/File:Make me pretty base by ak manga-d34s02x.png you state my changes are ineligible for copyright, but do not further specify why. I am in full legal right to make changes and re-license under the SA clause. If you wish to personally take on this issue you should be willing to show which law you lean on. I would remind you are personally responsible and can not rely on quoting policy as the Wikimedia foundation and Wikimedia Commons expressly state any such changes are not sanctioned. CFCF (talk) 11:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Of course you are allowed to edit a file which is published CC-BY but what you did by re-publishing the file as CC-BY-SA and labeling it Own work is w:copyfraud. Additionally, your attempt to restrict re-use of the file (adding the Share-Alike clause) never had any ground because your changes do not pass the Threshold of originality. As far as I can see, the only thing you did as modification was select a rectangle and press del. --McZusatz (talk) 12:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Not knowing the exact basis of the templates would not equate to fraud. The description explicitly stated that the image was not of my own creation. The threshold of originality is where personal judgement comes into the picture and I dispute your conclusion as I made various color and other changes that might not be apparent at first glance. CFCF (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I note that CFCF restored the CC-BY-SA license after McZusatz reverted it.
(FWIW, I entirely agree with McZusatz here; CFCF's "contribution" is beyond trivial, entirely uncreative and below any reasonable threshold of originality required to claim it as his/her own, or as a "derivative" work that can be relicensed, at least under US law. I'm pretty sure the majority of experienced users would agree). Ubcule (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
License has been changed again. I've raised this issue at the Village Pump.
All the best, Ubcule (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 16:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-18

15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

fyi: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2015-May/007505.html lg :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 16:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Flyback arcing.gif

I give you permission to delete it or tag it with the speedy template. Cccp3 (talk) 07:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 07:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-19

15:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 15:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File Babadag.jpg deleted - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Babadag.jpg

Hello.

After this message from you: "Thanks for uploading [[:]]. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself"

I have send written permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 28.04.2015

Why this file was deleted?

Thank you

Здравствуйте.

После полученного от вас сообщения о том, что файл, загруженный мной - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Babadag.jpg может быть удален по причине отсутствия у него разрешения, я согласно рекомендациям отправил письменного разрешение на указанный вами адрес - OTRS permissions-commons@wikimedia.org 28 апреля 2015. Однако, несмотря на это файл был удален.

Пожалуйста, сообщите мне по какой причине он был удален?

Спасибо.

  restored. --McZusatz (talk) 14:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-20

15:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Imker (batch download)/I18n

Hallo :-)! Habe eine i18n Seite angelegt für einfaches übersetzen. :-) Bei der supage &action=edit und man hat die formatierte Übersetzung. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Danke, bestimmt hilfreich, wenn jemand mit git(Hub) nicht so gut umgehen kann. --McZusatz (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 16:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded by TheBellaTwins1445

[skipped: 0; deleted: 0.0 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 3 problematic instances. This time I could tag all files appropriately and I won't need your help. --Flock (talk) 07:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

File:VIDEO_DE_MAROC_WA9i3.webm

Hallo McZusatz, könntest du mal einen Blick auf dieses Video werfen? Es war für morgen als Motd eingetragen, ich hab's da erstmal ersetzt. Keine Ahnung ob der Uploader die Rechte an Musik/Text besitzt und ob die verwendeten Bilder frei sind, das Wasserzeichen bzw. die Nennung der Erstellungssoftware in dieser Größe/Anordnung im Bild geht für mich jedoch eindeutig in Richtung Reklame. Danke und Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Sinnvolle Beiträge kamen sowieso nicht zustande. Der Nutzer hat sich verabschiedet. --McZusatz (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Danke schön! --Pristurus (talk) 22:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between May 03 and May 12

[skipped: 0; deleted: 9.127 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 20 problematic instances. I was unsure about 3 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 01:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-21

15:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between April 26 and May 05

[skipped: 0; deleted: 9.301 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 37 problematic instances. I was unsure about 6 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-22

16:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-25

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 07:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-23

15:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-24

15:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-26

15:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Categorisation

Please try to categorise your uploads correctly instead of flooding very broad categories such as Category:Food. - Takeaway (talk) 12:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between June 09 and June 18

[skipped: 3; deleted: 11.113 %; IOExceptions: 2;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 32 problematic instances. I was unsure about 7 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 22:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Corentin Martins

Ce fichier est de mon propre travail, pas la peine de le supprimer

Then just provide the permission so we can restore it. --McZusatz (talk) 19:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-27

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-28

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

YaCBot

Hallo, Der bot scheint down :(. Habe ihn testweise geklont. Hat irgendein problem meim login (auf tolslabs). Bin aber java-0 --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Nein, das war das erste Mal, dass der bot tatsächlich down sein soll. Das letzte was der mir mitgeteilt hat war
 All batches done. Exiting.
Was heißt, dass zumindest alle Dateien, die vor 2013 hochgeladen worden sind, mindestens einmal besucht wurden. --McZusatz (talk) 17:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:2 rue Saint-Rome - Tour Serta.jpg

Hello, there is a small problem with your Bot: it destroys the title of this image. Thank you, good day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: If you want to link to a category, the syntax is [[:category:name]] and not [[category:name]]. --McZusatz (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-29

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-30

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-31

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Fotoflugkurs

Ich halte es für Blödsinn, Beschreibungstexte in den Abschnitt Licensing zu verschieben und Beschreibungsfelder zu leeren, nur weil irgendwer das sagt. Wenn man den Baustein unbedingt verschieben will, gehört der über den Lizenzblock. Bitte mach die Änderungen rückgängig oder richtig. --Ailura (talk) 05:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Es ist Blödsinn dass eine Dateibeschreibung aus drei Bausteinen ohne jegliche Parametern besteht. Wer soll denn damit was anfangen? --McZusatz (talk) 08:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Von den (gefühlt) hundert reverts, die ich heute früh gemacht hatte, hatten etwa drei Dateien keinen eigenen Beschreibungstext. Die Projektbausteine brauchen keinen Parameter und sagen genau das aus, was da steht: Dass es sich um Bilder aus Projekt xy handelt. Wenn Du lieber zusätzliche Informationen hast, darfst Du sie ergänzen, it's a wiki. Aber den Baustein in die Lizenz stopfen ist sinnlos, das hat mit der Lizenz wenig zu tun. --Ailura (talk) 09:11, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Imo kann man hier die Beschreibung schneller rauslesen als hier. (Ganz zu schweigen von Maschinenlesbarkeit) --McZusatz (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Genau so habe ich meine Änderungen heute morgen auch gemacht [251] und das ist mit den aktuellen Upload-Tools im Unterschied zu 2013 auch in Serie möglich. Was Du gemacht hast, war den Baustein unter die Überschrift "Licensing" unter die Lizenz zu packen und da gehört er nicht hin. So wie es jetzt neu gemacht ist, sieht es für mich OK aus. --Ailura (talk) 09:57, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 10:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The reason for the color change.

Hi McZusatz. I didn't mean to cause any harm with the File:Xbox logo 2012 cropped.svg color change. I was trying to update the color to reflect the current color of the logo. The difference between the two colors was this Xbox One and Xbox 360

Ariesk47 (talk) 16:12, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Just include the reference in the upload summary and everyone is happy. :) --McZusatz (talk) 11:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ariesk47: Actually, see com:overwrite. --McZusatz (talk) 18:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between June 28 and July 07

[skipped: 0; deleted: 12.577 %; IOExceptions: 1;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 173 problematic instances. I was unsure about 5 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 08:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between July 07 and July 16

[skipped: 0; deleted: 7.501 %; IOExceptions: 9;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 79 problematic instances. I was unsure about 5 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Te pliki są moje

Te pliki są na pewno moje że proszę bez potrzeby tego nie usuwać. Zgłosiłem tylko jeden plik zwany jako File:Super Mario - Fire Ball (normal sound).wav że tylko jeden wystarczy usunąć ze względu na to że źle ma działający dźwięk. Proszę mi odpisać jeśli zostało odebrane.

