Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Michael Metzger!

TUSC token 0e481e6abd86e80314dad596008cd208 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Escudo de Porvenir edit

Hi! I will try to do my best... I don't have much time free but I will try. Just for curiosity... why the interest in this particular coat? --B1mbo (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done! Look at File:Escudo de Porvenir.svg. Bye, B1mbo (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Great... let me answer your questions. It's difficult to define pueblo. According to the National Institute of Statistics, a pueblo is a town with less than 3,000 people. I think aldea is a better translation for village and I imagine a place with less than 200, something really small.
The comuna is the lowest level of administration. Communes are divided in districts but just for census statistics. Technically, a comuna and a city/town/village are different (a comuna usually has a main city/town and a lot of villages inside for example)... for example, the comuna of Natales includes Puerto Natales and Puerto Edén, and the other way around, Santiago de Chile is composed by 32 comunas.
In the Spanish Wikipedia we have a discussion about having separate articles for the comuna and its capital (which almost 90% of the time has the same name than the comuna). But also we have more information than the German or English wikipedia. In a lot of cases, I don't see relevant for example creating two different articles for Porvenir (comuna) and Porvenir (town), because almost 99% of the information about the first will be the same than the city. Just in a few cases the difference is justified, unless you have sufficient information to have both. My recommendation: for the moment, have the same article for the city and the town. --B1mbo (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Michael Metzger!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

speedy deletion? edit

Re:

  • File:BKS Lechia Gdansk 2005 ubt 08.jpeg
  • File:BKS Lechia Gdansk 2005 ubt 081.jpeg

- what "copyright violation" are you talking about? It's the coat of arms of Gdańsk. It does not quality as speedy deletion; if you believe it needs to be removed, please file a deletion request and justify your point. tsca (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why speedy deletion for File:600px Rosso Bianco e Blu con G e martelli.png? It is the coat of arms of Górnik Zabrze. --ThePolish 21:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:View of Eagle Lake Facing South.jpg edit

 
File:View of Eagle Lake Facing South.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2601:645:8580:4870:DDB:61AB:E53D:B61F 19:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:View of Eagle Lake Facing South.jpg edit

 
File:View of Eagle Lake Facing South.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2601:645:8580:4870:DDB:61AB:E53D:B61F 19:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply