User talk:Medium69/archives/2015/09

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banc - 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Oui.--Jebulon 09:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perhaps FP. --Laitche 13:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 13:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe helenae (Aloès) - 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 18:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costus malortieanus - 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support DOF could be better, but OK for me. --C messier 18:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puy de Dôme - 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 15:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhea pennata (Nandou de Darwin) - 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Vallon-Pont-d'Arc.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 22:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 22:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nandou de Darwin (Rhea pennata) - 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 19:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia quimilo - 20150525 13h22 (10202).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although the crop is tight at left, the quality is good IMO. However the description is not accurate. Please add in the description field where you took this image. --Christian Ferrer 11:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)  Done--Medium69 21:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 14:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliconia Rostrata - 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy and composition could be better, but OK for me. --C messier 18:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uncarina roeoesliana - 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coucher de Soleil - 190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia lactiflora 'La Perle' (Pivoine de Chine) - 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. DoF could be better (f/2.8). --XRay 16:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 16:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Table échiquier - 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 16:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mountain Puy-de-Dôme, north view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment it would be good to add the direction of the shot --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus:  Done I completed the description--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 09:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uncarina grandidieri - 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me, no problem with a third opinion. --Hubertl 16:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ailurus fulgens (Panda roux) - 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycerium bifurcatum (Corne d'élan) - 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le secret - 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Subject captured well (wish it had been a nicer day!) --Daniel Case 19:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puy Pariou - 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoya pubicalyx - 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but DOF could be better. --C messier 12:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but with a crop to the left, you can make the composition more interesting (rule of thirds/golden ration). --C messier 12:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paeonia lactiflora 'La Perle' (Chinese peony).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best (and only) in scope --J. Lunau (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uncarina grandidieri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Translohr STE4 - 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bengal - 193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice focus. --Kadellar 00:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 10:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Translation File:Moons of solar system.svg

Excellent!! Thank you so much.--Breogan2008 (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Puy de Dôme - 136.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puy de Dôme - 136.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:47, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 13:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Puy Pariou, crater.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --El Grafo (talk) 16:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --6AND5 12:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front view of STE4 Translohr tram.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The interesting feature of this image is the single-track guidance system. The Clermont-Ferrand backdrop is incidental and there is nothing to suggest that the trams are in the Clermont-Ferrand livery (if they are at all). May I therefore suggest that the scope be changed to "Front view of Translohr tram". Martinvl (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 Comment, I'm happy with the scope, this is a Clermont-Ferrand tram. DeFacto (talk) 17:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 Question, are there any Wikipedia articles that could be linked into the image description for added reference? DeFacto (talk) 17:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Articles of interest - Since there are two different tramways in Clermont-Ferrand, one that ran between 1890 and 1956 and the post-2006 Translohr system, the scope "Tramway in Clermont-Ferrand" is ambiguous. I have since discovered that this is a model STE4 tram, so I suggest that the scope become "Front view of STE4 Translohr tram" Martinvl (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Tramway in Clermont-Ferrand, France. to Front view of STE4 Translohr tram --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support, good image. DeFacto (talk) 06:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pylone TDF du puy de Dôme - 178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gravé pour la vie - 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Categories and descrpiption need to be improved. --C messier 08:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)  Done Description changed and improved category.--Medium69 14:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 00:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 08:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arbre gravé - 141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, but description (location missing) and categorisation must be improved. --C messier 13:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)  Done I completed the description and change the category.--Medium69 15:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 08:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice overview. Composition. --RaboKarbakian 03:09, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le secret - 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak QI for me -- Spurzem 21:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 19:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puy de Côme - 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but category:Geology of Auvergne is superfluous, as it is a mother category of Puy de Côme category. --C messier 19:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)  Done--Medium69 23:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)