Odpowiedź

Przepraszam bardzo. Mogę wiedzieć kiedy ktoś mi odpisze? Te pliki na pewno są moje i proszę je ich nie usuwać, tylko jeden tzw. File:Super Mario - Fire Ball (normal sound).wav gdyż źle działa.

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between July 18 and July 27

[skipped: 6; deleted: 6.604 %; IOExceptions: 2;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 35 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-32

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-33

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
I see your hard working so i give you this star PLEASE HELP ME ABOUT MY IMAGE Weisenstar (talk) 10:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
HELLO i need help about my image here
File:Bullmastiff body.jpg

i hope your kindhearted that help me , because the only reason of abused editor who nominate it its bullmastiff not an Alpine mastiff please help me resolved that (I'm asking help) please RESPONSE

thank you very much if you help me Weisenstar (talk) 10:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC).

A barnstar for you!

  The Barnstar of Good Humor
Thank you for your help in my image i hope all people here is like you. Weisenstar (talk) 13:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

help me again

File:Border collie face.jpg
  • please help me again the abused editor nominate my other photo again please help me solve this please thanks. This message needing help please response thanks.
  • THis image is totally my work my own camera I use to this.

Help me about this one please

File:Bulldog face.jpg

The abused editor say its pit bull but his wrong its 100% bulldog. Need help please response. Thanks Weisenstar (talk) 01:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

WARNING

 

Because of the following reason:: nomination without any proof,reverting abuse,vandalism, and other things does not really do of an senior editor.

  • I want you as you are the admin to notify User:softlavender to stop what he doing because its destructive to all wiki projects
  • I'm not give you a treat this is an warning don't ignore this warning because if i see this thing will continuesly happened only one i assured this report goes to internet official to investigate Wikipedia
  • I give you 2 days to make this evil things stop does User:Softlavender do.
  • response at this message as faster as faster
  • this is not a threat this is warning.

Weisenstar (talk) 06:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

I have replied on your talk page. Please use your talk page to reply to my answer. --McZusatz (talk) 09:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between May 26 and June 04

[skipped: 1; deleted: 6.752 %; IOExceptions: 5;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 80 problematic instances. I was unsure about 3 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 04:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 14:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between April 18 and April 27

[skipped: 0; deleted: 9.497 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 30 problematic instances. I was unsure about 14 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 22:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Top 200-zu-SVG-konvertieren-Listen von McTopot

Hallo McZusatz,

es wäre sehr interessant solche Listen auch für die Kategorien technology, biology, chemistry (≠ chemical) und die größte Subkategorie (transport map) zu bekommen. Könntest du das einrichten?--Kopiersperre (talk) 20:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Zur Zeit sind die alle im Quellcode eingraviert. Ich schau mir das bis Sonntag mal an. --McZusatz (talk) 07:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Sollte jetzt laufen. --McZusatz (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Vielen Dank. Ist auch transport map aktiv?--Kopiersperre (talk) 21:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Die sollten heute im Laufe des Abends zu Top 200 map images that should use vector graphics eingemischt werden. --McZusatz (talk) 16:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Könntest sie lieber nicht reinmischen, sondern eine eigene Seite anlegen? Karten sind ein weites Feld, die Eisenbahner interessieren sich aber nur für die Top 200 transport map images that should use vector graphics. Außerdem habe ich graph (Category:Graph images that should use vector graphics) vergessen.--Kopiersperre (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Soll ich dann die beiden wieder so in den Quellcode schreiben oder als dynamische Regel alles was mehr als 800 Dateien hat, geht in einen neuen report? (Dann wären beispielsweise auch Category:Diagrams of route signs of the United Kingdom oder Category:Ribbon images that should use vector graphics seperat). --McZusatz (talk) 18:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Alle Kategorien mit > 800 Dateien mit einem Report zu versehen wäre am leichtesten nachzuvollziehen. Die Kategorie Diagrams of route signs of the United Kingdom sollte allerdings ausgenommen werden, da sie auch SVGs enthält, aber als Ganzes zur Vektorisierung freigeben wurde.--Kopiersperre (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Habe ich jetzt mal so als Betaversion implementiert: Wenn möglich, wurde jede Galerie aus mindestens 800 Dateien erstellt, wobei zudem jede Datei mindestens von einer Galerie gezählt wurde. Das geht nur wenn man die kleineren Kategorien zu den größeren einmischt, glaube ich. --McZusatz (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Bug T97253

Hi! Considering bug T97253 ("Exif values retrieved incorrectly if they appear before IFD") just to inform you, that at Commons:Esplanada#Problemas com metadados similar problems appeared (including a Lightroom user). Affected are:

Gunnex (talk) 20:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between May 11 and May 20

[skipped: 0; deleted: 16.875 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 81 problematic instances. I was unsure about 4 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 04:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between May 16 and May 25

[skipped: 0; deleted: 9.941 %; IOExceptions: 1;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 192 problematic instances. I was unsure about 10 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between June 01 and June 10

[skipped: 0; deleted: 7.81 %; IOExceptions: 2;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 22 problematic instances. I was unsure about 6 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 07:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between June 14 and June 23

[skipped: 0; deleted: 9.858 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 38 problematic instances. I was unsure about 7 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 00:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between June 21 and June 30

[skipped: 0; deleted: 14.899 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 122 problematic instances. I was unsure about 8 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 05:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 20:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between August 02 and August 11

[skipped: 1; deleted: 7.328 %; IOExceptions: 1;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 38 problematic instances. I was unsure about 6 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 12:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-34

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-35

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-36

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Pherbellia albocosta

Hallo McZusatz, könntest du bitte die leere Category:Pherbellia albocosta löschen, das ist nur ein Schreibfehler von Pherbellia albocostata; die korrekte Category:Pherbellia albocostata existiert und enthält alle entsprechenden Dateien. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-37

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-38

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between September 06 and September 15

[skipped: 0; deleted: 5.636 %; IOExceptions: 7;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 30 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 18:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-39

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, can you help we with this?

I see that you recently contributed to commons. I have a small query on Wikibooks. Here. Can you please help me with that?
acagastya  ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 02:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 07:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Imker ist toll,

 
Verzeichnis mit 974 Dateien

nur würde ich mir eine doppelt so grosse Limitierung des Downloads wünschen.

Einige Fotowettbewerbe in DE gehen von einer Summe von 1.000 Bildern aus.

Nur so als Hinweis. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Danke für das Feedback! Imker sollte aber meines Wissens nach nicht limitiert sein. Gibt es denn irgendweine Fehlermedlung wodurch klar wird, was genau limitiert ist? --McZusatz (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Siehe Bild :-) Ich finde keine Möglichkeit, den Wert 500 zu verändern. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
API continuation fehlt. -- Rillke(q?) 20:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Ups, da war noch ein Bug in Wiki.java. Die korrigierte Version kann jetzt hier heruntergeladen werden. Viel Spaß damit! --McZusatz (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Supi :-) werd ich mal testen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

richiesta cancellazione

con rispetto chiedo quale sia il problema in quanto le immagini che ho tutelato sono fatte tutte da me personalmente sia foto che loghi e sono già stati tutelati precedentemente.

Please have a look at Commons:Project_scope/Summary/it#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose. --McZusatz (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of images by GifTagger

I was a bit puzzled when I noticed a bot delete a gif file. At Commons:Bots/Requests/GifTagger you got your bot approved for 4 steps. On User:GifTagger you seem to have added a 5th step for the bot doesn't seem to be approved and is a clear violation of Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates. In my opinion you shouldn't be deleting these files. Please file an additional bot request for this last step. The outcome might be that it's approved, you can just continue after that. The outcome might be that it's not approved and you'll have to undelete the files. We'll see. Please stop deleting files until this bot request is finished. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

I am running on 32kbitps mobile data once again but I will keep this in mind until I am home. --McZusatz (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Museum of the Great Patriotic War (Kiev)

Hi, McZusatz. I hope you are doing well. I'd appreciate if you could help me with a question on the following picture that you kept from deleting. Initially I also thought that this picture could be kept according to the "De minimis". However I was told by a very experienced user that this is not the case because 'Copyrighted work X is the central part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work useless)". Do you still believe that this image should be kept? And a second question. What if I’ll create the same picture using a 50 megapixel EOS 5DS R camera and upload it to Commons (under license that allows free use and alterations). Then someone will take it and crop the statue out of it and use in his work claiming that it’s available on Commons under free license. Is there anything wrong with it? Thank you in advance for your answer. Cheers! Oleg (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

That's a good question. Imo, if the image is "blurry enough" and one can only identify the copyrighted object solely based on it's shape, it may be considered DM. --McZusatz (talk) 18:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Auto-deleting bot code

You bot hasn't been running and Top 200 flag images that should use vector graphics was just speedy deleted. —Dispenser (talk) 12:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

  "fixed". --McZusatz (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
tracked. --McZusatz (talk) 10:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between September 15 and September 24

[skipped: 0; deleted: 4.071 %; IOExceptions: 3;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 27 problematic instances. I was unsure about 1 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 00:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 11:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between September 23 and October 02

[skipped: 0; deleted: 3.939 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 29 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 11:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between August 29 and September 07

[skipped: 1; deleted: 6.935 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 37 problematic instances. I was unsure about 5 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between November 26 and December 05

[skipped: 0; deleted: 11.565 %; IOExceptions: 3;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 34 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 22:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between December 04 and December 13

[skipped: 0; deleted: 13.017 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 32 problematic instances. I was unsure about 1 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between December 12 and December 21

[skipped: 0; deleted: 10.828 %; IOExceptions: 3;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 27 problematic instances. I was unsure about 1 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 12:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-51

17:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-52

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

 

I wanted to send one final follow-up on a message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Even if you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 December 2015 deadline.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 09:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Please help translate to your languageHelp center

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-40

15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-41

18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-42

16:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between October 04 and October 13

[skipped: 25; deleted: 7.802 %; IOExceptions: 0;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 27 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 12:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-43

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Imker - Verbesserungsvorschlag

Hallo McZusatz,

vielen Dank für den Imker, den ich in den letzten Tagen öfter benutzt hatte.

Einen Verbesserungsvorschlag habe ich: Bei Dateien, die laut Betriebssystem nicht auf die lokale Plattform heruntergeladen werden können (unerlaubte Zeichen im Dateinamen: beispielsweise Freudenberg_-_historischer_Stadtkern_"Alter_Flecken".jpg ) sollte die Behandlung (Windows character bug) verändert werden. Dann generell alle Dateinamen zu codieren halte ich für gar nicht gut. Ich musste mühsam heraus finden welche Dateien betroffen waren und mehrmals den Download starten um eine Gesamtmenge von uncodierten Filenamen zu erhalten.

Mein Vorschlag: die problematischen Dateien in einem Unterordner (encodeing filenames beispielsweise) codiert zu schreiben und eine Fehlerdatei (als .txt -Logbuch) zusätzlich dort unterbringen. Diese Fehlerdatei kann am Ende ausgegeben werden, damit man überhaupt heraus findet was überhaupt problematisch war und gegebenfalls eingreifen kann.

Danke
--Atamari (talk) 21:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

@McZusatz: --Atamari (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
@Atamari:   Done --McZusatz (talk) 13:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:46, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-44

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-45

16:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between October 19 and October 28

[skipped: 0; deleted: 11.433 %; IOExceptions: 2;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 108 problematic instances. I was unsure about 7 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-46

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between October 27 and November 05

[skipped: 5; deleted: 9.091 %; IOExceptions: 5;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 34 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 10:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-47

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Report for files uploaded between November 04 and November 13

[skipped: 5; deleted: 8.8 %; IOExceptions: 2;]

Hi, I just finished my run and found 63 problematic instances. I was unsure about 2 of the files and it is up to you to have a look at them.

--Flock (talk) 03:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-48

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 15:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-49

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Bug

Hello,
Your bot is doing some strange modifications on interwikis:

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

There is no need to link files to their wiki pages. It should be done with the content gallery like Araucaria luxurians or a category. --McZusatz (talk) 12:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "McZusatz/Archive 5".